I think you're more accurately described as a "general basher" and Jones is just one of those things you decry because of your superior intellect.
Democracy: “a government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meetings or any other form of direct expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude towards property is communistic-negative property rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it is based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. It results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.” The 1928 Army Field Manual
Democracy: “a government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meetings or any other form of direct expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude towards property is communistic-negative property rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it is based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. It results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.” The 1928 Army Field Manual
I don't give Jones a pass. I support exposing the truth. I also recognize human flaws and admit that Jones has his share.
Jones has a very long track record that might be the longest of anyone living today.
His screaming and ranting, his arrogance and propensity to cut callers off mid- sentence disgusts me.
Your previous post makes allegations without supporting facts.
Many find fault with Jones' avoidance of the Jewish problem. I'm absolutely certain that he's as aware of that problem as anyone. Others have been more obvious in their exposure of the Jews but they're either destroyed or made irrelevant, David Duke being the prime example. Duke is far and away more articulate but he's been benched.
I don't think anyone's perfect and that would include Jones. That being said, Jones has done more to awaken the general public to the criminal takeover of America than any other individual.
Democracy: “a government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meetings or any other form of direct expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude towards property is communistic-negative property rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it is based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. It results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.” The 1928 Army Field Manual
since he's been wrong so often on very high-level key things.
Such as ?
Democracy: “a government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meetings or any other form of direct expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude towards property is communistic-negative property rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it is based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. It results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.” The 1928 Army Field Manual
By the way, I'm not an Alex Jones apologist. I think he's made some mistakes and said things that I disagreed with, but not KEY ISSUES and not to intentionally mislead his audience.
Anyone will make mistakes given enough time and exposure.
Democracy: “a government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meetings or any other form of direct expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude towards property is communistic-negative property rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it is based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. It results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.” The 1928 Army Field Manual
If you don't know, then it's time to go do some due diligence.
Another unsubstantiated blurt - weaker than circus lemonade !
Ya know, I responded to PSUSA ... and you decided to enter the conversation by asserting that had others commited comparable acts as Jones that I'd lambaste them ... what acts ?
Democracy: “a government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meetings or any other form of direct expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude towards property is communistic-negative property rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it is based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. It results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.” The 1928 Army Field Manual
The Amero. Now, are you honestly foolish enough to believe that the PTB were truly going to roll out the Amero ~ 2 years ago, but because of Jones' exposure they scrapped their plans?
That AMERO claim originated with Hal Turner - a FED informant. Maybe reporting it was an error but I don't think it was an intentional fraud on Jones' part. [Russia's Medvedev was pictured on Drudge holding some gold plated World Currency too]. At any rate, all I'm merely trying to say is that Jones gets a lot of criticism that isn't deserved.
I wouldn't suggest that anyone is beyond reproach, but as concerns Jones, I think he gets some undeserved harrassment, mostly from others that even use his information when it's convenient.
I think Jones relies too much on guests that are either Birchers or CNP members. I don't necessarily disagree with what they say but more with what they don't say. Paul Craig Roberts bothers me as does John Perkins because they played out their hands while doing business with the bad guys and then got religion.
Jones has a 3 hour program to do every day and often has guests that others don't. Some of those guests may have different views than I do but I still listen. For instance, I like Max Keiser but I don't agree with his take on Global Warming and I think he's a socialist. That doesn't reflect on my opinion of Jones.
Jones is his own worst enemy. His antics cause me to shut him off at times.
Democracy: “a government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meetings or any other form of direct expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude towards property is communistic-negative property rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it is based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. It results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.” The 1928 Army Field Manual