- Cold weather is not climate
- The US occupies a tiny fraction of the earth’s surface
- Hot weather in Moscow is representative of the planet
- If the present refuses to get warmer, adjust it upwards
- If the present refuses to get warmer, the past must become cooler
- GISS can always squeeze an extra 0.01 degrees out when marketing needs it
- Cold is just another manifestation of heat
- Whatever the weather is, the climate models predicted it
- Government funding is pure. Imaginary oil money is dirty
- All coral atolls were exactly 130 meters above sea level at the end of the last ice age, and are about to drown now
- Sea level is rising dramatically – somewhere else
- Temperatures are rising dramatically – somewhere else
- Global warming selectively targets the poor
- The weather is much more extreme now than it was before 24 hour cable news service started
- When CO2 hits XXX ppm, the poop is really going to hit the fan
See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: Important Laws Of Climate Change
Source:
Real Science
URL Source: https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com ... ortant-laws-of-climate-change/
Published: Mar 3, 2011
Author: Steven Goddard
Post Date: 2011-03-03 15:57:14 by Original_Intent
Keywords: Glowbull, Global, Worming, Warming
Views: 63
Comments: 2
Important Laws Of Climate Change
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Be the first to like this post.
(24 images)23 Responses to Important Laws Of Climate Change
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: farmfriend, christine, CadetD, wudidiz, TwentyTwelve, Lod, All (#0)
Glowbull Worming Ping
Hilarious!! But, you still shouldn't breathe very much.
#2. To: Original_Intent (#1)
Glowbull Worming Ping
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Research is only valid if we (pro-agw) agree with it.
Only stupid people don’t believe what we say.
..climate science does not have to be falsified
That is the beauty of Climate Science, It can not be unless it does not promote a future catastrophe. In that case it is done wrong by non qualified shills for “BIG Oil”
March 2, 2011 at 12:54 pm
‘When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’
March 2, 2011 at 12:59 pm
But tomorrow it may mean something else!
“Records began” a couple of hindred years ago – before then, weather and climate didn’t exist, therefore any extremes were irrelevant…
The science is always settled regardless of how many times we change the underpinning science.
You only think it has changed!
It is the same science developed over 100 years ago. It was misrepresented by the “Well Funded” sceptics that spend 1 dollar to our 1,00 dollars on propaganda!
Someone (else) has to change their behavior to avoid the end of Gaia!
Snow is caused by someone driving an SUV
The Sun and water vapor are minor players in the climate
Mankind caused the warm periods in the past just by existing
When a Team Study is refuted, hurry out another study using “independant” methods that show the first study got the correct answer in spite of being flawed.
It was not “Really” refuted because the “Refuters” did not understand what they were looking at! If you are not part of the “IN- Crowd” you do not have the encryption key that allows deciphering the Al-Gore-Rhythm!
Even though it is not warming, this is evidence that we are almost at a tipping point, after which it will be really bad.
Another rule is that the 193082;s Dust Bowl never happened. It was all a figment of John Steinbeck’s imagination. Summers are much hotter now than then.
And the MWP was local….well maybe regional..at best.
Anyway, we must get rid of the MWP so the simpletons don’t misunderstand that it never happened.
Another rule, or an addendum to another one:
Coral atolls no longer grow like they did before man disrupted the climate, globally.
Another climate science law. Satellite data is far more accurate than the crude thermometers used during the Stone Age times prior to 1979. We had little or no ability to measure the temperature prior to 1979, so all that data should be either adjusted or thrown out.
Also thermometers along runways and it the path of jet exhaust are the most accurate thermometers.
Another law. Since 1979 was the coldest year in recent history, that is the benchmark that we use to “prove” warming. If it’s warmer than the coldest year on record, there must be warming.
1) Historians are not climatologists, and thus must be treated as merely providing anecdotal evidence when they make claims of, say, five wheat growing seasons in Egypt during the Roman Climate Optimum. Or discussing the ranges of wheat-growing versus rye-growing during the Medieval Warm Period. Or, hell, naming the periods.
2) It’s easier to believe that a “scientist” in 1900 with a bog-standard mercury thermometer was simply too incompetent to read the instrument to within 300% of the calibrated markings than it is to believe that pavement, barbeque, or perhaps jet exhaust might have anything to do with discrepancies between raw surface temperature data and satellite data.
As usual you have missed the point. Even though those ‘laws’ are amusing and mostly true, you failed to add our most important ‘law’; No matter what happens in climate, we have said all along that is what may happen, and it is not inconsistant with AWG.
We have always said all along this was our most important ‘law’, really all the others just point to this one anyway. Quit mischaracterizing us climate scientists as we have known all along you would.
Hot is hot and so is cold, but only when we say so.
The poor are most affected. So give us your money; we’ll take it to them. Honest.
Soon there will be a crisis. We can avoid this by having the crisis before it gets here.
If we like what you say, you’re an expert, even if you’re really just a horny sex poodle.
The frequency and magnitude of ALL catestrophic natural disasters (such as Hurricanes, droughts, floods, earthquakes, volcanos, meteor strikes, etc.), and the resultant death/destruction/misery caused is increasing and is ALL due to Man Made Global Warming.
This differs from the Principle of the Fault of Global Warming which states that: “Any negitive change to any Environmental, Socio-Economic, or Geo-political system or sub-system can be ascribed to Man Made Global Warming, with a peer reviewed paper as proof (or at least an article in a mountian climbing magazine ).”
Any “study” that presumes that there is AGW is proof of AGW.
-Namoi Oresckes
Even though AGW is probably bunk we must act because we’d be doing the right thing for the environment
-Pick any Warmist
Humanity is not part of nature. Therefore anything man does is detrimental to nature somehow.
Heads I win. Tails you lose. I’m mean it’s cold outside because it is warming.
Sub-zero temperatures are conducive to a lot of ice melting.
Poster Comment: I included the comments because I thought they added nicely to the piece.