Title: Coast to Coast am Where did the towers go Dr. Judy Wood Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:May 7, 2011 Author:. Post Date:2011-05-07 23:52:29 by wudidiz Ping List:*9-11*Subscribe to *9-11* Keywords:None Views:980 Comments:55
Dr Judy Wood is a certified nut case and 100% false opposition. She had a hand in the death of one of her students that was on to her about the organization she is in and how they are really covering up what happened on 9/11, not revealing the truth.
Dr Judy Wood is a certified nut case and 100% false opposition. She had a hand in the death of one of her students that was on to her about the organization she is in and how they are really covering up what happened on 9/11, not revealing the truth.
Dude, shut up. Bring hard proof or go home. One of the hardest things about all this is dealing with folks like you that still wanna trust that some element of the attack was just as the media told it.
You, shouldn't label someone as a nut case just because you disagree with them... you darn sure would not want to be treated that way yourself over your insane 911 views.
GOD I WISH YOU WOULD FREAKING DIG DEEPER!
I don't like the erratic heat damage, I don't like the melted cars, I don't like the disintegrating spire, but it's all there and no amount of name calling is gonna make it go away, no amount of thermite is gonna account for the pin point damage, nothing conventional explains why a ten story mass of steel in the shape of a spire can turn into dust.
and no planes were used either. I wish you could get that too... Real Planes meant risk.. real planes can't maneuver in the ways the OCT describes, real planes leave parts behind, REAL PLANES DON'T MELT INTO STEEL AND CONCRETE....
Learn more about this whole thing RickyJ , your still only rolling with half the story.
Dude, shut up. Bring hard proof or go home. One of the hardest things about all this is dealing with folks like you that still wanna trust that some element of the attack was just as the media told it.
You, shouldn't label someone as a nut case just because you disagree with them... you darn sure would not want to be treated that way yourself over your insane 911 views.
GOD I WISH YOU WOULD FREAKING DIG DEEPER!
I don't like the erratic heat damage, I don't like the melted cars, I don't like the disintegrating spire, but it's all there and no amount of name calling is gonna make it go away, no amount of thermite is gonna account for the pin point damage, nothing conventional explains why a ten story mass of steel in the shape of a spire can turn into dust.
and no planes were used either. I wish you could get that too... Real Planes meant risk.. real planes can't maneuver in the ways the OCT describes, real planes leave parts behind, REAL PLANES DON'T MELT INTO STEEL AND CONCRETE....
Learn more about this whole thing RickyJ , your still only rolling with half the story.
(cont from below) I don't think the details of 'how they did it' matters as much as the reality of false flags, & getting the people to accept the painful truth.
why would '911 truthers' disparage 'no planers'? are they merely 'conditioned' into disbelief sincerely, or are they part of some larger conspiracy to hide the 'no plane truth'? if so, what would be the point? I'm open to both theories, but dont think th
why would '911 truthers' disparage 'no planers'? are they merely 'conditioned' into disbelief sincerely, or are they part of some larger conspiracy to hide the 'no plane truth'? if so, what would be the point? I'm open to both theories, but dont think the details of 'how they did it' matters as much as the reality of false flags, & getting the people to accept the painful truth.
Why would some truthers disparage others? Because we are suspicious and hostile. Cynical of the shill or the plant... Older wiser truthers get over that hostility and paranoia but the cynicism remains. Especially in those of us not bound my modern propaganda programing.
Are the plane huggers part of a larger conspiracy? Only in so much that they have been programmed to exhibit the knee jerk rejection of theories that sound too outlandish ...it is important to remember the bigger the lie and the more often it is repeated the more likely folks will believe it...but planes slamming into those buildings in the manner on film do not match the known laws of physics from the lack of wake vortex to the lack of blow back in the crash ...so much is wrong with the idea that planes were used given the evidence against. IF the plane huggers could understand the more subtle and complex facets of the event they would no longer be plane huggers.
Are the details of the HOW important?
Very much so I think...for the greater implications of fucked up freaky... What you have with the 911 event is the destruction of a money pit,the destruction of damaging corporate and political evidence (ennron) , testing of new high tech star wars DEW weaponry, testing of realtime media manipulation and live graphic manipulation, MASS NLP Brainwashing focusing on whipping up the war frenzy and uniting the people under the rag of the flag (Made in china) , and the approval to go ahead with all sorts of fucked up liberty stealing legislation.
It was a multi faceted event that did alot of things and advanced alot of agendas. Knowing how it went down, leads to why it went down..and the WHY is even more important the the how but you can't get to that until you pass through there first.