[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)

Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH...

ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies

Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES

Trump to send troops to Memphis

Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out)

Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?

What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!)

Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas,

Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World -

Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage

Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least

Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination

How They Control the World and Their Secret Weapon


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: Senate Blocks Bill for Illegal Immigrant Students
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/19/us/politics/19immig.html
Published: Dec 18, 2010
Author: DAVID M. HERSZENHORN
Post Date: 2010-12-18 13:19:42 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 2976
Comments: 162

Senate Blocks Bill for Illegal Immigrant Students

By DAVID M. HERSZENHORN

Published: December 18, 2010

The Senate on Saturday blocked a bill that would create a path to citizenship for certain illegal immigrant students who came to the United States as children, completed two years of college or military service and met other requirements including passing a criminal background check. The vote, 55-41 in favor of the bill, effectively kills the measure for this year, and its fate beyond that is uncertain.

-Snip


Poster Comment:

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 102.

#3. To: Jethro Tull (#0)

Why on Earth does Congress consider these "freebies" during America's sunset as a global empire?

Rhetorically, they have their own heads up their asses while the nation is hemorrhaging to death based upon their own doings.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-12-18   13:27:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: buckeroo (#3)

Right you are, buck. I haven't a clue how this bill didn't pass, but it's a wonderful surprise as it will further anger the perpetual angry base of the socialist wing of the National Party. This rebuff to the Illegal Lobby makes me berry, berry happy.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-12-18   13:33:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Jethro Tull, Red Jones (#4)

This rebuff to the Illegal Lobby makes me berry, berry happy.

You are not alone. However... Red Jones might have a sad face.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-12-18   13:49:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: buckeroo, Red Jones, 4 (#5)

Red, has many fine qualities, but I believe he carries a touch of Stockholm Syndrome regarding illegals :)

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-12-18   13:52:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Jethro Tull (#6)

but I believe he carries a touch of Stockholm Syndrome regarding illegals :)

you are certainly entitled to your opinion.

But remember, I am sticking with Ronald Reagan on this issue. Reagan believed in forgiving the illegals.

I feel that any civilized society has an obligation to the children that grow up in that society. Most illegal immigrants' children believe it or not grow up with English as their preferred language. They go to American schools, have american friends and think that they are American.

We allowed their parents to come here and to exist here.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-12-18   13:59:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Red Jones (#7)

But remember, I am sticking with Ronald Reagan on this issue. Reagan believed in forgiving the illegals.

They go to American schools, have american friends and think that they are American.

Reagan sold his amnesty as a measure to STOP ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION!!! How has that worked out for this nation?

Yes, the illegal children go to our pubic schools on our tax dollars, Red. Isn't that enough of a gift to them without adding the amnesty cherry on top? Our schools are now broke with vast amounts of money spent on ESL and free lunches. How's it all working out for us, Red?

abraxas  posted on  2010-12-18   22:07:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: abraxas (#19)

don't blame me that the US congress has passed a law that protected employers who hire illegals. that was done in 1986. Don't blame me for that. and actually don't blame ronald reagan. He did not have a vote in congress. He came before the public and told everyone that the law needed to be changed to penalize employers for hiring illegals. He told everyone that congress screwed up and it needed to be fixed. I saw Reagan's speech. Don't blame me and don't blame reagan for the failure of congress.

Reagan was actually under great pressure to sign the bill. He did not come up with the idea contrary to your implication. He was also handicapped by dementia at the time and he had people surrounding him like Bush who were deceiving him. At least he came before the public and told everyone of the problem. that is a lot more than almost anyone else did.

If we had passed the legislation that reagan asked for, then these 20-30 million illegals would not be here. So don't blame him.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-12-18   22:16:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Red Jones (#21)

Reagan was actually under great pressure to sign the bill. He did not come up with the idea contrary to your implication. He was also handicapped by dementia at the time and he had people surrounding him like Bush who were deceiving him. At least he came before the public and told everyone of the problem. that is a lot more than almost anyone else did.

Spare me Red. Reagan signed it and therefore he is responsible for it. Sheesh, just a few posts up you were cheerleading Reagan as your reason for promoting amnesty.......yet, you continually omit that it was sold as a way to END ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION and has failed miserably.

abraxas  posted on  2010-12-18   22:20:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: abraxas (#24)

yet, you continually omit that it was sold as a way to END ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION and has failed miserably.

you are mistaken. Many politicians in those days and the mass media told us that the 1986 reform legislation would end illegal immigration. But Ronald Reagan was not one such person. You are a liar. Reagan said, and I saw his speech, that we needed to pass legislation to stop the new illegals from coming. he said that at the time he signed what he said was flawed legislation. Others sold the legislation as you said, reagan did not. The rest of our establishment did as you say. but reagan was the 1 rebel who told us the truth.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-12-18   22:24:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Red Jones (#28)

Red -

I know that your feelings and positions on this matter are strong, but to call another member a liar is beneath you.

Lod  posted on  2010-12-18   22:34:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Lod (#36)

if people here are going to lie outright about reagan's speech on this subject and historical events, that is OK with me. I'm not going to lie about it.

Reagan stood before the nation on national tv and told them the legislation needed to be modified or else millions of illegals would come. and then abraxas blames reagan. not acceptable.

the media and other politicians besides reagan told us the legislation would keep illegals out. Reagan himself said just the opposite. Don't blame reagan for what the others did is all I'm saying.

and as far as I'm concerned abraxas called me a liar by disputing what I said about Reagan. all I did was throw the truth back at her.

It is an absolute lie and a slander against reagan to say that reagan tried to sell anyone on that legislation. He signed very reluctantly he said in a national speech and pointed out its flaws. Just because the media has a different story-line I am supposed to believe it. screw the media and all those foolish enough to idolize it.

and don't blame me if your memories are so fuzzy.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-12-18   22:43:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Red Jones (#45)

and don't blame me if your memories are so fuzzy.

You have a fuzzy memory Red:

Here are the first two paragraphs of Reagan's signing statement for the 1986 amnesty:

Statement on Signing the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986

November 6, 1986

The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 is the most comprehensive reform of our immigration laws since 1952. In the past 35 years our nation has been increasingly affected by illegal immigration. This legislation takes a major step toward meeting this challenge to our sovereignty. At the same time, it preserves and enhances the Nation's heritage of legal immigration. I am pleased to sign the bill into law.

In 1981 this administration asked the Congress to pass a comprehensive legislative package, including employer sanctions, other measures to increase enforcement of the immigration laws, and legalization. The act provides these three essential components. The employer sanctions program is the keystone and major element. It will remove the incentive for illegal immigration by eliminating the job opportunities which draw illegal aliens here. We have consistently supported a legalization program which is both generous to the alien and fair to the countless thousands of people throughout the world who seek legally to come to America. The legalization provisions in this act will go far to improve the lives of a class of individuals who now must hide in the shadows, without access to many of the benefits of a free and open society. Very soon many of these men and women will be able to step into the sunlight and, ultimately, if they choose, they may become Americans.

Here's a link to the entire protest free Reagan document:

www.reaga n.utexas.edu/arc...speeches/1986/110686b.htm

abraxas  posted on  2010-12-18   22:59:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: abraxas (#56)

I saw reagan's speech to the nation on this subject. I remember what he said. The 1'st 2 paragraphs of that signing statement may not have been the same as the speech I saw. and it does not contradit what I saw either.

you go believe in your fables if you want.

it isn't just my memory. The wall street journal described reagan's position at the time and the conflict between him and senate republicans who were the people who insisted the employers not be punished for hiring illegals. reagan took a different stand on that point.

Only a liar paints it different.

the passages you put up have nothing to do with penalties to employers. reagan asked for such penalties. and you are a liar to characterize it otherwise.

the wall street journal at the time specifically said that both reagan and House democrats wanted penalties for employers and that they were frustrated by senate republicans. the media conveniently failed to communicate this stuff to us. and you badger me for not being steeped in the media's fables about reagan and this issue.

by disputing my version you have called me a liar, and you did it with a mocking attitude that was rude. All I have done is throw it back in your face with the truth and correctly called you a liar - which you are.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-12-18   23:09:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: Red Jones (#65)

I remember what he said.

The wall street journal described reagan's position

Only a liar paints it different.

by disputing my version you have called me a liar, and you did it with a mocking attitude that was rude.

Post the speech content, your recall lacks credibility.

Then, by all means, post the WSJ recap for the lot of us.

Oh, really? I painted Reagan's SIGNING STATEMENT. Was he a liar? Go to the link I provided and read the ENTIRE document that details Reagan's position on EVERY ASPECT OF THE BILL. How can I lie about REAGAN'S SIGNING STATEMENT? It is what it is. He said it. He signed it.

lol......your recall has proven again and again and again to lack credibility. Do I call you a liar because of this? No. But while you call other posters on fuzzy memory I simply have taken you to the mat for your own with documentation BY REAGAN that proves you are wrong.

You want to talk about rude after you called me a liar?

abraxas  posted on  2010-12-18   23:21:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#102. To: abraxas (#73)

I looked again at that signing statement. so reagan said that the law had provisions for employer sanctions.

I've explained to you that I've witnessed that employers routinely hire illegals without any penalty, that they are not afraid of hiring illegals, that they know how to do it and it does not bother them. There are no sanctions of significance and there never were. there is no real effort to stop illegals from coming here. that is reality. It doesn't matter what reagan's signing statement says.

you're an idiot. the man characterizes the law falsely and you choose to believe that his false characterization is true.

the man had dementia. he was easily influenced by people around him.

He gave a speech saying that we needed to modify the law to penalize employers. I saw the speech. I also read in the wall street journal how it went. and I have shared that with you many times.

you believe the story told by those who rule, that somehow we tried our best to keep illegals out and it didn't work. we never even tried.

according to some idiot jerk I'm to be ridiculed and mocked just for seeing the truth. No, I'll be rude and disrespectful to you in kind and I will call you a liar as you did to me. only difference is, you are the real liar if you follow the context of the situation.

you simply want your comfortable cocoon where you can complain and throw mud at illegals without any effect. someone that upsets tha comfortable cocoon by telling you the truth you can't tolerate.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-12-19   4:34:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 102.

#115. To: Red Jones (#102)

you're an idiot. the man characterizes the law falsely and you choose to believe that his false characterization is true.

So, you are now saying that Reagan was a liar too? And that we should not believe what he claimed to believe his own legislation would accomplish?

I've already stated he sold us the amnesty on a pile of BS. Apparently you now agree with me on this issue.

abraxas  posted on  2010-12-19 11:39:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 102.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]