See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: Physicist Michio Kaku Demands Entombment Of Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS2T1wHeYHw
Published: Mar 22, 2011
Author: rdnckhppy
Post Date: 2011-03-22 14:39:25 by wudidiz
Ping List: *Out There* Subscribe to *Out There*
Keywords: None
Views: 178
Comments: 6
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: wudidiz (#0)
That was Lod's suggestion almost a week back. Nips! listen to the famous physicist and me.
Somewhere in Kenya, a village is missing its idiot.
While entombment may well be the eventual solution there are several good reasons why it is premature. 1. The piles are still hot and will continue to heat giving off radiation. The concrete does not entomb the reactor underneath just the top. 2. Without first stabilizing and cooling the piles the risk of melt down is not mitigated. 3. The concrete would not stop radiation from leaching into the water table and the ocean resulting in an ongoing source of contamination to the ocean and the surrounding countryside. 4. Without handling the cores and the stored spent fuel rods the concrete will quickly deteriorate. Already the core at Chernobyl is degrading the concrete to the point to where a new cover needs to be put on.
You saw how well that worked against Godzilla. Radiation>concrete
__________________________________________________________ If those aliens who descended down over the Dome of the Rock really wanted some publicity, they'd swoop down over those reactors and zap those fuel rods into solid lead.
I suggested pumping mud into the thing and then spraying it with corexit. Eventually the only solution will be to bomb the place and let the chips fall where they may.
I want either less corruption or more opportunity to participate in it. Ashleigh Brilliant
1. The piles are still hot and will continue to heat giving off radiation. The concrete does not entomb the reactor underneath just the top. 2. Without first stabilizing and cooling the piles the risk of melt down is not mitigated. 3. The concrete would not stop radiation from leaching into the water table and the ocean resulting in an ongoing source of contamination to the ocean and the surrounding countryside. 4. Without handling the cores and the stored spent fuel rods the concrete will quickly deteriorate. Already the core at Chernobyl is degrading the concrete to the point to where a new cover needs to be put on. Thank you, OI. I'm interested to hear what Michio Kaku would say to all that.
#2. To: Lod, wudidiz (#1)
#3. To: wudidiz (#0)
Professor Sushi Egghead: "I'm saying call out the Japanese Air Force"
"This man is Jesus,” shouted one man, spilling his Guinness as Barack Obama began his inaugural address. “When will he come to Kenya to save us?"
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#4. To: wudidiz (#0)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#5. To: Lod (#1)
That was Lod's suggestion almost a week back.
#6. To: Original_Intent, Lod, X-15, FormerLurker, angK, all (#2)
While entombment may well be the eventual solution there are several good reasons why it is premature.
No Planes. Think about it. ................. Guaranteed Penetration (no it's not porn)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest