[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Jimmy Dore: CHINA & 20 Nations To Intervene & End Israel’s Genocide!

20,000 Women. 350 Kilometers. Zero Pay. In One Week. How Did Ibrahim Traore Pull This Off?

Spain is in CHAOS! Revolution is in the air

Joe Rogan Ambushes Gavin Newsom Via Text With A COVID Question He Never Saw Coming

Batman Vs The Joker: Democrats Will Double Down On Chaos To Save Their Party

US Vows To Quit IEA If The Agency Keeps Pushing Green Transition

Tucker Carlson: People Are Frustrated That Certain Commit Crimes With Impunity

No news again, but the battle of the machines marches on...

Cash Jordan: Rioters ATTACK ICE HQ… Troops FLATTEN Uprising With ‘Zero Mercy’

Doctor Reveals What COVID Vaccines Do to the Lungs in Just One Week

Sorry paid off influencers, MAGA bot accounts, and Satan....but I'm not going to just "move on"

Marjorie Taylor Greene Bombshell Interview

Welcome To The Land Of The Free... Until You Express An Opinion

Putin ‘tells Iran to accept nuclear deal with no enrichment’

76% of Honey at Stores is Fake

"225,000 Ukrainians have now DESERTED the war" Ukraine is in a death spiral Col. Dan Davis

The New York Times Finally Stops Avoiding The G-Word

The Gaza Water Massacre: What Israel Just Confessed About Shooting Children

Powerful ERUPTION spit out volcanic mud and debris - Army Personnel ran for their lives

Another 'Conspiracy Theory' Comes True: California Bill Passes To Buy Fire-Ravaged Palisades For Low-Income Apartments

A 1,600-year-old church in the Holy Land has been torched. But not by ISIS.

More civilians have been killed while seeking aid in Gaza than were killed on 7 October.

MORE TRANS VIOLENCE

WAYNE ROOT: Here’s How Trump Turns the Epstein List Fiasco into Home Run

Maxwell Says Epstein Client List Implicates Top Democrats

Medical Record Review Of the Twins Who Died After Vaccination

New federal secrets exposed as Republican unravels Lee Harvey Oswald's hidden ties to CIA

Protest outside migrant hotel in Essex erupts into violence

Congressman Faces Eviction Over $85k Back-Rent For Luxury DC Penthouse

This Is Not Normal! We Just Had Four “1-In-1,000-Year Storms” In A Single Week!


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Official kilo losing weight (atoms)?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-04-scientists-kilo-weight.html
Published: Apr 26, 2011
Author: staff
Post Date: 2011-04-26 02:10:01 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 251
Comments: 14

Ensuring a pound of butter is indeed a pound, or a gallon of milk a full gallon, has long been the province of government agencies that deal with weights and measures. But now it seems scientists are having a little trouble with the golf-ball-size piece of metal that is used to set the standard weight for a kilogram, or kilo.

A bunch of these prototypes have been made over the years, seven of which are kept in a triple-locked vault at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in Sevres, with one known as the International Prototype.

The problem is that as these prototypes have been taken out and weighed, which last happened in 1990, something odd has turned up - their weights began diverging. The International Prototype, for example, weighed 50 micrograms less than the others, meaning it had lost weight, or the others were getting heavier, or they were all moving a bit - no one knows for certain. And no one knows what caused the changing weights, either.

Americans might not think the definition of a kilo affects them, but it does. Since 1893 "the pound has been defined as a derived measure of the kilo," says Richard Davis, formerly the kilogram specialist with the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology and then the secretary of the Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities.

Not that the 50 micrograms will affect someone buying a pound of coffee in America or a kilo of potatoes in Germany. "It's a pretty small effect. It's the weight of a small grain of sand, and this has no consequence," says Michael Stock, director of the International Bureau's Electricity Department. "It's only people working at the highest levels of science who will be affected."

But to scientists, for whom very precise measurement is important, it's a big deal. So they decided to start working on a new standard based on a universal constant - a measure that relies on science principles rather than on an object whose size or other properties could change from one sample to another.

The standard for a meter, for example, is now defined as "the length of the path traveled by light in vacuum during a time interval of {99,792,458 of a second." Again, even for Americans who don't know a kilometer from a kleptomaniac, this is an issue because the official definition of a foot is exactly 0.3048 meters.

There are seven base units in the International System of Units (things like seconds, meters, degrees) and every one of them but the kilo has one of these universal constant definitions. Only the kilo is still defined by a manmade artifact - in this case a cylinder of metal made up of 90 percent platinum and 10 percent iridium that's 1.54212598 inches high by 1.54212598 inches in diameter. Which, by definition, weighs exactly 1 kilo (2.2046 pounds).

The whole system is based on a group of scientists in France who, after the revolution of 1789, started to set up a universal measurement system to get away from the hodgepodge of measurements then existing in Europe, many of which were based on things like the length of the current king's arm. "What do you do when you get a new king?" Stock says.

The system began to be adopted by the rest of the world in the 19th century when industrialization and international trade made having similar measuring systems important.

But finding a universal constant for a kilo isn't as easy as it might seem.

One suggestion was to create a precise sphere of pure silicon that weighed exactly 1 kilo, then count the number of silicon atoms it contained and define a kilo as the weight of that many silicon atoms. But while that sounds simple, it turns out to be technically very difficult.

Another idea was to base it on a relationship with an esoteric concept in physics called the Planck Constant, something even Stock had trouble expressing in layman's terms. But it would allow scientists to create a definition based on a universal constant.

Except that the experiments to establish it may be a little beyond science just yet. Groups in the United Kingdom, the United States, Switzerland and France have been doing the experiments and so far they have not come up with the same number.

"That's the problem," says Stock. "There are different results, and they don't agree."

It is unlikely that the universe is shifting under our feet, the researchers say. More that our measuring ability isn't quite up to capturing the extremely small thing being measured here.

For now, the kilo stays linked to the platinum/iridium cylinder locked away outside Paris. The meeting of the General Conference on Weights and Measures, which could adopt a new definition of the kilo, is scheduled for 2015.

Asked whether we can expect a definitive kilo by then, Stock smiles. "Probably yes, but good science takes time."

(c) 2011, USA Today. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

#2. To: Tatarewicz, RickyJ (#0)

A litre of water always weighs a kilogram.

wudidiz  posted on  2011-04-26   14:19:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: wudidiz (#2)

A litre of water always weighs a kilogram.

Only under precise temperature and pressure it does.

RickyJ  posted on  2011-04-26   17:58:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: RickyJ (#3)

Before I google it, let me guess.

Room temperature and at sea level?

wudidiz  posted on  2011-04-26   22:18:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: RickyJ, All (#4)

To say the temperature of the water affects the weight is somewhat misleading. If you take 1 gallon of room temperature water and place it in a sealed container, the weight will not change regardless of the temperature. Weight is the measure of the pull of gravity on the mass of an object. The mass of water will not change based on temperature, therefore the weight will not change. To be more accurate, the temperature of the water will affect the volume. Ice takes up more space than liquid water. Therefore a gallon of ice will contain less mass than a gallon of room temperature water. The difference in volume is what causes the difference in mass and therefore, the difference in weight. However, it's useful enough to know that 1 gallon of water weighs about 8 1/3lbs.

wudidiz  posted on  2011-04-26   22:44:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: wudidiz (#5)

To say the temperature of the water affects the weight is somewhat misleading.

I didn't say that, nor did I imply that. The way to measure a litre of water is defined, correct? So if it is solid it will be less dense and weigh less with the same volume as it would as a liquid.

I am correct, water has to be a precise temperature and precise pressure for an accurate measurement of a kilo. It also has to be pure, nothing but water.

RickyJ  posted on  2011-04-26   22:53:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 6.

#7. To: RickyJ (#6)

I didn't say that, nor did I imply that.

Fantastic. I just copy/pasted it from a link.

I am correct, water has to be a precise temperature and precise pressure for an accurate measurement of a kilo. It also has to be pure, nothing but water.

What temperature and what pressure?

wudidiz  posted on  2011-04-26 23:37:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]