Title: Coast to Coast am Where did the towers go Dr. Judy Wood Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:May 7, 2011 Author:. Post Date:2011-05-07 23:52:29 by wudidiz Ping List:*9-11*Subscribe to *9-11* Keywords:None Views:1367 Comments:55
Most of the nation doubts the official line, and to continue to beat the story is to miss the whirlwind of "change" that is blowing through our doors and windows.
I'm not so sure of that. I know very few personally that do doubt the official story. Then again, I don't know many people. :)
Dr Judy Wood is a certified nut case and 100% false opposition. She had a hand in the death of one of her students that was on to her about the organization she is in and how they are really covering up what happened on 9/11, not revealing the truth.
Dude, shut up. Bring hard proof or go home. One of the hardest things about all this is dealing with folks like you that still wanna trust that some element of the attack was just as the media told it.
You, shouldn't label someone as a nut case just because you disagree with them... you darn sure would not want to be treated that way yourself over your insane 911 views.
GOD I WISH YOU WOULD FREAKING DIG DEEPER!
I don't like the erratic heat damage, I don't like the melted cars, I don't like the disintegrating spire, but it's all there and no amount of name calling is gonna make it go away, no amount of thermite is gonna account for the pin point damage, nothing conventional explains why a ten story mass of steel in the shape of a spire can turn into dust.
and no planes were used either. I wish you could get that too... Real Planes meant risk.. real planes can't maneuver in the ways the OCT describes, real planes leave parts behind, REAL PLANES DON'T MELT INTO STEEL AND CONCRETE....
Learn more about this whole thing RickyJ , your still only rolling with half the story.
United america , america united , united america, america united
sigh...
your programming runs deep dude... Prison planet ain't doing you no favors either.
You should get down with some september clues , or killtown, or smoke and mirrors,
you should stop cherry picking the evidence that best fits the world view you desire and just take the facts as they are no matter how uncomfortable they make you feel.
Dude, shut up. Bring hard proof or go home. One of the hardest things about all this is dealing with folks like you that still wanna trust that some element of the attack was just as the media told it.
You, shouldn't label someone as a nut case just because you disagree with them... you darn sure would not want to be treated that way yourself over your insane 911 views.
GOD I WISH YOU WOULD FREAKING DIG DEEPER!
I don't like the erratic heat damage, I don't like the melted cars, I don't like the disintegrating spire, but it's all there and no amount of name calling is gonna make it go away, no amount of thermite is gonna account for the pin point damage, nothing conventional explains why a ten story mass of steel in the shape of a spire can turn into dust.
and no planes were used either. I wish you could get that too... Real Planes meant risk.. real planes can't maneuver in the ways the OCT describes, real planes leave parts behind, REAL PLANES DON'T MELT INTO STEEL AND CONCRETE....
Learn more about this whole thing RickyJ , your still only rolling with half the story.
(cont from below) I don't think the details of 'how they did it' matters as much as the reality of false flags, & getting the people to accept the painful truth.
why would '911 truthers' disparage 'no planers'? are they merely 'conditioned' into disbelief sincerely, or are they part of some larger conspiracy to hide the 'no plane truth'? if so, what would be the point? I'm open to both theories, but dont think th
"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you".Sirach 4:28
I thought I've seen polls where more than half the nation has doubts as to the official version. I could be wrong, but at this point nearly 10 years later, minds are fixed and a new 'tube or DVD won't move the needle any further in our direction, IMO.
why would '911 truthers' disparage 'no planers'? are they merely 'conditioned' into disbelief sincerely, or are they part of some larger conspiracy to hide the 'no plane truth'? if so, what would be the point? I'm open to both theories, but dont think the details of 'how they did it' matters as much as the reality of false flags, & getting the people to accept the painful truth.
Why would some truthers disparage others? Because we are suspicious and hostile. Cynical of the shill or the plant... Older wiser truthers get over that hostility and paranoia but the cynicism remains. Especially in those of us not bound my modern propaganda programing.
Are the plane huggers part of a larger conspiracy? Only in so much that they have been programmed to exhibit the knee jerk rejection of theories that sound too outlandish ...it is important to remember the bigger the lie and the more often it is repeated the more likely folks will believe it...but planes slamming into those buildings in the manner on film do not match the known laws of physics from the lack of wake vortex to the lack of blow back in the crash ...so much is wrong with the idea that planes were used given the evidence against. IF the plane huggers could understand the more subtle and complex facets of the event they would no longer be plane huggers.
Are the details of the HOW important?
Very much so I think...for the greater implications of fucked up freaky... What you have with the 911 event is the destruction of a money pit,the destruction of damaging corporate and political evidence (ennron) , testing of new high tech star wars DEW weaponry, testing of realtime media manipulation and live graphic manipulation, MASS NLP Brainwashing focusing on whipping up the war frenzy and uniting the people under the rag of the flag (Made in china) , and the approval to go ahead with all sorts of fucked up liberty stealing legislation.
It was a multi faceted event that did alot of things and advanced alot of agendas. Knowing how it went down, leads to why it went down..and the WHY is even more important the the how but you can't get to that until you pass through there first.
"What of the disintegrating spire?" and the melted cars and erratic heat damage and TOTAL lack of chuck concrete , pulverized aint the right word ...atomized is... down the the asbestos
Yes, controlled demolition (of which nano-thermite is king) is the only mechanism by which to create the powdered concrete - the pyroclastic cloud of concrete dust. Nothing else made by man is capable of doing it - only volcanos. And if you watch the online vids of thermite eating up steel, you will see that it is quite capable of the disintegrating spire, the melted cars, and the erratic heat damage.
Dr. Judy Wood is a nut. I have done the research a years ago and don't have the time to educate you now so look yourself.
I agree with you. I've also done the research.
And to be sure, TPTB were going to use a sure thing on 9/11. They weren't going to take any chances that the buildings didn't come down. And nano-thermite is a sure thing. You can prove it in court any time. Please there are thermite chips in all the dust samples. What Judy Woods professes cannot be proven and doesn't work.
"Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide. ~ Gautama Siddhartha The Buddha
#41. To: Eric Stratton, titorite, RickyJ, wudidiz (#29)
Otherwise, to me it's just another resource. I don't trust any single source implicitly anymore in this day and age. Most have proven themselves not fully trustworthy in one form or another.
I became convinced sometime back that Wackypedia is a disinformation outlet. It can be useful for trivia and some things of a non-polictical/social reality nature but they routinely post "Hit-bios" of people and groups that the establishment does not like and will not allow them to be corrected. Generally they will forward only the official disinformation line.
"Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide. ~ Gautama Siddhartha The Buddha
The real problem with WackyPedia is that enough true information is there to build credibility, with the gullible, for that which is not true. That and you can never know for sure where the disinformation is going to be planted. Most of their stuff on archaeology is worthless - it is the mainstream "we are the epitome of all cultures and it so impossible that earlier cultures could have been technologically more advanced that it is not even worth considering". Of course the feral government knows better. There are persistent rumors that they have uncovered more than one cache of ancient advanced technology.
"Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide. ~ Gautama Siddhartha The Buddha
That was just an attempt to divert everyone's attention from the meteor question.
Oh God! Oh God! Oh God!......... Can't you Canucks get anything right?
"In a free society we're supposed to know the truth," ... "In a society where truth becomes treason, then we're in big trouble. And now, people who are revealing the truth are getting into trouble for it" -- Ron Paul, circa 2010-12-02
Rumsfeld's Revolution: Is the Big Shift in Defense Really Happening at Last?
By: Philip Gold Discovery Institute June 30, 2001
As for space . . . what goes up, and what comes down, must await a series of White House and Congressional decisions concerning national policies, current treaties, and technological priorities. These decisions do not mean "militarizing" space, which has been militarized ever since the first ICBM passed through and the first spy satellite went up. These decisions do involve what measures will be taken to protect our military and civilian satellites; what measures will be taken to deny others the use of space in an emergency; and whether non-nuclear weapons capable of striking earthly targets will be sent aloft. Current treaties prohibit testing nuclear weapons and placing weapons of mass destruction in outer space. These should be maintained. But there is no reason why other weapons, especially directed energy weapons as they become available, should not be sent aloft, if national security requires it.
many nations can develop, and several are developing "niche capabilities," relatively crude systems that do the job. Further, since they don't need space the way we do, even a High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) attack - a nuclear burst in space that could degrade or destroy large chunks of everybody's capability - wouldn't affect them vitally. In addition, no serious missile defense system can work without a space-based component to attack enemy missiles and warheads during their boost and midcourse phases. Finally, it may be desirable to place non-nuclear weapons in space for use on targets below, and to develop a "launch on demand" capability for both manned and unmanned vehicles.(26)
Steven E. Jones is implicated in his murder. Not only was Michael Zebuhr investigating Jones' story that molten metal flowed from windows of the WTC, MZ's uncle, William/Bill Zebuhr was a Cold Fusion colleague of Jones, as was another murder victim, Eugene Mallove.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Thank you for those links at Posts #51 and #52. I noticed that the pdf file linked at #51 (titled "MILITARY SPACE CONTROL: AN INTUITIVE ANALYSIS") mentions the phrase "Launch-On-Demand" (at Chapter 2, page 7 of the report) and so does the Discovery Institute info posted above at #48, although the meaning in both cases isn't exactly identical. It reminded me of this "launch on warning" phrase regarding a Leftist Presidential policy change posted at CLINTON'S ROGUES GALLERY:
This is Google's cache of http://www.alamo-girl.com/0013.htm. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Apr 27, 2011 16:09:05 GMT.
Newsmax 3/9/99 Christopher Ruddy " [sic] ominous developments have occurred during a time when President Bill Clinton has systematically moved to disarm the United States. While it has gone largely unreported, President Clinton has overseen the destruction of nearly two-thirds of Americas nuclear weapons stockpile. He has ordered that America no longer have a "launch on warning" policy and has replaced it with one that says America will retaliate only after it has been attacked. This non-sensical Clinton policy means that American cities and American military targets must first be destroyed before America retaliates. He has proposed taking computer circuitry out of land-based missiles, so that they could not be launched in an emergency. Clinton has proposed making it much more difficult for our submarines to launch their weapons, and even has suggested welding closed the missile hatches on our submarines.
Cross referencing 4um thread "Obama gives Interpol free hand in U.S.", Post #13 on communiques about Obama's space policy changes that may be in the works to hand Space Jurisdiction over to Europeans.
Edited: spelling error.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
2 flights that had been transmitting hijack signals landed in Whitehorse
The Canadian Press Posted: Apr 25, 2011 8:51 PM ET Last Updated: Apr 25, 2011 11:36 PM ET
When Max Fraser started collecting footage and stories about how Sept. 11, 2001, played out in the Yukon capital of Whitehorse, he set out to make a point- of-view documentary about the terrifying spectre of 2 supposedly hijacked jumbo jets landing in or on Whitehorse.
It's hard to forget the images of an American Airlines jet slamming into the World Trade Center in New York City, followed by a United Airlines jet hitting the second tower minutes later. The images were beamed to television sets around the world.
What Fraser ended up with is the mysterious tale of how Korean Air Flight 085, bound for New York City, came to land at the then-Whitehorse International Airport at 11:54 a.m. that day,
'Nowhere else in the world on 9/11 was a community under an evacuation order and nowhere else were emergency authorities told to prepare for a mass casualty incident involving a hijacked airliner.'Max Fraser, filmmaker