See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: Social security - an email reply to Alan Simpson, Senator from Wyoming
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 16, 2011
Author: email
Post Date: 2011-03-16 14:03:15 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 599
Comments: 71
Alan Simpson, Senator from Wyoming , Co-Chair of Obama's deficit Commission, calls senior citizens the Greediest Generation as he Compared "Social Security" to a Milk Cow with 310 million teats. August, 2010. Here's a response in a letter from a unknown fellow in Montana .... I Think he is a little ticked off ! He also tells it like it is! "Hey Alan, let's get a few things straight... 1. As a career politician, you have been on the public dole for FIFTY YEARS. 2. I have been paying Social Security taxes for 48 YEARS (since I was 15 Years old. I am now 63). 3. My Social Security payments, and those of millions of other Americans, were safely tucked away in an interest bearing account for Decades until you political pukes decided to raid the account and give OUR money to a bunch of zero ambition losers in return for votes, thus Bankrupting the system and turning Social Security into a Ponzi scheme That would have made Bernie Madoff proud. 4. Recently, just like Lucy & Charlie Brown, you and your ilk pulled the Proverbial football away from millions of American seniors nearing Retirement and moved the goalposts for full retirement from age 65 to Age 67. NOW, you and your shill commission is proposing to move the Goalposts YET AGAIN. 5. I, and millions of other Americans, have been paying into Medicare From Day One, and now you morons propose to change the rules of the Game. Why? Because you idiots mismanaged other parts of the economy to Such an extent that you need to steal money from Medicare to pay the Bills. 6. I, and millions of other Americans, have been paying income taxes our Entire lives, and now you propose to increase our taxes yet again. Why? Because you incompetent bastards spent our money so profligately that You just kept on spending even after you ran out of money. Now, you come To the American taxpayers and say you need more to pay off YOUR debt. To add insult to injury, you label us "greedy" for calling "bullshit" on Your incompetence. Well, Captain Bullshit, I have a few questions for YOU. 1. How much money have you earned from the American taxpayers during Your pathetic 50-year political career? 2. At what age did you retire from your pathetic political career, and How much are you receiving in annual retirement benefits from the American taxpayers? 3. How much do you pay for YOUR government provided health insurance? 4. What cuts in YOUR retirement and healthcare benefits are you Proposing in your disgusting deficit reduction proposal, or, as usual, Have you exempted yourself and your political cronies? It is you, Captain Bullshit, and your political co-conspirators who are "greedy". It is you and they who have bankrupted America and stolen the American dream from millions of loyal, patriotic taxpayers. And for What? Votes. That's right, sir. You and yours have bankrupted America For the sole purpose of advancing your pathetic political careers. You Know it, we know it, and you know that we know it. And you can take that to the bank, you miserable son of a bitch."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-19) not displayed.
.
.
.
#20. To: Cynicom (#19)
(Edited)
We haven't had a legitimate government in my lifetime. That the process is rigged is only encouraged by the citizens of this country continuing to vote. I have also had to admit during my lifetime that there is no difference between Republican, Democrat, Libertarian or whomever. Whoever ends up in the elected office was not put there by the voters, but by the evildoers. Hence, the reason nothing changes, except for the worse. I can remember discussing the corruption of politics, politicians and the system of Mexico. Now I have to admit that I look at the very same thing in this country. We have not evolved by letting the evildoers have their way, unless you consider going backwards "incremental change over time".
Helpful paths: WeRefuse.com Launches Nullification Activist Centers in All 50 States
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Surrendering our electoral process to them uncontested doesn't seem to be the best way to go, imo.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Roosevelt opened the door to socialism, which everyone hates, right??????? So voters put him in office four unprecedented times. Along came Johnson and nearly 65 per cent of the voters, voted him into office. Unprecedented in our history and Johnson brought us socialism without bounds, the people loved him. Medicare, medicaid, relaxed SS, free education for dummies, on and on. What we have, people voted for, now it is time to pay the piper.
The Founding Fathers bled and died for a reason. They had tried "reform" for years but the King did not listen.
You're kidding, right? You don't suppose it's possible, do you, that banking interests put up campaign funds up front to insure the election of politicians that will borrow incessantly from the bankers to in turn guarantee a windfall flow of interest paid on principle?
"I am not one of those weak-spirited, sappy Americans who want to be liked by all the people around them. I don’t care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do. The important question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it." - William S Burroughs
Yes, I do suppose that's possible but I was talking about interest to the guv on SS tax holdings, among others. You aren't asserting that there are no such accrued interest perks for the guv, are you?
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
They had tried "reform" for years but the King did not listen. I'm all for closing our electoral process to Unconstitutionals. Surrendering it to them, no.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
In terms of growing government power, sure you are probably right. I momentarily forgot that we were dealing with people who see collectivism as a religion. Screw the people, the self-appointed guardians of the people are all that matters!
"I am not one of those weak-spirited, sappy Americans who want to be liked by all the people around them. I don’t care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do. The important question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it." - William S Burroughs
It was surrendered a long time ago. The current generations are simply rubber stamping the legitimacy of this government. Roosevelt was elected four times, the last time he did not campaign and the voters retained him in office. Term limits did result from that. However term limits for Congress have all died on the vine. Voting makes one a part of the system, legitimizing this government.
Not voting does what besides give them carte blanche with less paperwork and aggravation? Stepping aside so they can usurp our system unopposed doesn't exonerate non-voters from aiding and abetting their ransackings, imo. Do you have another suggestion short of war? I think what we need to do, for starters, is to hold our own elections for a Congress of Constitutionalists only.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Thanks for the links.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic. The only difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits. Albert Einstein
And buttwheat and all those pulling his strings, aren't listening either. The electorate had a once in a lifetime opportunity to make themselves heard at the 2010 election by ridding congress of all those up for reelection. They made a half-assed attempt that only caused the puppeteers to go back to the drawing board for ways to minimize the results of that election. Guess what? The evildoers have already made a dent in the "commitment" some of those new congressmen made to their constituents. Too many are already caving in.
Glad to see that you've reassessed the situation and their shenanigans.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
You're welcome. :)
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Yes, and pay we will. Especially given the way Congress and the POTUS spend money.
Punctuated with a. 30. 06 over his head.
Reversing the question for an answer.... A large majority of eligible Americans have always voted. They have had their choice of government, past and present. Add a minority voting for one of two preselected people would have changed what???? Nothing, not a thing. For nearly 80 years the Russians had a near 100 per cent participation by voters in a compulsory voting law, for preselected winners. Nothing changed by voting, the country collapsed, only to be bailed out by the West. Interesting side note that I was taught 50 years ago. Accepting a given that over 80 million Americans do not vote, how many of the total number of voters do not actually vote for higher offices????? The number of voters going to the polls never equals the total vote for President. As people vote, going from local to county to state to Federal, the actual number of votes DECREASES as we go up the ladder. Of the patriotic voters that trek to the polls, MANY DO NOT VOTE FOR PRESIDENT. THEY UNDERSTAND THEY HAVE NO REAL CHOICE. Many of the people that vote understand the system is stacked and to register their quiet opposition, they vote but do not vote.
Goldwater would have changed things, same goes for Wallace, Perot, Buchanan and Paul. The problem isn't so much the system, but rather the proportion of those who choose to participate. The left, manipulated by Soros and the corporate media, are wining the day with their candidates. Members of forums like this should know better than to be blinded by their lies. The right thinking people in the right positions can damage their agenda. To quit, or to act sanctimonious toward the efforts of the average political trench fighter, isn't a position serious men or woman should take. Quitting isn't an option as the left advances. We are not an army, but rather snipers at this moment in time.
thanks for the info. edit: whoops. this was intended for JD post #2
"if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." 1 Cor 12:31—13:13 great letter. did you write that?
"if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." 1 Cor 12:31—13:13 thanks for the info
"if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." 1 Cor 12:31—13:13 Quit, I did. Sanctimonious???? Not by desire nor intent, rather an approach with a view being expressed, that was honed from near six decades of "voting". I supported and voted for Goldwater, perhaps you did also. Working for the government at the time, I was the ONLY one in my department that did. It was made plain at the time that I was not overly bright, however, when the flow of body bags became never ending, it was impossible to find anyone that had voted for Johnson. Anyone that was paying attention at the time, 1952, arrived at one conclusion, the system was fixed so that the masses ALWAYS VOTED as the people in control desired. Both major parties wanted Ike to lead their ticket. How was that possible? The Dems were for the working man, for labor, the Pubs were for capital, the investor. One answer, Baruch a dem, decided Ike should run as a pub. The masses lose everytime.
I did vote for Goldwater and also worked in his campaign. It was the last time I was fooled by who decided an election. I remember quite clearly the events surrounding Eisenhower running for President. One week he was running as a dem, the next week as a pub. That was confirmation for me that Eisenhower running as a pub was not of his making.
You're welcome.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic. The only difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits. Albert Einstein
Well, I guess that is better than some of the names thrown my way here on 4um.
the masses vote this way or that according to whom? i believe that vote fraud exists and has for many decades. it, like the news, and the economy is controlled and manipulated. now, there's two schools of thought on this. we can take it back either by refusing to participate en masse or we can take it back by massive numbers voting 3rd party. nothing inbetween will work, imho. the fact that so many are dependent on welfare and entitlement programs, and/or a paycheck from both federal and state governments makes it extremely unlikely that americans will eschew the establishment parties. i have often heard Lindsey Williams say that within 2 yrs, 80% of us will be working for government. we already know that government has its tentacles in just about every industry directly or indirectly, so i think we're there now.
Obviously the poster doesn't know you, nor does he/she/it care to take the time to figure it out. I find "sanctimonious" a good adjective for the behavior that most who post here exhibit. It does not, however, fit you in the least.
Masses vote as programmed by the ruling elite (money power). Example... Last go around Ron Paul was the ONLY VIABLE AMERICAN RUNNING. You, I and a few others understood his message, but the masses cheered endlessly for, Romney, McCain etc etc. Our "choice" came down to McCain or Obama, so 130 million voters went to the polls and voted for someone. Paul was not there. Paul was laffed off stage, ridiculed by MSM and his own party. Result??????????? The war goes on, young Americans dying for nothing, endless debt. Once again, 130 million voters gave legitimacy to this corrupt government. Piecemeal reform is not worth considering. Already many of the teabaggers are turning colors. Voting for a system controlled from the top is exactly what is desired and the masses agree, I did my duty. Did they really???? Lets say the missing 80 million had voted, what do you think the outcome would have been???
There are great lessons to be learned by going back and looking at recent past presidents. Roosevelt ran in 1932 on a platform of anti big government. He lied. Patriotic voters made him King for life, until grim reaper said enough was enough. Imagine that, patriotic voters would have kept Roosevelt in office for life????????
In my opinion, that was NOT patriotic, that was being a fool. To have continued staying ignorant and using foolish voting practices is the very reason we are in the mess we are today. It takes a bigger person to admit their mistakes and to correct them than it does to continue making the same mistakes over and over again. Of course, by continuing on with the mistakes one never learns much.
I didn't write that artisan. It came to me in e-mail. Wonderful, isn't it?
The wars end tomorrow if the kids joining take the time to learn 1/10th of what you know. In their case it's buyer beware because their being sold a pile of horse shit while being told it's ice cream.
For the sake of discerning human nature, WHAT DO YOU THINK WOULD HAVE BEEN THE OUTCOME OF THE LAST ELECTION, HAD THE 80 MILLION NON VOTERS, VOTED????????????
They would have done exactly what they shouldn't do to save this nation. So sitting at home gave us the same result as if they had taken part in the elections. To have seen what happened in 2010 begs evaluation of human nature, i.e., what happened to the loud voices of changing our government and those in congress. Only a few changes were made. It ain't pretty, but there you have it ... same freaking criminals continuing to pay their obligations to those putting them in office, NOT their constituents. AND ... those criminals come and serve without regard for party.
Some may recall back at the time, I went around asking people if they knew who Ron Paul was. I cannot recall the actual percentage, but it was rare to find anyone. Yet they all knew via osmosis programming, who Obama and McCain were. Had they all been required to vote, I suspect the result would have been the same. People that do vote, lie a lot. Nobody voted for Johnson or Carter, yet they won. Odd.
What has this to do with the kids who volunteer to be cannon fodder?
Exactly. A non voter is the same as a vote for the incumbent. As they used to say in Chicago..."A stay at home voter, is a vote for the (Daley) Machine" Only a RAT stooge or a government troll could advocate people not voting. We have a whole new bunch in the House because people went out and voted.
"The person who agrees with you 80 percent of the time is a friend and an ally — not a 20 percent traitor" - Ronald Reagan
???????????????????????? Not a thing. I was asking a hypothetical question about what might have been the outcome of the election had the 80 million voted. "For the sake of discerning human nature, WHAT DO YOU THINK WOULD HAVE BEEN THE OUTCOME OF THE LAST ELECTION, HAD THE 80 MILLION NON VOTERS, VOTED???????????? " There was no mention of the kids.
My #52 to you had nothing to do with elections or voting. It had to do with the underlings who willingly serve the Empire. This must stop. I simply wasn't sure where you were coming from w/ the number of people who don't vote.
It was a hypothetical question, addressed to people that I considered would give it some thot and a reasoned view.
Comments (61 - 71) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestOnly one thing matters to the ruling elite, that is that the government remains a legitimate system, voted for in a "free" election by the masses.
#21. To: James Deffenbach (#18)
Beautiful dream, I would love to see it.
#22. To: Phant2000 (#20)
We have not evolved by letting the evildoers have their way
#23. To: Phant2000 (#20)
We have not evolved by letting the evildoers have their way, unless you consider going backwards "incremental change over time".
#24. To: GreyLmist, Phant2000 (#22)
Surrendering our electoral process to them uncontested doesn't seem to be the best way to go, imo.
#25. To: GreyLmist (#10)
I suspect that dumping SS taxes into the general pot means that more interest is accrued for the gummint on all the holdings that are lumped into the general pot, with SS "earmarked" as the minimum projected interest-earnings before paying out any funds collected for that or paying out other taxes for other purposes
#26. To: Dakmar (#25)
(Edited)
You're kidding, right? You don't suppose it's possible, do you, that banking interests put up campaign funds up front to insure the election of politicians that will borrow incessantly from the bankers to in turn guarantee a windfall flow of interest paid on principle?
#27. To: Cynicom (#24)
The Founding Fathers bled and died for a reason.
#28. To: GreyLmist (#26)
You aren't asserting that there isn't any such accrued interest perks for the guv, are you?
#29. To: GreyLmist (#27)
Surrendering it to them, no.
#30. To: Cynicom (#29)
(Edited)
Voting makes one a part of the system, legitimizing this government.
#31. To: GreyLmist (#21)
Lord Acton
OsamaBinGoldstein
#32. To: Cynicom (#24)
They had tried "reform" for years but the King did not listen.
#33. To: Dakmar (#28)
In terms of growing government power, sure you are probably right. I momentarily forgot that we were dealing with people who see collectivism as a religion.
#34. To: James Deffenbach (#31)
Thanks for the links.
#35. To: Cynicom (#23)
What we have, people voted for, now it is time to pay the piper.
#36. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
C
"Satan / Cheney in "08" 
#37. To: GreyLmist, Phant2000 (#30)
Not voting does what besides give them carte blanche with less paperwork and aggravation?
#38. To: Cynicom (#37)
A large majority of eligible Americans have always voted. They have had their choice of government, past and present. Add a minority voting for one of two preselected people would have changed what???? Nothing, not a thing.
#39. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
(Edited)
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
#40. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
#41. To: James Deffenbach (#2)
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
#42. To: 2big2fail, Phant2000 (#38)
To quit, or to act sanctimonious toward the efforts of the average political trench fighter, isn't a position serious men or woman should take. Quitting isn't an option as the left advances.
#43. To: Cynicom (#42)
I supported and voted for Goldwater, perhaps you did also.
#44. To: Artisan (#41)
thanks for the info
Lord Acton
OsamaBinGoldstein
#45. To: Phant2000, 2big2fail (#43)
Adj. 1. sanctimonious - excessively or hypocritically pious; "a sickening sanctimonious smile" holier-than-thou, pharisaic, pharisaical, self-righteous, pietistic, pietistical pious - having or showing or expressing reverence for a deity; "pious readings"
#46. To: Cynicom (#42)
#47. To: Cynicom (#45)
(Edited)
Well, I guess that is better than some of the names thrown my way here on 4um.
#48. To: christine (#46)
the masses vote this way or that according to whom?
#49. To: Phant2000, christine (#47)
Obviously the poster doesn't know you, nor does he/she/it care to take the time to figure it out.
#50. To: Cynicom (#49)
Imagine that, patriotic voters would have kept Roosevelt in office for life????????
#51. To: Artisan (#40)
#52. To: Cynicom (#48)
#53. To: Jethro Tull, Christine, Phant2000 (#52)
Lets say the missing 80 million had voted, what do you think the outcome would have been???
#54. To: Cynicom (#53)
WHAT DO YOU THINK WOULD HAVE BEEN THE OUTCOME OF THE LAST ELECTION, HAD THE 80 MILLION NON VOTERS, VOTED????????????
#55. To: Phant2000 (#54)
They would have done exactly what they shouldn't do to save this nation. So sitting at home gave us the same result as if they had taken part in the elections.
#56. To: Cynicom (#53)
For the sake of discerning human nature, WHAT DO YOU THINK WOULD HAVE BEEN THE OUTCOME OF THE LAST ELECTION, HAD THE 80 MILLION NON VOTERS, VOTED????????????
#57. To: Phant2000 (#54)
So sitting at home gave us the same result as if they had taken part in the elections.
#58. To: Jethro Tull (#56)
What has this to do with the kids who volunteer to be cannon fodder?
#59. To: Cynicom (#58)
#60. To: Jethro Tull (#59)
This must stop. I simply wasn't sure where you were coming from w/ the number of people who don't vote.
.
.
.