[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Russia's Dark Future

A Missile Shield for America - A Trillion Dollar Fantasy?

Kentucky School Board Chairman Resigns After Calling for People to ‘Shoot Republicans’

These Are 2025's 'Most Livable' Cities

Nicotine and Fish

Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity

Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case

California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year

CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case.

Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK

Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study

Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used

Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter

With great power comes no accountability.

Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%.

Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites

Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes !

Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration

Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA

Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium'

Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit?

Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL

Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes

6 Factors That Describe China's Current State

Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing

Little Bitty

Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid

17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: Senate Blocks Bill for Illegal Immigrant Students
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/19/us/politics/19immig.html
Published: Dec 18, 2010
Author: DAVID M. HERSZENHORN
Post Date: 2010-12-18 13:19:42 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 2477
Comments: 162

Senate Blocks Bill for Illegal Immigrant Students

By DAVID M. HERSZENHORN

Published: December 18, 2010

The Senate on Saturday blocked a bill that would create a path to citizenship for certain illegal immigrant students who came to the United States as children, completed two years of college or military service and met other requirements including passing a criminal background check. The vote, 55-41 in favor of the bill, effectively kills the measure for this year, and its fate beyond that is uncertain.

-Snip


Poster Comment:

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 71.

#3. To: Jethro Tull (#0)

Why on Earth does Congress consider these "freebies" during America's sunset as a global empire?

Rhetorically, they have their own heads up their asses while the nation is hemorrhaging to death based upon their own doings.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-12-18   13:27:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: buckeroo (#3)

Right you are, buck. I haven't a clue how this bill didn't pass, but it's a wonderful surprise as it will further anger the perpetual angry base of the socialist wing of the National Party. This rebuff to the Illegal Lobby makes me berry, berry happy.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-12-18   13:33:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Jethro Tull, Red Jones (#4)

This rebuff to the Illegal Lobby makes me berry, berry happy.

You are not alone. However... Red Jones might have a sad face.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-12-18   13:49:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: buckeroo, Red Jones, 4 (#5)

Red, has many fine qualities, but I believe he carries a touch of Stockholm Syndrome regarding illegals :)

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-12-18   13:52:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Jethro Tull (#6)

but I believe he carries a touch of Stockholm Syndrome regarding illegals :)

you are certainly entitled to your opinion.

But remember, I am sticking with Ronald Reagan on this issue. Reagan believed in forgiving the illegals.

I feel that any civilized society has an obligation to the children that grow up in that society. Most illegal immigrants' children believe it or not grow up with English as their preferred language. They go to American schools, have american friends and think that they are American.

We allowed their parents to come here and to exist here.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-12-18   13:59:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Red Jones (#7)

But remember, I am sticking with Ronald Reagan on this issue. Reagan believed in forgiving the illegals.

They go to American schools, have american friends and think that they are American.

Reagan sold his amnesty as a measure to STOP ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION!!! How has that worked out for this nation?

Yes, the illegal children go to our pubic schools on our tax dollars, Red. Isn't that enough of a gift to them without adding the amnesty cherry on top? Our schools are now broke with vast amounts of money spent on ESL and free lunches. How's it all working out for us, Red?

abraxas  posted on  2010-12-18   22:07:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: abraxas (#19)

don't blame me that the US congress has passed a law that protected employers who hire illegals. that was done in 1986. Don't blame me for that. and actually don't blame ronald reagan. He did not have a vote in congress. He came before the public and told everyone that the law needed to be changed to penalize employers for hiring illegals. He told everyone that congress screwed up and it needed to be fixed. I saw Reagan's speech. Don't blame me and don't blame reagan for the failure of congress.

Reagan was actually under great pressure to sign the bill. He did not come up with the idea contrary to your implication. He was also handicapped by dementia at the time and he had people surrounding him like Bush who were deceiving him. At least he came before the public and told everyone of the problem. that is a lot more than almost anyone else did.

If we had passed the legislation that reagan asked for, then these 20-30 million illegals would not be here. So don't blame him.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-12-18   22:16:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Red Jones (#21)

Reagan was actually under great pressure to sign the bill. He did not come up with the idea contrary to your implication. He was also handicapped by dementia at the time and he had people surrounding him like Bush who were deceiving him. At least he came before the public and told everyone of the problem. that is a lot more than almost anyone else did.

Spare me Red. Reagan signed it and therefore he is responsible for it. Sheesh, just a few posts up you were cheerleading Reagan as your reason for promoting amnesty.......yet, you continually omit that it was sold as a way to END ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION and has failed miserably.

abraxas  posted on  2010-12-18   22:20:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: abraxas (#24)

yet, you continually omit that it was sold as a way to END ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION and has failed miserably.

you are mistaken. Many politicians in those days and the mass media told us that the 1986 reform legislation would end illegal immigration. But Ronald Reagan was not one such person. You are a liar. Reagan said, and I saw his speech, that we needed to pass legislation to stop the new illegals from coming. he said that at the time he signed what he said was flawed legislation. Others sold the legislation as you said, reagan did not. The rest of our establishment did as you say. but reagan was the 1 rebel who told us the truth.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-12-18   22:24:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Red Jones (#28)

Red -

I know that your feelings and positions on this matter are strong, but to call another member a liar is beneath you.

Lod  posted on  2010-12-18   22:34:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Lod (#36)

if people here are going to lie outright about reagan's speech on this subject and historical events, that is OK with me. I'm not going to lie about it.

Reagan stood before the nation on national tv and told them the legislation needed to be modified or else millions of illegals would come. and then abraxas blames reagan. not acceptable.

the media and other politicians besides reagan told us the legislation would keep illegals out. Reagan himself said just the opposite. Don't blame reagan for what the others did is all I'm saying.

and as far as I'm concerned abraxas called me a liar by disputing what I said about Reagan. all I did was throw the truth back at her.

It is an absolute lie and a slander against reagan to say that reagan tried to sell anyone on that legislation. He signed very reluctantly he said in a national speech and pointed out its flaws. Just because the media has a different story-line I am supposed to believe it. screw the media and all those foolish enough to idolize it.

and don't blame me if your memories are so fuzzy.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-12-18   22:43:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: Red Jones (#45)

Red -

Calling someone a liar is just so derogatory.

You can post evidence to the contrary without denigrating the poster personally, can't you?

Have a blessed evening.

Lod  posted on  2010-12-18   22:52:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: Lod, Red Jones (#52)

Not to pile on, because I don't want to pile, but I do feel compelled to comment.

Having been called a liar myself when I was simply mistaken, later admitted after I did some research, I know it does rankle.

So, I always give the benefit of the doubt, because sometimes people are mistaken and so it is not a lie, it is simply bad information.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-12-18   23:01:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: Original_Intent, 4 (#59)

So, I always give the benefit of the doubt, because sometimes people are mistaken and so it is not a lie, it is simply bad information.

Amen.

Don't call the poster a LIAR, just point them in the right direction to the truth.

How tough is that?

We don't need beat-downs, we want the truth here.

Lod  posted on  2010-12-18   23:07:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: Lod (#63)

We don't need beat-downs, we want the truth here.

Sir Lod...

Your olde age is showing, olde man. hehehehehe

Cynicom  posted on  2010-12-18   23:08:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: Cynicom, Lod (#64)

We don't need beat-downs, we want the truth here.

Sir Lod...

Your olde age is showing, olde man. hehehehehe

I don't know about you guys, but my father had some firm ideas about how a gentleman behaves toward a lady. I think it would take an act of will for me to do much more than just be coldly polite even if a woman is being an absolute bitch.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-12-18   23:20:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 71.

        There are no replies to Comment # 71.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 71.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]