Title: Foreign Policy & War Profiteering Source:
YouTube and whatreallyhappened.com URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtwUjcGNuIw Published:Apr 21, 2011 Author:AbbyMediaRoots Post Date:2011-04-21 18:47:27 by GreyLmist Keywords:Foreign Policy, War Profiteering, Lobbyists for War, Corporate Campaign Contributio Views:102 Comments:6
Good stuff and dead on. All this comes to a halt once the grunts get a clue and become house painters or electricians, rather than paid assassins for Uncle Sholom.
Thank you. At 3:16 is where it talks about war for personal gain like the millions that Congress has invested in the Military Industrial Complex, MIC lobbying and campaign donations, policy roadmap prescriptions for Pakistan, the Balkans, Cuba, Iraq, Iran, and Libya drafted by groups like the Atlantic Council and handed down to our Senate Foreign Relations committee, Hagel, Kerry, and so on.
Submitted by chopinwood on Thu, 01/05/2012 - 11:41 in Peace / War
Wow - A fair article about Ron Paul?
I tend to see Ron Paul as the only real traditional conservative out there today, and not at all out of sorts with strong American traditions that dominated the Republican Party up to 1952, said Sean Kay, a political science policy professor at Ohio Wesleyan University. Ron Paul has very appropriately challenged two fundamental assumptions about the war on terror and national security: that terrorism is a tactic and cannot be defeated in any conventional sense and that the U.S. Constitution should matter on things like counter- terrorism and national security.
Dylan Ratigan interview of Lucy Morgan Edwards, former political advisor to the EU Ambassador, reporter for the Economist, and author of "The Afghan Solution."
Around the 2 1/2 min. mark, she mentions Ahmed Shah Massoud/The Lion of Panjshir/creator of the United Front (Northern Alliance) by his last name; says he was contacted in July 2001 by the [allegedly] Anti-Taliban character, "Abdul Haq" and they agreed to work together for internal rebellion in Afghanistan. Next, she says, "But then, of course, 9/11 happened" -- completely skipping over the assassination of that Northern Alliance leader, oddly just days before 9/11. Apparently "Haq" was also working with the Taliban and supposedly didn't want the West to bomb Afghanistan because the Northern Alliance would break into Kabul and take the reigns of power. When she says, "Tajik warlords" at the 4:15 mark, she is talking about the Northern Alliance, which is largely comprised of forces outside of Afghanistan -- from Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. She does not say that the Taliban have been pushed by the War mostly to the SE corner where not only water resources are lowest but which is likely the direction that the pipeline would move into Pakistan. As usual, no mention is made of the Pashtun's Hebrew roots or that bin Laden was married to a Pashtun. What we can deduce, though, is that something of a cat and mouse game for the expansion of Pipelinestan was being set up prior to 9/11 and the War has been drug out for the benefit of Profiteers.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
My Title: "The Fighting Season" and War Profiteering [original video title: "The 9/11 Argument Is Growing A Bit Stale!" War Profiteering MIC Stooge SMACKDOWN!] -- view at the site; 12 1/2 mins.
Summary notes:
"The Fighting Season" - at 4:55 [March?/Mars: War Planet]
Fighting Season to fight for what, and who are we fighting, and to what end? - at 5:27
Ethnic Cleansing of the Taliban - at 8:08
Regime Change in partnership with Northern Alliance tribes (meaning mostly Tajikistani and Uzbekistani foreign forces, not Afghans) - at 8:18
"7th Cenutury Talibanism" ? -- at 8:34; Taliban (meaning "students" or "two students") didn't even exist until 1996. Afghanistan was Islamic long before then.
Afghanistan was "on a diet of resources" until 2010 - at 9:19
NIE Report; fighting Afghans whose country we are in - at 9:43
Accelerate departure time; what we're doing has stopped making sense a long time ago - at 11:50
In summary: French/Amercan Foreign Legion-type outsourcing -- Using our Military as Bloodsport diversion for Resource War, like (symbol of France) rooster fights
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC