See other Resistance Articles
Title: SWAT TEAM RAIDS OF PATRIOT HOMES HAVE BEGUN
Source:
targetfreedom.typepad.com
URL Source: http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/ta ... f-patriot-homes-has-begun.html
Published: Mar 17, 2011
Author: Gary Franchi
Post Date: 2011-03-17 08:59:09 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 367
Comments: 22
SWAT TEAM RAIDS OF PATRIOT HOMES HAVE BEGUN targetfreedom.com/books/s...patriot-homes-have-begun/ BREAKING ALERT: Patriot Raided by SWAT Under Patriot Act Walter Reddy, the founder of the modern Committees of Safety, joins Gary Franchi for a special interview to recount the recent SWAT Team raid on his home. Watch and share NOW: American Patriot Raided in "Patriot" Act Style Action Unsubstantiated claims used as "probable cause" Members link: www.rtr.org/videos/2/14328 If you and/or your senators and representative are in favor of the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act you may want to think twice. Recently, a friend of mine had his home raided by a SWAT team for three hours - operating without a search warrant. Why? Because Walter Reddy is a good patriot and a good American? In a police state, it doesn't matter. You see another man who knows of Walter went to the police station and made wild accusations about him. And even though, the man refused sign to (swear to) his statement to police, the police nonetheless acted on the hearsay and unsubstantiated charges. Oh and of course they confiscated his lawful firearms though he was not then nor is he now charged with any crime. Let's wake up and grow up! The so-called P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act is nothing more than a license for a police state to operate with impunity. This dangerous act is as unconstitutional and unAmerican as it can be. Police actions under it routinely violate the First Amendment, Second Amendment, Fourth Amendment and Fifth Amendment of your innocent fellow Americans. Walter is just another man who is trying to right America's severely listing republic. Don't expect to see this article on the nighly news. America, we can do better and we MUST! Here is an article about Walter; he is deservedly well respected. Walter Reddy's First Amendment website is CommitteesOfSafety.Org WAKE UP AMERICA! WAKE UP, STAND UP AND SPEAK UP! OR PREPARE TO LICK THE BOOTS OF YOUR MASTERS! The sociopathic police personality: Is it a product of the “Rotten Apple” or the “Rotten Barrel?” www.springerlink.com/content/744g275720njq429/ The “Rotten Apple” theory states that deviant police officers are those who psychological testing fails to screen out. This concept is favored by police administrators because it offers a quick and easy solution to police deviant behavior. However, there is a growing body of literature that suggests that it is the stressful occupation that is policing that is the fertile soil from which police deviant behavior springs otherwise known as the “Rotten Barrel” theory. This article shall explore police deviant behavior from the perspective that it is the “Rotten Barrel” that leads to police deviant behavior. What we are now seeing appears to indicate that psychological testing is being used to locate and hire sociopathic deviants rather than to screen them out. Are the people, who ought to be in prisons or mental institutions, now being given guns and badges? Are the prisons or mental institutions now for religious, or freedom loving people? Sociopathic deviants are the first line of enforcement in every dictatorship. Watch our Police State with your own eyes. This is where the term "police state" originates California police use a Taser on an unarmed, legless man in a wheelchair? www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/75729.html Cops Stop Ambulance On Way To Hospital And Fight With EMT www.infowars.net:80/articles/may2009/280509Fight.htm Full Dash Cam Video of Oklahoma Highway Patrol vs EMT www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=T4G37Ouy164 www.infowars.net:80/articles/may2009/280509Fight.htm Who will protect us from our Protectors? The "Police State" Special Edition Issue of The New American magazine. (Fall/Winter 1994)
Primary Link:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=foG-J2Tdg9o
Secondary Link:
realityreport.blip.tv/file/4884847
thetruthaboutminnesota.or...16193&xm=reddy-raid&rm=hm
(this will never be on your evening news)
Police State Jobs Available for Psychopaths targetfreedom.typepad.com...sychopathjobopenings.html
Cell phone video shows highway patrol grabbing paramedic by the throat
www.youtube.com/watch?v=-...Y&feature=haxa_popt00us09 Full story:
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Itistoolate (#0)
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." - Ben Franklin
Thanks for this, ISTL. This is a vivid example of why this act has to be tossed.
The TeaParty R's will flush this quicker than Obama's ashtray. We ALL need to get involved and VOTE in the primaries!
"The person who agrees with you 80 percent of the time is a friend and an ally — not a 20 percent traitor" - Ronald Reagan
I think we'll see a 3rd party from these folks yet.
They ARE the 3rd party. Turds like Harry Reid have said publicly that the TeaParty will go away when the economy gets better. He's as wrong as Cornwallis at Yorktown. "The person who agrees with you 80 percent of the time is a friend and an ally — not a 20 percent traitor" - Ronald Reagan
What Tea Party R's have taken a stand against the "Patriot" Act??
It is a violation of Natural Law to use this document in a manner inconsistent with its labeling.
How about almost all of them?
"The person who agrees with you 80 percent of the time is a friend and an ally — not a 20 percent traitor" - Ronald Reagan
I TAKE THAT BACK. I was distracted today and let that comment slip by. The Tea Party did not do so hot with regard to this vote, Flintlock. Here's from your google link: Tea Party Cements Patriot Act Into Place It is a violation of Natural Law to use this document in a manner inconsistent with its labeling.
Bachmann and West voted for it.
The Pat Act personal jurisdiction claim is exclusive to 14th American serf/slaves. This being said, the so-called Patriot in question forfeited or exchanged his 1st, 2nd etc. rights for "Incorporated rights" (privileges dolled out by Legislative slave masters and judges) when he accepted Federal Benefits. Did the 14th Amendment do away with State Citizenship? "The Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, ratified in 1868, creates or at least recognizes for the first time a citizenship of the United States, as distinct from that of the states." Black's Law Dictionary, 5th Edition, p. 591 [1979]. The answer is absolutely not. In fact the leading and controlling case on State Citizenship and United States Citizenship is the Supreme Court case, The Slaughter-House Cases (16 Wallace 36: 21 L.Ed. 394 [1873]). In this case, the Supreme Court distinguishes between State Citizenship and United States Citizenship. "It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the United States and a citizenship of a state, which are distinct from each other and which depend upon different characteristics of the individual." The Slaughter-House Cases: 83 U.S. 36, 74. "The importance of the case can hardly be overestimated. By distinguishing between state citizenship and national citizenship and by emphasizing that the rights and privileges of federal citizenship do not include the protection of ordinary civil liberties such as freedom of speech and press, religion, etc., but only the privileges which one enjoys by virtue of his federal citizenship, the Court averted, for the time being at least, the revolution in our constitutional system apparently intended by the framers of the amendment and reserved to the states the responsibility for protecting civil rights generally." Cases In Constitutional Law by Robert F. Cushman, 5th Edition, pp. 250-251 (College Law Textbook) [1979]. "Citizenship is elaborated in two privileges and immunities clauses of the United States Constitution. . . . The Slaughter-House Cases [1873] 83 U.S. 36, 21 L.Ed. 394, emphasized the distinct character of federal and state citizenship. Slaughter-House held that privileges and immunities conferred by state citizenship were outside federal reach through the Fourteenth Amendment. . . . Federal citizenship was seen as including only such things as interstate travel and voting. While subsequent decisions have extended the meaning of citizenship in the Fourteenth Amendment, Slaughter-House is still controlling in that it precludes use of privileges and immunities language in protecting citizens by federal authority." Constitutional Law Deskbook - Individual Rights, by Chandler, Enslen, Renstrom; Second Edition, p. 634 (Lawyers Cooperative Publishing, 1993). "The Fourteenth Amendment did not obliterate the distinction between national and state citizenship, but rather preserved it. Slaughter-House Cases." 103d Congress, 1st Session, Document 103-6: The Constitution of the United States of America; Analysis And Interpretation: Annotations Of Cases Decided By The Supreme Court Of The United States To June 29, 1992, p. 1566. 1 In addition, the Supreme Court in The Slaughter-House Cases concluded that there are two citizens under the Constitution of the United States: "The next observation is more important in view of the arguments of counsel in the present case. It is, that the distinction between citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a State is clearly recognized and established. It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the United States, and a citizenship of a State, which are distinct from each other, and which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual. We think this distinction and its explicit recognition in this Amendment of great weight in this argument, because the next paragraph of this same section, which is the one mainly relied on by the plaintiffs in error, speaks only of privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, and does not speak of those of citizens of the several States. The argument, however, in favor of the plaintiffs rests wholly on the assumption that the citizenship is the same, and the privileges and immunities guaranteed by the clause are the same. The language is, 'No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.' It is a little remarkable, if this clause was intended as a protection to the citizen of a State against the legislative power of his own State, that the word citizen of the State should be left out when it is so carefully used, and used in contradistinction to citizens of the United States, in the very sentence which precedes it. It is too clear for argument that the change in phraseology was adopted understandingly and with a purpose. Of the privileges and immunities of the citizen of the United States, and of the privileges and immunities of the citizen of the State, and what they respectively are, we will presently consider; but we wish to state here that it is only the former which are placed by this clause under the protection of the Federal Constitution, and that the latter, whatever they may be, are not intended to have any additional protection by this paragraph of the amendment." The Slaughter-House Cases: 83 U.S. 36, at 73-74. "The expression, Citizen of a State, is carefully omitted here. In Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1, of the Constitution of the United States, it had been already provided that 'the Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.' The rights of Citizens of the States [under Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1] and of citizens of the United States [under The Fourteenth Amendment] are each guarded by these different provisions. That these rights are separate and distinct, was held in the Slaughterhouse Cases, recently decided by the Supreme court. The rights of Citizens of the State, as such, are not under consideration in the Fourteenth Amendment. They stand as they did before the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, and are fully guaranteed by other provisions." United States v. Anthony: 24 Fed. Cas. 829, 830 (Case No. 14,459) [1873]. 2 "This provision [The Fourteenth Amendment] protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship. See Slaughter-House Cases 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 21 L.Ed. 394 (1873)." Jones v. Temmer: 829 F.Supp. 1226, 1232 [1993]. Therefore, State citizenship and United States citizenship are provided for in the Constitution of the United States. A citizen of a state is to be found at Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution of the United States whereas a citizen of the United States is located at the Fourteenth Amendment. _________________________________ 1 "... [U]ndoubtedly in a purely technical and abstract sense citizenship of one of the states may not include citizenship of the United States." United States v. Northwestern Express, Stage & Transportation Company: 164 U.S. 686, 688 [1897] get case 2 "Appellant does not invoke the commerce clause, and is neither a citizen of a state nor of the United States within the protection of the privileges and immunities clauses of Article IV, Section 2 of the Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment. Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. (US) 168, 177, 19 L ed 357, 359; Pembina Consol. Silver Mining & Milling Co. v. Pennsylvania, 125 U.S. 181, 187, 31 L ed 650, 653, 8 S.Ct. 737, 740, 2 Inters Com Rep 24; Selover, B. & Co. v. Walsh, 226 U.S. 112, 126, 57 L ed 146, 152, 33 S.Ct. 69, 72." Asbury Hospital v. Cass County N.D.: 326 U.S. 207, 210-211 [1945] get case © Copyright 2005 Daniel Joseph Goodman Yours in Observing "Real Pats" Avoid the 14th Like Poison to Liberty, P.H.
In effect, it’s (The Holacaust Inc.) become like a grotesque doll wielded by witch doctors, used to keep individuals from asking too many questions, from thinking for themselves and stepping out of line.
an aquaintence going to the local cops to try to snitch on someone sounds very similar to how randy weaver was targeted. upon reviewing that case recently, thats apparently how that tragedy actually began, years before it ended.
"if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." 1 Cor 12:31—13:13 my friend Muhammed, the USMC vet 911 truther,had his house raided by a similar SWAT type outfit a few yrs ago.They asked his wife about his youtube vids,(which were simply interviews of him by me).i thought that was freakin HILARIOUS.hi feds! ;-)
"if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." 1 Cor 12:31—13:13 No.Actually almost all tea party reps voted for it.Only 7 did not. google '26 repubs who voted against patriot act who are they & also 44/52 tea party members vote to renew patriot act
"if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." 1 Cor 12:31—13:13 note i didnt think the raid itself was hilarious, i think it was illegal & obscene.i just meant that theyd inquire about some innocuous youtube vids shows how crazy & paranoid the cops are about truth.
"if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." 1 Cor 12:31—13:13 Tea Party Cements Patriot Act Into Place Mar 14, 2011 ... Of the 41 Tea Party-backed candidates, 31 voted to extend the Patriot Act, eight voted against it, and one did not vote. ... www.thenewamerican.com/.....ts-patriot-act-into-place - Cached www.google.com/search?cli...r_pw.&fp=23daeab4d2e2d925 Yeah, I edited my post #8 on that above.
It is a violation of Natural Law to use this document in a manner inconsistent with its labeling.
West is not a member of the TeaParty Caucus.
"The person who agrees with you 80 percent of the time is a friend and an ally — not a 20 percent traitor" - Ronald Reagan
There's a difference between being "Teaparty backed" and the TeaPerty Caucus. 8 is progress, there'll a lot more than 8 next time around.
"The person who agrees with you 80 percent of the time is a friend and an ally — not a 20 percent traitor" - Ronald Reagan
A true patriot should be shedding blood for what he believes in, not going online and bitching about getting raided by jackboots in the middle of the night. Until somebody starts smoking these thugs when they come thru your door, expect the abuse to continue.
Yes, it's quite remarkable and yes it does protect the citizen of a State against Uncosntitutional legislation by their State and also against Unconstitutional Federal legislation, such as the "Patriot Act". I call it the Nullification Clause. The Slaughterhouse Cases = Pro-States' Rights ruling. The State of the cholera-causing butchers did not violate any of their Constitutionally protected rights by moving to protect the citizens of that State from their epidemic-causing business practices.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
My experience concludes Tea Partiers are NEOCON Palin/Gingrich lovers for the most part, waving "Don't Tread on Me" flags and chanting "Don't Touch My Medicare". In other words: Useful Idiots mostly.
I would suggest that either the psychological testing is inaccurate or is itself deviant and that they are now selecting for that specific behavior profile.
I'm sorry but at this juncture that would be flat stupid. The time for that was 20 or 30 years ago. Now it would only be used as an excuse for further Police State incursions and abrogations of Constitutionally protected rights. Ideas, and communication such as on this forum are actually a powerful antidote to the Police State as it now exists. They may not always hold true, but for the moment it is. There is still enough of the machinery of liberty left to turn back the rising tide of tyranny. However, it requires simply having enough people willing to stand up and manfully say, "NO!" Their power is not so complete that they do not fear widespread dissent and disagreement. That is why they are working to suppress it. The correct response is to fight back, join groups fighting back, and to make a stand for liberty but at this point armed insurrection lacks popular support and would simply result in a lot of dead bodies followed by a tighter clamp down.
#2. To: Itistoolate (#0)
#3. To: Jethro Tull, Itistoolate (#2)
This is a vivid example of why this act has to be tossed.
#4. To: Flintlock (#3)
#5. To: Jethro Tull (#4)
I think we'll see a 3rd party from these folks yet.
#6. To: Flintlock (#3)
The TeaParty R's will flush this quicker than Obama's ashtray.
#7. To: randge (#6)
What Tea Party R's have taken a stand against the "Patriot" Act??
#8. To: Flintlock (#7)
(Edited)
How about almost all of them?
Mar 14, 2011 ... Of the 41 Tea Party-backed candidates, 31 voted to extend the
Patriot Act, eight voted against it, and one did not vote. ...
www.thenewamerican.com/.....ts-patriot-act-into-place - Cached
#9. To: Flintlock (#7)
#10. To: Itistoolate (#0)
This dangerous act is as unconstitutional and unAmerican as it can be. Police actions under it routinely violate the First Amendment, Second Amendment, Fourth Amendment and Fifth Amendment of your innocent fellow Americans. Walter is just another man who is trying to right America's severely listing republic. Don't expect to see this article on the nighly news. America, we can do better and we MUST!
#11. To: Itistoolate (#0)
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
#12. To: Jethro Tull (#2)
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
#13. To: Flintlock, randge, christine (#7)
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
#14. To: All (#12)
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
#15. To: Artisan (#13)
#16. To: echo5sierra (#9)
West voted for it.
#17. To: randge, Artisan (#15)
Of the 41 Tea Party-backed candidates, 31 voted to extend the Patriot Act, eight voted against it, and one did not vote.
#18. To: Itistoolate (#0)
#19. To: PatrickHenry (#10)
(Edited)
The language is, 'No State shall make or enforce any law [My note: any law, whether at the State level or the Federal level] which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.' It is a little remarkable, if this clause was intended as a protection to the citizen of a State against the legislative power of his own State
#20. To: Itistoolate (#0)
#21. To: Itistoolate (#0)
The “Rotten Apple” theory states that deviant police officers are those who psychological testing fails to screen out. This concept is favored by police administrators because it offers a quick and easy solution to police deviant behavior.
#22. To: Obnoxicated (#18)
A true patriot should be shedding blood for what he believes in, not going online and bitching about getting raided by jackboots in the middle of the night. Until somebody starts smoking these thugs when they come thru your door, expect the abuse to continue.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
