See other All is Vanity Articles
Title: Bye Bye Men!
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Dec 17, 2010
Author: YouTube
Post Date: 2010-12-17 11:50:16 by Turtle
Keywords: None
Views: 412
Comments: 14
Poster Comment: A friend of mine sent me this link. Rosin is of course an ugly Jew, and Jews want to destroy the existing culure. As Camille Paglia so accurately pointed out, if women were charge of civilization we'd still be living in grass huts. I wonder what's going to happen to these woman when they look around and realize there are no men for them?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Turtle (#0)
The End of Men by Paul Elam on December 17, 2010 By Paul Elam This article begins with a blog post I came across in October over at Oz Conservative. OzCon’s views fit well with his blog name. He’s definitely right of center, with a clear antifeminist slant and an ostensibly supportive view of the men’s movement- at least his men’s movement. But in this article, he asks in the title, “What’s Wrong with the Men’s Rights Movement?” And in that piece he takes some very specific shots at our problems as he sees them, which mainly boil down to the fact that not enough of us are patriarchs. His rationale for this is simple and plainly stated. There are essentially two factions of the MRM, liberals and sexual separatists, and that we have formed an alliance that few men will embrace because, like feminists, we are anti marriage and hypercritical of traditional masculinity. He even feels we are more a compliment to feminists ideologically than would appear on the surface. I am going to come back to all this, but I must first sidetrack to a recently released video by Hanna Rosin, in her continuing diatribe about “The End of Man.” The rest of this article will be written with the assumption you have carefully viewed all of it. Both Rosin and OzCon get a lot of things wrong. Truth tell though, Rosin, despite all her drivel, from females being more intelligent and focused than males, to her thoroughly muddled and inconclusive rambling on why men are falling behind, she gets a lot more right than OzCon- at least where it counts. So rather than hack away at this keyboard, pointlessly dissecting either of their fallacies, it is more advantageous and informative to point to what Rosin gets right. Because what she gets right is a very apt description of the precipice edge on which every man and boy in modern western culture now teeters. We are in the process now of being marginalized into a servile shadow existence by women. We can attribute this, as Rosin does, to a changing economy, or we can look at the forces of consumerism that are more likely behind the social metamorphosis, with feminism stoking the fires along the way. We can pick most any reason we want. In the end, it doesn’t matter. Rosin is right, men are on their way out- and there is nothing that is going to stop it. As we have beaten into the ground around here lately, men are falling father behind women at an exponentially increasing rate. If you have any doubt, consider the following; the areas where Rosin hit her target. Young women now out earn young men, the majority of the workforce is female, and the gap will increase. Women are dominating managerial positions, and the gap will increase. Men’s presence and performance in education, from grammar school to grad school, is plummeting and shows every sign of worsening in the future. Women are rapidly becoming the majority of single home owners and will exceed men drastically in the future in almost all growth professions, and especially in jobs that are financially lucrative. Meanwhile men will face low paying jobs and rampant unemployment. It is estimated that when the current bad economy recovers, 18 million men ages 25 to 54 will be unemployed and unemployable. And that is not even considering the millions that will be employed at below sustenance levels in dreg jobs across the western landscape. We have an educational establishment intractably dominated by anti male ideology, a law enforcement/judicial apparatus that has become an incarceration machine for men, and every bit of public sentiment needed to take all of this much further than it has already gone. All this is happening in a culture that will continue to place the social onus on men to use their earnings and their blood to enhance the lives of women. Where social pressures fail, state functionaries will take up the slack. This is the end of men, at least as we have known them to be in our lifetimes. I am not suggesting that we follow Rosin’s advice to just ‘drink the kool-aid,’ and comply, to make the transition less painful. Just the opposite. But if we are to pursue any rational course of action we better accept that we are on an irrevocable path to female domination, and male subjugation. The only thing that will stop it at this point is a catastrophic event that leads to anarchy. They say there are no atheists in foxholes. Well, there aren’t any feminists either. By the way, if you think subjugation is too strong a term, try hopping on a woman only train car in India and see what happens. Perhaps if you live through it you can tell us all about it. Or better yet, just have enough sex with enough women till one of them gets you thrown behind bars. OzCon would likely have us believe that this makes the case for traditional marriage. But given the state of marriage and family law, that is a delusion of such magnitude that it would register on the Richter scale. The decision to marry is a personal one. It’s a man’s choice and a man’s folly. But I’ll have no truck with any man that would teach our boys and young men that marriage and the caretaking of women is what makes him a real man. It is the woefully misguided and pathogenic pipe dream of men who invest more in their idealizations than they do in common sense; who in fact invest more in securing their genetic legacy than they do their own children’s well being. And it doesn’t begin and end with marriage. In fact, we don’t need a marriage strike, per se, at all. Women will out prosper men in every way, but they will always be hypergamous. The future will bring us nothing but a vast majority of women who thug-fuck for reproductive reasons, while manipulating and/or coercing Omega and Beta lapdogs for supplemental income. Most of the rest will compete with each other ever more viciously for the steadily dwindling numbers of men that can support them in ways they cannot on their own. The other two are already married. I hope that OzCon is one of the guys with bragging rights. In the end, though, there is little room for marriage in the future. It is toast- even if you have your nose too far up Ward Cleaver’s fetid, decomposing ass to smell it burning. What we need, assuming there is a “we,” is a chivalry strike, which is to say a total abdication and rejection of any responsibilities to women, individually, and as a group. It is, after all, fitting in a world where women have no responsibilities whatsoever toward anyone but themselves. As to contempt for traditional masculinity, I have none. I don’t even know that anyone can tell me what it means (though many try). I’ll save my contempt for stupidity and chosen blindness. Let the “patriarch’s” of the world have their foolish ways. It matters not to me. I will be busy surviving as they march themselves and their unfortunate progeny into the grinding halls of family justice. We’ll call it intellectual culling, and the world will be better for it. This is not an activist’s call to action, at least not collectively. There is no petition to sign, no club to join, and not many would heed the call if there was. Most men, especially traditionalists, will do what men have done in the face of gender feminism for half a century now; that is, follow their instincts to please women and wait for Hannah Rosin to tell them what to think about their own lives, how to live them, and what their place is. As an individual though, I feel compelled to do something more than just take care of me. I have seen noticed in the analytics for my YouTube Channel that there are a small, but not insignificant number of young people, mostly male, who watch my videos. I get email from teenagers who read this site from time to time. I have never considered fully what to say to them. But the times they are a changing. I have started a list of titles for open letters to write to these young men. I think geared for 12 year olds and up seems appropriate. I want to spend some of my time writing these letters and developing ways to ensure distribution of them. Maybe I will even launch a new website for the effort. There is a really rough road ahead for these unfortunates, and hardly anyone around to tell them about it. And maybe I could actually help a couple of them avoid a bad end. Life delivers no promises, but I can always hope.
Hanna Rosin Abusing her Children: ON VIDEO By Paul Elam Hanna Rosin’s recent video on the “End of Men,” a continuation of her efforts to assert that women are taking over the world because in societies that don’t depend on brute strength, intellectually superior women should naturally ascend to dominance. Never mind the glaring Master Race implications of Rosin’s elitist ideology. There is another concern here that Rosin smugly showcases for her viewing audience. Her psychological abuse of her own children. Having spent two decades counselling populations that are disproportionately affected by abuse of all kinds, I happen to know something about the subject. Her abuse of them is clear and unmistakable, though some may not notice because we tend to see abuse in terms of overtly physical and sexual acts. Psychological abuse, a devastating form, can be much more subtle, but Rosin does manage to make it more obvious when she drags her children into the video, which is provided at the bottom for your convenience. At 7:15 in the video, Rosin unambiguously asserts that females are superior to males in several ways, most notably that they are more intelligent and better communicators and listeners that are able to focus better than males, essentially making them more suitable for lucrative professional positions. She uses these ideas to essentially laud the creation of a male underclass- as women continue to thrive. She also notes that boys are falling way behind girls in education (which she acts as though is troubling), but says she can’t offer any reasons for that because she is writing a book about it and has not done the research. So rather than use scholarly references, she offers up her 10 year old daughter’s "expertise," showing a home video of an interaction involving the Rosin family. First and foremost, we must keep in mind what this interaction is. It is one of a 10 year old girl, gloating on an outrageous sense of superiority over boys, while her younger brother is forced to sit silently and listen. At 9:40 we are introduced to Noa, who is sitting next to mother Hannah at a table. Opposite this pair is the father and Rosin’s son, neither of whose names did Rosin mention. Noa is there to explain why the boys in her class do not perform as well as the girls. “The girls are obviously smarter,” she says, her tone laden with derision. She goes on, stating, “I mean, they [girls] have much larger vocabularies. They learn much faster.” At this point the son lifts his arms and attempts to object with, “No!” The father touches his arm, clearly an admonishment, and says, “Let her talk,” without as much as looking at him. The message at this point is already crystal clear. In the Rosin family, the belief is that females are superior to males, and any dissent from this will not be allowed. Noa continues her speech. “They [girls] are much more controlled. The boys today are losing recess. …[O]nly boys.” At this point Hanna interrupts to ask. “And why is that?” “They were just not listening to the class while the girls sat there very nicely,” answers Noa, her sense of superiority even more evident in her voice. Apparently in her class, each and every boy is a behavioral problem, while each and every girl is a model student. Either that, or the teacher is gender profiling for punishment in the classroom. But either way, make no mistake about it; where the Rosin family is concerned, this is the psychological abuse of both children. First consider the son, and I know there will be many that would say he did not appear to be adversely affected by what happened in this video. It’s true; he does not appear to have clearly visible effects for the three seconds the camera was on him. But that camera is not capable of telling us what is going on with his self image, even though he tried to tell us himself by objecting to being barraged with messages of how inferior he was to his sister, and indeed to all women. Now, if that does not convince you of a problem here; if you are looking at this and asking, “Hey, what’s the big deal?” let me ask you to imagine your reaction to a family scene where a son, with scripted assistance from his father, is allowed to tell his younger sister how superior boys are while the mother sits by to enforce the daughters silence as it happens? It would be abusive, would it not? So is this. Period. If Rosin is actually writing a book on why boys are failing, I would suggest that her abusive form of parenting might provide her good source material. She will likely be able to support it later when her son fails out of school. It happens to a lot of people with diminished self worth. The father is no less culpable. Almost all abusive homes have one primary abuser, and a chief enabler. While likely well controlled by Hanna, Dad is obviously the muscle behind his wife’s philosophical edicts. His son would not be being abused if didn’t have a father who allowed it. And his daughter would not be learning a hateful mentality if her father was giving her the loving guidance she needs. And that brings us to the matter of young Noa. What are we doing to children when we raise them with the mentality that they are superior to entire classes of human beings? Well, for one we are subjecting them to the same learned hatred that resulted in a countless forms of bigotry and discrimination that we have long sought to correct; the same learned hatred that resulted in segregated schools (though that will not be necessary with boys if we just drum them out of education altogether). We have fought the scourge of racism being taught to our children. We teach young men now, from an early age and rightly so, that any notion of superiority to women is misguided, destructive and will not be tolerated. It is not just because those ideas are wrong, but because we know that raising children with hateful, racist and sexist ideas has a severely negative impact on what kind of adults they will turn out to be. These same concerns should extend to boys as well, but as we saw in the snickering reaction of the audience to that video, and the smugness with which Hanna Rosin puts her abusive mothering on display for the world, we have a long way to go. Rosin’s personal catch phrase in recent times has been, “The End of Men.” It is an idea she is obviously dedicated to, as evidence by the fact that she is destroying the youngest, most vulnerable man in her life, right in her own home, and putting it on display for the world laugh at.
In other words, f*ck this beotch and her fellow travelers. Let's see how beotches do without men, most can barely take care of themselves let alone children without the help a corrupt and criminal GUNverment. Fact of the matter men can do most everything a woman can do and do it better.
Things will change, because what Rosin is promoting is unstable and will destroy society. For years I've been meeting hostile women, because they suddenly realized their careers didn't include a husband, home and children.
"If ever this vast country is brought under a single government, it will be one of the most extensive corruption, indifferent and incapable of a wholesome care over so wide a spread of surface. This will not be borne, and you will have to choose between reform and revolution. If I know the spirit of this country, the one or the other is inevitable." - Thomas Jefferson
Men aren't going anywhere. When the SHTF all this Helen Reddy I-am-woman-hear-me-roar crap is going to disappear in a hot minute and the natural roles between men and women will be restored. I don't think I am putting too fine a point on it when I say all the anger and confusion of the last fifty years stems from the gender role-reversal. As soon as the Matriarchy experiment deflates, the better ALL WOMEN AND MEN will be, as will the country.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡ "The ground of liberty is to be gained by inches, and we must be contented to secure what we can get from time to time and eternally press forward for what is yet to get. It takes time to persuade men to do even what is for their own good." -- Thomas Jefferson
Things will get back to normal, but there are still going to be a lot of problems until it happens.
"If ever this vast country is brought under a single government, it will be one of the most extensive corruption, indifferent and incapable of a wholesome care over so wide a spread of surface. This will not be borne, and you will have to choose between reform and revolution. If I know the spirit of this country, the one or the other is inevitable." - Thomas Jefferson
Women would be a lot happier, too.
"If ever this vast country is brought under a single government, it will be one of the most extensive corruption, indifferent and incapable of a wholesome care over so wide a spread of surface. This will not be borne, and you will have to choose between reform and revolution. If I know the spirit of this country, the one or the other is inevitable." - Thomas Jefferson
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡ "The ground of liberty is to be gained by inches, and we must be contented to secure what we can get from time to time and eternally press forward for what is yet to get. It takes time to persuade men to do even what is for their own good." -- Thomas Jefferson
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡ "The ground of liberty is to be gained by inches, and we must be contented to secure what we can get from time to time and eternally press forward for what is yet to get. It takes time to persuade men to do even what is for their own good." -- Thomas Jefferson
They are everywhere, blame men for their f*cked up lives, play the victim card, and are extremely dangerous to men. They want their freedom, so they divorce their husbands and he gets stuck slaving away to pay for it, often living out of his car or worse committing suicide. They play the victim card when spurned by claiming false rape or abuse or domestic violence.....there is whole class of women in the west schooled in these techniques.....just ask Julian Assange or the Duke Lacrosse Team.
Most of them are dykes so they don't care. It means more women for them - or so they think. You are right though - this is part of the hidden war AGAINST American Culture. It is part of a series of knowing and intentional attempts to degrade the culture. Another key example is the marketing of perversion i.e., homosexuality in all its varied and distorted perversions and iterations. The push on homosexual "marriage" is part of it, as well as the gradual attempts to normalize Pedophilia. Another aspect is the War Against Christmas - as though the offense taken by one or two percent of the population who hate Christians should be regarded as having an overriding right to suppress Christmas. As well is the push to flood the country with Wetbacks. Those are just some of the elements of the hatred unleashed and the attempts to degrade and destroy moral culture.
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha
The decline is upon us, the acceleration into outright destruction will follow and wimmins like these will be amongst the first to be disappeared, Christ what man would take a bullet for that sh*t? My guess is none.
Penis-envy is so ugly, especially coming from a jewess....
__________________________________________________________
#2. To: Turtle (#0)
#3. To: Turtle (#0)
#4. To: Lysander_Spooner (#3)
Let's see how beotches do without men, most can barely take care of themselves let alone children without the help a corrupt and criminal GUNverment.
#5. To: Turtle (#0)
#6. To: Lysander_Spooner (#1)
#7. To: Brian D (#5)
Men aren't going anywhere
#8. To: ghostdogtxn (#6)
don't let them drive, vote or work, and we'll all be much happier.
#9. To: Lysander_Spooner (#2)
#10. To: Turtle (#8)
#11. To: Turtle (#4)
(Edited)
hostile women
#12. To: Turtle (#0)
I wonder what's going to happen to these woman when they look around and realize there are no men for them?
#13. To: Original_Intent (#12)
(Edited)
#14. To: Turtle (#0)
"This man is Jesus,” shouted one man, spilling his Guinness as Barack Obama began his inaugural address. “When will he come to Kenya to save us?"
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest