See other War, War, War Articles
Title: Eisenhower's death camps
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Aq8vSahbZk
Published: Jan 19, 2011
Author: Staff
Post Date: 2011-01-19 23:33:17 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 509
Comments: 44
Poster Comment: Eisnhower was Jewish.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 30.
#5. To: Horse (#0)
Remember the photo of Ike's West Point yearbook picture when he was dubbed "IKE, THE TERRIBLE SWEDISH JEW"? By the way, he was next, or nearly so, to the last in his class. This article was first printed in 1990, but we thought it was meaningful to reprint it now. Note: During Cadet Eisenhower's time at West Point Academy, Eisenhower was summoned to the office of the headmaster and was asked some pointed questions. At the time, it was routine procedure to test a cadet's blood to insure White racial integrity. Apparently, there was a question of Eisenhower's racial lineage and this was brought to Eisenhower's attention by the headmaster. When asked if he was part Oriental, Eisenhower replied in the negative. After some discussion, Eisenhower admitted having Jewish background. The headmaster then reportedly said, "That's where you get your Oriental blood?" Although he was allowed to remain at the academy, word got around since this was a time in history when non-Whites were not allowed into the academy. Note - The issue of Eisenhower's little-known Jewish background in academically essential in understanding his psychopathic hatred of German men, women and children. Later, in Eisenhower's West Point Military Academy graduating class yearbook, published in 1915, Eisenhower is identified as a "terrible Swedish Jew." Wherever Eisenhower went during his military career, Eisenhower's Jewish background and secondary manifesting behavior was a concern to his fellow officers. During World War II when Col. Eisenhower was working for Gen. Douglas MacArthur in the South Pacific, MacArthur protested to his superiors in Washington (DC) that Eisenhower was incompetent and that he did not want Eisenhower on his staff. In 1943, Washington not only transferred Col. Eisenhower to Europe but promoted him over more than 30 more experienced senior officers to five star general and placed him in charge of all the US forces in Europe. Thus it comes as no surprise that General George Patton, a real Aryan warrior, hated Eisenhower.
Wiki: "Eisenhower graduated in the upper half of the class of 1915.[15] The 1915 class was known as "the class the stars fell on", because 59 members eventually became general officers." So much for rumors circulated here that Ike was dead last in his class and other obvious falsehoods. Uh-huh. And while I am no Patton expert, I suspect he'd bitch-slap you into next week if you ever called him an "Aryan" to his face. Patton was a man of war and wanted to beat the Nazis first and then take on the Russkies. I am aware of the quote attributed to Patton (i.e. "The Aryan mind is helpless in the face of the Jewish mind.") but I have concluded that it is merely a fabrication made by David Lane to the gullible readers of St*rmfr*nt, R*nse, Ary*n-N*t**n.org, and other websites that aren't exactly neutral arbiters of history. Notice that David Lane offers absolutely no proof that Patton ever made such a statement yet many people (who should know better) accept his assertion at face value.
Patton on the Jews and Germans
Interesting video. Too bad so little of it is true. Naturally, they offer no sources for these quotes. ” … Quick-tempered and bluff in speech, [Patton] was frequently involved in political controversy, not least because of his propensity to racist and anti-Semitic remarks. … ” – http://conservapedia.com/George_S._Patton,_Jr. Letters They Wouldn’t Publish Dear Editor: Jonathan F. Keiler (Correspondence, July 18) asserts that “there is no evidence that [General George S. Patton's] anti-Semitism, even if it exceeded the usual country-club variety, affected his conduct during the war.” Prof. Joseph Bendersky, in his study of antisemitism in the American military (“The ‘Jewish Threat’,” 2000), described two important instances in which Patton, motivated by antisemitism, influenced U.S. policy toward Jews. Following the Allied liberation of North Africa in November 1942, Patton, warning of a Jewish conspiracy to “take over” Morocco and the need to appease Arab public opinion, persuaded General Eisenhower to oppose abolishing the anti-Jewish legislation that the Vichy regime had imposed in the region, or even releasing local Jews who were being held in forced labor camps. Eisenhower’s recommendations in turn were endorsed by Secretary of War Henry Stimson, and soon “set the tone for future American wartime policies on the entire Middle East.” After the war, Bendersky writes, it was Patton who “set the tone for army policies and behavior” toward the Holocaust survivors who were languishing in Displaced Persons camps in the American zone of occupation. Patton despised the Jewish DPs, denouncing them as “animals” and “a sub-human species without any of the cultural or social refinements of our time.” Such attitudes inevitably filtered down to the officers and soldiers in charge of the camps. The treatment of the DPs was so poor that presidential envoy Earl Harrison, after touring the camps in 1945, reported that “We appear to be treating the Jews as the Nazis treated them except that we do not exterminate them.” When President Truman ordered Eisenhower to improve treatment of the DPs, a furious Patton wrote in his diary: “Harrison and his ilk believe that the displaced person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews, who are lower than animals.” Sincerely, Dr. Rafael Medoff The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies If even the professional Holocaust industry won't go after Patton other than for a few relatively minor issues, then I suspect there is little substance. What you often find when investigating these claims made by persons and groups with their own ax to grind is that they often manufacture these quotes and stories and there is absolutely nothing to back them up. But that doesn't stop Bubba from believing it because Bubba saw it on YouTube. And some Bubbas want to believe it so they accept it uncritically. That Patton was a volatile leader with an even more volatile mouth, no one denies. He had plenty of obnoxious opinions on many matters other than Jews or Aryans or Russians. And while he decried the plight of Germans, he was also one of the most bloodthirsty anti-Nazis around at the time. Like many great generals, he was more than a little bit of a wacko. And a great general is often not a great man or a great thinker.
C'mon, next thing you'll be telling me that Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are antisemites too! LOL. I never have understood the admiration for Gandhi. He worked for the Brits in South Africa, denigrated the kaffir as inferior to Indians in South Africa, etc. Later, he tried to limit the damage to his reputation from his earlier remarks about jews. Henry Ford was right. History is bunk. But it is interesting to examine, if only for the biases the elites wish to impose on the masses.
Henry Ford put one of these in every car that rolled off the assembly line. The International Jew — The World's Foremost Problem Originally Published By Henry Ford Many people have seen the booklet. These are the original articles that appeared in the Dearborn Independent.
I'm sure you're aware how Ford, his family and his foundation later tried to sanitize the record of his publications. It didn't help much. What I find disappointing is that the record of Ford in funding antiwar activities, including funding a peace ship, is forgotten almost entirely. He should have won the Nobel Peace Prize for it IMO. What Ford did was exactly what the Nobel Prize was intended to recognize.
EXPULSIONS OF THE JEWS YEAR _______________ PLACE 70------------------------------Jerusalem 132-35-------------------------Bar Kochba 250 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Carthage 379-95-------------------------“Unconverted” Jews expelled from Spain. 415 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Alexandria 554 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Diocese of Clement (France) 561 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Diocese of Uzzes (France) 612 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Visigoth Spain 642 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Visigoth Empire 855 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Italy 876 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sens 1012 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz 1096 --------------------------- Crusades: 12,000 Jews killed in Germany. 1121 --------------------------- “Unconverted” Jews expelled from Belgium. 1181 --------------------------- Jews expelled from France by King Philip 1182 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France 1182 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Germany 1189 --------------------------- British Crown lays claim to Jewish possessions 1290 --------------------------- All but 16,000 Jews expelled from England 1298 --------------------------- 140 European Jewish communities destroyed. 1276 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Upper Bavaria 1290 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - England 1306 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France 1322 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France (again) 1348 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Switzerland 1349 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hielbronn (Germany) 1349 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Saxony 1349 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hungary 1360 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hungary 1370 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Belgium 1380 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Slovakia 1388 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Strasbourg 1394 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Germany 1394 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France 1420 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lyons 1421 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Austria 1424 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fribourg 1424 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Zurich 1424 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cologne 1432 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Savoy 1438 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz 1439 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Augsburg 1442 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Netherlands 1444 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Netherlands 1446 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bavaria 1453 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France 1453 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Breslau 1454 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wurzburg 1462 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz 1483 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz 1484 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Warsaw 1485 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vincenza (Italy) 1492 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Spain 1492 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Italy 1495 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lithuania 1496 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Naples 1496 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Portugal 1498 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Nuremberg 1498 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Navarre 1510 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Brandenberg 1510 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prussia 1514 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Strasbourg 1515 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Genoa 1519 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Regensburg 1533 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Naples 1541 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Naples 1542 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague & Bohemia 1550 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Genoa 1551 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bavaria 1555 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pesaro 1557 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague 1559 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Austria 1561 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague 1567 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wurzburg 1569 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Papal States 1571 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Brandenburg 1582 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Netherlands 1582 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hungary 1593 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Brandenburg, Austria 1597 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cremona, Pavia & Lodi 1614 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Frankfort 1615 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Worms 1619 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Kiev 1648 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ukraine 1648 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Poland 1649 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hamburg 1654 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Little Russia (Beylorus) 1656 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lithuania 1669 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Oran (North Africa) 1669 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vienna 1670 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vienna 1712 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sandomir 1727 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Russia 1738 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wurtemburg 1740 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Little Russia (Beylorus) 1744 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague, Bohemia 1744 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Slovakia 1744 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Livonia 1745 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moravia 1753 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Kovad (Lithuania) 1761 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bordeaux 1772 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Deported to the Pale of Settlement (Poland/Russia) 1775 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Warsaw 1789 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Alcace 1804 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Villages in Russia 1808 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Villages & Countrysides (Russia) 1815 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lubeck & Bremen 1815 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria 1820 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bremen 1843 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Russian Border Austria & Prussia 1862 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Area in the U.S. under Grant's Jurisdiction 1866 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Galatz, Romania 1880s - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Russia 1891 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moscow 1919 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bavaria (foreign born Jews) 1938-45 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Nazi Controlled Areas 1948 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Arab Countries ASK YOURSELF WHY??
#31. To: Itistoolate (#30)
They do seem to have annoyed various Gentiles for a long time, don't they? In part, this is merely a measure of their long continuity. Other conquered peoples were swallowed whole by conquering empires. Jews always had a more binding community structure, largely based around their status as the People of the Book, a common nickname for them in many languages.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#10. To: angK (#5)
In 1943, Washington not only transferred Col. Eisenhower to Europe but promoted him over more than 30 more experienced senior officers to five star general and placed him in charge of all the US forces in Europe.
Thus it comes as no surprise that General George Patton, a real Aryan warrior, hated Eisenhower.
Ike and Patton were held back by the Army old guard who thought cavalry was the thing and that tanks and machine guns were too nasty. These are the same "senior officers" that both Patton and Ike got promoted over when it became clear that Hitler and Tojo did not hold such refined views on the use of tanks and machine guns. In addition, the careers of the 59 generals graduating in the West Point class of 1915 shows that it wasn't just a couple of young bucks like Ike that got promoted over the old Army lifers, it was a bunch of them. Your narrative does nothing to account for this, let alone the obvious factual errors you're airing here. Eisenhower graduated in 1915. He served with the infantry until 1918 at various camps in Texas and Georgia. During World War I, Eisenhower became the #3 leader of the new tank corps and rose to temporary (Bvt.) Lieutenant Colonel in the National Army. During the war he trained tank crews at "Camp Colt"—his first command—on the grounds of "Pickett's Charge" on the Gettysburg, Pennsylvania Civil War battle site. Ike and his tank crews never saw combat. After the war, Eisenhower reverted to his regular rank of captain (and was promoted to major a few days later) before assuming duties at Camp Meade, Maryland, where he remained until 1922. His interest in tank warfare was strengthened by many conversations with George S. Patton and other senior tank leaders; however their ideas on tank warfare were strongly discouraged by superiors.
#11. To: TooConservative (#10)
#12. To: Itistoolate (#11)
The Weekly Standard
Director
Melrose Park, PA
#21. To: TooConservative (#12)
#25. To: Itistoolate (#21)
I don't buy Gandhi's explanation. But it is routinely offered by the establishment historians who whitewash Lincoln as some imaginary Great Emancipator.
In an article in the November 26, 1938 issue of a magazine called Harijan, Gandhi suggested that Germany's Jews could successfully confront their Nazi oppressors with non-violence. Well, this was 1938. World War II had not yet begun. If we wish to excuse Gandhi on the grounds that he didn't know what he was talking about, since he was writing before Hitler's plans were known, we should also consider that he told Louis Fischer, one of his biographers, after the war was over, that "collective suicide" might have been a better strategy: "The Jews died anyway, didn't they? They might as well have died significantly" (see "The Gandhi Nobody Knows" by Richard Grenier, Commentary, March 1983). Collective suicide is not satyagraha, since it is in no way passive. And how passive can one be about one's children when committing collective suicide? Gandhi never advocated collective suicide in any other situation.
#26. To: TooConservative (#25)
#29. To: Itistoolate (#26)
#30. To: TooConservative (#29)
Replies to Comment # 30. EXPULSIONS OF THE JEWS
End Trace Mode for Comment # 30.