[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Arctic Sea Ice Soars to Highest Level for 21 Years

Tucker Carlson Reveals He Was Clawed By a Demon While Sleeping, Even Started to Bleed

Top Kamala Harris Surrogate Mark Cuban Faces Intense Backlash From #WomenForTrump

Kamala Harris Is Insane & Cannot Be Trusted

Israel-Hezbollah Ceasefire Possible Within 'Days': Lebanese PM

‘We were totally betrayed’ – 500 migrants for tiny German village of 600 will nearly double population

Hezbollah tactics, weapons stall Israeli advance

President Kennedy's Final Address to the United Nations General Assembly

RFK Jr. Explains Plan For Reforming The CIA

Harris Campaign Recruits Foreign Volunteers, Tells Noncitizens How To Skirt Donation Rules

Lame Yuck! With Nothing To Lose, Biden Goes On Baby-Mouthing Spree At White House Halloween Party

The Fastest Way To Reverse A Fatty Liver Naturally | Dr. William Li

CIA Advisor Warns: This is the beginning of the 2025 Civil War

When Evil Is Allowed In, Evil Stays

US layoffs rose 42% in three years, reaching 1.83M in September.

Iran Will Carry Out 'Definitive, Painful' Retaliatory Strike, Likely Before Election: CNN

How 2024 Election Will Lead To Second Civil War

Tulsi Gabbard Drops a Killer Trump Ad

Israel Genocide Tracker Account Sparks 'Panic' Among Israeli Soldiers

Battleground Voting Shift: Hispanic Voters Now Driven by Issues, Not Party Lines

North Carolina Appeals Court Rules to Allow Voters Who have Never Lived in the U.S. To Vote in State Elections

The 5 Tiers of Stolen Elections (Dems already did 1 & 2)

A Palestinian Family Goes to Pick Up Olives. It Ends in an Execution by Israeli Soldiers

Israel Suffers A Multimillion Dollar Economic SUCKER PUNCH!

The Babylon Bee Endorses Communist Harris

Nosy NY Times Journos Uncover Elon Musk's Secret Luxury Compound In Austin

A 20% surge in gov't spending inflates the national debt, inflation, and interest rates, now reaching 10% of GDP

MI EARLY VOTE SHOCKER! An Excess of 125,428 Votes Cast!

DMSO is the ivermectin for strokes and neurological damage

The Curious Case Of Ariane Tabatabai


Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: Wizard of Oz Verified by using New Testament Verification Methods
Source: yt
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 13, 2011
Author: .
Post Date: 2011-02-13 08:25:16 by PSUSA
Keywords: None
Views: 966
Comments: 63

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 59.

#4. To: PSUSA (#0)

Brilliant. Just brilliant.

wudidiz  posted on  2011-02-13   16:59:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: wudidiz (#4)

Glad ya liked it.

So... Can I count on you showing up at our next Black Mass? A wonderful time will be had by all.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2011-02-13   17:24:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: PSUSA (#5)

Black Mass

I thought you were racist.

wudidiz  posted on  2011-02-13   17:25:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: wudidiz (#6)

I am.

But if I have a hornets nest to get rid of, I will not pass up on Black Flag pesticide just because of the word "black" is on the label.

OTOH, if they had a nigger advertising it, I'd find an alternative.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2011-02-13   17:29:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: PSUSA (#7)

Look how nice and neat and tidy my tagline is. Then look at yours. It's all big and messy and sloppy and reads like gobblydegook. Good heavens man, get a hold of yourself.

wudidiz  posted on  2011-02-13   17:31:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: wudidiz (#8)

But mine is 100% verifiable. All you need to do is pick up your holey bobble, blow the dust off the cover, open it up, and read it for yourself.

Yours, OTOH, is 100% unverifiable crap. You might as well say that the USS Enterprise fired photon torpedoes into the WTC bldgs.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2011-02-13   17:48:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: PSUSA, wudidiz (#9)

You might as well say that the USS Enterprise fired photon torpedoes into the WTC bldgs.

For you from the Wizard of Oz: I'd turn back if I were you:

Notice how the Tinman didn't vanish or shape-shift much into mismatched parts when he crashed, like the "9/11 Fantastic Four planes" did? Here's where you'll probably want to say something pseudo-scientific to explain that like they just didn't make metal for those particular flying machines like they used to.

http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=gSoEcRg5DcE

GreyLmist  posted on  2011-02-14   15:02:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: GreyLmist (#11)

Notice how the Tinman didn't vanish or shape-shift much into mismatched parts when he crashed, like the "9/11 Fantastic Four planes" did? Here's where you'll probably want to say something pseudo-scientific to explain that like they just didn't make metal for those particular flying machines like they used to.

I have no idea what you are trying to say, but when you crash at about about 400-500 mph, there isn't much left of the parts, either of the plane or of the people aboard. It would be pseudo-scientific of me if I claimed otherwise.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2011-02-14   15:25:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: PSUSA, GreyLmist (#12)

I have no idea what you are trying to say......

wudidiz  posted on  2011-02-14   16:19:23 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: wudidiz (#16)

Oh really!

A "real" plane would crash against the building, it's tail snap off, and fuel-filled wings explode on impact.

Let us examine this bit of bullshit.

1) a real plane did crash into the building.

2) Who says it's "tail" would snap off? Let's see if you or anyone else can give a reason why that would happen.

3) Fuel does not just immediately explode. It requires, REQUIRES, the proper fuel/air mixture in order to burn.

Come on, man! You can do better than that!

.

PSUSA  posted on  2011-02-14   16:26:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: PSUSA (#17)

Let us examine this bit of bullshit.

1) a real plane did crash into the building.

I disagree.

Why do you suppose there is no break in the building after the wing "entered" the wall?

wudidiz  posted on  2011-02-14   20:46:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: wudidiz (#18)

Why do you suppose there is no break in the building after the wing "entered" the wall?

Why are you basing that on a fuzzy pic, that may or may not be doctored (it doesn't matter), when I gave you 3 good reasons why that pic was wrong?

,

PSUSA  posted on  2011-02-15   6:32:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: PSUSA (#19)

An aluminum airplane wouldn't slide through steel and concrete like a hot knife through butter. At 400 mph, it would crumple on impact.

"Why would the government fake crashing planes into the WTC towers and thereby also having to fake all the crash videos when it would be much easier for them to crash real planes into them?"

wudidiz  posted on  2011-02-15   11:49:12 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: wudidiz (#20)

An aluminum airplane wouldn't slide through steel and concrete like a hot knife through butter. At 400 mph, it would crumple on impact.

I too find it hard to believe that an aluminum hull aircraft can neatly melt into a building the way we see in this depiction of UA 175 making the second WTC strike into the South Tower. Intuitively, many of us find the absolute lack of deformation in the aircraft and the preservation of the relationship of the major structural components of the throughout the duration of the impact shown hard to swallow. Really though, which one of us can say conclusively that what is depicted here is impossible?

What I find even more difficult to fathom however, is the NY television station video of the nose of the aircraft exiting the South Tower. I have held a radome from a smaller aircraft in my hands. I believe that it was made of a carbon fiber composite. The tip of an airliner is made of the same material. Although it is tough, it would not take much effort to irreparably damage a component like this with a ball peen hammer. Then there is the hull surrounding the cockpit. Like the rest of the aircraft fuselage, it is just an aluminum shell.

In the video you posted,wudidiz, we see the nose of the UA 175 melt into the south side of the building. In the following video we see it miraculously emerge out of the north face of WTC II:

I don't have time to engage in the "no planes" debate with anyone here. I'm throwing this in the hopper for you all to chew over. But I'll do so with a warning. You are all aware of how deep the rabbit hole is. I am very leery of presenting this kind of stuff to the uninitiated or even arguing this hypothesis with those that have been studying these events for the last ten years. It quickly gets too abstruse and the implications are just too wild for most folks to even contemplate. When I talk to those that hold conventional opinions regarding the contradictions in the reported facts of the events of 9/11 I just don't go there. Folks will have to dig this up for themselves, as far as I'm concerned.

Some interesting discussion here: "www.project.nsearch.com"

randge  posted on  2011-02-16   14:31:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: randge (#50)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2011-02-17   9:52:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: Eric Stratton (#57)

What they also need to include is the other angles

I think that they have crammed all the videos that I've seen of the second attack into this video where a simulation shows an airspeed of 581 mph (487 knots) just before impact:

Do you see the forward part of the aircraft exit the building in all of them?

The VMO or VNe, the maximum or never-exceed speed at sea level is 360 knots.(Impact is at 300 meters.) It's been suggested that the turbines will rebel at these speeds so close to the ground and start to act as a brake. Some have stated that you can't control a 767 at such altitudes over 220 mph. The g's in the dive depicted here would also be daunting for a pilot as is suggested in the video I've posted.

I can't of course vouch for all this, but I find this sort of speculation pretty hair-raising, Eric.

randge  posted on  2011-02-17   11:32:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: randge (#58)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2011-02-17   12:07:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 59.

        There are no replies to Comment # 59.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 59.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]