He sure makes it hard to like him or trust him when he "Charlie Sheens" ... I have often wondered if he were on more than coffee.
He certainly knows what the elements of cointelpro are, what the intended consequences of cointelpro are and on that particular day he definitely conducted himself in an unfortunate fashion that has deservedly reduced his effectiveness.
Leaderless resistance is the solution. Placing "trust" in any one individual lessens the overall strength of the grass roots effort to educate the people at large and demand a restoration of our unsupervised liberty.
Somehow we must overcome pettiness. Somehow we must find the strength to stand alone when necessary or with like minded individuals when possible and in effect "JUST SAY NO" to everything "FEDERAL" or UNCONSTITUTIONAL starting with the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM and its subsidiary the U.S. Govt.
We don't need Alex Jones to resist the FEDS. Alex Jones becomes a distraction that allows you to point the finger at him as having fallen short of the mark, when the truth is it is you that's falling short everytime you compromise with the filth running America.
When you KNOW that the banking elite are controlling the wars around the world through their political puppets and yet continue to maintain a relationship with any bank you're a hypocrite ... whatever Alex Jones is doesn't matter until each one of us decides to live our own lives commensurate with our beliefs despite the antics of the Alex Jones' of the world.
Man up, steel yourself against the real enemy, the little pussy residing deep down inside that makes you rationalize the compromises you make with the same system and people you claim to despise.
Jones' fate and his behavior are irrelevant to our freedom. Jones is not responsible for me, I am.
Leaderless resistance is the solution. Placing "trust" in any one individual lessens the overall strength of the grass roots effort to educate the people at large and demand a restoration of our unsupervised liberty.
I agree however this does not prevent us from becoming leaders ourselves.
Leaderless resistance is the solution. Placing "trust" in any one individual lessens the overall strength of the grass roots effort to educate the people at large and demand a restoration of our unsupervised liberty.
I agree however this does not prevent us from becoming leaders ourselves.
On one level, that of the individual, "leaderless resistance" is fine. Each of us can do what we can, no matter how small, to fight back. However, to take on a large well organized group, which is what we are facing, you need a large well organized group. There IS strength in numbers. That is why the Tea Party scared the shit out of them so much that they had to infiltrate it and take it over. The key is to prevent that, but that has its drawbacks too, because then the leadership gets targeted.
That is why the Tea Party scared the shit out of them so much that they had to infiltrate it and take it over.
Partly why I'm back to working with the grange. If the tea party took over the grange it would be impossible for a few infiltrators to change what they do. The hard part is convincing the tea partiers of this.
One of the Tea Party's strengths is also one of its weaknesses. They are a diverse coalition which has brought a lot of people together, but you have a mix of NeoCons, ZioCon Fundamentalists, and Libertarians. So, they are not going to agree on all of the key issues. And the focus on being fiscally conservative is fine but the ultimate problem is the people who pull the strings which result in the policies that make that a problem. You have to go for the root not the symptom.