See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: Strange emissions by sun are suddenly mutating matter…
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://projectworldawareness.com/20 ... -are-suddenly-mutating-matter/
Published: Oct 5, 2010
Author: BY TERRENCE AYM
Post Date: 2010-12-26 09:57:09 by gengis gandhi
Keywords: None
Views: 274
Comments: 8
Terrifying scientific discovery: Strange emissions by sun are suddenly mutating matter… POSTED ON OCTOBER 5, 2010 BY ROCKINGJUDE BY TERRENCE AYM The angry sun For months mounting fear has driven researchers to wring their hands over the approaching solar storms. Some have predicted devastating solar tsunamis that could wipe away our advanced technology, others voiced dire warnings that violent explosions on the surface of the sun could reach out to Earth, breach our magnetic field, and expose billions to high intensity X-rays and other deadly forms of cancer-causing radiation. Now evidence has surfaced that something potentially more dangerous is happening deep within the hidden core of our life-giving star: never-before-seen particles —or some mysterious force—is being shot out from the sun and it’s hitting Earth. Whatever it is, the evidence suggests it’s affecting all matter. Strange and unknown Alarmed physicists first became aware of this threat over the past several years. Initially dismissed as an anomaly, now frantic scientists are shooting e- mails back and forth to colleagues across the world attempting to grasp exactly what is happening to the sun. Strange and unknown Alarmed physicists first became aware of this threat over the past several years. Initially dismissed as an anomaly, now frantic scientists are shooting e- mails back and forth to colleagues across the world attempting to grasp exactly what is happening to the sun. Something impossible has happened. Yet the “impossible” has been proven to be true. Laboratories around the globe have confirmed that the rate of radioactive decay—once thought to be a constant and a bedrock of science—is no longer a constant. Something being emitted from the sun is interacting with matter in strange and unknown ways with the startling potential to dramatically change the nature of the very Earth itself. Exactly what has scientists so on edge is the fact that the natural rate of decay of atomic particles has always been predictable. Indeed, using the decay rate of Carbon-14 has been a method to date archeological artifacts. The process, known as carbon dating, measures the quantity of Carbon-14 within organic objects. According to the numbers, Carbon-14 has a specific half-life of 5,730 years. Physicists have proven through exhaustive observation and experimentation over the course of a century that it takes 5,730 years for Carbon-14 atoms to decay into a stable Nitrogen-14. The values don’t change—or at least they never have in the past. With certain evidence that radioactive decay can be significantly affected by an unknown effect from the sun, much of science is turned on its head. Rate of decay speeding up Worst of all, if the decay rates of matter are being mutated then all matter on Earth is being affected including the matter that makes up life. The mutation may go so far as to change the underlying reality of the quantum universe—and by extrapolation-the nature of life, the principles of physics, perhaps even the uniform flow of time. In fact, some evidence of time dilation has been gleaned from close observation of the decay rate. If particles interacting with the matter are not the cause— and matter is being affected by a new force of nature-then time itself may be speeding up and there’s no way to stop it. Neutrinos the cause? Researchers have correlated the anomalies in the decay rate to a 33-day period. That time frame matches the 33-day rotation of the solar core. Such a match strains credulity as being a mere coincidence. Since the sun’s core is known to blast out continuous streams of particles called neutrinos, some scientists are attempting to find evidence that neutrinos are the culprits behind the mutation of matter. There’s a problem with that hypothesis, however, as neutrinos are like ghost particles. They’re extremely difficult to detect. Normally, neutrinos pass through the Earth without any interaction at all. To a neutrino, it’s as if the Earth doesn’t exist. Other than discovering a previously unknown property of neutrinos, or finding a new particle altogether, the possibility exists that no particle is behind the changes recorded in the radioactive decay rates. What could be causing the phenomenon is a previously unknown force. Unknown dangers As the sun builds towards solar maximum and a period of dangerous intensity never experienced by any living person inexorably approaches, strange, uncontrollable forces could be building deep within its fiery nuclear furnace. It’s already been proven that the sun’s mass warps time, bends light waves and accounts for mutation of species on Earth. Now this new force may be directly interacting with matter in a way that could not only change Mankind’s understanding of physics, but change Mankind itself…and not necessarily in a beneficial way. Yes, the e-mails will continue to fly and the hands will continue to wring. But in the end, we are all just observers. Whether the phenomenon has no real impact on humanity, or the worst impact imaginable, nothing can be done to stop it. Once again, the titanic forces of nature rear up to overwhelm our technology—and we find ourselves like the playthings of gods. Utterly helpless. Sources Is the Sun Emitting a Mystery Particle, Ian O’Neill, Discovery News The Sun Influences the Decay of Radioactive Elements,Tudor Vieru, Softpedia Mysteriously, Solar Activity Found to Influence Behavior of Radioactive Materials On Earth, Rebecca Boyle, POSCI As_I_Please writes“Scientists at the US National Institute of Standards and Technology and Purdue University have ruled out neutrino flux as a cause of previously observed fluctuations in nuclear decay rates. From the article: ‘Researchers … tested this by comparing radioactive gold-198 in two shapes, spheres and thin foils, with the same mass and activity. Gold-198 releases neutrinos as it decays. The team reasoned that if neutrinos are affecting the decay rate, the atoms in the spheres should decay more slowly than the atoms in the foil because the neutrinos emitted by the atoms in the spheres would have a greater chance of interacting with their neighboring atoms. The maximum neutrino flux in the sample in their experiments was several times greater than the flux of neutrinos from the sun. The researchers followed the gamma-ray emission rate of each source for several weeks and found no difference between the decay rate of the spheres and the corresponding foils.’ The paper can be found here on arXiv. Slashdot has previously covered the original announcement and followed up with the skepticism of other scientists.” http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/09/25/0254219/Scientists-Confirm-Nuclear- Decay-Rate-Constancy
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#3. To: gengis gandhi (#0)
No doubt the Young Earth Creationists will latch onto that one.
No doubt the Young Earth Creationists will latch onto that one. Like a drowning man latching onto a life ring. The Young Earthers are amusing though - kind of the Comic Relief of Cosmology. Their viewpoint rests almost completely upon denial of all evidence to the contrary. It is a rather ego-centric view assuming that in all of creation that the earth is the only home to life - particularly intelligent life, and that the rest of the universe is either an illusion or created simultaneously with the earth, including galaxies hundreds of billions of light years away, just to screw with our minds. Basically they are asserting that God is a big "Practical Joker". Ultimately their view rests solely upon their particular misinterpretation of 1 text and requires disregarding or explaining away, often in the most preposterous manner, any and all evidence contradicting their dogma.
LOL. Yes. They being doing that for some time now.. lol The Young Earthers are amusing though - kind of the Comic Relief of Cosmology. Their viewpoint rests almost completely upon denial of all evidence to the contrary. Yes, although they have rightly pointed out the fatal flaws of Darwinism, they then look around for more evidence that would support either a 6,000 year old Human Race, a 6,000 year old Earth, or even a 6,000 year old universe. Evolution, of course, is an unproven science that is unlikely to be correct, but to then try and discredit long proven sciences like cosmology or geology to suit one Biblical book that most people regard to be a parable is ridiculous. It is a rather ego-centric view assuming that in all of creation that the earth is the only home to life - particularly intelligent life I think all life happens by design, I was watching an episode of the BBC's Sky at Night covering SETI, one scientist quoted the odds of amino acids combining in just the right way for life to happen, can't remember the figure for certain, but I think it was at least 1 in 10^22, more than all the (supposed) planets in the known Universe. Which actually makes me think we shouldn't even be here! lol So, whatever life comes about in the Universe, it is at the discretion of a Creator. He created an immense Universe, one too big for us to explore even if we had a billion years to do so - so maybe He created other races out there. and that the rest of the universe is either an illusion or created simultaneously with the earth, including galaxies hundreds of billions of light years away, just to screw with our minds. Basically they are asserting that God is a big "Practical Joker". I've heard all kinds of strange theories. I think the most credible one is about the speed of light dropping over millenia, as supposedly there is evidence to support that. Well, maybe, if the rate isotope decay can vary, then so can the speed of light. Still doubt it could credibly support the idea of a young universe. Other less credible theories include using Relativity to explain the apparent great age of the Universe compared to a young Earth. Mind you.. I do think God is a Practical Joker in many ways, like why does He always send clouds for a once in a lifetime astronomical event - like the Soltice lunar eclipse? lol Ultimately their view rests solely upon their particular misinterpretation of 1 text and requires disregarding or explaining away, often in the most preposterous manner, any and all evidence contradicting their dogma. Yes, they use one small part of a book. At least Cremo uses entire volumes of other ancient texts. lol I'd say that the only part of Genises that is based loosely on fact is the Flood - there seems to be evidence that that really happened, the rest are just parables I think. Anyway, for a long time I was of the mindset that both Young Earth Creationism and Darwinism were wrong. I was thinking there had to be a third way, just not sure what. I think typical of the MSM, limiting debate to a narrow range of talking points, and, in this case, one side that completely lacks credibility, thus shifting the public view to the other side - Darwinism. When I came across the theories of Michael Cremo and others - a light switched on in my head.
Just taking stray bits and pieces: As far as recent science goes, like the assertions of the Science Fiction Writers of the 30's, planets are, cosmologically speaking, as common as grains of sand. Increasingly the evidence that is mounting suggests that the speed of light is a limitation on the speed of light, but that it may not be a universal limit. Modern research, again predicted by those kooky science fiction writers of the 30's, is tending to suggest the existence of multiple parallel universes. We don't know how many that might be but that they exist is becoming increasingly likely. As a proponent of Intelligent Design I certainly do not disagree with your conclusions there. It would surprise me if God didn't have a sense of humor. However, like a stern, wise, and loving father, he allows his children to make mistakes and order their own affairs, knowing that to intervene too obviously would interfere with their development and ability to take care of themselves. Thus the subtlety in the ways he acts, which I think are largely unnoted for what it is. It is like religious worship which exists for the benefit of man as such adulation is not a need of God, but rather adds order to human affairs and reminds man that in the end we are ALL spiritual beings. The burning question to me is, is there a Mrs. God? I like Cremo and Thompson for their affect upon the staid, plodding, set in their ways, scientific establishment. I also think they, and others, are more correct that the establishment which categorically, unthinkingly knee-jerk, rejects them.
#8. To: Original_Intent (#7)
The RCC have attempted to address that question lol:
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestLaboratories around the globe have confirmed that the rate of radioactive decay—once thought to be a constant and a bedrock of science—is no longer a constant.
#4. To: irishthatcherite (#3)
Laboratories around the globe have confirmed that the rate of radioactive decay—once thought to be a constant and a bedrock of science—is no longer a constant.
#5. To: Original_Intent (#4)
Like a drowning man latching onto a life ring.
#7. To: irishthatcherite (#5)
Replies to Comment # 7. The burning question to me is, is there a Mrs. God?
End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.