[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel

Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups

Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum

Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics

"I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox

The UK is F*CKED, and the people have had enough

No place for hate apeech

America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country

Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house.

Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC

Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES

Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)


Pious Perverts
See other Pious Perverts Articles

Title: Yukon Drops the Soap
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=305216
Published: Mar 27, 2011
Author: yukon
Post Date: 2011-03-27 13:14:48 by JRiggs
Keywords: None
Views: 171335
Comments: 627

Title: New favorite website
Source: Gun broker
URL Source: http://www.lovethecock.com/
Published: Mar 27, 2011
Author: yukon
Post Date: 2011-03-27 01:39:54 by yukon
Views: 490
Comments: 45

For shooting and killing. Addicting and no libturds!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 295.

#239. To: JRiggs, all, buckeroo (#0)

Check out this thread at LF:

libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...?ArtNum=19108&Disp=35#C35

Buckeroo comes to the aid and defense of Yukon, positing that he has been framed, framed I tell ya.

He claims that there are "rumors" that somebody or someone has done Yukie wrong by hacking into LP and posting the hard core gay porn link. It gets worse. He claims that Goldi is smart, savvy and cunning.......having an ulterior motive to remove Yukie from LP in order to save the site from going down. Yukon, therefore, must be sacrificed, martyred for the greater good of the bastion of free speech known as Liberty Post.

Yukon, posing as Iblu, questions Buckeroo about the possibility that Buckeroo would be just the sort of fellow to pull a stunt like that. Meanwhile, Buckeroo continues to pretend that Iblu isn't Yukon and lashes out at others who must "prove" it to be true.

Enjoy the comedy of Buckeroo sucking up to Iblu and creating conspiracy theories to put Yukon back into the closet........and in some sinister twist perhaps get his posting rights resumed by the ever so bright Goldi-Lox.

abraxas  posted on  2011-03-29   11:07:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#244. To: abraxas (#239)

Check out this thread at LF:

libertysflame.com/cgi-bin...?ArtNum=19108&Disp=35#C35

Buckeroo comes to the aid and defense of Yukon, positing that he has been framed, framed I tell ya.

I read it. I really though bucky was smarter than that, or at the least he was putting on an act.

JRiggs  posted on  2011-03-29   13:02:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#251. To: JRiggs, abraxas (#244)

I read it. I really though bucky was smarter than that, or at the least he was putting on an act.

It is quite possible that Buck was being sarcastic. He has an odd sense of humor.

farmfriend  posted on  2011-03-29   13:45:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#255. To: farmfriend (#251)

It is quite possible that Buck was being sarcastic. He has an odd sense of humor.

Even War was begging him to accept the obvious instead of questioning Yukon even after he outed himself from the closet and as Iblu on LF.

abraxas  posted on  2011-03-29   13:52:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#256. To: abraxas, farmfriend (#255)

Bucko still can't accept the fact that the official 9/11 story is complete BS.

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-03-29   13:56:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#260. To: FormerLurker, abraxas (#256)

Bucko still can't accept the fact that the official 9/11 story is complete BS.

Coming from someone who fully accepts the official line on AGW, you don't have much room to throw stones.

farmfriend  posted on  2011-03-29   14:24:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#262. To: farmfriend (#260)

Coming from someone who fully accepts the official line on AGW, you don't have much room to throw stones.

Huh? It's been years since I spoke on the topic, and I don't have any real firm stance on it one way or the other. Why do you even bring it up?

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-03-29   14:25:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#265. To: FormerLurker (#262)

Huh? It's been years since I spoke on the topic, and I don't have any real firm stance on it one way or the other. Why do you even bring it up?

Because I'm a woman and I never forget past wrongs. In my mind you were being hypocritical.

farmfriend  posted on  2011-03-29   14:28:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#266. To: farmfriend (#265)

Because I'm a woman and I never forget past wrongs. In my mind you were being hypocritical.

In my mind you were shilling for the oil companies. I'm willing to bury the hatchet if you are.

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-03-29   14:30:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#269. To: FormerLurker (#266)

In my mind you were shilling for the oil companies. I'm willing to bury the hatchet if you are.

Again, you were the one shilling for the oil companies since they are the ones funding AGW. I'm willing to go back to ignoring you but I will never trust you.

farmfriend  posted on  2011-03-29   14:33:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#272. To: farmfriend (#269)

Again, you were the one shilling for the oil companies since they are the ones funding AGW.

You are quite confused if you think the oil companies wish to stop selling oil at jacked up prices.

I'm willing to go back to ignoring you but I will never trust you

Likewise then.

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-03-29   14:35:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#275. To: FormerLurker, farmfriend, all (#272)

Let us not allow the global warming question to overshadow our gloating, please...

wudidiz  posted on  2011-03-29   14:37:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#279. To: wudidiz (#275) (Edited)

Let us not allow the global warming question to overshadow our gloating, please...

I'm not the one who brought it up. Like I said, it's not even on my mind these days and I have no firm idea of whether or not it's a valid concern, other than the fact POLLUTION in general should be a concern for everyone.

EDIT:

ALSO, our dependence on oil is what is driving the wars in the Middle East, while the oil companies are raping us with their jacked up prices.

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-03-29   14:40:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#288. To: FormerLurker, wudidiz (#279)

I'm not the one who brought it up. Like I said, it's not even on my mind these days and I have no firm idea of whether or not it's a valid concern, other than the fact POLLUTION in general should be a concern for everyone.

Of course AGW has nothing to do with pollution at all but hey let's not split hairs. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is necessary for life actually.

ALSO, our dependence on oil is what is driving the wars in the Middle East, while the oil companies are raping us with their jacked up prices.

Prices that are artificially jacked up BECAUSE of the AGW crap. It is planned that way. Manufactured shortages always drive up price and they are manufacturing shortages with the AGW environmental controls. That's the way the NWO works. They also make a killing off the green stuff because of government subsidies. When the subsidies dry up, they pull out and projects go under. It is a win win for them.

farmfriend  posted on  2011-03-29   14:53:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#295. To: farmfriend (#288)

CO2 is not a pollutant. It is necessary for life actually

Burning oil does more than just produce CO2. In fact, the production of petroleum derived plastics does a LOT more damage to the environment.

What the question was in terms of global warming was whether or not the CO2 was rising to abnormal levels, where the earth could not absorb what was being produced.

Humans don't require CO2, but plants (including ocean plankton) do. Thing is, too much of ANYTHING can be bad.

Bottom line is, there are more than likely cheaper and better ways to produce energy, and to produce necessary items such as plastics. Thing is, there is NO way in hell they will be allowed to replace oil, since those who pull the strings rely on oil for their monopoly on power and energy.

Hence, the idea that oil companies would be FOR curtailing their own profits seems a bit ludicrous.

FormerLurker  posted on  2011-03-29   15:09:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 295.

#299. To: FormerLurker (#295)

What the question was in terms of global warming was whether or not the CO2 was rising to abnormal levels, where the earth could not absorb what was being produced.

Since we are historic lows for the planet I doubt that is the case.

farmfriend  posted on  2011-03-29 15:17:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 295.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]