[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Thomas Massie NAMES Epstein as a CIA and Israeli Asset How Chickens See the World (Its CRAZIER Than You Think) You remember TommyTheMadArtist? Joe Rogan on the Belgian Malinois Democrat New Mexico Governor Admits National Guard Making Progress In High-Crime Albuquerque Florida banning vaccine mandates To Prevent Strokes, Take Potassium. Lawyer for Epstein VICTIMS Shares Details Trump FEARED THE MOST WW3? French Hospitals Told To Prepare For A "Major Military Engagement" Within Six Months The Zionist Experiment Is Over Sen. Tim Kaine: ‘Extremely Troubling’ to Say Natural Rights Are from God Israel & The Assassination Of The Kennedy Brothers JEWISH RITUAL MURDER (Documentary) The Pakistani mayor of Rotherham claims she proud to be British and proud to be Pakistani. Khe Sanh 1968 How U.S. Marines Faced the Siege in Vietnam Did Xi's Parade Flip The Script On US Defense Of Taiwan? Cascade Volcanoes Show Weird Pulse Without Warning – Mount Rainier Showing Signs of Trouble! Cash Jordan: Chicago Apartments RAIDED... ICE 'Forcibly Evicts' Illegal Squatters at 3AM We are FINALLY turning the tide on 9/11 - The TRUTH is coming out | Redacted w Clayton Morris Netanyahu SHAKEN as New Hostage Video DESTROYS IDF Lies! We are FINALLY turning the tide on 9/11 VIDEO Shocking Video Shows Ukrainian Refugee Fatally Stabbed On Charlotte Train By Career Criminal Man Identifies as Cat to Cop his video made her stop consuming sugar. Shot And Bothered - Restored Classic Coyote & Road Runner Looney Tunes Cartoon 1966 How to Prove the Holocaust is a Hoax in Under 2 Minutes ..And The Legacy Media Wonders Why Nobody Trusts Them "The Time For Real Change Is Now!" - Conor McGregor Urges Irish To Lobby Councillors For Presidential Bid Daniela Cambone: Danger Not Seen in 40+ Years Tucker Carlson: Whistleblower Exposes the Real Puppet Masters Controlling the State Department

Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: News on The George Gordon School Of Law
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 14, 2011
Author: Innieway
Post Date: 2011-04-14 08:57:52 by innieway
Keywords: None
Views: 755
Comments: 35

Does anybody remember George Gordon? I found something very interesting which may be of interest to those who do...

George Gordon Lies

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

#1. To: innieway (#0)

Does anybody remember George Gordon?

Yes, I do. What I remember most/best is his story about how he was held in contempt one time for refusing to take an oath in court. It was a pretty entertaining story.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2011-04-14   9:13:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

did you ever listen to eric whoru? that guy was hilarious.

Artisan  posted on  2011-04-14   9:35:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

One of the guys I enjoyed listening to was Howard Freeman. He was into the UCC thing and told people why they should write "without prejudice" above their signatures on traffic tickets and things like that. Very interesting, very informative speaker. One of the funniest stories he told was about some guy in California who called him. Man was out of work and had gotten a speeding ticket and, iirc, it was going to cost him something like 200 bucks. So Mr. Freeman was telling him about writing that above his signature and the man said thanks and was about to hang up. But Mr. Freeman started trying to explain to him WHY he should write that and the guy told him that he appreciated it but if that is what Mr. Freeman said he should do then he would do that but he couldn't afford to stay on the phone too long 'cause it was long distance and then hung up. So the day came the guy had to go to court and the judge looked at the ticket, looked at where he had signed "without prejudice" and asked the guy what it meant. Of course the judge most likely knew what it was supposed to mean but the guy said it meant that he wasn't prejudiced against anyone, that he "loved niggers, Jews and everyone." And the judge doubled his fine.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2011-04-14   9:53:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

haha! actually id like to see that doubled fine challenged on appeal, since its the guys right to think what he wants.

Artisan  posted on  2011-04-14   10:00:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

haha! actually id like to see that doubled fine challenged on appeal, since its the guys right to think what he wants.

Sure he has the right to think what he wants. I think the judge was fining him as much for his ignorance as his views. If he knew why he signed it the way he was told to sign it, it should have helped him some.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2011-04-14   10:40:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

i dont know what "without prejudice' means. do you? i do have a problem with judge arbitrarily raising fines for alleged violation of vehicle code. If a defendant had a lick of sense, they would aggressively challenge such an act legally. i know i would.

Artisan  posted on  2011-04-14   10:48:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Yes, as a matter of fact I do know what it means. Simplified, it means that you are saying you are not willfully or knowingly waiving any right (or even any privilege) by signing your name. It is almost the same, or maybe is the same, as writing on there something like "I am signing this $#it under duress and only because I was told I had to in order to avoid going to jail. And I am not waiving any of my rights, including, but not limited to, the right to trial by jury." It's shorter to write "without prejudice" and is not as likely to get you a ride into the hoosegow and a phony charge of resisting arrest or other such bs.

“The making of a valid Reservation of Rights preserves whatever rights the person then possesses, and prevents the loss of such rights by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel.” (UCC 1-207.7)

http://truthpills.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/without-prejudice-ucc-1207-1-308/

James Deffenbach  posted on  2011-04-14   12:28:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#23. To: James Deffenbach (#13)

thanks for the explanation!

Artisan  posted on  2011-04-15 03:55:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]