Wow. In capitals and with exclamation point! Impressive! Or I mean IMPRESSIVE!
STRONGLY
How strongly? And why didn't you add a "!" to it? I mean you capitalized it and all, presumably for emphasis, but adding a few "!!!" would help in that area.
So, how is this debunked? And what is it that he "debunked"? Was it the jebus bullshit myth? Wiki says that is the religious part of "zeitgeist". Is that "proof" in your movie? If so, where?
If it's "clearly disinfo", then perhaps you can prove it? It doesn't take wading through a 2 hour video to prove something like this.
If it doesn't have naked women in it doing naughty things, I'm not going to watch it, and I bet that you didn't watch it either. You probably made the claim without bothering to check it out for yourself.
So, how is this debunked? And what is it that he "debunked"?
The flimsy sources presented in Zeitgeist compilation to make their case. When I watched it, I was struck by how little both Greek and Hindu Gods are understood. Zeitgeist touches very lightly on astrological information too.
For a thorough source evaluation that includes scholarly analysis to support the documentation, it takes at least two hours.
For a thorough source evaluation that includes scholarly analysis to support the documentation, it takes at least two hours.
But it would be easier to verify if it was in text format. Video is no good for that imo. Plus it just doesn't hold my attention as well as text does.
I've never seen the movie and I don't plan on seeing it.
When I watched it, I was struck by how little both Greek and Hindu Gods are understood. Zeitgeist touches very lightly on astrological information too.
How long would that movie be if they went into those details?
But it would be easier to verify if it was in text format
I'd say more than half of the frames in this documentary are text. Yes, this isn't the most attention grabbing format. That's why I mosly listen and type other information. Lol......truly giving credit to the topics that are touched on lightly would merit a very long running series indeed.
Even on this debunking film, I'm noting that some information is brushed over much too lightly. For one thing, they do not understand the workings of an age and what behaviours people exhibit in relation to ages. They ignore the larger procession of 26K years around the zodiac and the relation to changing ages. They do not understand the "great flood" in relation to the procession either. They use what they do not understand to debunk it......like floods in relation to polar shift. They poo-poo the epic of Gilgamesh in relation to the flood.
They poo-poo the epic of Gilgamesh in relation to the flood.
The flood was likely caused by several things, one being the melting of the glaciers; the other being a possible shift in the Earth's tilt and polar axis.
The Epic of Gilgamesh is the basis for the tale of Noah's Ark. They are both legends, and more than likely the Epic of Gilgamesh was itself based upon an earlier work. Of course the Church destroyed every piece of ancient history they could get their hands on (and/or locked up whatever ancient scripts they found in monasteries or the Vatican vault), so we have no way of knowing what the original source was.