[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)

Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH...

ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies

Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES

Trump to send troops to Memphis

Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out)

Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?

What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!)

Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas,

Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World -

Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage

Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least

Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination

How They Control the World and Their Secret Weapon

Newmont Pulls Out of Canada, Delists TSX

Eva Vlaardingerbroek's Warning: Elites Plan to Make Humans Immortal in the Cloud

The $7.9 Trillion Company You've Never Heard Of

CCP's motivation for (the Korean) war was to grow its military: US-China-Russia relations


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: GOP Demands $55 Million Taxpayer Dollars For 2012 Convention Security (But Demands You to Sacrifice Social Security)
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 24, 2011
Author: http://www.politicususa.com/en/gop-conve
Post Date: 2011-07-24 17:29:55 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 733
Comments: 42

GOP Demands $55 Million Taxpayer Dollars For 2012 Convention Security July 15, 2011 By Jason Easley 172digg Share4768 44

Republicans have been telling us that America can’t afford Social Security, Medicare, or unemployment, but they want taxpayers to foot the bill for $55 million worth of security at the 2012 GOP convention.

This is what the GOP’s fiscal conservatism really looks like.

The video from My Fox Tampa Bay:

Buckhorn pushes for funds for RNC security: MyFoxTAMPABAY.com

Tampa Mayor Bob Buckhorn was in full give us money or the terrorists win mode, “We need to make sure that the nominee and the delegates are safe because God forbid there be an incident… This is a national security event. They’ve got to live up to their obligation. And yes, it’s a lot of money. But without that money, we would have almost an impossible task trying to put this on.”

In typical Republican fashion, they want the money RIGHT NOW!!!! The RNC host committee’s Ken Jones said, “We need the money soon. We can’t wait until next year. We have to have it this year. That’s very important.”

Sadly, Bob Buckhorn is a Democrat. Mayor Buckhorn does have some legitimate concerns. In the current economic environment, no US city could afford to foot the bill for such an event. The mayor is worried that DC is going to leave him high and dry and his city will lose the convention.

However, I disagree with both Mayor Buckhorn and Ken Jones that the only way for the 2012 GOP convention to be able to afford security is if the taxpayers get stuck with the bill. Why can’t the RNC show us how effective the private sector can be and raise the money themselves? I am sure the Koch Brothers would be glad to cut a check to get the ball rolling.

Republicans are always telling the American public that the big government is a waste, so instead of paying Tampa police for security, why don’t they just award a no bid contract to Xe? Before we let Republicans privatize our schools, prisons, and every other public asset that isn’t nailed down, they should use themselves as a case study. Find a private contractor that will provide top notch comprehensive security for less than $55 million, then we’ll be glad to discuss privatization.

Republicans have been telling us that we can’t afford Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid, Veterans benefits, public education, unemployment benefits, and even in some extreme cases police and firefighters. If we can’t afford basic public services, then where is the money supposed to come from for us to pay for security at the GOP convention?

If we are too broke to take care of seniors, vets, the disabled, and the poor, then we are also too broke pay for people to work the door at your self-congratulatory four day kegger.

Sorry GOP, but we’re broke. Remember?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

#1. To: tom007 (#0)

They wouldn't need that much security if they actually operated for the good of the Republic.

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-07-24   17:31:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Original_Intent (#1)

"They wouldn't need that much security if they actually operated for the good of the Republic."

I bet there is an Island in Norway that will not be used next summer for it's usual purpous. Send them there to have their convention. It's sucure for them, and if boats are kept away from that place and the sky made a no fly zone, we will be more secure here.

Ferret  posted on  2011-07-25   0:35:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Ferret, Original_Intent (#7)

"They wouldn't need that much security if they actually operated for the good of the Republic."

Are you two love birds insinuating the the democrats act in the interest of the Republic?

Name one, just one RAT who stands to defend the Constitution. You can't because there are none, zero, nada.

Sheesh, you guys claim to be politically savvy?

ROTFLMAO

Flintlock  posted on  2011-07-25   1:07:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 10.

#13. To: Flintlock, Ferret (#10)

You will not find me defending the Demoncrats. They are every bit as corrupt as the Republicrats. My general view is "a pox on both their houses."

My comment stands though. If the GOP were truly operating in the interests of the country and its people they would have only the occasional nut to worried about. However, that is not the case. Like the Dems they operate first in their own personal interest and then for whoever gives them the most Campaign Contributions Bribes.

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-07-25 02:49:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Flintlock (#10)

This was about the Republicans. Why are you assuming? Did my post raise a question in you?

Why don't you ask before you dump on people? Why the defaut to a 'love bird' insult?

With all due respect, put your mind in gear before you put your mouth in motion.

I am not responding you in any defensive way because I have nothing here to apologize for.

Ferret  posted on  2011-07-25 02:57:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]