[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

NASA chooses SpaceX and Blue Origin to deliver rover, astronaut base to the moon The Female Fantasy Exposed: Why Women Love Toxic Love Stories United States will NOT comply with the ICC arrest warrant for Prime Minister Netanyahu: Mississippi’s GDP Beats France: A Shocking Look at Economic Policy Failures (Per Capita) White House Refuses to Recognize US Responsibility for Escalation of Conflict in Ukraine MAKE EDUCATION GREAT AGAIN!! They will burn it with a "Peresvet" or shoot it down with a "hypersound" NY Times: Could Trumps Return Pose a Threat to Climate and Weather Data? Apples new AI-powered Siri? Pepe Escobar: The BRICS Spirit Is Alive And Well In South Africa Trump Can Stop WW III By Helping Kamala Make History About that ICBM Russia just launched on Dnipro These Are America's Safest Cities Trump's Opportunity To Reset US-Iran Relations Trump Nominates Pam Bondi For Attorney General After Gaetz Withdraws From Consideration Judea Snarls: Donald Trump seeks to divide the State of Israel and Create a Palestinian State Gaetz Withdraws From Consideration For Attorney General TROUBLE OFF AIR MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow ‘takes $5m pay cut’ CNN’s Jake Tapper STORMS OFF as JD Vance ANNIHILATES Him Over Trump’s ‘Enemy Within’ Remarks! 🚨BREAKING: Hundreds of January 6th Political Prisoners Set FREE, DC Judges PANIC! Trump Pardon Soon Tulsi Gabbard vs. Democrats and the Media!! Gaetz Withdraws From Consideration For Attorney General Putin Threatening Kiev Electricity Netanyahu seeking a ban on formation of state committee of inquiry into Oct. 7 Dear DOGE: Milton Friedman Wanted to Cut Most of It Chairman of Arab Americans for Trump claims to have received 100% promise of Palestinian State from President-elect NASA makes surprising discovery at the end of our universe: 'It shouldn't exist' TRUMP Begins Fight vs BIG TECH CENSORSHIP CARTEL Why The U.S. Is Freaking Out Over China’s New Peru Port Wire thefts leave Hacienda Heights residents without phone, internet service

Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Caught on Tape: AngryCop vs. Hat
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 26, 2011
Author: Various
Post Date: 2011-01-26 02:19:47 by RidleyReport
Keywords: None
Views: 371
Comments: 10

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMZRqkGkyJs

Multiple camera angles capture pissed policeman assaulting man over his "don't tread on me" hat. Supposedly you are not allowed to wear such a thing in court. This was filmed at district court in Keene, New Hampshire.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

#1. To: RidleyReport (#0)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." - Ben Franklin

Eric Stratton  posted on  2011-01-26   2:33:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Tough women come from New York, sweet women from Texas, prissy women from Southern California, but we NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WOMEN have fire & ice in our blood. We can ride 4-wheelers, be a princess, throw a left hook, pack heat, hunt with the men, bake a cake, love with passion, and if we have an opinion, you know you're going to hear it!!

farmfriend  posted on  2011-01-26   3:09:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

This is retarded.

It's illegal to wear a hat in court. Assaulted and Kidnapped?

He was arrested and charged for breaking the law.

wudidiz  posted on  2011-01-26   3:48:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It's illegal to wear a hat in court. Assaulted and Kidnapped?

He was arrested and charged for breaking the law.

Okay, I don't know if it was illegal or not. I think he should have just taken his hat off though. Until such time as the ptb don't make the rules and carry guns, it's wise to just take one's hat off in Court. If you don't know that and need to be told, you should still take it off.

wudidiz  posted on  2011-01-26   3:58:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Court is Not the place to be playing the role of a punk. The judges, prosecutors, guards and cops are just sitting there waiting like predators for someone to do that. They know how to deal with resistors.

Do I agree with it? Of course not. But that's the way it is and trying to change it in a courtroom especially when one's friend is being judged, is unwise, counterproductive and silly.

wudidiz  posted on  2011-01-26   4:04:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Pigs being pigs, nothing new here.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2011-01-26   4:19:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Court is Not the place to be playing the role of a punk

No kidding.

I knew an ex-con who, when being sentenced to three years in a burglary charge, made the wise crack that he could do the three years standing on his head - yeah, he said it.

The judge then gave him two more years.

Buzzard  posted on  2011-01-26   10:51:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

to determine if its illegal to weara hat one would nees to read the actual statute. he could have worn a t shirt with the same flag. theyd have a hard time forcing him to strip naked. if they arrested him for words on a shirt. hed have a great lawsuit

"if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." 1 Cor 12:31—13:13
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html

Artisan  posted on  2011-01-26   11:37:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡

"Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." -- Thomas Jefferson

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2011-01-27   10:11:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

There's always historical precedent even when it comes to removing hats. Liberty is always radical and must be quashed by the self-appointed authorities.

"...The Quakers were natural enemies of slavery, with their fundamental belief in equality in a hierarchical society where that was still highly controversial. They believed above all else that every person is made in the image of God and carries the divine light, so it is blasphemous to elevate one above another.

They refused to raise their hats to their social betters or to call them "my lord", "my lady" or even "you", insisting on the familiar "thou". Their egalitarianism was still quite scandalous in the 18th Century, but it made slavery uniquely abhorrent to the Quakers.

The problem was that they were a dangerous sect of fanatics, according to the received wisdom, so no-one listened to a word they said. They were excluded from public office. " http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/6476645.stm

bluegrass  posted on  2011-02-01   22:55:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]