See other Religion Articles
Title: 1st Amendment protects military funeral protesters - 'WRATH OF GOD POURING OUT ON THIS LAND" -
Source:
AP
URL Source: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie ... AULT&CTIME=2011-03-02-10-27-23
Published: Mar 2, 2011
Author: By MARK SHERMAN
Post Date: 2011-03-02 14:45:36 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Keywords: None
Views: 269
Comments: 5
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the First Amendment protects fundamentalist church members who mount anti-gay protests outside military funerals, despite the pain they cause grieving families. The court voted 8-1 in favor of the Westboro Baptist Church of Topeka, Kan. The decision upheld an appeals court ruling that threw out a $5 million judgment to the father of a dead Marine who sued church members after they picketed his son's funeral. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion for the court. Justice Samuel Alito dissented. Roberts said free speech rights in the First Amendment shield the funeral protesters, noting that they obeyed police directions and were 1,000 feet from the church. "Speech is powerful. It can stir people to action, move them to tears of both joy and sorrow, and - as it did here - inflict great pain. On the facts before us, we cannot react to that pain by punishing the speaker," Roberts said. "As a nation we have chosen a different course - to protect even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate." Alito strongly disagreed. "Our profound national commitment to free and open debate is not a license for the vicious verbal assault that occurred in this case," he said. Matthew Snyder died in Iraq in 2006 and his body was returned to the United States for burial. Members of the Westboro Baptist Church, who have picketed military funerals for several years, decided to protest outside the Westminster, Md., church where his funeral was to be held. The Rev. Fred Phelps and his family members who make up most of the Westboro Baptist Church have picketed many military funerals in their quest to draw attention to their incendiary view that U.S. deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq are God's punishment for the nation's tolerance of homosexuality. They showed up with their usual signs, including "Thank God for dead soldiers," "You're Going to Hell," "God Hates the USA/Thank God for 9/11," and one that combined the U.S. Marine Corps motto, Semper Fi, with a slur against gay men. The church members drew counter-demonstrators, as well as media coverage and a heavy police presence to maintain order. The result was a spectacle that led to altering the route of the funeral procession. Several weeks later, Albert Snyder was surfing the Internet for tributes to his son from other soldiers and strangers when he came upon a poem on the church's website that attacked Matthew's parents for the way they brought up their son. Soon after, Snyder filed a lawsuit accusing the Phelpses of intentionally inflicting emotional distress. He won $11 million at trial, later reduced by a judge to $5 million. The federal appeals court in Richmond, Va., threw out the verdict and said the Constitution shielded the church members from liability. Forty-eight states, 42 U.S. senators and veterans groups sided with Snyder, asking the court to shield funerals from the Phelps family's "psychological terrorism." While distancing themselves from the church's message, media organizations, including The Associated Press, urged the court to side with the Phelps family because of concerns that a victory for Snyder could erode speech rights. Roberts described the court's holding as narrow, and in a separate opinion, Justice Stephen Breyer suggested in other circumstances, governments would not be "powerless to provide private individuals with necessary protection." But in this case, Breyer said, it would be wrong to "punish Westboro for seeking to communicate its views on matters of public concern." Margie Phelps, a daughter of the minister and a lawyer who argued the case at the Supreme Court, said she expected the outcome. "The only surprise is that Justice Alito did not feel compelled to follow his oath," Phelps said. "We read the law. We follow the law. The only way for a different ruling is to shred the First Amendment." She also offered her church's view of the decision. "I think it's pretty self-explanatory, but here's the core point: The wrath of God is pouring onto this land. Rather than trying to shut us up, use your platforms to tell this nation to mourn for your sins."
1st Amendment protects military funeral protesters
"I think it's pretty self-explanatory, but here's the core point: The wrath of God is pouring onto this land. Rather than trying to shut us up, use your platforms to tell this nation to mourn for your sins."
In this Oct. 6, 2010 file photo, Margie Phelps, second from right, a daughter of Fred Phelps, and the lawyer who argued the case for of the Westboro Baptist Church, of Tokepa Kan., walks from the Supreme Court, in Washington. The Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment protects fundamentalist church members who mount attention-getting, anti-gay protests outside military funerals. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, File)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)
Good decision. While the church is loopie, they have that right.
Somewhere in Kenya, a village is missing its idiot.
=================================== What is even more sad is that our troops are dying in countries that hate them while their own is being overrun by Mexico.
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
Funerals need to be private matters, not open to the public. Services can be closed to the public. Funerals are displays only for the living. The dead have better things to do. I don't plan to have a funeral. Big affairs glorifying death and military service to the bankers need to end, imo.
i have always defended this group's right. i'm amazed how many so-called patriots claim to defend liberty yet cry ' this fringe church must be stopped!' total nonsense.i interviewed these folks 3 yrs ago. they were very nice & made more sense than critics
"if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." 1 Cor 12:31—13:13 Bill Orely agrees with you 100%. http://video.foxnews.com/v/4565312/crash-victim-opens- fire-on-first-responders/?playlist_id=86856#/v/4565205/film-reveals-horrifying- faces-of-drug-abuse/?playlist_id=87485 he is very upset that people can dare to have free speech,. Oreily says that children will commit suicide because of this ruling. ''offensive'' speech should not be allowed in MURIKA. the government needs to REGULATE ALL POTENTIALLY ''FRINGE' OR OFFENSIVE speech. right? ha ha. What a freakin pathetic joke.
"if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." 1 Cor 12:31—13:13
#2. To: Lod (#1)
While the church is loopie, they have that right.
#3. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)
#4. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM, lod (#2)
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
#5. To: ratcat (#3)
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest