See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: The Elite Are Not Even Trying To Hide How Much They Hate The U.S. Constitution Anymore
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://endoftheamericandream.com/ar ... e-the-u-s-constitution-anymore
Published: Jul 4, 2011
Author: The End of The American Dream
Post Date: 2011-07-04 23:20:09 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Ping List: *THE FED AND THE NWO* Subscribe to *THE FED AND THE NWO*
Keywords: None
Views: 311
Comments: 28
In the United States today, it is becoming increasingly fashionable to openly trash the U.S. Constitution. Many among the elite are not even trying to hide how much they hate the U.S. Constitution anymore. As the Patriot movement and the Tea Party movement call for a return to the principles that this nation was founded upon, many among the elite and in the mainstream media are responding by publicly dumping on the U.S. Constitution. The level of vitriol that we are seeing for our founding fathers and for our Constitution is unprecedented. It turns out that the U.S. Constitution does not fit very well with the benevolent futuristic "Big Brother" totalitarianism that they want to impose on all of us. All of that talk about "freedom" and "liberty" in the Constitution does not exactly square with the centralized global planning that the elite have in mind. The ruling elite believe that the "rights of the individual" must be greatly restricted for the "good of society" and for the "good of the environment". Right now the "constitutional revival" that is happening in the United States is a direct threat to what the elite are trying to accomplish, so they are responding by openly attacking the Constitution. At more than 90 percent of the law schools in the United States today, the U.S. Constitution is portrayed as a hopelessly outdated document that is in desperate need of revision or it is portrayed as a "living, breathing document" that we are free to alter as society "progresses". In law schools across the country, law students are being taught that our founding fathers were racist, sexist, homophobic bigots that did the best that they could at the time. Keep in mind that a very large percentage of our politicians and all of our judges go through these law schools. I personally sat in law school classes and listened to law professors trash the U.S. Constitution. This is really happening. But these days it is apparently not enough to just poison the minds of law students. Now the mainstream media is launching a major attack on the U.S. Constitution. The latest issue of Time Magazine, the number one political magazine in the United States, has a picture of a half-shredded U.S. Constitution on the cover with the words "Does It Still Matter?" emblazoned across it. This front page article was authored by Richard Stengel and unfortunately the article is not a defense of the U.S. Constitution. Rather, Stengel insists in his article that the U.S. Constitution "must accommodate each new generation and circumstance." That is exactly the kind of thing that is constantly being pushed down the throats of law school students all over the country. Stengel also declares in his article that we must not allow the Constitution to be "an obstacle" that will keep us from making the "progress" that we need to make as a society.... "We can pat ourselves on the back about the past 223 years, but we cannot let the Constitution become an obstacle to the U.S.'s moving into the future with a sensible health care system, a globalized economy, an evolving sense of civil and political rights." This is typical of what the elite will do. They will applaud the Constitution as being a good document "for the past" but then they will talk about how we "need to move forward" because people are so much smarter now than they were back then. The reality is that many elitists love to denigrate the circumstances under which the Constitution was drafted and they love to talk about how much more "sophisticated" we are today. In an article entitled "Is It Time To Update The U.S. Constitution?" CNN's Fareed Zakaria recently declared that it was time to reexamine our founding document that was created in a "cramped room" that had "shades drawn over the windows".... By contrast, any talk of revising or revisiting the U.S. Constitution is, of course, seen as heresy. The United States Constitution was, as you know, drafted in a cramped room in Philadelphia in 1787 with shades drawn over the windows. It was signed by 39 people. What Zakaria failed to mention was that those shades were drawn because our founding fathers were literally risking their lives to create our Constitution. But Zakaria was kind compared to a lot of the other pundits out there. On an ABC News political talk show over the weekend, Georgetown professor Michael Eric Dyson declared that there are "some gaps, some holes, lacunas, gulfs, abysses" in the Constitution and he went on to make the following statement.... "When it makes the transition from parchment to pavement, there again is the rub. The reality is when I talk about the document being living and vital, I’m talking about the interpretation of it. I’m talking about the meaning of it." Do you know why elitists love to talk about the Constitution being a "living" document? It is because they feel like they have permission to change and "reinterpret" a document that is "living and breathing". Elitists love the idea that the U.S. Constitution "evolves", and of course they believe that it is the role of the ruling elite to direct this "evolution". James Altucher, managing partner at Formula Capital, expressed his opinion of the U.S. Constitution in his recent article entitled "July 4th Is A Scam".... Most importantly, lets not view the Constitution as gospel. Countries, people, systems, technology evolves. As they do, its important to see what from the past is good and what can be discarded. What can be "discarded"? Absolutely disgusting. But there are others out there that go even farther in trashing the Constitution. So far we have examined quotes from elitists that show at least a few shreds of respect for the Constitution. They desperately want to change it and reinterpret it, but at least they acknowledge that is has played a beneficial role in American history. There are others among the elite that are not afraid to openly declare hate for the U.S. Constitution. For example, Michael Klarman of Harvard University Law School delivered a Constitution Day lecture at Johns Hopkins University last September 16th. His lecture was entitled "A Skeptical View of Constitution Worship", and it was a blistering assault on the U.S. Constitution. Klarman made four major points about "constitutional idolatry" in his speech.... I have four points I want to make today against constitutional idolatry, which is my label for our misguided tendency to blindly worship the Constitution, giving it credit for all the things we love and honor about our country. (1) The Framers’ constitution, to a large degree, represented values we should abhor or at least reject today. (2) There are parts of the Constitution with which we are still stuck today even though we would never freely choose them and they are impossible to defend based on contemporary values. (3) For the most part, the Constitution is irrelevant to the current political design of our nation. (4) The rights protections we do enjoy today, the importance of which I do not minimize, are mostly a function of political and social mores, which have dramatically evolved over time and owe relatively little to courts using the Constitution to protect them. Remember, this is not some nutjob that was making this speech. This was a professor of law at Harvard University. Barack Obama went to the law school at Harvard University. Hordes of our future politicians and judges and law professors go through that place. Klarman is not someone to be taken lightly. Klarman's remarks were noticed over at The Economist. It is an open secret that The Economist is a mouthpiece for the global banking elite and they were quite taken with what Klarman had to say. They published an article supporting Klarman's ideas that was entitled "The Perils Of Constitution-Worship". In that article, those who love and support the U.S. Constitution were described as "infantile".... Indeed, there is something infantile in the belief of the constitution-worshippers that the complex political arguments of today can be settled by simple fidelity to a document written in the 18th century. In the United States today there is a tug of war over the U.S. Constitution. Either the "constitutional revival" being spearheaded by the Patriot movement and the Tea Party movement will eventually win, or the ruling elite and the mainstream media will eventually win. The stakes are incredibly high. Just consider what Alex Jones has to say about the matter in the video posted below.... So will you stand up for the U.S. Constitution? Great tests for this nation are coming. We are standing right on the verge of the economic collapse of America, and that will be a great time of challenge for the United States. Our loyalty to the Constitution will be pressed to the limit as society descends into anarchy. Our politicians are supposed to take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. But sadly, most of our politicians today seem to think that the Constitution should be serving them. In fact, this very attitude was clearly expressed in the Time Magazine article mentioned above.... "The Constitution serves the nation; the nation does not serve the Constitution." The inference, of course, is that once we have made enough "progress" we will be able to toss aside the U.S. Constitution like some sort of used rag. Well, the reality is that there are tens of millions of red-blooded Americans that are not ready to give up on the U.S. Constitution. If you are an American that still believes in liberty and freedom, don't be afraid to let your voice be heard, because if none of us stand up the America that so many of us grew up loving will soon cease to exist.
The Elite Are Not Even Trying To Hide How Much They Hate The U.S. Constitution Anymore
Subscribe to *THE FED AND THE NWO*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)
Anglo - America in Prophecy & the Lost Tribes of Israel www.cogwriter.com/britishisrael.htm Will the Anglo-Nations be Divided and Have People Taken as Slaves?
This was a professor of law at Harvard University. 2. Barack Obama went to the law school at Harvard University. 1. As if those two things were mutually exclusive. 2. Case closed.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Lord Acton He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic. The only difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits. Albert Einstein
What the elites most dislike about the Constitution are the restraints and limitations it puts upon the government's ability to compel obedience to the elites. The Constitution's primary and most glaring omission is simply a provision to allow the free citizenry to enforce the Constitution upon the wayward government short of open revolt. For those who "Cry Wolf" saying that the Constitution is out of date I would ask: The Constitution is, and was, a document written by a free people to delegate some powers to the central government, but it is a document of enumerated powers - meaning that the government has only those powers allowed by the Constitution. This was done intentionally and the reasoning is still valid i.e., to keep government the servant not the master. No, the Constitution is inconvenient, but only for those who would seek to enslave and command others, to strip them of their liberty, and make of them slaves. In short the only people who do not like the Constitution are those who would be tyrants.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." ~ Ben Franklin "For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it.” ~ Patrick Henry
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." ~ Ben Franklin "For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it.” ~ Patrick Henry
==================================================== This is EXACTLY correct.
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
Do they no longer have a right to privacy in their own homes or bodies? =========================================================== The Homeland Security Act trumps the US Constitution. It is a treasonous edict comparable to something the King of England would have tired to declare on the Colonies.
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." ~ Ben Franklin "For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it.” ~ Patrick Henry
Curious how the falling out of the bottom of the dollar will impact all of this. ========================================================= You've hit pay dirt. The Constitution was designed to protect and liberate Americans from servitude and unfair taxation to the king. We're back to square one.
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." ~ Ben Franklin "For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it.” ~ Patrick Henry
hardly.... http://loveforlife.com.au/content/08/03/27/ultimate-delusion-stephen-ames excerpt: "....Remember, King George was the "Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and c, and of the United States of America." See: Treaty of Peace (1783) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large 80.. Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope, is in charge of the USA ..' What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers and King George were working hand-in-hand to bring the people of America to their knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war. See Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. and 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15) The United States is not a land mass, it is a corporation. Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King of England, he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace * U.S. 8 Statutes at Large 80. On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the repayment of 21 loans that the UNITED STATES had already received dating from February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King money which is due January 1, 1788 from King George via France. King George funded both sides of the Revolutionary War. Now the Articles of Confederation which were declared in force March 1, 1781 States in Article 12: "All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged." The Articles of Confederation acknowledge the debt owed to King George. Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was nothing more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, the conquest was not yet complete. Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic instability of the country under the Articles of Confederation. Only five States come to the meeting, but there is a call for another meeting to take place in Philadelphia the following year with the express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of Confederation. Something had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people know that the so called founding fathers were going to reorganize the United States because it was Bankrupt. On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approve the Constitution. The States have now become Constitutors. Constitutor: In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another's debt. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. The States were now liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people of America were not because they were not a party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a vote......" On August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was Titled.-An Act making provision for the payment of the Debt of the United States. This can be found at 1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act for all intents and purposes abolished the States and Created the Districts. If you don't believe it look it up. The Act set up Federal Districts, here in Pennsylvania we got two. In this Act each District was assigned a portion of the debt. The next step was for the states to reorganize their governments which most did in 1790. This had to be done because the States needed to legally bind the people to the debt. The original State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for a vote. So the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to people for a vote thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great Britain. The people became citizens of the State where they resided and ipso facto a citizen of the United States. A citizen is a member of a fictional entity and it is synonymous with subject. What you think is a state is in reality a corporation, in other words, a Person. "Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272 "Word "person" does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176. There are no states, just corporations. Every body politic on this planet is a corporation. A corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind, that speak to you. We labor, pledge our property and give our children to a fiction. For an in-depth look into the nature of these corporations and to see how you also have been declared a fictional entity. See: AMERICAN LAW AND PROCEDURE. JURISPRUDENCE AND LEGAL INSTITUTIONS. VOL.XIII By James De Witt Andrews LL.B. (Albany Law School), LL.D. (Ruskin University) from La Salle University. This book explains in detail the nature and purpose of these corporations, you will be stunned at what you read. Now before we go any further let us examine a few things in the Constitution. Article six section one keeps the loans from the King valid it states; "All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation." Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article One Section Eight clause Two which states that Congress has the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States. This was needed so the United States (Which went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then because the States were a party to the Constitution they would also be liable for it. The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States Bank in 1791. This was a private Bank of which there were 25,000 shares issued of which 18,000 were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the United States money in exchange for Securities of the United States. Now the creditors of the United States which included the King wanted paid the Interest on the loans that were given to the United States. So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing alcohol. The people resisted so George Washington sent out the militia to collect the tax which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey rebellion. It is the Militia's duty to collect taxes. How did the United States collect taxes off of the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? I'll tell you how. The people are slaves! The United States belongs to the founding fathers, their posterity and Great Britain. America is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been. How many times have you seen someone in court attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him he can't. It is because you are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!!!!!! If you don't believe read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 which states " But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it."....." =========================== worship of the CONstitution IS idolatry.
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
Genesis 15:13-14/Galatians 3:16,17....29/ http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp? ARTICLE_ID=55421 /Psalm 2
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
hardly.... http://loveforlife.com.au/content/08/03/27/ultimate-delusion-stephen-ames =================================================== Thanks. I didn't read that yet, but does it mention anywhere the American Revolution was caused at least in part by unfair taxation?
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
I'll have to read it again....either in there, or in another article, it says the founders didn't want to pay the tax without representation, but they still wanted the benefits of the king. I read a blurb once about George and Martha Washington having bonds out, on the Revolutionary soldiers, I believe, possibly connected with this story here about Haym Solomon, a Rothschild agent: http://www.sweetliberty.org/perspective/jewishpersecution18.htm Furthermore, after Washington used the militia to put down the whiskey rebels, he became the biggest whiskey producer in the nation, a bit of a conflict of interest I would say.
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
=========================================== Never have I heard of that. If you get a link, please do. The Civil War was also a great turning point for America. One of the largest US scandals in American history was the building of railroads out West after the war ended. Much corruption.
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
"...George Washington was known first and foremost as commander in chief of the Continental Army and our nation's first president. But Washington was also a successful business entrepreneur and innovative farmer. Washington erected a large stone gristmill in 1771 to increase production of flour and cornmeal, and to be able to export high quality flour to the West Indies, England, and Europe. In 1797, Washington's Scottish farm manager James Anderson encouraged him to build a whiskey distillery adjacent to the gristmill. The distillery was the largest in America, producing 11,000 gallons of whiskey in 1799, making it one of the most successful economic enterprises at Mount Vernon. ...." http://www.mountvernon.org/visit/plan/index.cfm/pid/356/ Side note, regarding the Whiskey Tax: it was worked in such a way that the small producers would end up paying a higher tax than the big guys. Further, "with no constitutional authority to do so, Washington divided the states up into DISTRICTS" [search] or see here: THE DEATH OF THE 1787 U.S. CONSTITUTION "....as a matter of fact, the 1787 Constitution is dead. You could also tell any inquirer, this could not have happened except for the Bank funding this fiasco to gain control of the country. The Bank could not have come into existence without Washington violating the Constitution and dividing the states into District states, to be legislated over by Congress, under the direction of the President, the CEO and commander-in-chief. This allowed the Insular cases to come about after the packing of the courts. By the Bank loaning large sums of money to any government official they could; they completed their control of the confirmation process of our judges and the electoral process of Congress and the President, giving complete control of our government to the Bank and the foreign interests it represents. Washington declared a state of Emergency to put down the Whiskey Rebellion, or so he said, in realty it was the only way the Bank could operate in the states. Read your Constitution, Congress already had authority to put down a domestic rebellion, and use the Militias, there was no reason for Congress to give this power to the President, beyond his Constitutional authority. The Bank was Chartered in D.C., Congress had exclusive jurisdiction in the District, not the Constitution. Remember, after the second bank Charter ended and could not be rechartered, in 1837 Biddle obtained a Charter for the Bank in Pennsylvania. This would not have been possible except for President Washington having created District states, which were extensions of D.C.. So technically, you could argue the Constitution was bypassed before the 1870 Constitution was put in place, and administrative law as Mr. Ma..... claims is the law today, was overruled. By the time 1867 rolled around everything was in place, the war and Emergency powers of the President had been tried and upheld by the packed courts, Congress' legislative power over the states in the name of public policy was made complete by the 14th Amendment. ...." http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/20773 =================== What About Those Pilgrims? excerpt: "....CONTROVERSIAL EXCERPTS FROM MY RESEARCH ON THE U.S.-BRITISH "SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP" Aside from the two books previously mentioned, I am not aware of any expose of either the Pilgrim Society or the British-Speaking Union. On January 28, 1994, I was informed by a thirty-second degree Mason that the Grand Lodge of Texas is under orders of the Grand Lodge in Washington, D.C. which is under the Grand Lodge of England. The Larouche position on "the English" was stated recently: "The most important constant in the history of the United States of America has been the implacable hostility of the British Empire and the London-centered British oligarchy. This hostility generated the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812 and the Civil War, in addition to many lesser clashes. But after Gettysburg and Vicksburg in 1863, the reality of US military and naval superiority forced London to come to terms with the inevitable persistence of the United States on the world scene as a great power for another century and more. By 1895-1898, galloping British decadence, expressed as industrial decline combined with a looming inability to maintain global naval domination, suggested to the circles of the soon-to-be King Edward VII the advisability of harnessing the power and resources of the United States to the British imperial chariot. Thus was born the London- Washington Special Relationship, under which the United States was established as London's auxiliary, proxy, and dupe through such stages as the 1898 Anglo- American rapprochement before Manila Bay, Edward VII's sponsorship of Theodore Roosevelt's aspirations to "Anglo-Saxon" respectability and, most decisively, Woodrow Wilson's declaration of war on Germany in April, 1917. Under the Special Relationship, London has parlayed its financial and epistemological dominance over the United States into profound and often decisive influence over US directions in foreign policy and finance." In the past I have personally attended a number of Larouche meetings in Austin. I would not describe myself as a follower-particularly since at the last meeting the overt "Communist" philosophy of the lecturer became apparent; he stopped speaking in the middle of a prepared speech. However, the anti-British rhetoric of the Larouchites does, in my opinion, have a firm basis in historical fact. George Washington, to his credit, accomplished much for this country and his "Farewell Message" is no more timely today. However, it has also been asserted that: "The confession of General Cornwallis to General Washington at Yorktown has been well hidden by historians. History books and text books have taught for years that when Cornwallis surrendered his army to General Washington that American independence came, and we lived happily ever after until the tribulations of the twentieth century." The King James Masonic Bible lists George Washington as a Mason. He was initiated into Masonry in 1752.(5) He took his first degrees in the lodge of Fredericksburg, Virginia on November 4, 1752. He was then passed on March 3, 1753 and raised in August 4, 1753 to Master Mason. George Washington visited a British military Lodge under a flag of truce and received a degree in it (probably the Mark degreee).(6) On April 28, 1788, George Washington became Worshipful Master of Alexandria Lodge No. 22 and was re-elected on December 20, 1788. He was the only Brother to be president of the U.S. and Worshipful Master of his Lodge at the same time.(7) Old Juba, Washington's trusted slave, used to row a priest across the Potomac to visit him and "Marse George made the sign of the Cross befo' he eat." The tale of the skeleton in the family closet was the conversion of George to "Papistry." Bishop Carroll made the statement that Washington died as did Emperor Valentinia who was received into the Church before his death.(8) When George Washington badly needed financial help to pay his soldiers, the international bankers loaned him funds contingent upon appointing Alexander Hamilton as the first Secretary of the Treasury. Hamilton was all English at heart. [ATKWDI note: actually, he was a mulatto Jew]. He was an expert in British banking methods and was trained in the inner sanctum of international banking.(9) A retired Harvard professor once told students in his Oklahoma high school class that Hamilton and Washington agreed to a central bank if the war was ended.(10) I have a Congressional Research Report that says as a fact that the first U.S. Bank was mostly foreign owned. On Yom Kippur Eve, 1779, Washington's soldiers, unpaid for months, were at a point of mutiny before a battle: "At last a desperate Washington sent a messenger on horseback through the night to Philadelphia with instructions to obtain, from Haym Salomon, a loan of $400,000, an enormous sum in those days, to pay and provision his troops. The messenger found Salomon in the synagogue, and a hasty whispered conference took place. Salomon rose and quickly moved about the synagogue, collecting certain friends. A small group left together, and that night the money was raised. Did Haym Salomon himself contribute $240,000 of the money? So the legend, perpetuated in many accounts, insists."(11) [ATKHWDI....is it possible George and Martha put up some of the funds, with the promise it would be paid back after the war? Could that be the reason George was so hot to trot against the rebels?] Jonathan Williams (1750-1815), a dedicated American patriot, wrote in his now rare book, Legions of Satan (1781), that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that "a holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown." Lord Lothian, the British Ambassador to Washington, once called George Washington the founder of the modern British Empire.(12) This is the very same Lord Lothian honored by the 1939 Pilgrims banquet! ....." ======================= Happy Tax Day, Alexander Hamilton "...whereas Tea Partiers sometimes associate their objections to federal taxes with a desire to “get back to the Constitution,” federal taxation is one of the Constitution’s central purposes. And we can thank the wunderkind Alexander Hamilton for proposing the legislation by which the first U.S. Congress imposed the first federal tax ever on an American product. Hamilton wasn’t messing around. Empowered by the new government to do what he and Morris had long been frustrated in trying to do, the young, charismatic, brilliant, diligent Secretary worked up a full-blown plan for connecting national wealth, and even more importantly national credit, to ambitious national aims. Like Morris, though to a far more sophisticated degree, Hamilton wanted the United States to become an economic powerhouse and financial empire to compete with England. And he’d been tireless in figuring out how to do it. The key, as Morris had always suggested, was to combine a big public debt with vigorously enforced taxes earmarked for funding that debt. That is: sell U.S. bonds to the small, rich merchant lending class and, as Morris had put it, “open the purses of the people,” collecting taxes from the American people, in metal, not paper, and earmarking revenues for paying the bondholders their 6% interest in hard, cold cash — 6% untaxed interest, that is. Federal power would thus shift national wealth upward and consolidate it. Yoking national credit to national interest, government would serve as an economic pivot between the creditors and the people and thus be in a position to finance roads, canals, wars, and other national projects. Morris had fought hard during the confederation period for a simple federal tariff on imports, known as an “impost,” and opposition even to that measure had always been stiff: states wanted to retain their sovereign power to tax. But he’d also schooled his supporters in what a real federal tax slate would look like. Once people had become inured to paying a federal tariff, Morris had predicted, the federal government would be able to impose taxes on domestic products too, taxes known as “excises.” Continuing to expand tariffs alone would hit too hard the very people Morris and Hamilton wanted to encourage: the merchant financiers, who also engaged in international trade (that’s where they got the gold). Fully consolidating wealth, and fully connecting it to high national aims, meant collecting revenue for finding bonds from people who would never own a bond. Hence the importance, to Hamilton, of imposing domestic taxes....." http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/04/william-hogeland-happy-tax-day-alexander- hamilton.html InMyHUMBLEOPINION, the CONstitution was a contract ON America.
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
I've read it was the biggest land grab in American history ....until the Federal Reserve took over in 1913 and started their land grab from every possible angle. [Psalm 83:4,12]
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
Thanks. I have been to Mount Vernon and don't remember anything about the distillery or even seeing it.
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
[ATKHWDI....is it possible George and Martha put up some of the funds, with the promise it would be paid back after the war? Could that be the reason George was so hot to trot against the rebels?] ===================================================== No wonder Israel owns our assets.
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
good point.
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
A tug of war game is how they plan to win because they have more people, more money, bigger media, and other resources arrayed against us. We don't have to play their energy, resource, and time-wasting game. Just declare them Secessionist outlaws and go about the business of Constitutional governance by blockading their intrusive disturbances as what they are: alien invaders of no authority.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
The latest issue of Time Magazine, the number one political magazine in the United States, has a picture of a half-shredded U.S. Constitution on the cover with the words "Does It Still Matter?" emblazoned across it. This front page article was authored by Richard Stengel and unfortunately the article is not a defense of the U.S. Constitution. Send a reply to Stengel, the managing editor of that globalist propaganda platform, by boycotting Time Magazine and citing his junk article as the reason for canceling subscriptions to it.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
This is where the "ruling elite" and the rest of us part company. They had better keep their heads down. ;)
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
I do not subscribe to that rag. Thank God for small favors.
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
It might be a good idea to nuke Jerusalem, soon, very soon! That might create a retaliatory strike by the Chinese who have said they intend to attack the U.S. militarily in the next 5 to 10 years. Anyway, all those old ICBM silos are now empty under the SALT agreements with the Russians. ;)
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
================================================ We know that is inevitable. Ping me if you find links to this. tnx
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
I heard this on C-Span.
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
I am an old time patriot and a tea partier of my own persuasion. I do not pay income taxes since it is a voluntary self assessment. Look up info on the Save-A-Patriot Fellowship. If you own property they are your best defense against the gov't thieves.
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
#2. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)
1. Remember, this is not some nutjob that was making this speech.
OsamaBinGoldstein
#3. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM, all (#0)
In what way has individual liberty gone out of date?
In what way has protection from arbitrary arrest fallen out of fashion?
#4. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM, All (#0)
#5. To: Original_Intent (#3)
#6. To: Original_Intent (#3)
What the elites most dislike about the Constitution are the restraints and limitations it puts upon the government's ability to compel obedience to the elites.
#7. To: Eric Stratton, Origianl_Intent (#5)
Do people no longer have the right to freedom of religion, speech, and their right to pursue happiness?
#8. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#7)
#9. To: Eric Stratton (#4)
That is actually a correct statement, the current design of the nation indeed makes the Constitution, but more importantly the concepts in it, "irrelevant" as it were.
#10. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#9)
#11. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#9)
The Constitution was designed to protect and liberate Americans from servitude and unfair taxation to the king.
#12. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#11)
(Edited)
How did the United States collect taxes off of the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? I'll tell you how. The people are slaves! The United States belongs to the founding fathers, their posterity and Great Britain. America is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been. How many times have you seen someone in court attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him he can't. [ http://www.apfn.org/apfn/orders-from- england.htm ]. It is because you are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!!!!!!
#13. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#11)
The Constitution was designed to protect and liberate Americans from servitude and unfair taxation to the king.
#14. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#13)
(Edited)
#15. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#14)
Furthermore, after Washington used the militia to put down the whiskey rebels, he became the biggest whiskey producer in the nation, a bit of a conflict of interest I would say.
#16. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#15)
#17. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#15)
The Civil War was also a great turning point for America. One of the largest US scandals in American history was the building of railroads out West after the war ended. Much corruption.
#18. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#16)
#19. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#16)
I have a Congressional Research Report that says as a fact that the first U.S. Bank was mostly foreign owned. On Yom Kippur Eve, 1779, Washington's soldiers, unpaid for months, were at a point of mutiny before a battle: "At last a desperate Washington sent a messenger on horseback through the night to Philadelphia with instructions to obtain, from Haym Salomon, a loan of $400,000, an enormous sum in those days, to pay and provision his troops. The messenger found Salomon in the synagogue, and a hasty whispered conference took place. Salomon rose and quickly moved about the synagogue, collecting certain friends. A small group left together, and that night the money was raised. Did Haym Salomon himself contribute $240,000 of the money? So the legend, perpetuated in many accounts, insists."(11)
#20. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#19)
#21. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)
In the United States today there is a tug of war over the U.S. Constitution. Either the "constitutional revival" being spearheaded by the Patriot movement and the Tea Party movement will eventually win, or the ruling elite and the mainstream media will eventually win.
#22. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)
the mainstream media is launching a major attack on the U.S. Constitution.
#23. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)
The ruling elite believe that the "rights of the individual" must be greatly restricted for the "good of society" and for the "good of the environment".
#24. To: GreyLmist (#22)
Send a reply to Stengel, the managing editor of that globalist propaganda platform, by boycotting Time Magazine and citing his junk article as the reason for canceling subscriptions to it.
#25. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#19)
(Edited)
No wonder Israel owns our assets.
#26. To: BTP Holdings (#25)
That might create a retaliatory strike by the Chinese who have said they intend to attack the U.S. militarily in the next 5 to 10 years.
#27. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#26)
Ping me if you find links to this.
#28. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)
(Edited)
As the Patriot movement and the Tea Party movement call for a return to the principles that this nation was founded upon, many among the elite and in the mainstream media are responding by publicly dumping on the U.S. Constitution.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest