Title: 25% Of Marines Would Shoot Americans, 100% Of Oath Keepers Would Shoot Them Back (2/2) Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Apr 6, 2011 Author:Stewart Rhodes Post Date:2011-04-06 10:52:09 by christine Keywords:None Views:640 Comments:52
The "patriot" movement has been compromised. There was no extermination of the Jewish people in WW2. The Jews are controlling "oath-keepers" which means they are controlled opposition. They exist for one purpose only, to identify those that could cause them trouble. Don't ever join this false opposition group.
The "patriot" movement has been compromised. There was no extermination of the Jewish people in WW2. The Jews are controlling "oath-keepers" which means they are controlled opposition. They exist for one purpose only, to identify those that could cause them trouble. Don't ever join this false opposition group.
You're full of dogshit, RickyJ. I am a founding member of Oath Keepers. I am to the left of the frame on this video on April 19th, 2009. I am the Vice President of Southern Texas for Oath Keepers.
We are not a controlled opposition group. We are working on restoring sound money at the state level and the real state militias to provide economic and monetary security to the states.
Stewart Rhodes has worked for Ron Paul as a staffer and is as solid as any patriot out there. We uphold the constitution, and encourage others to do the same. We might only have 3%, would you rather we lay down and die?
You need to clean the shit out of your head, you have no fucking clue what you are talking about.
wow, quite a statement there. Is that supposed to represent your group in a positive light? You sound like the typical rage-filled out of control trigger-temper cops who are featured in the news & on 4um everyday.
I am just tired of every patriotic organization being characterized as a "controlled opposition group" by someone. Doesn't matter which group it is, someone will always jump on a site like this and claim we are "controlled opposition". It is starting to piss me off just a little bit.
When my dad passed away, some people jumped on various websites and started saying the same thing about my dad, how he was a "token jew" for the Birch Society, or he was a NWO plant to flush out patriots, and that he was a millionaire from his work with George Soros or David Rockefeller. When I was a teenager, our family, all seven of us had to eat rice and beans for lunch a lot because we couldn't afford anything else. Millions of dollars damn sure would have helped then. We paid the price for fighting for freedom. Now I am an adult, doing the same thing, and I am accused of being "controlled opposition".
I am just really tired of people who don't know what they are talking about spouting off about this organization or the next with no reason or proof for what they are saying.
oh ok. I can understand that.But since you are a principled man who ive posted w/ for years here & lp,i think i can say you owe it to yourself, your group & rickyJ who is a long-time poster deserved of respect to uphold high Christian standards.My 2cents
My boss' wife just dropped dead from a two day bacterial infection today, and I was kind of in a bad mood. Ricky, your post just caught me at a really bad time. I am sorry I jumped your case.
The American government has already taken fire power to veterans, during the Anocostia Veteran's Camp removal while Hoover was still POTUS. General MacArthur came in with his army tanks and troops to push out the starving veterans who had set up the camp to demand some food for their families. At the time of the removal, women and children were in the camp too, but that didn't matter to MacArthur. The move assured FDR's win and also brought about Veteran's Affairs.
It would be my guess that MacArthur was following the orders from the same people who gave Hoover his orders, and that would be those who would rob the country of its wealth and prosperity for their own profit, the upper crust of the elite.
I would also say it's likely that Hoover took the blame because he was told to. I'd think a president would fire a general who repeatedly disobeyed direct orders.
Hoover took the blame because he was told to I would guess.
I questioned the rogue general aspect of the story too. I had to laugh at MacArthur's justification that the starving veterans in the camp were planning to take over the government. As for Hoover, I don't think he had much of a chance anyway as he had already taken treasury to prop up businesses like Bush and Obama have done while the plight of the people got continually worse despite all the rosy stories that happy days were here again.
It's interesting to look at the news coverage during this time, as the MSM was spewing disinformation steadily then as they do now. When the tenant farmers in AK had a peaceful demonstration to demand food for the starving, it was all covered at "riots" and such. Leading up to the massive theft of the people's savings and assets, prior to the stock market crash, all the newspaper whores were taking pay-offs from businesses to write propaganda about how good those stocks were. This bubble and bust cycle is continual, every 20-30 years, where the politicians and businesses work together to pick the meat off the carcass just as soon as the memory of the last one fades and the people are ripe for duping again.