[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

A Comprehensive Guide To Choosing The Right Protein Powde

3-Time Convicted Violent Criminal Repeatedly Threatened to Kidnap and Kill Judge Cannon and Her Family

Candace Owens: Kamala Harris is not Black Â…

Prof. John Mearsheimer: Israel NOT Going To Win In Lebanon

Iran to destroy all Israel gas fields, power plants at once if Tel Aviv makes mistake: Deputy IRGC chief

Army Vet Calls Out FEMA for Prioritizing Migrants Over Hurricane Victims, Takes Matters Into His Own Hands

Unemployment among 25-34-year-olds with degrees nearly doubles in 4 months

Silver breaks 13-year resistance, signaling potential new secular trend

Two Ukrainian officials found with $6M cash, yet Hurricane Helene victims struggle for aid?

Elite colleges shocked: Students "Don't know how' to read books."

Is Washington's 'high threat' volcano about to blow? Scientists baffled by record spike in earthquakes around Mount Adams

FEMA whistleblowers revealed a treasonous misuse of taxpayer funds.

Exposing how useless FEMA is in Asheville, NC.

Kamala Harris Admin ARRESTED a man for bringing a helicopter full of supplies to Hurricane Helene victims.

MSNBC brings on an anti-Trump impeachment witness, only to be stunned when he announces he's voting for Trump.

She escaped the religious sect she grew up in. Now she says Trump’s MAGA movement is eerily similar

Federal Law REQUIRES Car Makers to MONITOR You

Candace Owens: When are you going to address this, KAMALA?

Democrats Celebrate a Seemingly Impressive September Jobs Report – What They are Not Telling You

The Boiling Point – America Have You Had ‘Enough,’ Yet?

Shopping Malls Implementing Curfews And Teen "Waiting Zones" To Try And Curb Chaos, Theft And Fights

US Public Debt Grew $115 Billion A Day For the Past 3 Days Totaling $345 Billion.

Dramatic Footage Shows Tanker Blown Up In Critical Maritime Chokepoint As Disasters Mount For Biden-Harris

The Remdesivir Papers: Did Service Members Deserve to Die?

“My Blood is Boiling”: Furious Elon Musk Goes Off on FEMA for Blocking SpaceX Engineers from Assisting

“The Stench is Unbearable”: Dead Bodies Piling Up, FEMA Abandons NC Residents Amid Hurricane Helene

Cash and the Constitution

Disaster Relief (INSIDER) Tells Why FEMA Won't Let Citizens Help.

The $212 Billion Dollar Food ingredient poisoning your Brain

"Last Election EVER" - Elon Musk vs Mark Cuban: Billionaires BATTLE Over Dangers If Trump Loses 2024


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: The Reason Why Obama Will Not Invoke the 14th Amendment: The Supreme Court
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 27, 2011
Author: http://blog.buzzflash.com/node/12888
Post Date: 2011-07-27 10:35:04 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 148
Comments: 6

The Reason Why Obama Will Not Invoke the 14th Amendment: The Supreme Court Submitted by mark karlin on Tue, 07/26/2011 - 3:57pm.

EditorBlog

MARK KARLIN, EDITOR OF BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

There's a simple reason that President Obama will not invoke the 14th Amendment to resolve the debt-ceiling crisis: the Supreme Court.

Yes, there is speculation that Obama is too risk averse to assert that the Constitution gives him the power to unilaterally raise the debt ceiling - and that may be true.

But Obama and his advisers know that if he bypasses Congress by using the 14th Amendment, it will immediately be challenged in the federal courts - which are loaded with partisan Republican judges - and fast tracked to the Supreme Court.

With Scalia having led a partisan majority time and time again - including his stopping of the State Supreme Court-ordered presidential recount in Florida in 2004 so as not to harm the reputation of the presumed winner, George W. Bush, (Scalia wrote in justification of his infamous opinion) - it is a given that five members of the Supreme Court have no compunction about leaving the Constitution in the dust.

As BuzzFlash has argued before, despite calling themselves "strict constructionists," the five majority votes on the Supreme Court are anything but. In fact, they often interpret the Constitution to justify their political outlook as they did in Bush v. Gore and Citizens United, and a host of other rulings that have dramatically affected the direction of this nation.

Thom Hartmann views the 5-4 majority record as being so significant that they have become a de facto arm of the Republicans in Congress. Hartmann calls the GOP majority on the court the "Five Kings."

The 14th Amendment is pretty clear when it comes to the debt ceiling: "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned."

That's about as strict constructionist as you can get in prohibiting Congress from limiting the debt ceiling, even though it has been their tradition to vote on increasing it - as they frequently have done under Republican and Democratic presidents alike.

But the "Supreme Court Five" aren't going to really enforce the Constitution as it is written, should Obama invoke the 14th Amendment. They will rule against presidential authority and side with the Republicans in Congress. Because their motivation in high-stakes partisan issues like this is not the law as it is written; it is scoring a victory for their political beliefs and sponsors.

That is why President Obama will ultimately not assert the 14th Amendment to resolve the debt-ceiling crisis. The "Five Kings" won't allow him, in the end, to do so.

******

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: tom007 (#0)

The "Five Kings" won't allow him, in the end, to do so.

=======================================================

OK. So who do these 'Five Kings' work for?

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2011-07-27   11:52:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: tom007 (#0)

It is not clear, under the 14th Amendment, if any remedy to the federal debt is susceptible of litigation. In any case, Presidential action in this crisis would probably buy enough time to make the Congress scurry to pass some remedial legislation of its own. Litigation could (1) be commenced in a number of different courts almost simultaneously, which could lead to conflicting results, and (2) take months to conclude, even perhaps going beyond Election Day 2012.

It is true that a lot of judges were appointed by Republicans, but that doesn't mean that they are Teabaggers or even sympathetic to the current rule-or-ruin Republican agenda.

Shoonra  posted on  2011-07-27   11:52:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#1)

Since this is a blog/forum open for discussion I suppose we have to have the occasional partisan clap-trap thrown out to discuss! They all work for the banksters.

"Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."

Frederic Bastiat

noone222  posted on  2011-07-27   12:18:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: tom007 (#0)

That's about as strict constructionist as you can get in prohibiting Congress from limiting the debt ceiling

WTF?

"Mr. Prime Minister, there is only one important question facing us, and that is the question whether the white race will survive." -- Leonid Brezhnev to James Callahan

Prefrontal Vortex  posted on  2011-07-27   12:55:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: tom007 (#0)

The 14th Amendment is pretty clear when it comes to the debt ceiling: "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned."

Actually, the wording is vague enough they can do anything they want with it.

TooConservative  posted on  2011-07-27   13:05:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: tom007 (#0)

it is a given that five members of the Supreme Court have no compunction about leaving the Constitution in the dust.

They are REALLY scumbags. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2011-07-27   16:37:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]