See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: The Elite Are Not Even Trying To Hide How Much They Hate The U.S. Constitution Anymore
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://endoftheamericandream.com/ar ... e-the-u-s-constitution-anymore
Published: Jul 4, 2011
Author: The End of The American Dream
Post Date: 2011-07-04 23:20:09 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Ping List: *THE FED AND THE NWO* Subscribe to *THE FED AND THE NWO*
Keywords: None
Views: 315
Comments: 28
In the United States today, it is becoming increasingly fashionable to openly trash the U.S. Constitution. Many among the elite are not even trying to hide how much they hate the U.S. Constitution anymore. As the Patriot movement and the Tea Party movement call for a return to the principles that this nation was founded upon, many among the elite and in the mainstream media are responding by publicly dumping on the U.S. Constitution. The level of vitriol that we are seeing for our founding fathers and for our Constitution is unprecedented. It turns out that the U.S. Constitution does not fit very well with the benevolent futuristic "Big Brother" totalitarianism that they want to impose on all of us. All of that talk about "freedom" and "liberty" in the Constitution does not exactly square with the centralized global planning that the elite have in mind. The ruling elite believe that the "rights of the individual" must be greatly restricted for the "good of society" and for the "good of the environment". Right now the "constitutional revival" that is happening in the United States is a direct threat to what the elite are trying to accomplish, so they are responding by openly attacking the Constitution. At more than 90 percent of the law schools in the United States today, the U.S. Constitution is portrayed as a hopelessly outdated document that is in desperate need of revision or it is portrayed as a "living, breathing document" that we are free to alter as society "progresses". In law schools across the country, law students are being taught that our founding fathers were racist, sexist, homophobic bigots that did the best that they could at the time. Keep in mind that a very large percentage of our politicians and all of our judges go through these law schools. I personally sat in law school classes and listened to law professors trash the U.S. Constitution. This is really happening. But these days it is apparently not enough to just poison the minds of law students. Now the mainstream media is launching a major attack on the U.S. Constitution. The latest issue of Time Magazine, the number one political magazine in the United States, has a picture of a half-shredded U.S. Constitution on the cover with the words "Does It Still Matter?" emblazoned across it. This front page article was authored by Richard Stengel and unfortunately the article is not a defense of the U.S. Constitution. Rather, Stengel insists in his article that the U.S. Constitution "must accommodate each new generation and circumstance." That is exactly the kind of thing that is constantly being pushed down the throats of law school students all over the country. Stengel also declares in his article that we must not allow the Constitution to be "an obstacle" that will keep us from making the "progress" that we need to make as a society.... "We can pat ourselves on the back about the past 223 years, but we cannot let the Constitution become an obstacle to the U.S.'s moving into the future with a sensible health care system, a globalized economy, an evolving sense of civil and political rights." This is typical of what the elite will do. They will applaud the Constitution as being a good document "for the past" but then they will talk about how we "need to move forward" because people are so much smarter now than they were back then. The reality is that many elitists love to denigrate the circumstances under which the Constitution was drafted and they love to talk about how much more "sophisticated" we are today. In an article entitled "Is It Time To Update The U.S. Constitution?" CNN's Fareed Zakaria recently declared that it was time to reexamine our founding document that was created in a "cramped room" that had "shades drawn over the windows".... By contrast, any talk of revising or revisiting the U.S. Constitution is, of course, seen as heresy. The United States Constitution was, as you know, drafted in a cramped room in Philadelphia in 1787 with shades drawn over the windows. It was signed by 39 people. What Zakaria failed to mention was that those shades were drawn because our founding fathers were literally risking their lives to create our Constitution. But Zakaria was kind compared to a lot of the other pundits out there. On an ABC News political talk show over the weekend, Georgetown professor Michael Eric Dyson declared that there are "some gaps, some holes, lacunas, gulfs, abysses" in the Constitution and he went on to make the following statement.... "When it makes the transition from parchment to pavement, there again is the rub. The reality is when I talk about the document being living and vital, I’m talking about the interpretation of it. I’m talking about the meaning of it." Do you know why elitists love to talk about the Constitution being a "living" document? It is because they feel like they have permission to change and "reinterpret" a document that is "living and breathing". Elitists love the idea that the U.S. Constitution "evolves", and of course they believe that it is the role of the ruling elite to direct this "evolution". James Altucher, managing partner at Formula Capital, expressed his opinion of the U.S. Constitution in his recent article entitled "July 4th Is A Scam".... Most importantly, lets not view the Constitution as gospel. Countries, people, systems, technology evolves. As they do, its important to see what from the past is good and what can be discarded. What can be "discarded"? Absolutely disgusting. But there are others out there that go even farther in trashing the Constitution. So far we have examined quotes from elitists that show at least a few shreds of respect for the Constitution. They desperately want to change it and reinterpret it, but at least they acknowledge that is has played a beneficial role in American history. There are others among the elite that are not afraid to openly declare hate for the U.S. Constitution. For example, Michael Klarman of Harvard University Law School delivered a Constitution Day lecture at Johns Hopkins University last September 16th. His lecture was entitled "A Skeptical View of Constitution Worship", and it was a blistering assault on the U.S. Constitution. Klarman made four major points about "constitutional idolatry" in his speech.... I have four points I want to make today against constitutional idolatry, which is my label for our misguided tendency to blindly worship the Constitution, giving it credit for all the things we love and honor about our country. (1) The Framers’ constitution, to a large degree, represented values we should abhor or at least reject today. (2) There are parts of the Constitution with which we are still stuck today even though we would never freely choose them and they are impossible to defend based on contemporary values. (3) For the most part, the Constitution is irrelevant to the current political design of our nation. (4) The rights protections we do enjoy today, the importance of which I do not minimize, are mostly a function of political and social mores, which have dramatically evolved over time and owe relatively little to courts using the Constitution to protect them. Remember, this is not some nutjob that was making this speech. This was a professor of law at Harvard University. Barack Obama went to the law school at Harvard University. Hordes of our future politicians and judges and law professors go through that place. Klarman is not someone to be taken lightly. Klarman's remarks were noticed over at The Economist. It is an open secret that The Economist is a mouthpiece for the global banking elite and they were quite taken with what Klarman had to say. They published an article supporting Klarman's ideas that was entitled "The Perils Of Constitution-Worship". In that article, those who love and support the U.S. Constitution were described as "infantile".... Indeed, there is something infantile in the belief of the constitution-worshippers that the complex political arguments of today can be settled by simple fidelity to a document written in the 18th century. In the United States today there is a tug of war over the U.S. Constitution. Either the "constitutional revival" being spearheaded by the Patriot movement and the Tea Party movement will eventually win, or the ruling elite and the mainstream media will eventually win. The stakes are incredibly high. Just consider what Alex Jones has to say about the matter in the video posted below.... So will you stand up for the U.S. Constitution? Great tests for this nation are coming. We are standing right on the verge of the economic collapse of America, and that will be a great time of challenge for the United States. Our loyalty to the Constitution will be pressed to the limit as society descends into anarchy. Our politicians are supposed to take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. But sadly, most of our politicians today seem to think that the Constitution should be serving them. In fact, this very attitude was clearly expressed in the Time Magazine article mentioned above.... "The Constitution serves the nation; the nation does not serve the Constitution." The inference, of course, is that once we have made enough "progress" we will be able to toss aside the U.S. Constitution like some sort of used rag. Well, the reality is that there are tens of millions of red-blooded Americans that are not ready to give up on the U.S. Constitution. If you are an American that still believes in liberty and freedom, don't be afraid to let your voice be heard, because if none of us stand up the America that so many of us grew up loving will soon cease to exist.
The Elite Are Not Even Trying To Hide How Much They Hate The U.S. Constitution Anymore
Subscribe to *THE FED AND THE NWO*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 9.
#4. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM, All (#0)
deleted
Curious how the falling out of the bottom of the dollar will impact all of this. ========================================================= You've hit pay dirt. The Constitution was designed to protect and liberate Americans from servitude and unfair taxation to the king. We're back to square one.
#10. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#9)
deleted
hardly.... http://loveforlife.com.au/content/08/03/27/ultimate-delusion-stephen-ames excerpt: "....Remember, King George was the "Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and c, and of the United States of America." See: Treaty of Peace (1783) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large 80.. Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope, is in charge of the USA ..' What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers and King George were working hand-in-hand to bring the people of America to their knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war. See Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. and 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15) The United States is not a land mass, it is a corporation. Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King of England, he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace * U.S. 8 Statutes at Large 80. On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the repayment of 21 loans that the UNITED STATES had already received dating from February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King money which is due January 1, 1788 from King George via France. King George funded both sides of the Revolutionary War. Now the Articles of Confederation which were declared in force March 1, 1781 States in Article 12: "All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged." The Articles of Confederation acknowledge the debt owed to King George. Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was nothing more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, the conquest was not yet complete. Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic instability of the country under the Articles of Confederation. Only five States come to the meeting, but there is a call for another meeting to take place in Philadelphia the following year with the express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of Confederation. Something had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people know that the so called founding fathers were going to reorganize the United States because it was Bankrupt. On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approve the Constitution. The States have now become Constitutors. Constitutor: In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another's debt. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. The States were now liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people of America were not because they were not a party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a vote......" On August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was Titled.-An Act making provision for the payment of the Debt of the United States. This can be found at 1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act for all intents and purposes abolished the States and Created the Districts. If you don't believe it look it up. The Act set up Federal Districts, here in Pennsylvania we got two. In this Act each District was assigned a portion of the debt. The next step was for the states to reorganize their governments which most did in 1790. This had to be done because the States needed to legally bind the people to the debt. The original State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for a vote. So the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to people for a vote thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great Britain. The people became citizens of the State where they resided and ipso facto a citizen of the United States. A citizen is a member of a fictional entity and it is synonymous with subject. What you think is a state is in reality a corporation, in other words, a Person. "Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272 "Word "person" does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176. There are no states, just corporations. Every body politic on this planet is a corporation. A corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind, that speak to you. We labor, pledge our property and give our children to a fiction. For an in-depth look into the nature of these corporations and to see how you also have been declared a fictional entity. See: AMERICAN LAW AND PROCEDURE. JURISPRUDENCE AND LEGAL INSTITUTIONS. VOL.XIII By James De Witt Andrews LL.B. (Albany Law School), LL.D. (Ruskin University) from La Salle University. This book explains in detail the nature and purpose of these corporations, you will be stunned at what you read. Now before we go any further let us examine a few things in the Constitution. Article six section one keeps the loans from the King valid it states; "All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation." Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article One Section Eight clause Two which states that Congress has the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States. This was needed so the United States (Which went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then because the States were a party to the Constitution they would also be liable for it. The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States Bank in 1791. This was a private Bank of which there were 25,000 shares issued of which 18,000 were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the United States money in exchange for Securities of the United States. Now the creditors of the United States which included the King wanted paid the Interest on the loans that were given to the United States. So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing alcohol. The people resisted so George Washington sent out the militia to collect the tax which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey rebellion. It is the Militia's duty to collect taxes. How did the United States collect taxes off of the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? I'll tell you how. The people are slaves! The United States belongs to the founding fathers, their posterity and Great Britain. America is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been. How many times have you seen someone in court attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him he can't. It is because you are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!!!!!! If you don't believe read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 which states " But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it."....." =========================== worship of the CONstitution IS idolatry.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#9. To: Eric Stratton (#4)
That is actually a correct statement, the current design of the nation indeed makes the Constitution, but more importantly the concepts in it, "irrelevant" as it were.
Replies to Comment # 9.
#11. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#9)
The Constitution was designed to protect and liberate Americans from servitude and unfair taxation to the king.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 9.