Title: Moon hoax: Naut curses at 47 secs Source:
NASA URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbP8i3jo9fU&NR=1 Published:Dec 17, 2010 Author:pt1gard Post Date:2010-12-17 18:21:13 by RickyJ Keywords:THEY, LIE, ALL, THE TIME Views:386 Comments:26
Sure looks like he is yanked slightly up and to the left here, and it really pisses him off too. There was no natural force on the moon that could have done that.
There was no natural force on the moon that could have done that.
You have forgotten about G-R-E-E-N_C-H-E-E-S-E; the moon is made of green cheese.
"In a free society we're supposed to know the truth," ... "In a society where truth becomes treason, then we're in big trouble. And now, people who are revealing the truth are getting into trouble for it" -- Ron Paul, circa 2010-12-02
You have forgotten about G-R-E-E-N_C-H-E-E-S-E; the moon is made of green cheese.
I never seen any color cheese move anything as heavy as a man.
At 1/6 the gravity of Earth they could lie flat on the moon and push off with just their hands and get up, their legs weren't even needed to get up, yet they always have trouble getting up when they are supposedly on the moon.
I never seen any color cheese move anything as heavy as a man.
Obviously, the Black Holes in the G-R-E-E-N_C-H-E-E-S-E is dismissed.
"In a free society we're supposed to know the truth," ... "In a society where truth becomes treason, then we're in big trouble. And now, people who are revealing the truth are getting into trouble for it" -- Ron Paul, circa 2010-12-02
There was always something surreal to me in these films that I never quite put my finger on. When I started watching them critically, what came to me was the disconnect between motion and exertion on the one hand and breathing and phrasing of speech. They really don't go together. It was this video, in particular the event at 2:35 that got me thinking.
I believe that we were there, but I have some regard for the idea that Stanley Kubrick may have made videos like this here on Earth. I think that it's not outside the limits of credibility that the NASA videos were made to cloak something from view - either something that was of a classified nature or to cover some perhaps unexpected failure.
If we were there, then I see no reason for them to fake any videos. All this crap about alien bases on the moon is disinfo to make those that believe we faked the moon landings look like they are nuts. Why would aliens have bases on the moon when Earth has a much more friendly environment for them to have bases on?
Even with very high power telescopes from Earth a base of any significance could be seen. It would be impossible to cover something like that up unless it were underground. If they went to the moon the recently sent lunar orbiter could have produced very detailed pictures of the landing site. But the pictures are blurry and not detailed at all despite being so close to the moon and having the latest technology. Amazingly though other pictures from it that are not claimed to be the Apollo landing sites are very clear and detailed. Coincidence? I don't think so.
I gather from the reference to "Charlie" that this is the Apollo 16 mission of April 1972. The lunar landing was done on the highlands, and it originally was theorized that this was volcanic geology but the astronauts discovered it was not volcanic ground but rock-strewn (apparently from meteorites). This meant that the ground underfoot was less steady than anticipated. I don't see evidence of any sort of Peter Pan wires. What I see is an astronaut (either John Young or Ken Mattingly) having to bend and kneel in a space suit which probably was not completely flexible - with some reason to be nervous if a rock should puncture the suit. In bending over and the like, this astronaut is doing things in the much reduced lunar gravity that he probably had little opportunity to practice. It also means in the lunar gravity that his various muscle movements have results he did not fully anticipate. In fact, from the many turns this astronaut is making, any sort of Peter Pan wires would have been hopelessly tangled.
Sorry to hear that. When I played the .avi file of the first cd in the VLC media player a pop up came up that said the avi index was broken and needed to be repaired and gave you a button to repair it. I clicked it and in about 5 minutes or so it was playing. The second cd is the same way. You might need a codec as well.
It's depressing to see an otherwise intelligent group of people arguing whether or not we went to the moon. I guess the Soviets just amicably took one in the shorts in the public relations department, rather than call us out and humiliate us in front of the world. When no amount of proof will convince you and there is no limit on accepting sophistry as 'proof', one is truly lost.
I guess the Soviets just amicably took one in the shorts in the public relations department, rather than call us out and humiliate us in front of the world.
The lies and propaganda are much deeper than most could imagine. The Soviets and the Americans, contrary to official stances and statements, were not enemies at all, they were working together on their space programs.
i have looked at some of these videos and i dont think for a minute we ever went to the moon. not because of anything specific, but more because of common sense and understanding how absurd the government is, and how foolish the people are.
"if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." 1 Cor 12:3113:13 "I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him" George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
It's funny, no one here, for all intents and purposes, believes that 9/11 was at face value.
Cynicom and buckeroo are 2 posters who believe that arab boogeymen did 911, not the government. There may be more, but i havent noticed them.
"if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." 1 Cor 12:3113:13 "I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him" George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html