[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Government Unions vs. Taxpayers
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100 ... 3766704576009350303578410.html
Published: Dec 14, 2010
Author: Tim Pawlenty
Post Date: 2010-12-14 10:36:06 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 353
Comments: 11

When Americans think of organized labor, they might think of images like I saw growing up in a blue-collar meatpacking town: hard hats, work boots, tough conditions and gritty jobs. While I didn't work in the slaughterhouses, I did become a union member when I worked at a grocery store to help put myself through school. I was grateful for the paycheck and proud of the work I did.

The rise of the labor movement in the early 20th century was a triumph for America's working class. In an era of deep economic anxiety, unions stood up for hard-working but vulnerable families, protecting them from physical and economic exploitation.

Much has changed. The majority of union members today no longer work in construction, manufacturing or "strong back" jobs. They work for government, which, thanks to President Obama, has become the only booming "industry" left in our economy. Since January 2008 the private sector has lost nearly eight million jobs while local, state and federal governments added 590,000.

Federal employees receive an average of $123,049 annually in pay and benefits, twice the average of the private sector. And across the country, at every level of government, the pattern is the same: Unionized public employees are making more money, receiving more generous benefits, and enjoying greater job security than the working families forced to pay for it with ever-higher taxes, deficits and debt.

How did this happen? Very quietly. The rise of government unions has been like a silent coup, an inside job engineered by self-interested politicians and fueled by campaign contributions.

Public employee unions contribute mightily to the campaigns of liberal politicians ($91 million in the midterm elections alone) who vote to increase government pay and workers. As more government employees join the unions and pay dues, the union bosses pour ever more money and energy into liberal campaigns. The result is that certain states are now approaching default. Decades of overpromising and fiscal malpractice by state and local officials have created unfunded public employee benefit liabilities of more than $3 trillion.

View Full Image Pawlenty Images.com/Corbis Pawlenty Pawlenty

Over the last eight years in Minnesota, we have taken decisive action to prevent our problems from becoming a state crisis. Public employee unions fought us virtually every step of the way. Mass transit employees, for example, went on strike for 44 days in 2005—because we refused to grant them lifetime health-care benefits after working just 15 years. It was a tough fight, but in the end Minnesota taxpayers won.

We reworked benefits for new hires. We required existing employees to contribute more to their pensions. We reformed our public employee health plan and froze wages.

We proved that even in deep-blue Minnesota, taxpayers can take on big government and big labor, and win. In coming years, that fight will have to be joined throughout the country in city halls, state capitals and in Washington, D.C.

Reformers would be wise to adopt three overriding principles.

First, we need to bring public employee compensation back in line with the private sector and reduce the overall size of the federal civilian work force. Mr. Obama's proposal to freeze federal pay is a step in the right direction, but it falls well short of shrinking government and eliminating the pay premium enjoyed by federal employees.

Second, get the numbers right. Government should start using the same established accounting standards that private businesses are required to use, so we can accurately assess unfunded liabilities.

Third, we need to end defined-benefit retirement plans for government employees. Defined-benefit systems have created a financial albatross for taxpayers. The private sector dropped them years ago in favor of the clarity and predictability of defined-contribution models such as 401(k) plans. This change alone can save taxpayers trillions of dollars.

The moral case for unions—protecting working families from exploitation—does not apply to public employment. Government employees today are among the most protected, well-paid employees in the country. Ironically, public-sector unions have become the exploiters, and working families once again need someone to stand up for them.

If we're going to stop the government unions' silent coup, conservative reformers around the country must fight this challenge head on. The choice between big government and everyday Americans isn't a hard one.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

#3. To: christine (#0)

Federal employees receive an average of $123,049 annually in pay and benefits, twice the average of the private sectorFederal employees receive an average of $123,049 annually in pay and benefits, twice the average of the private sector

Uhhhhhhhhhh........

I would like to see that figure documented.

Why are there labor unions in government????

Same reasons unions were formed to protect workers from Capitalists.

Examples...

For the grand total of $4080 a year I went to work for the Federal.

NO health insurance...whopping $5000 life insurance. We in the CAA could be sued by anyone when we were doing our job and anything untoward happened. Driving a Federal car, involved in an accident??? You had to carry your own insurance, while driving their vehicle.

Work???? Must be at duty station at least ten minutes prior to taking a position. No pay. If no relief at end of eight hours, must stay at least 29 minutes, with NO PAY. No lunch or break time, eat on the fly, when you can, if you can. One weekend off a month. Rotating shifts with no differential.

Transfer at any time to anywhere at government convenience, refuse and you were terminated at once.

Tell me why we now have runaway unions????? What started it.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-12-14   10:55:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Cynicom, All (#3)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-12-14   11:30:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Eric Stratton (#5)

I believe I asked if Christine understood what brought about the unions.

Our first unions came about in the 1970s for self protection, money was not the problem. We understood that pay was below outside, in return for long term employment.

All government agencies are laden with supervisory/management that produce nothing, their numbers far exceed any need.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-12-14   11:42:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 6.

#7. To: Cynicom (#6)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-12-14 12:16:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Cynicom (#6)

I believe I asked if Christine understood what brought about the unions.

yes, i understand what brought about unions. the purpose was for the protection of individual workers against employer abuse. i see nothing wrong with that, of course, but the point of the article is that the unions that were once private are now federalized. the drain is now on taxpayers in the private sector and not employed by the federal government.

christine  posted on  2010-12-14 12:48:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]