Title: Pyramids in China - The "White Pyramid" discovered! Source:
YouTube URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Alj3xspWTsw Published:Apr 16, 2008 Author:walthain Post Date:2011-03-06 05:08:37 by FormerLurker Keywords:None Views:358 Comments:21
I dunno. There is no evidence, as far as I can see, that these pyramids are any less a product of human hands and minds as is the annoying fiddle music in this video. ;]
And I represent the alternative point which is both. I also suspect that with the sudden appearance of anatomically modern man that our distant distant ancestors may not even have been native to this planet.
And I represent the alternative point which is both. I also suspect that with the sudden appearance of anatomically modern man that our distant distant ancestors may not even have been native to this planet.
That is an intriguing possibility that sparks the imagination. I kind of like this sort of speculation.
But whut tells us that there was alien intervention or involvement with pyramids in particular??
That is an intriguing possibility that sparks the imagination. I kind of like this sort of speculation.
But whut tells us that there was alien intervention or involvement with pyramids in particular??
I hold to the idea that there was an earlier civilization we don't know about.
I believe that to be the case as well, but where did that civilization originate. Plato in his Critias and Tinnaeus dialogs quotes Solon as saying that the Egyptians of that time had records going back 100,000 years.
That is the question to which there are many answers.
But none which we know are definite. Despite their reluctance and screaming hissy fits, because it disturbs their pet theories, academic archaeology is being forced increment by increment to accept an earlier rise for civilization than heretofore taken as the accepted. For example, while not trumpeted, the beginnings of formal agriculture in the South Pacific has now been forced backwards to at least 40,000 years ago. There are overgrown block walls on Tonga which go with no known civilization. Of course the lamestream tries to ignore them, but being rock construction blocks they aren't going anywhere very fast.
Of course there is the problem of the Sphinx and it's enclosure which show water damage from heavy rainfall, the problem of course being that the last time there was sufficient rainfall to account for the erosion was prior to 8,000 B.C..
Other anomalies crop up here and there. Tiahuanaco, which is now about 2 miles above sea level, has docks and quays which only make sense if you assume they were built at a time before the Andes were upthrust which would place their construction to around 10,000 B.C. or earlier.
One Arab Historian, Ibn Ben Said, translated one Egyptian Stele (a type of stone marker with hieroglyphics on it) as suggesting that the Great Pyramid was built as far back as 75,000 years before present.
There are a lot of anomalies that do not fit in the standard and accepted academic timelines and very unscientifically they are rejected out of hand because they are considered "impossible".
I really want to read that book forbidden archeology.
I would read the abridged popular version first "The Hidden History of The Human Race". Forbidden Archaeology is a very forbidding text - it is written in the technical language of Archaeology and so is not a good first book. It is a very exhaustive book, but not a good one for a novice.