See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: HOLDER: Whites Can’t Be Victims of Racial Injustice Because They Haven’t Suffered Enough
Source:
Big Journalism
URL Source: http://bigjournalism.com/jburns/201 ... e-they-havent-suffered-enough/
Published: Mar 2, 2011
Author: Jonathon Burns
Post Date: 2011-03-02 13:09:17 by abraxas
Keywords: None
Views: 370
Comments: 32
As reported and applauded by Politico, Holder announced Tuesday that he was fed up with listening to whining whites who claim the justice department deliberately blocks investigations of black on white racism. Predictably, the Establishment media sides with Holder. “Think about that,” Holder said. “When you compare what people endured in the South in the 60s to try to get the right to vote for African Americans, to compare what people subjected to that with what happened in Philadelphia, which was inappropriate .. .to describe it in those terms I think does a great disservice to people who put their lives on the line for my people,” said Holder, who is black. Holder noted that his late sister-in-law, Vivian Malone Jones, helped integrate the University of Alabama. “To compare that kind of courage, that kind of action, to say some Black Panther incident is of greater concern to us, historically, I think just flies in the face of history,” Holder said with evident exasperation.” So the obvious takeaway from this is that some racism is worse than others. Some racist injustice is worthy of prosecution, other racism is not. Apparently, whites simply haven’t suffered enough. They don’t deserve legal protection. So, any injustices committed against white people should be swept under the rug. It’s not worth Eric Holder’s time. One might be shocked by the statements. One might even wonder why the media chooses not to attack Holder for his patently racist statements. After all, were a white man to suggest this, his career would be over in a hail of media machine-gun fire. Reporters would fall over themselves to attack him, and his family would be ruthlessly attacked in the community. His kids would have to stay home from school (assuming their teachers weren’t on strike, anyway), and he’d get hate mail and death threats for decades. But the Establishment Media’s lack of moral indignation isn’t surprising. In America, it’s blasphemous to even suggest that whites could be victims of racial injustice. Whites are the permanent “oppressors” in the mainstream media narrative, while all other races are the permanent “victims.” In fact, “white” and “oppressor” are essentially synonymous — meaning: whites are the bad guys. All whites have been lumped together and typecast in a bad reality TV show. Because whites as a group do not have clean hands, therefore, they are denied the right of seeking justice. If that isn’t stereotyping, I don’t know what is. The larger issue, of course, is that “whites as racists” constitutes the fundamental lens through which Holder views issues in America. During the healthcare debate, Holder likened opposition of Obamacare to opposition to civil rights. Not civil rights in the sense that, “all Americans share civil rights,” mind you, but “Civil Rights” as in the struggle for black legal equality in America during the 40’s-60’s. Translation: those who oppose Obamacare are racists. Such language is naked race-baiting and scapegoating. But Holder doesn’t care. Whites are the bad guy bogeymen, trotted out when it gets tough to pass legislation. And his recent comments reveal his paradigm: white Americans are generally racist and any time they oppose any Obama policy or “injustice” at the hands of a racist group, they’re either being racists or they’re simply not entitled to equal protection because they haven’t suffered as much as other groups. Nobody is seeking to belittle the suffering of other people, here, but America seeks equality. This means equal protection under the law, not equality in historical racial suffering. Holder’s statements are completely sadistic, and they betray his motives. He has a score to settle, and by his figure whites have a lot more suffering to endure before they have a right to expect justice from the “Justice Department.” Satisfying vendettas is for Mob Bosses, not the US Attorney General’s Office. The Establishment media’s silence regarding his racist statements demonstrates agreement and approval. Such hypocrisy. Such shame. Such racism.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: abraxas, *Paging Ray Ciss* (#0)
If only we had picked our own damn cotton, or hired Mexicans to do it, then holder and the rest of the niggers would still be living in mud huts, dodging lions, eating rotting and fermenting fruit, bathing in cow urine, shrinking heads, dining on "long pig", and spearing carp. Niggers are so ungrateful. .
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files
ruin everything, including sig lines.
#2. To: abraxas (#0)
You be white. You can'ts say that it be raycis'.
#3. To: abraxas (#0)
Seriously though this is just part of the model of keeping the Proles divided into warring camps. Divide and conquer. Keep everybody resentful of everybody else and nobody ever gets together to oppose the bastards, mostly white, who are creating all of the problems for everyone else.
#4. To: Original_Intent (#3)
Yep, the only approved area for blacks and whites to unite is to join hands against antisemitism or go to jail together for refusal to comply.
Keep everybody resentful of everybody else and nobody ever gets together to oppose the bastards, mostly white, who are creating all of the problems for everyone else.
" If you cannot govern yourself, you will be governed by assholes. " Randge, Poet de Forum, 1/11/11
#5. To: abraxas (#0)
Well he's right. And seriously, what's in it for him? Whites don't take it seriously, so why should he? NO ONE would reward him. It's utterly ridiculous to expect him to do something for whites that they won't do for themselves. Blacks are another matter. Holder makes absolute sense, if he is simply assuming white supremacy, which a lot of whites and even more blacks do.
“To compare that kind of courage, that kind of action, to say some Black Panther incident is of greater concern to us, historically, I think just flies in the face of history,” Holder said with evident exasperation.
If the Jews are bloodsuckers, anti-racism is the anti-coagulant.
#6. To: abraxas (#4)
Yep, the only approved area for blacks and whites to unite is to join hands against antisemitism or go to jail together for refusal to comply. LOL! /Sardonic Laugh That is about it. Otherwise the objective is to continue the dumbing down and collapsing the society into Neo Feudalism.
Keep everybody resentful of everybody else and nobody ever gets together to oppose the bastards, mostly white, who are creating all of the problems for everyone else.
#7. To: abraxas (#0)
Actually it's not hypocrisy. And if you're not a racist, you're anti-white.
Such hypocrisy. Such shame. Such racism.
If the Jews are bloodsuckers, anti-racism is the anti-coagulant.
#8. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#7)
And if you are you are Psychoceramic.
And if you're not a racist, you're anti-white.
#9. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#5)
Holder makes absolute sense, if he is simply assuming white supremacy About a COMPLETE DIVERSION from the issue: "Holder announced Tuesday that he was fed up with listening to whining whites who claim the justice department deliberately blocks investigations of black on white racism" The salient issue is that HIS department is blocking investigations into black on white racism. Holder is excusing himself for racial profiling in regards to the justice department. So much for equal under the law........
Well he's right.
" If you cannot govern yourself, you will be governed by assholes. " Randge, Poet de Forum, 1/11/11
#10. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#5)
That is what he is doing. He knows blacks are inferior to whites, so they need an edge. The only way they can beat us is with a stacked and marked deck, and a shady dealer running the game. And even then, they can only beat those whites that are stupid enough and choose to play that game. .
Holder makes absolute sense, if he is simply assuming white supremacy, which a lot of whites and even more blacks do.
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files
ruin everything, including sig lines.
#11. To: abraxas (#9)
Why would anyone want equal treatment? In fact, it's impossible, and a religious crusade for it of course leads to nonsense. Anti-whites love hearing whites complain about unequal treatment. Such whites are well and truly beaten. It's good porn for Jews, exceeded only by Tarantino movies.
If the Jews are bloodsuckers, anti-racism is the anti-coagulant.
#12. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#11) (Edited)
Er, that is the premise of INDIVIDUAL rights, PV. That's the premise our representative republic is founded upon. Actually, you see a lot of what is termed "reverse racism" these days.....and you will see more as whites move to more minority status. However, this PC notion of "multi-culturism" really doesn't fly if whites are simply delegated to a status detested by minorities who fought for equal rights. It was equal protection and treatment under the law that altered minority mistreatment. The premise had already been established, yet not applied. So, now it's okay to not apply it to whitie? PS: This is why hate crime legislation should be abolished. It doesn't apply equally and it claims that a victim of racism is worth more punishment than non-racist victims of crime.......no equal protection and treatment.
Why would anyone want equal treatment?
" If you cannot govern yourself, you will be governed by assholes. " Randge, Poet de Forum, 1/11/11
#13. To: all (#0)
In the interest of staying on topic, the above behaviour would not be tolerated by whites, nor would the Holder comment, had it been made by a white. There is a dual standard of racial discrimination in America and Whitey is at the back of the bus. Just saying...
#14. To: abraxas (#12)
Yeah yeah, life, liberty, property and all that. That has NOTHING to do with the franchise. The framers restricted THAT to property-owning white men, and the first naturalization law restricted citizenship to whites. Equal treatment? You can sometimes get that in a prison. And even slaves had freedom of speech. I don't want equal treatment. I want GOOD treatment. Equal treatment makes sense when people agree on what good treatment is. And if racial equality before the law is to be held a principle, then obviously the law should be restricted to those areas where the races ARE equal. I don't care that whites are treated differently by the law. I care that they are treated badly.
That's the premise our representative republic is founded upon.
If the Jews are bloodsuckers, anti-racism is the anti-coagulant.
#15. To: Prefrontal Vortex, abraxas (#14)
Equality before the law simply means that the law considers such things as race, social status, and wealth irrelevant. What is, and should be the only thing but sadly is not, being judged are facts and actions. In such a court then judgement is rendered based upon what someone did or did not do. Nothing more, nothing less. Skin color, parentage, place of origin, religion, and other matters related have no place in a court of law, but unfortunately we do not have a justice system we have a legal system and one which is heavily influenced by political concerns and other hidden agendas. However, as long as you remain hung up and fixated on irrelevancies, such as race, I imagine that will continue to elude you.
#16. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#14)
I don't want equal treatment. I care that they are treated badly. I am referring to equal treatment UNDER THE LAW as is the duty of Holder and the Justice Dept. to advocate. You certainly do want equal treatment under the law and equal protection as well. We aren't talking about the average joe treating another average joe equally. We are talking about equal treatment in the COURT SYSTEM. So, if I can be charged FOR a hate crime against a minority, then I should garner prosecution for the same if I am a victim under the law. Well, under Holder, Whites DO NOT have or even merit equal protection under the law. That's been my point all along. Hence, Whitie is treated badly for daring to insist upon equal treatment under the law.
Equal treatment? You can sometimes get that in a prison. And even slaves had freedom of speech.
" If you cannot govern yourself, you will be governed by assholes. " Randge, Poet de Forum, 1/11/11
#17. To: abraxas (#0)
Ahistorical nonsense. Blacks already had the right to vote and black males long before any females of all races in this country. Blacks wanted to call it "racist" if they let their voter registrations expire and tried to vote anyway. They wanted to call it "racist" if they had to pay a poll tax like whites and others or pass a literacy test the same as non-blacks. They wanted to redefine the right to free association by choice, not coercion, in business and socially, etc, as "racist". That's the more accurate account of the "Civil Rights Movement".
Holder said. “When you compare what people endured in the South in the 60s to try to get the right to vote for African Americans
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#18. To: abraxas (#16)
So am I, and I don't agree he has that duty, since the law covers many areas where the races aren't equal.
I am referring to equal treatment UNDER THE LAW as is the duty of Holder and the Justice Dept. to advocate.
If the Jews are bloodsuckers, anti-racism is the anti-coagulant.
#19. To: GreyLmist, abraxas (#17) (Edited)
The problem with a lot of those requirements though, although administered fairly I regard them as valid, is that they were not, in some locales, conducted fairly and were used as a device to exclude some from exercising the Franchise. Were they administered fairly with all given the same test I see nothing wrong with requiring literacy and knowledge of how the government is supposed to work. In fact I very strongly advocate a neutral written examination on American History and Civics (which would at the same time test literacy).
#20. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#18)
One nation, distribution of races in various areas is irrelevant when the law is supposed to be applied from coast to coast. Races are rarely equally distributed. Moot point. What is Holder's duty as the head of the Justice Department? Is it to apply the law in a variety of ways depending on the racial distribution of various areas from coast to coast?
So am I, and I don't agree he has that duty, since the law covers many areas where the races aren't equal.
" If you cannot govern yourself, you will be governed by assholes. " Randge, Poet de Forum, 1/11/11
#21. To: Prefrontal Vortex, abraxas (#18)
So am I, and I don't agree he has that duty, since the law covers many areas where the races aren't equal. Again you miss the point. Equality before the law is not an equation of social or even intellectual equality but an equality of rights, and a presumption that ALL deserve fair and just treatment regardless of any real world differences. That holds true as much for a white moron as a black genius.
I am referring to equal treatment UNDER THE LAW as is the duty of Holder and the Justice Dept. to advocate.
#22. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#14)
That has NOTHING to do with the franchise. The framers restricted THAT to property-owning white men, and the first naturalization law restricted citizenship to whites. They weren't trying to be the UN, just govern themselves and their own. How dare they? Is there another country you can point to as a better role model at that time?
Yeah yeah, life, liberty, property and all that.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#23. To: GreyLmist (#22)
:)
If the Jews are bloodsuckers, anti-racism is the anti-coagulant.
#24. To: abraxas (#0)
I'm suffered! O Lord how I've suffered! *Sob*
"If ever this vast country is brought under a single government, it will be one of the most extensive corruption, indifferent and incapable of a wholesome care over so wide a spread of surface. This will not be borne, and you will have to choose between reform and revolution. If I know the spirit of this country, the one or the other is inevitable." - Thomas Jefferson
#25. To: Turtle (#24) (Edited)
Turtles have the unalienable right to be the main ingredient in turtle soup. : ) Insufferable Turtle!! lol
I'm suffered! O Lord how I've suffered! *Sob*
" If you cannot govern yourself, you will be governed by assholes. " Randge, Poet de Forum, 1/11/11
#26. To: abraxas (#0)
Change the whites in the title to jews and then all hell would break lose by the establishment.
God is always good!
#27. To: Jethro Tull (#13)
And that's how Holder and his monkey, or buckwheat and HIS monkey, want it. Whichever term you choose there's monkeys among us monkeying with our constitution.
There is a dual standard of racial discrimination in America and Whitey is at the back of the bus. Just saying...
#28. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#14)
How would it fly if Holder were white and speaking of "my people"? I suspect, like a lead balloon.
"I think does a great disservice to people who put their lives on the line for my people."
" If you cannot govern yourself, you will be governed by assholes. " Randge, Poet de Forum, 1/11/11
#29. To: Original_Intent (#19) (Edited)
The poor were disadvantaged, regardless of race. Blacks in urban districts likely had far less transportation difficulty to renew their voter registrations on time than poor whites up an Appalachian mountain, for instance. Blacks had thriving businesses and schools that performed better before integration than they do now. Presumptions that they had some staggering ratio imbalance in comparative poverty levels and academically are mythical, not fact-based. I strongly advocate, too, a Civics Literacy test for voting and so did Tom Tancredo but Rachel Maddow pilloried him for it on her show because she's not able to distinguish the difference in Literacy Testing and Civics Literacy Testing. [Edit to add: Compared him and his audience to the Klan.] So, I also strongly advocate that our airwaves should not be wantonly polluted by such substandard "journalistic" influences trying to sway American voters with their irresponsible and idiotic fit-dances. No license for their networks, I say.
The problem with a lot of those requirements though, although administered fairly I regard them as valid, is that they were not, in some locales, conducted fairly and were used as a device to exclude some from exercising the Franchise. Were they administered I see nothing wrong with requiring literacy and knowledge of how the government is supposed to work. In fact I very strongly advocate a neutral written examination on American History and Civics (which would at the same time test literacy).
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#30. To: Jethro Tull, 4 (#13)
Some here say this is a 'divide and conquer' tactic. I say it is simple appeasement. What our .gov seems to value above everything else is stability. They have no problems in giving certain groups special rights and money, if it keeps the bongo parties and chimp-outs to a bare minimum. After all, they are not giving away their money, oh no they will never do that, they are giving away our money. And special rights are a legislative deal, or sometimes it's the judiciary, so that costs them nothing too. Then there is the MSM which is in on it, when they ignore black on white crime and the kikes shenanigans here and in israhell. They don't want to rock the boat either, especially the kikes that are the owners of the media. Stability means they can all make $$$. That is all they care about. Too bad that they killed the goose that laid the golden egg. .
There is a dual standard of racial discrimination in America and Whitey is at the back of the bus. Just saying...
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files
ruin everything, including sig lines.
#31. To: abraxas (#0)
Well yeah, to Holder that would "fly in the face of history" because he, like his boss, the Kenyan, is a racist pig. Neither of them give a $#it about whitey or what happens to white people.
“To compare that kind of courage, that kind of action, to say some Black Panther incident is of greater concern to us, historically, I think just flies in the face of history,” Holder said with evident exasperation.”
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton
He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace
#32. To: PSUSA (#1)
Notice how they are forever carping about being mistreated here in America, but it's never enough mistreatment to drive them back to Africa where there's NO welfare or minority set-asides (??) in any government budget on that wretched continent.
Niggers are so ungrateful.
__________________________________________________________
"This man is Jesus,” shouted one man, spilling his Guinness as Barack Obama began his inaugural address. “When will he come to Kenya to save us?"
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest