[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)

Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances

STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones

This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat

Cinnamon reduces fat

How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.

'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot

Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel

Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups

Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum

Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics

"I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox

The UK is F*CKED, and the people have had enough

No place for hate apeech

America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country

Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house.

Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC

Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES

Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: HOLDER: Whites Can’t Be Victims of Racial Injustice Because They Haven’t Suffered Enough
Source: Big Journalism
URL Source: http://bigjournalism.com/jburns/201 ... e-they-havent-suffered-enough/
Published: Mar 2, 2011
Author: Jonathon Burns
Post Date: 2011-03-02 13:09:17 by abraxas
Keywords: None
Views: 365
Comments: 32

As reported and applauded by Politico, Holder announced Tuesday that he was fed up with listening to whining whites who claim the justice department deliberately blocks investigations of black on white racism. Predictably, the Establishment media sides with Holder.

“Think about that,” Holder said. “When you compare what people endured in the South in the 60s to try to get the right to vote for African Americans, to compare what people subjected to that with what happened in Philadelphia, which was inappropriate .. .to describe it in those terms I think does a great disservice to people who put their lives on the line for my people,” said Holder, who is black.

Holder noted that his late sister-in-law, Vivian Malone Jones, helped integrate the University of Alabama.

“To compare that kind of courage, that kind of action, to say some Black Panther incident is of greater concern to us, historically, I think just flies in the face of history,” Holder said with evident exasperation.”

So the obvious takeaway from this is that some racism is worse than others. Some racist injustice is worthy of prosecution, other racism is not. Apparently, whites simply haven’t suffered enough. They don’t deserve legal protection. So, any injustices committed against white people should be swept under the rug. It’s not worth Eric Holder’s time.

One might be shocked by the statements. One might even wonder why the media chooses not to attack Holder for his patently racist statements. After all, were a white man to suggest this, his career would be over in a hail of media machine-gun fire. Reporters would fall over themselves to attack him, and his family would be ruthlessly attacked in the community. His kids would have to stay home from school (assuming their teachers weren’t on strike, anyway), and he’d get hate mail and death threats for decades.

But the Establishment Media’s lack of moral indignation isn’t surprising. In America, it’s blasphemous to even suggest that whites could be victims of racial injustice.

Whites are the permanent “oppressors” in the mainstream media narrative, while all other races are the permanent “victims.” In fact, “white” and “oppressor” are essentially synonymous — meaning: whites are the bad guys. All whites have been lumped together and typecast in a bad reality TV show. Because whites as a group do not have clean hands, therefore, they are denied the right of seeking justice.

If that isn’t stereotyping, I don’t know what is.

The larger issue, of course, is that “whites as racists” constitutes the fundamental lens through which Holder views issues in America. During the healthcare debate, Holder likened opposition of Obamacare to opposition to civil rights. Not civil rights in the sense that, “all Americans share civil rights,” mind you, but “Civil Rights” as in the struggle for black legal equality in America during the 40’s-60’s. Translation: those who oppose Obamacare are racists. Such language is naked race-baiting and scapegoating. But Holder doesn’t care. Whites are the bad guy bogeymen, trotted out when it gets tough to pass legislation. And his recent comments reveal his paradigm: white Americans are generally racist and any time they oppose any Obama policy or “injustice” at the hands of a racist group, they’re either being racists or they’re simply not entitled to equal protection because they haven’t suffered as much as other groups.

Nobody is seeking to belittle the suffering of other people, here, but America seeks equality. This means equal protection under the law, not equality in historical racial suffering.

Holder’s statements are completely sadistic, and they betray his motives. He has a score to settle, and by his figure whites have a lot more suffering to endure before they have a right to expect justice from the “Justice Department.” Satisfying vendettas is for Mob Bosses, not the US Attorney General’s Office.

The Establishment media’s silence regarding his racist statements demonstrates agreement and approval. Such hypocrisy. Such shame. Such racism.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 18.

#5. To: abraxas (#0)

“To compare that kind of courage, that kind of action, to say some Black Panther incident is of greater concern to us, historically, I think just flies in the face of history,” Holder said with evident exasperation.

Well he's right.

And seriously, what's in it for him? Whites don't take it seriously, so why should he?

NO ONE would reward him. It's utterly ridiculous to expect him to do something for whites that they won't do for themselves.

Blacks are another matter.

Holder makes absolute sense, if he is simply assuming white supremacy, which a lot of whites and even more blacks do.

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2011-03-02   13:26:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#5)

Well he's right.

Holder makes absolute sense, if he is simply assuming white supremacy

About a COMPLETE DIVERSION from the issue:

"Holder announced Tuesday that he was fed up with listening to whining whites who claim the justice department deliberately blocks investigations of black on white racism"

The salient issue is that HIS department is blocking investigations into black on white racism. Holder is excusing himself for racial profiling in regards to the justice department. So much for equal under the law........

abraxas  posted on  2011-03-02   13:35:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: abraxas (#9)

Why would anyone want equal treatment? In fact, it's impossible, and a religious crusade for it of course leads to nonsense.

Anti-whites love hearing whites complain about unequal treatment. Such whites are well and truly beaten. It's good porn for Jews, exceeded only by Tarantino movies.

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2011-03-02   13:42:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#11) (Edited)

Why would anyone want equal treatment?

Er, that is the premise of INDIVIDUAL rights, PV. That's the premise our representative republic is founded upon.

Actually, you see a lot of what is termed "reverse racism" these days.....and you will see more as whites move to more minority status. However, this PC notion of "multi-culturism" really doesn't fly if whites are simply delegated to a status detested by minorities who fought for equal rights.

It was equal protection and treatment under the law that altered minority mistreatment. The premise had already been established, yet not applied. So, now it's okay to not apply it to whitie?

PS: This is why hate crime legislation should be abolished. It doesn't apply equally and it claims that a victim of racism is worth more punishment than non-racist victims of crime.......no equal protection and treatment.

abraxas  posted on  2011-03-02   13:48:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: abraxas (#12)

That's the premise our representative republic is founded upon.

Yeah yeah, life, liberty, property and all that.

That has NOTHING to do with the franchise. The framers restricted THAT to property-owning white men, and the first naturalization law restricted citizenship to whites.

Equal treatment? You can sometimes get that in a prison. And even slaves had freedom of speech.

I don't want equal treatment.

I want GOOD treatment.

Equal treatment makes sense when people agree on what good treatment is.

And if racial equality before the law is to be held a principle, then obviously the law should be restricted to those areas where the races ARE equal.

I don't care that whites are treated differently by the law.

I care that they are treated badly.

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2011-03-02   14:03:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#14)

Equal treatment? You can sometimes get that in a prison. And even slaves had freedom of speech.

I don't want equal treatment.

I care that they are treated badly.

I am referring to equal treatment UNDER THE LAW as is the duty of Holder and the Justice Dept. to advocate.

You certainly do want equal treatment under the law and equal protection as well. We aren't talking about the average joe treating another average joe equally. We are talking about equal treatment in the COURT SYSTEM. So, if I can be charged FOR a hate crime against a minority, then I should garner prosecution for the same if I am a victim under the law.

Well, under Holder, Whites DO NOT have or even merit equal protection under the law. That's been my point all along. Hence, Whitie is treated badly for daring to insist upon equal treatment under the law.

abraxas  posted on  2011-03-02   14:14:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: abraxas (#16)

I am referring to equal treatment UNDER THE LAW as is the duty of Holder and the Justice Dept. to advocate.

So am I, and I don't agree he has that duty, since the law covers many areas where the races aren't equal.

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2011-03-02   14:22:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 18.

#20. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#18)

So am I, and I don't agree he has that duty, since the law covers many areas where the races aren't equal.

One nation, distribution of races in various areas is irrelevant when the law is supposed to be applied from coast to coast. Races are rarely equally distributed. Moot point.

What is Holder's duty as the head of the Justice Department? Is it to apply the law in a variety of ways depending on the racial distribution of various areas from coast to coast?

abraxas  posted on  2011-03-02 14:26:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Prefrontal Vortex, abraxas (#18)

I am referring to equal treatment UNDER THE LAW as is the duty of Holder and the Justice Dept. to advocate.

So am I, and I don't agree he has that duty, since the law covers many areas where the races aren't equal.

Again you miss the point. Equality before the law is not an equation of social or even intellectual equality but an equality of rights, and a presumption that ALL deserve fair and just treatment regardless of any real world differences.

That holds true as much for a white moron as a black genius.

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-03-02 14:27:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 18.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]