[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

A Missile Shield for America - A Trillion Dollar Fantasy?

Kentucky School Board Chairman Resigns After Calling for People to ‘Shoot Republicans’

These Are 2025's 'Most Livable' Cities

Nicotine and Fish

Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity

Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case

California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year

CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case.

Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK

Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study

Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used

Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter

With great power comes no accountability.

Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%.

Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites

Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes !

Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration

Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA

Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium'

Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit?

Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL

Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes

6 Factors That Describe China's Current State

Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing

Little Bitty

Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid

17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago

Hamas Still Killing IDF Soldiers After 642 Days


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: So that's what they mean by the “War on Poverty”
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... hats_what_they_mean_by_the.php
Published: Mar 18, 2011
Author: PZ Myers
Post Date: 2011-03-22 17:25:22 by CadetD
Keywords: cashless, society
Views: 2109
Comments: 91

Minnesota is leading the way. Our Rethuglicans have figured out how to end poverty: by making it illegal to have money if you're poor? Wait, that makes no sense.

Minnesota Republicans are pushing legislation that would make it a crime for people on public assistance to have more $20 in cash in their pockets any given month.

Lest you think our most contemptible lawmakers have no heart at all, consider that this is the generous version of their earlier plan.

This represents a change from their initial proposal, which banned them from having any money at all.

I'm not sure what they're thinking. If they're so poor, the only way they could have any money is if they stole it from a rich guy? Or something? Maybe they're just setting up a perfect Catch 22: now the police can roust someone who looks poor, and if they've got no money, send them to jail for vagrancy; if they've got more than $20, arrest them for possession of illegal currency.

Some people don't believe me. Here's the link to the proposed legislation. They want to give all benefits via a debit card so they can restrict and monitor purchases. And if this is their sole source of income, that means they're only allowed a cash allowance of $20/month. Control, control, control.

Section 1. [256.9870] ELECTRONIC BENEFIT TRANSFER DEBIT CARD. Subdivision 1. Electronic benefit transfer or EBT debit card. (a) Electronic benefit transfer (EBT) debit cardholders in the general assistance program and the Minnesota supplemental aid program under chapter 256D and programs under chapter 256J are prohibited from withdrawing cash from an automatic teller machine or receiving cash from vendors with the EBT debit card. The EBT debit card may only be used as a debit card. (b) Beginning July 1, 2011, cash benefits for programs listed under paragraph (a) must be issued on a separate EBT card with the head of household's name printed on the card. The card must also state that "It is unlawful to use this card to purchase tobacco products or alcoholic beverages." This card must be issued within 30 calendar days of an eligibility determination. During the initial 30 calendar days of eligibility, a recipient may have cash benefits issued on an EBT card without the recipient's name printed on the card. This card may be the same card on which food support is issued and does not need to meet the requirements of this section. (c) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), EBT cardholders may opt to have up to $20 per month accessible via automatic teller machine or receive up to $20 cash back from a vendor.

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

http://wonkette.com/440932/minnesota-republicans-to-outlaw-poor-people-having-money; Link to legislation: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bin/bldbill.php?bill=H0171.1.html&session=ls87

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 54.

#2. To: CadetD (#0)

I get behind welfare recipients at the grocery store, their basket is filled with cuts of meat that I can't afford. They have candy, soft drinks, ice cream to the top of the basket. They pull out their "Lone Star" card and bingo!, it's on me. Then they set their cigarettes, beer and wine up and pull out cash to pay for that. All the time they are chatting on an IPhone that costs at least $300.00. I guess I don't really have a problem with what's being proposed. Welfare recipients should ONLY have access to healthy food, nothing else, and if they can afford beer, wine, cigarettes, etc, they can afford their own food.

Luke The Spook  posted on  2011-03-22   18:04:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Luke The Spook (#2)

Welfare recipients should ONLY have access to healthy food, nothing else, and if they can afford beer, wine, cigarettes, etc, they can afford their own food.

Then they should ALSO prohibit ALL food and drink which contains Aspartame, MSG, High Fructose Corn Syrup, genetically modified corn and soy, artificial colors, artifical flavors, and preservatives.

If you want them to eat healthy, then at least eliminate the REAL poisons which are present on grocery store shelves.

Oh and BTW, MANY working families collect foodstamps, so don't think they're all "welfare recipients".

BTW, do you feel as strongly about this for oil companies who get billions of dollars in subsidies (ie. corporate welfare) and tax breaks each and every year? Should we restrict them to only making a $20 profit over cost each month?

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-03-22   20:00:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: FormerLurker (#7)

Oh and BTW, MANY working families collect foodstamps, so don't think they're all "welfare recipients".

Welfare, state sponsored welfare, should be eliminated. Period. That's the job of the churches, not the government. The churches are close to the population. They know who needs assistance, and who's looking for a free ride.

I do missionary work in Central America. Those people don't have welfare! They feed their families by working, whatever, where ever, whenever, however. Real work, HARD work. By comparison "Merikan welfare recipients are rich beyond belief!

Corporate welfare? There is no "To big to fail". Let the business compete. They don't make a profit, they go bankrupt.

Luke The Spook  posted on  2011-03-22   20:46:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Luke The Spook (#11)

Welfare, state sponsored welfare, should be eliminated. Period.

If ALL assisstance were cut off, what do people do, rob banks and mug people in order to feed their families? I'm not talking about the career welfare cases, I'm talking about those who have been laid off and can't find meaningful work that can provide enough income to support themselves and their families.

If it were eliminated altogether and the economic situation doesn't improve immediately, forcing people to starve and live in the street, there'd be widespread chaos, turmoil, and anarchy.

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-03-22   21:00:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: FormerLurker, Luke The Spook (#14)

If it were eliminated altogether and the economic situation doesn't improve immediately, forcing people to starve and live in the street, there'd be widespread chaos, turmoil, and anarchy.

Exactly. And the really sick thing is employers are intentionally avoiding the long term unemployed for whatever strange reasoning.

Based on the numbers that are not fudged the overall unemployment rate is somewhere around 22%. In Oregon, where I live, it is closer to 25%. There are not even many minimum wage jobs, and places that would previously willing to hire someone with respiration, like Blockbuster, now are demanding experience for a minimum wage counter job.

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-03-22   21:12:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Original_Intent (#17)

Something for you to consider. This nation wasn't built on "having a job", it was built on creating a job, doing a job, not working for some multinational corporation. I have faith in the people in this country who want to work, not the parasites.

Blockbuster "demands"! Phucque'em!

Luke The Spook  posted on  2011-03-22   21:46:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Luke The Spook, FormerLurker (#18)

Something for you to consider. This nation wasn't built on "having a job", it was built on creating a job, doing a job, not working for some multinational corporation. I have faith in the people in this country who want to work, not the parasites.

I do not disagree. However, how many of the small business licenses, taxes, restrictions, and zoning laws existed while this country was building?

No, it is not impossible for someone to start a business, but it takes a lot of knowledge of the bureaucracy and stupid laws to keep one alive.

I don't like welfare, I don't like forced hand-outs. I also don't like seeing people grubbing in garbage cans and children starving on the side of the road.

The laws we have now have been set up to FORCE people to work for someone else. To work for those multinationals. Except that now, like a sick game of musical chairs, the jobs have all been shipped out of the country - intentionally to set up this situation. A knee jerk reaction is not a solution.

I don't have an easy solution, politically, that is going to solve it. Ideally taxes would be cut to a tenth of what they now are and most of the stupid counterproductive rules and regulations done away with.

Realistically, do you honestly see a way to do that quickly so that we don't wind up with hundreds of thousands of children starving to death?

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-03-22   22:00:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Original_Intent (#19)

Realistically, do you honestly see a way to do that quickly so that we don't wind up with hundreds of thousands of children starving to death?

What we have now doesn't work. It can't be sustained, economically or morally, and the planet can't sustain it. So. we suck it up and take the pain. It won't be easy, however, the longer it goes on, the worse it ultimately will be. Those who have the will to survive, will survive. They will find a way. Creative, imaginative humans will survive and prosper.

I really enjoyed Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged". Maybe it was prophetic. Perhaps that's the answer.

Luke The Spook  posted on  2011-03-22   22:24:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Luke The Spook, Original_Intent (#22)

I really enjoyed Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged".

A great book that goes over the heads of the leftist peebrains

Flintlock  posted on  2011-03-22   23:15:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Flintlock (#38)

Damn Straight! Ayn Rand - "All for Me and Me for Me". Unidimensional, limited vision, and a great saleswoman. While Capitalism has its virtues, and is much superior to socialism, it is not without flaw. And the type of tunnel vision of Ayn Rand appeals to a certain class of shallow thinker who does not look beyond their own personal advantage.

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-03-22   23:26:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: Original_Intent (#39)

Ayn Rand - "All for Me and Me for Me".

Not at all! Ayn Rand admired competence above all else. The competent individual is usually able to take care of themselves and their dependents. They are not a burden on society, and she believed that such individuals should not be burdened by those who are incompetent and can't or won't take care of themselves. She particularly despised people who got into responsible positions because they knew someone in the bureaucracy and then screwed everything up because they didn't have a clue.

She believed there would be no need for welfare if people were taking care of their own problems and their own burdens. She called this The Virtue of Selfishness.

angK  posted on  2011-03-22   23:54:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: angK (#42)

She called this The Virtue of Selfishness.

The problem is that there is no virtue in selfishness. I admire competence as well, but the reality is that not all people are of equal ability. In a sane society the more able end up in the higher positions and the less able are still accorded a survivable situation. That is in an ideal world. We do not have an ideal world and people do not live in isolation from one another. In looking at the current scene I deal in realities not theoretical constructs. In reality we have a rotten and corrupt political system, and a population which is largely apathetic. That is the reality. We have an economic system that is increasingly controlled by a very few for their own selfish benefit. So, much for the virtue of selfishness.

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-03-23   0:09:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: Original_Intent (#45)

In a sane society the more able end up in the higher positions and the less able are still accorded a survivable situation. That is in an ideal world. We do not have an ideal world and people do not live in isolation from one another.

That is not a sane society O.I., nor an ideal world. That is the kind of society that should be avoided at all costs. You are still advocating a society where the CAN! DO! and those who CAN'T! LIVE OFF THE DOERS! Are you suggesting that the less able should be afforded jobs such as maids, landscapers, hewers of wood?

A sane society is one where the able take care of the less able members of their own families. That way, no-one else has to take care of them. That is not living in isolation from one another, that is THE VIRTUE OF SELFISHNESS and that is the true definition of competence and sanity.

angK  posted on  2011-03-23   0:40:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: angK (#52)

That is not a sane society O.I., nor an ideal world. That is the kind of society that should be avoided at all costs. You are still advocating a society where the CAN! DO! and those who CAN'T! LIVE OFF THE DOERS! Are you suggesting that the less able should be afforded jobs such as maids, landscapers, hewers of wood?

Everyone is capable of doing something. I am not suggesting that the less able should freeload. Just that in accord to merit and ability the more able, in a sane society, rise to the more responsible positions and the less able work at those tasks which they are able to competently do. There is dignity in work and in making one's own way - being productive. It is like the comment of Oliver Wendell Holmes - "all pursuits are great when greatly pursued". Living off of your family is no real difference from drawing a welfare check. Because some are more able does not require that those less able do nothing. Each of us is responsible for our own condition. It is just an acknowledgment of reality - all may be equal before the law but not all are equal in ability.

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-03-23   0:52:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: Original_Intent (#53)

Living off of your family is no real difference from drawing a welfare check. Because some are more able does not require that those less able do nothing. Each of us is responsible for our own condition.

I am thinking more of the disabled than the less able. The point is that they should not be a burden on society.

"Each of us is responsible for our own condition." Tsk, tsk, tsk. That is getting dangerously close to the VIRTUE OF SELFISHNESS.

By the way. It has occurred to me that there are whole families of incompetents, that may not be able to take care of their own. Ayn Rand appreciated a good hamburger and included anyone in any line of work, in her philosophy, as long as they were competent.

angK  posted on  2011-03-23   1:41:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 54.

        There are no replies to Comment # 54.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 54.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]