[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Possible Trump Rally Attack - Serious Injuries Reported

BULLETIN: ISRAEL IS ENTERING **** UKRAINE **** WAR ! Missile Defenses in Kiev !

ATF TO USE 2ND TRUMP ATTACK TO JUSTIFY NEW GUN CONTROL...

An EMP Attack on the U.S. Power Grids and Critical National Infrastructure

New York Residents Beg Trump to Come Back, Solve Out-of-Control Illegal Immigration

Chicago Teachers Confess They Were told to Give Illegals Passing Grades

Am I Racist? Reviewed by a BLACK MAN

Ukraine and Israel Following the Same Playbook, But Uncle Sam Doesn't Want to Play

"The Diddy indictment is PROTECTING the highest people in power" Ian Carroll

The White House just held its first cabinet meeting in almost a year. Guess who was running it.

The Democrats' War On America, Part One: What "Saving Our Democracy" Really Means

New York's MTA Proposes $65.4 Billion In Upgrades With Cash It Doesn't Have

More than 100 killed or missing as Sinaloa Cartel war rages in Mexico

New York state reports 1st human case of EEE in nearly a decade

Oktoberfest tightens security after a deadly knife attack in western Germany

Wild Walrus Just Wanted to Take A Summer Vacation Across Europe

[Video] 'Days of democracy are GONE' seethes Neil Oliver as 'JAIL' awaits Brits DARING to speak up

Police robot dodges a bullet, teargasses a man, and pins him to the ground during a standoff in Texas

Julian Assange EXPOSED

Howling mad! Fury as school allows pupil suffering from 'species dysphoria' to identify as a WOLF

"I Thank God": Heroic Woman Saves Arkansas Trooper From Attack By Drunk Illegal Alien

Taxpayers Left In The Dust On Policy For Trans Inmates In Minnesota

Progressive Policy Backfire Turns Liberals Into Gun Owners

PURE EVIL: Israel booby-trapped CHILDRENS TOYS with explosives to kill Lebanese children

These Are The World's Most Reliable Car Brands

Swing State Renters Earn 17% Less Than Needed To Afford A Typical Apartment

Fort Wayne man faces charges for keeping over 10 lbs of fentanyl in Airbnb

🚨 Secret Service Announces EMERGENCY LIVE Trump Assassination Press Conference | LIVE Right Now [Livestream in progress]

More Political Perverts, Kamala's Cringe-fest On Oprah, And A Great Moment For Trump

It's really amazing! Planet chocolate cake eaten by hitting it with a hammer [Slow news day]


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: Socialist Kent Wong – Illegal Aliens Will Replace “Old White Men”
Source: New Zeal
URL Source: http://newzeal.blogspot.com/2010/12 ... -wong-illegal-aliens-will.html
Published: Dec 17, 2010
Author: CMAC
Post Date: 2010-12-18 11:43:01 by Red Jones
Keywords: None
Views: 214
Comments: 14

Socialist Kent Wong – Illegal Aliens Will Replace “Old White Men”

December 17, 2010

New Zeal

The so called “Dream Act” is seen by the America left as a major step towards amnesty for illegal aliens.

That means another step towards permanent Democrat/Marxist control of the U.S.A.

Los Angeles labor academic and activist Kent Wong pumps up the “Dream Act ” to a rally at MacArthur Park on December 13.

Wong is a close associate of the Democratic Socialists of America Marxists who are leading the “immigration reform” charge.

Wong addressed D.S.A.’s 2005 national conference in Los Angeles alongside current Obama labor secretary Hilda Solis and ACORN leader Wade Rathke. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.

#1. To: Red Jones (#0)

Hilarious! The illegals will dispatch this guy along with ol' whitey.

But people never follow the logical conclusion to anything..

Lady X  posted on  2010-12-18   11:49:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Lady X (#1)

it is not hilarious to me. Because in the southwest white people face great racial persecution due to the long-term illegal immigration and associated mis-handling of this issue.

The US government does not audit the payroll records of American employers to see who is legal and who is illegal. The law was arranged in 1986 to allow employers to hire illegals without penalty. All any employer must do is take a photo-copy of certain documents at the time of hiring, and if the documents appear real, then the employer cannot be harmed - per the law. At the time when that law was passed there were congressmen who stood up and said during the public debate that the illegals would engender a black market for fake documents. Exactly that has occurred. It takes a few hours to a day for illegals to acquire fake documents and they are not expensive.

Employers are not required to make any effort to determine if a person is actually legal or illegal prior to hiring.

I read that in an entire year the federal government handed out only $3 million in fines to employers who hire illegals. I read also that in Arizona over a 3 year period the state has handed over a grand total of 131 illegals to the federal government. There is no effort to audit the payrolls of employers here in Arizona to see who is legal or illegal.

In South Carolina they audit the payrolls of employers. THey do this with all employers. and when they're done checking all employers, they are going to begin to re-check them. a constant process of auditing the employers is what they're doing. This is a process that they do that works. It causes the employers to let the illegals go which causes them to leave the state.

This socialist above talking racism is not a joke, it is an unfortunate reality. The joke is the white people all over our country who vote Republican to stop illegals. Republicans are the ones who in 1986 demanded that the law protect employers who hire illegals. Under the Bush administration the payrolls of employers all over the country were audited to identify employees who were illegal. But the purpose was not to ask the employers to fire these people. The purpose was to better account for the social security program so that the illegals could get their social security checks when they're done working. I'm not making this up, I'm telling you simple facts.

The article says that these socialists are leaders of the immigration reform effort. There are no socialists elected in Washington except perhaps Bernie Sanders in the Senate who calls himself an Independent, but used to call himself a Socialist. It is republicans who are leading the immigration reform effort. And Republicans have told us that they will establish a new institution in our country called 'guest workers'. We already have many programs to enable employers to hire foreigners with the aid of work visas. But we're about to greatly expand that system.

The republicans are not planning on sending the illegals home. They are planning on turning them into guest workers and making the stream of guest workers permanent. And this is a system for persecuting against the people who grew up in this country. Some racists will eagerly call it an attack on white people and cheer it.

The end result already is that portions of the labor market in the southwest and elsewhere are overwhelmingly dominated by an ethnic group not from here. and that results in huge persecution against people who are from here. and this has been going on for a long time. It will only intensify with Republicans having their way again.

I would not say that Democrats are heroes on this issue. Under Obama they have been completely dysfunctional on this issue. They've had 2 years to implement a reasonable solution and they've made no effort whatsoever. They'll play dumb and stupid until their partners the republicans have the power to give us guest workers which is a huge stab in the back to us.

The solution that we have always been denied by our politicians and that still to this day is the best solution was proposed by Ronald Reagan. Reagan said in 1986 that we should forgive the illegals who have come here and found jobs and appeared to fit in. He said we should ask them all to become US citizens and that if they agree, then we should let them stay. He said that at the same time we should require employers to not hire illegals in the future. Where we have failed is that we have never required employers to hire legal people only. This has been a purposeful failure by leading politicians disloyal to our nation, the socialists had nothing to do with this failure.

The Republicans go out of their way to speak as offensively as they can towards the new immigrants, thus fanning the flames of racism, while at the same time they let as many in as they can. This is a recipe for disaster and as I live in the southwest I do not think it is funny.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-12-18   12:19:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Rojo (#3)

The Republicans....The Republicans...blah,blah,blah......The Republicans

Rojo

As usual, your Obama voting ass is full of $hit.

Hey, the gulf stream is dying, right? So when are we going sailing? The sharks were asking about you.

Flintlock  posted on  2010-12-18   12:35:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Flintlock (#4)

The sharks were asking about you.

that is funny. I don't like sharks.

First you want to suck my dick. and then you can't speak my name correctly.

You're one of those idiots who has voted republican and the republicans are who let the illegal immigrants come in. As I keep saying in 1986 it was Republican leadership of the US Senate who insisted that no immigration reform bill could be passed unless employers were protected. Ronald Reagan said publicly that to satisfy leaders of the Senate (who were republican) it was necessary to pass a flawed bill that allowed employers to freely hire illegals. Reagan said he would sign the bill, but we needed to correct that flaw in the law. We never corrected it in 24 years.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-12-18   12:50:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Red Jones (#5)

First you want to suck my dick

Now Rojo

You lying Obama voting, wetback loving geezer

I offered to suck your dick ONLY if you won a bet, a bet you would surely lose. It wasn't a serious offer, sorry to disappoint you since I'm sure the thought of mansex excites you.

I am not ergi, ODIN!!! forbids it. You OTOH are about as argr as they get.

I don't like sharks.

Ah, the part of the bet you failed to mention.

Flintlock  posted on  2010-12-18   14:43:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Flintlock (#6)

I offered to suck your dick ONLY if you won a bet, a bet you would surely lose

Now we know what you are. You're just quibbling over the conditions.

angK  posted on  2010-12-20   23:55:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 12.

#13. To: angK (#12)

Now we know what you are. You're just quibbling over the conditions.

Nice try scumbag. If you had half a brain and bothered to read the whole bet, you'd see the offer was taken out of context and it was IMPOSIBLE for Rojo to win.

You also fail to mention what Rojo would lose when he lost, but don't worry, I understand that you're excited by any mention of possible mansex. You can't help yourself, you were born that way, right?

Now, crawl back in your hole.

Flintlock  posted on  2010-12-21 00:34:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 12.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]