See other Resistance Articles
Title: Add Lithium to water supply to make people behave
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://abcoffreedom.weebly.com/abc- ... dd-lithium-to-drinking-605880/
Published: May 26, 2011
Author: wong
Post Date: 2011-05-26 05:50:52 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 162
Comments: 10
www.thedaily.com/page/201.../052211-news-lithium-1-5/ Article from "The Daily" 22/05/11 "Experts" are pushing to add lithium to the entire USA's drinking water supply, as they claim that research indicates this will:- Reduce suicide rates, events of violent crime and hard drug use. "cultivating a more serene social order" I was wondering why in recent months, the media has been bizarrely pushing "zombie" stories - this might explain it! Dr Allan Young - physchology professor from Imperial college London seems genuinely surprised that after publishing his initial research in 2009, he was "likened to a Nazi" and received numerous death-threats I can't bring the complete Daily article over from its (above) link
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
A very long time ago, I think about 1920, there was a proposal to put iodine in the water .... just a tiny amount, to prevent goiter and other deficiencies. The idea was scrapped when it was discovered that some people were allergic to iodine. I don't know if anyone is allergic to lithium but in its therapeutic doses to control schizophrenia or mood swings it literally teeters on the edge of a toxic dose. It reduces mood swings only when it is so strong as to shock the system with near-toxicity; which is why constant blood tests are needed to monitor that the dosage is just right for the individual patient. And the end result is a patient whose mood is not merely steady but practically stunned; the patient is calm ... and a bit dopey. No more works of art or invention from that patient. I cannot see how it can have universal good results by exposing the whole populace to a dosage far below the therapeutic level and not monitoring individuals. Of course, I know nothing about medicine, but I do know something about lithium as a psychiatric drug. Even if it works, there are substantial drawbacks. There was a most informative article in New York Magazine about 30 years ago. While someone was checking the police reports in those Texas counties, I wonder if anyone checked the school attainments -- what happened to the rates of students each year who were accepted at top universities and won large scholarships, etc. I might add that some people are already exposed to lithium in their daily work, and we don't know how this additional exposure through drinking water would effect them.
You're beginning to make too much sense to me, Shoo.
"Now more than ever, we need access to the crucial authorities in the Patriot Act" - Attorney General Eric Holder
Excellent points, Shoonra. Thank you. "Are Lithium Pushers Dangerous?" - New York Magazine 12 Jan 1976
Yikes! This is beyond belief and akin to "Soma" in the book Brave New world. What's next?
"The person who agrees with you 80 percent of the time is a friend and an ally — not a 20 percent traitor" - Ronald Reagan
lash a timber to your spine....sailor kidding
"The person who agrees with you 80 percent of the time is a friend and an ally — not a 20 percent traitor" - Ronald Reagan
Scary isn't it? Those "patriot myths" stick in my throat like a turkey bone on Thanksgiving. But look at the bright side, Flint. In a decade or so, think of the wonderful tales we can exchange in the FEMA re-education camps :)
"Now more than ever, we need access to the crucial authorities in the Patriot Act" - Attorney General Eric Holder
Confusion between the words affect and effect is so common that I almost never see either of the words used correctly. Since I read anything that doesn't move fast enough to get away from me, and since I read hundreds of essays by college students each semester, I have reason to believe that this error is not just a misspelling, but an actual misapprehension of the two words and how they are used. Generally speaking, affect is a verb and effect is a noun. When you affect something, you produce an effect on it. Even in the passive voice, something would be affected, not effected. There are certain situations where effect is used as a verb and situations where affect is used as a noun, but very few people ever have a need to use them thus, so unless you are already confident of your ability to use these words correctly, just treat as general the rule that effect is a noun and affect a verb. (If you feel the need to get fancy, however, here are the meanings of effect as a verb and affect as a noun. As a verb, effect means to execute, produce, or accomplish something; as a noun, affect is used primarily by psychologists to refer to feelings and desires as factors in thought or conduct.) If you find that you have sometimes made the mistake of switching these two troublesome words, you probably should proofread specifically for them until you have formed the habit of using them correctly without having to think about it.
Good lesson for all of us, Tat.
Yadda-Yadda Warden! Life as a nomad suits me and my recent IP changes are but a dress rehearsal for things to come.
"The person who agrees with you 80 percent of the time is a friend and an ally — not a 20 percent traitor" - Ronald Reagan
No Planes. Think about it. ................. Guaranteed Penetration (no it's not porn)................. Israelis For 9/11 Truth
#2. To: wudidiz (#1)
(Edited)
#3. To: Shoonra (#2)
#4. To: Shoonra (#2)
(Edited)
No Planes. Think about it. ................. Guaranteed Penetration (no it's not porn)................. Israelis For 9/11 Truth
#5. To: Tatarewicz (#1)
#6. To: Jethro Tull (#3)
(Edited)
You're beginning to make too much sense to me, Shoo.
#7. To: Flintlock (#6)
#8. To: Shoonra (#2)
As others have noted you make worthwhile contributions to discussions but they're undermined when misuse words like effect/affect:
#9. To: Tatarewicz (#8)
If you find that you have sometimes made the mistake of switching these two troublesome words, you probably should proofread specifically for them until you have formed the habit of using them correctly without having to think about it.
#10. To: Jethro Tull (#7)
But look at the bright side, Flint. In a decade or so, think of the wonderful tales we can exchange in the FEMA re-education camps :)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
