[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Big Daily News

What does public school do to children?

Guilty of Transphobia?

Elizabeth Warren has claimed, "Check my website. I don't take contributions from Big Pharma executives.

Walmart Is Preparing to Welcome Its Next Customer: The AI Shopping Agent

Mehdi Hasan debunks top 7 lies about Gaza

Why The Qataris Are Happy To Dump Their 747 On Trump

President Trumps New Diplomatic Agenda

White House Has Presented Iran With Written Nuke Deal Proposal In Huge First

I have NO words...

Elon Musk's tunneling robot

What's happening in Mexico is HORRIFYING and President Claudia Scheinbaum is in on it

RFK Jr TORCHES Big Pharma Libs In Congress "You Tried For 20 Years, I Did It In 100 Days"

Ed Martin Reveals J6 Pipe Bomber Probe Shakeup, Warns DOJ 'Much, Much Worse Than People Think'

"Rogue" Devices Found Hidden In Chinese Solar Panels Could "Destroy The Grid"

U.S. Deficit Hits $1.4 Trillion as China’s Surplus Climbs to $1.1 Trillion

Breakdown in classrooms Students using AI can’t read write or solve basic math

“Don’t you dare enforce the law!”

Can the Annual Theft of $521,000,000,000 From the Federal Budget Be Stopped?

Another conspiracy theory confirmed

This should infuriate every American

Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Nationwide Injunctions in Trump v. CASA

Older Employees Can’t Retire – FORCED to Work Minimum Wage

The Met Office is Unable to Name the Sites Providing Estimated Temperature Data For its 103 Non-Existent Stations

EPA Targets Engine Start-Stop Systems In Cars

Scientists find toxic metals linked to autism in popular toothpaste

FRAGMENTS OF HIV-AIDS VIRUS INSIDE COVID VACCINES.

Harvard Hammered: Feds Yank An Additional $450 Million In Grants

TOTAL WAR: TRUMP SHUTS DOWN THE IRS 45,000 AGENTS FIRED!

Netanyahu: Israel Will Finish War in Gaza, Drive Out 50% of Palestinians


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Ann Coulter said she thinks there should be more journalists put in jail (Republicans idea of Freedom)
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 13, 2011
Author: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/13
Post Date: 2011-02-13 14:57:50 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 405
Comments: 23

Ann Coulter said she thinks there should be more journalists put in jail during her appearance at the annual CPAC conference on Saturday.

Coulter's comments came during a response to a question from a woman in the audience. The woman initially asked Coulter why she and other Republicans had championed free elections in Iraq but were warning about them in Egypt.

"You don't go around disturbing countries where you have a loyal ally," Coulter responded.

"What is more important though to American values--being friends with israel still or knowing there are jailed dissidents and journalists [in Egypt]?" the woman asked.

"What do you mean knowing that there are jailed journalists?" Coulter said. "I think there should be more jailed journalists." This prompted a huge round of applause from the crowd.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 14.

#4. To: tom007 (#0)

Ann Coulter said she thinks there should be more journalists put in jail

Coulter is a big government Republican, not to mention an idiot. Her and big government Republicans like her appear to believe that the only journalists being arrested would be those that disagree with her political point of view. In reality those being arrested would depend upon which party is in power and whose ox is being gored.

A government that can arrest journalists in the way that she wants can arrest her and anyone else for saying things that those in power feel threaten the government in some way. She doesn't think there are liberals who would love to use this type of power to arrest her or Rush or Glenn Beck or Bill O'Reilly or (name your favorite Big government Republican here)? Like I said, she's an idiot.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2011-02-13   15:17:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#4)

Let's turn the question around: Is there anything, under any circumstances, that a reporter could say to the masses, that ought to result in sanctions?

Disclosure of classified information, that he knew was classified, and that he was the first person to disclose publicly?

Calling an election for a certain candidate, before the polls in that state are even closed, and even when the votes at the time tilt the other way?

Libel?

Disclosing private information, e.g. the name and address of a private citizen, who is acting as a whistleblower, witness, or watchdog?

Passing along incorrect information about guns, gun laws, or gun usage, that he has been repeatedly corrected upon before, but which he continues to misrepresent?

Dependence on an obviously fraudulent document to make charges against a public official, even after the authenticity of the document has been publicly questioned?

Or, instead, is there absolutely nothing whatsoever that a journalist could possibly ever do that should properly result in sanctions?

freeedom  posted on  2011-02-13   16:45:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 14.

#17. To: freeedom (#14)

Disclosure of classified information, that he knew was classified, and that he was the first person to disclose publicly?

I believe that the USSC has already answered this question in New York Times Co. v. United States.

Calling an election for a certain candidate, before the polls in that state are even closed, and even when the votes at the time tilt the other way?

Libel?

Disclosing private information, e.g. the name and address of a private citizen, who is acting as a whistleblower, witness, or watchdog?

Passing along incorrect information about guns, gun laws, or gun usage, that he has been repeatedly corrected upon before, but which he continues to misrepresent?

Dependence on an obviously fraudulent document to make charges against a public official, even after the authenticity of the document has been publicly questioned?

Sorry. I am of the opinion that people using the free market have the ability to hurt the companies the journalists work for much more than anything the government could do. We are already seeing that today with the decline of print news and it is due to just the type of stuff that you mention.

While it sounds good to jail journalists for doing and saying things you don't like, it will lead to abuse.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2011-02-13 17:25:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: freeedom, F.A. Hayek Fan (#14)

Or, instead, is there absolutely nothing whatsoever that a journalist could possibly ever do that should properly result in sanctions?

Only 2 cases should ever result in sanctions: Knowingly telling or propagating a known lie. And unless it results in loss of life it should only result in a financial penalty, but that can be up to and including all known assets, and a fine beyond that.

Otherwise it is the responsibility of the government to protect its own information. The most major leaks, the Pentagon Papers comes to mind, were planned disinformation operations. So, it should not be possible to prosecute a reporter for releasing classified information which was intentionally leaked.

And we already have laws against libel. We do not live, yet, in a Police State, although it is getting close, so we should not have Police State laws and prosecutions.

The other case which could or should involve sanctions is where releasing information endangers, knowingly, the life of another. Where no one died as a result the sanctions should be civil only. If loss of life resulted then "Book'im Danno".

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-02-13 18:42:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 14.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]