[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

MAHA MEME

noone2222 and John Bolton sitting in a tree K I S S I N G

Donald Trump To Help Construct The Third Temple?

"The Elites Want To ROB Us of Our SOVEREIGNTY!" | Robert F Kennedy

Take Your Money OUT of THESE Banks NOW! - Jim Rickards

Trump Taps Tulsi Gabbard As Director Of National Intelligence

DC In Full Blown Panic After Trump Picks Matt Gaetz For Attorney General

Cleveland Clinic Warns Wave of Mass Deaths Will Wipe Out Covid-Vaxxed Within ‘5 Years’

Judah-ism is as Judah-ism does

Danger ahead: November 2024, Boston Dynamics introduces a fully autonomous "Atlas" robot. Robot humanoids are here.

Trump names [Fox News host] Pete Hegseth as his Defense secretary

Lefties losing it: Trump’s YMCA dance goes viral

Elon Musk: "15 Products You'll Stop Buying After You Know What They're Made Of"

Walmart And Other Major Retailers Canceling Billions In Orders Amid Fears Of A Dark Winter Ahead

Joe and Jill Biden deliver final 'kick' against Kamala Harris on election day

Relative importance of carbon dioxide and water in the greenhouse effect: Does the tail wag the dog?

Fired FEMA Employee Speaks Out, Says It Was Not Isolated Incident: Colossal Event Of Avoidance

Judge Merchan Hands Trump Historic Victory Donald Receives Stay on Felony Conviction

PNut the Squirrel was marked for death and decapitation from the start as rabies test results are negative

Yemeni forces strike military base in Tel Aviv with hypersonic ballistic missile

SheÂ’s lying. The FEC shows the payment

Speaker Johnson Orders Entire Biden Administration to Preserve and Retain All Records and Documents

Boeing has given up on diversity.

Trump Targeting up to 100,000 Deep Staters for Absolute Exile From DC

FBI Execs Rush to Retire After Trump Victory Leaves Them Shell-Shocked.

Witness to Tragedy: Huge Financial Incentives Led Hospitals to Use COVID Treatments That Killed Patients

‘Knucklehead’: Tim Walz returns to Minnesota ‘defeated'

Study Confirms the Awesome Destructive Power of Sugar in Utero Originally published via Armageddon Prose:

Ukraine mobilizing mentally challenged and deaf people lawmaker

COL. Douglas Macgregor : Trump and Netanyahu At Crossroads


Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: Social security - an email reply to Alan Simpson, Senator from Wyoming
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 16, 2011
Author: email
Post Date: 2011-03-16 14:03:15 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 683
Comments: 71

Alan Simpson, Senator from Wyoming , Co-Chair of Obama's deficit Commission, calls senior citizens the Greediest Generation as he Compared "Social Security" to a Milk Cow with 310 million teats. August, 2010.

Here's a response in a letter from a unknown fellow in Montana .... I Think he is a little ticked off ! He also tells it like it is! "Hey Alan, let's get a few things straight...

1. As a career politician, you have been on the public dole for FIFTY YEARS.

2. I have been paying Social Security taxes for 48 YEARS (since I was 15 Years old. I am now 63).

3. My Social Security payments, and those of millions of other Americans, were safely tucked away in an interest bearing account for Decades until you political pukes decided to raid the account and give OUR money to a bunch of zero ambition losers in return for votes, thus Bankrupting the system and turning Social Security into a Ponzi scheme That would have made Bernie Madoff proud.

4. Recently, just like Lucy & Charlie Brown, you and your ilk pulled the Proverbial football away from millions of American seniors nearing Retirement and moved the goalposts for full retirement from age 65 to Age 67. NOW, you and your shill commission is proposing to move the Goalposts YET AGAIN.

5. I, and millions of other Americans, have been paying into Medicare From Day One, and now you morons propose to change the rules of the Game. Why? Because you idiots mismanaged other parts of the economy to Such an extent that you need to steal money from Medicare to pay the Bills.

6. I, and millions of other Americans, have been paying income taxes our Entire lives, and now you propose to increase our taxes yet again. Why? Because you incompetent bastards spent our money so profligately that You just kept on spending even after you ran out of money. Now, you come To the American taxpayers and say you need more to pay off YOUR debt.

To add insult to injury, you label us "greedy" for calling "bullshit" on Your incompetence. Well, Captain Bullshit, I have a few questions for YOU.

1. How much money have you earned from the American taxpayers during Your pathetic 50-year political career?

2. At what age did you retire from your pathetic political career, and How much are you receiving in annual retirement benefits from the American taxpayers?

3. How much do you pay for YOUR government provided health insurance?

4. What cuts in YOUR retirement and healthcare benefits are you Proposing in your disgusting deficit reduction proposal, or, as usual, Have you exempted yourself and your political cronies?

It is you, Captain Bullshit, and your political co-conspirators who are "greedy". It is you and they who have bankrupted America and stolen the American dream from millions of loyal, patriotic taxpayers. And for What? Votes. That's right, sir. You and yours have bankrupted America For the sole purpose of advancing your pathetic political careers. You Know it, we know it, and you know that we know it.

And you can take that to the bank, you miserable son of a bitch."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 45.

#5. To: Jethro Tull, Phant2000 (#0)

It is you, Captain Bullshit, and your political co-conspirators who are "greedy". It is you and they who have bankrupted America and stolen the American dream from millions of loyal, patriotic taxpayers. And for What? Votes. That's right, sir. You and yours have bankrupted America For the sole purpose of advancing your pathetic political careers. You Know it, we know it, and you know that we know it.

The ballot box and voting have proven to be the best control of the masses ever envisioned.

I have hoped for a long time that this SOB would be run over by a mile long, slow moving train.

The miserable olde bastard. Citizen Tull needs to consult with the Grim Reaper.

Cynicom  posted on  2011-03-16   14:53:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Cynicom (#5)

The ballot box and voting have proven to be the best control of the masses ever envisioned.

I have hoped for a long time that this SOB would be run over by a mile long, slow moving train.

Again, you remind us NOT to vote or be part of the problem if we do!

As for Simpson, if hope could have rid us of him, he would have been gone long ago. Then again, look what "hope" got all those who voted for buttwheat! Trouble is, even those who didn't vote for buttwheat, or didn't vote at all, have to suffer the consequences of those who did vote for the bastard.

Phant2000  posted on  2011-03-16   17:07:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Phant2000 (#14)

Then again, look what "hope" got all those who voted for buttwheat! Trouble is, even those who didn't vote for buttwheat, or didn't vote at all, have to suffer the consequences of those who did vote for the bastard.

Only one thing matters to the ruling elite, that is that the government remains a legitimate system, voted for in a "free" election by the masses.

The fact that the entire process on the Federal level is rigged seems to be of no interest.

Cynicom  posted on  2011-03-16   20:12:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Cynicom (#19) (Edited)

Only one thing matters to the ruling elite, that is that the government remains a legitimate system, voted for in a "free" election by the masses.

We haven't had a legitimate government in my lifetime. That the process is rigged is only encouraged by the citizens of this country continuing to vote.

I have also had to admit during my lifetime that there is no difference between Republican, Democrat, Libertarian or whomever. Whoever ends up in the elected office was not put there by the voters, but by the evildoers. Hence, the reason nothing changes, except for the worse.

I can remember discussing the corruption of politics, politicians and the system of Mexico. Now I have to admit that I look at the very same thing in this country. We have not evolved by letting the evildoers have their way, unless you consider going backwards "incremental change over time".

Phant2000  posted on  2011-03-16   20:27:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Phant2000 (#20)

We have not evolved by letting the evildoers have their way

Surrendering our electoral process to them uncontested doesn't seem to be the best way to go, imo.

GreyLmist  posted on  2011-03-16   20:50:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: GreyLmist, Phant2000 (#22)

Surrendering our electoral process to them uncontested doesn't seem to be the best way to go, imo.

The Founding Fathers bled and died for a reason.

They had tried "reform" for years but the King did not listen.

Cynicom  posted on  2011-03-16   21:01:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Cynicom (#24)

The Founding Fathers bled and died for a reason.

They had tried "reform" for years but the King did not listen.

I'm all for closing our electoral process to Unconstitutionals. Surrendering it to them, no.

GreyLmist  posted on  2011-03-16   22:13:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: GreyLmist (#27)

Surrendering it to them, no.

It was surrendered a long time ago.

The current generations are simply rubber stamping the legitimacy of this government.

Roosevelt was elected four times, the last time he did not campaign and the voters retained him in office. Term limits did result from that. However term limits for Congress have all died on the vine.

Voting makes one a part of the system, legitimizing this government.

Cynicom  posted on  2011-03-16   22:23:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Cynicom (#29) (Edited)

Voting makes one a part of the system, legitimizing this government.

Not voting does what besides give them carte blanche with less paperwork and aggravation? Stepping aside so they can usurp our system unopposed doesn't exonerate non-voters from aiding and abetting their ransackings, imo. Do you have another suggestion short of war? I think what we need to do, for starters, is to hold our own elections for a Congress of Constitutionalists only.

GreyLmist  posted on  2011-03-16   23:05:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: GreyLmist, Phant2000 (#30)

Not voting does what besides give them carte blanche with less paperwork and aggravation?

Reversing the question for an answer....

A large majority of eligible Americans have always voted. They have had their choice of government, past and present. Add a minority voting for one of two preselected people would have changed what???? Nothing, not a thing.

For nearly 80 years the Russians had a near 100 per cent participation by voters in a compulsory voting law, for preselected winners. Nothing changed by voting, the country collapsed, only to be bailed out by the West.

Interesting side note that I was taught 50 years ago. Accepting a given that over 80 million Americans do not vote, how many of the total number of voters do not actually vote for higher offices?????

The number of voters going to the polls never equals the total vote for President. As people vote, going from local to county to state to Federal, the actual number of votes DECREASES as we go up the ladder.

Of the patriotic voters that trek to the polls, MANY DO NOT VOTE FOR PRESIDENT. THEY UNDERSTAND THEY HAVE NO REAL CHOICE.

Many of the people that vote understand the system is stacked and to register their quiet opposition, they vote but do not vote.

Cynicom  posted on  2011-03-17   5:08:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Cynicom (#37)

A large majority of eligible Americans have always voted. They have had their choice of government, past and present. Add a minority voting for one of two preselected people would have changed what???? Nothing, not a thing.

Goldwater would have changed things, same goes for Wallace, Perot, Buchanan and Paul. The problem isn't so much the system, but rather the proportion of those who choose to participate. The left, manipulated by Soros and the corporate media, are wining the day with their candidates. Members of forums like this should know better than to be blinded by their lies. The right thinking people in the right positions can damage their agenda. To quit, or to act sanctimonious toward the efforts of the average political trench fighter, isn't a position serious men or woman should take. Quitting isn't an option as the left advances. We are not an army, but rather snipers at this moment in time.

2big2fail  posted on  2011-03-17   5:38:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: 2big2fail, Phant2000 (#38)

To quit, or to act sanctimonious toward the efforts of the average political trench fighter, isn't a position serious men or woman should take. Quitting isn't an option as the left advances.

Quit, I did.

Sanctimonious???? Not by desire nor intent, rather an approach with a view being expressed, that was honed from near six decades of "voting".

I supported and voted for Goldwater, perhaps you did also. Working for the government at the time, I was the ONLY one in my department that did.

It was made plain at the time that I was not overly bright, however, when the flow of body bags became never ending, it was impossible to find anyone that had voted for Johnson.

Anyone that was paying attention at the time, 1952, arrived at one conclusion, the system was fixed so that the masses ALWAYS VOTED as the people in control desired. Both major parties wanted Ike to lead their ticket. How was that possible?

The Dems were for the working man, for labor, the Pubs were for capital, the investor.

One answer, Baruch a dem, decided Ike should run as a pub.

The masses lose everytime.

Cynicom  posted on  2011-03-17   9:08:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Cynicom (#42)

I supported and voted for Goldwater, perhaps you did also.

I did vote for Goldwater and also worked in his campaign. It was the last time I was fooled by who decided an election.

I remember quite clearly the events surrounding Eisenhower running for President. One week he was running as a dem, the next week as a pub. That was confirmation for me that Eisenhower running as a pub was not of his making.

Phant2000  posted on  2011-03-17   9:28:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Phant2000, 2big2fail (#43)

Adj. 1. sanctimonious - excessively or hypocritically pious; "a sickening sanctimonious smile" holier-than-thou, pharisaic, pharisaical, self-righteous, pietistic, pietistical pious - having or showing or expressing reverence for a deity; "pious readings"

Well, I guess that is better than some of the names thrown my way here on 4um.

Cynicom  posted on  2011-03-17   10:09:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 45.

#47. To: Cynicom (#45) (Edited)

Well, I guess that is better than some of the names thrown my way here on 4um.

Obviously the poster doesn't know you, nor does he/she/it care to take the time to figure it out. I find "sanctimonious" a good adjective for the behavior that most who post here exhibit. It does not, however, fit you in the least.

Phant2000  posted on  2011-03-17 11:01:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 45.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]