[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Cascade Volcanoes Show Weird Pulse Without Warning – Mount Rainier Showing Signs of Trouble!

Cash Jordan: Chicago Apartments RAIDED... ICE 'Forcibly Evicts' Illegal Squatters at 3AM

We are FINALLY turning the tide on 9/11 - The TRUTH is coming out | Redacted w Clayton Morris

Netanyahu SHAKEN as New Hostage Video DESTROYS IDF Lies!

We are FINALLY turning the tide on 9/11 VIDEO

Shocking Video Shows Ukrainian Refugee Fatally Stabbed On Charlotte Train By Career Criminal

Man Identifies as Cat to Cop

his video made her stop consuming sugar.

Shot And Bothered - Restored Classic Coyote & Road Runner Looney Tunes Cartoon 1966

How to Prove the Holocaust is a Hoax in Under 2 Minutes

..And The Legacy Media Wonders Why Nobody Trusts Them

"The Time For Real Change Is Now!" - Conor McGregor Urges Irish To Lobby Councillors For Presidential Bid

Daniela Cambone: Danger Not Seen in 40+ Years

Tucker Carlson: Whistleblower Exposes the Real Puppet Masters Controlling the State Department

Democrat nominee for NJ Governor, says that she will push an LGBTQ agenda in schools and WILL NOT allow parents to opt out.

Holy SH*T, America's blood supply is tainted with mRNA

Thomas Massie's America First : A Documentary by Tom Woods & Dan Smotz

Kenvue Craters On Report RFK Jr To Link Autism To Tylenol Use In Pregnancy

All 76 weapons at China 2025 military parade explained. 47 are brand new.

Chef: Strategy for Salting Steaks

'Dangerous' Chagas disease confirmed in California, raising concerns for Bay Area

MICROPLASTICS ARE LINKED TO HEART DISEASE; HERE'S HOW TO LOWER YOUR RISK

This Scholar PREDICTED the COLLAPSE of America 700 years ago

I Got ChatGPT To Admit Its Antichrist Purpose

"The CIA is inside Venezuela right now" Col Macgregor says regime change is coming

Caroline Kennedy’s son, Jack Schlossberg, mulling a run.

Florida Surgeon General Nukes ALL School Vaxx Mandates, Likens Them to Slavery

Doc on High Protein Diet. Try for more plant based protein.

ICE EMPTIES Amazon Warehouse… Prime Orders HALTED as ‘Migrant Workforce’ REMOVED

Trump to ask SCOTUS to reverse E. Jean Carroll sex-abuse verdict


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Dieting forces brain to eat itself, scientists claim
Source: Daily Telegraph
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 7, 2011
Author: Nick Collins
Post Date: 2011-08-07 06:14:44 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 195
Comments: 4

Dieters struggle to lose weight because a lack of nutrition forces their brain cells to eat themselves, making the feeling of hunger even stronger, scientists claim.

Like other parts of the body, brain cells begin to eat themselves as a last-ditch source of energy to ward off starvation, a study found.

The body responds by producing fatty acids, which turn up the hunger signal in the brain and increase our impulse to eat.

Researchers from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine at Yeshiva University in New York said the findings could lead to new scientifically proven weight loss treatments.

Tests on mice found that stopping the brain cells from eating themselves – a process known as autophagy – prevented levels of hunger from rising in response to starvation.

The chemical change in their brains caused the mice to become lighter and slimmer after a period of fasting, the researchers reported in the journal Cell Metabolism.


Wonder if fasting or hunger strikes damage the brain?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)

"Dieting forces brain to eat itself, scientists claim"

I heard Limbaugh expounding on that the other day. Didn't know where he got it.

Said in his case, his brain could eat itself and grow Mega Stronger! :-)

Wonder why it didn't work for me???

ndcorup  posted on  2011-08-07   10:26:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Tatarewicz (#0)

Wonder if fasting or hunger strikes damage the brain?

Even if it did, it would be temporary. Contrary to popular believe, the brain can regenerate cells just like other parts of the body can.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2011-08-07   11:39:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Tatarewicz (#0)

scientifically proven weight loss treatments.

LOL! It is simple, eat a nutritious diet and exercise, your weight will take care of itself.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2011-08-07   11:41:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: RickyJ (#3) (Edited)

The problem is with so much tasty food, exceeding serving size and under doing exercise in this age of automation and machines.

A joke arose on a C2C discussion: lady ordered a giant pizza, gobbling it up with the aid of aspartame-containing soft drink. Aspartame lowers serotonin which in turn makes you feel hungry.

news.yahoo.com/nutrition-...1312620262090-bea7e551-67

Should nutrition labels reflect how much we actually eat? The Week – Thu, Aug 4, 2011

Because Americans habitually consume more than the typical "serving size," nutrition labels can mislead more people than they help

Nutrition labels on food packaging are supposed to clarify how healthy various foods are, but their approach is often unrealistic and misleading, according to a new report from the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI). The so-called "serving sizes" the labels list are often wildly out of touch with the amount of food that people actually eat. That means consumers who just give labels a brief once-over — without multiplying the nutrition counts by the number of servings in a package — believe they're getting a lot less sodium, fat, and calories than they really are. Here, a brief guide:

How unrealistic are nutrition labels' serving sizes? Very. According to the CSPI, most people would consider a can of soup, for example, one serving. But most soup labels list a "serving" as just one cup — less than half the can. After a quick glance at the label, a consumer who consumes the whole can might believe he's getting 800 mg of sodium, when in fact he's getting more than 1,800 mg. (It's recommended that most people eat a maximum 1,500 mg of sodium a day.)

Is that typical for nutrition labels? Yes, says CSPI director Michael Jacobson. From coffee creamers to aerosol cooking sprays, food products have come under scrutiny by critics for their absurdly unrealistic nutrition labels. "Over the years we’ve looked and laughed at many serving sizes,” says Jacobson, as quoted by The New York Times.

Why are the labels' serving sizes so puny? Many of the serving sizes are based on consumer research dating back to the 1970s, when food portions — and Americans — were less "super-sized" than they are today. The FDA has stated that serving sizes were standardized to make it easier to compare two different brands of soup, for example, in two different sizes of can.

Is anything being done about misleading food labels? It's hard to tell. The FDA, which regulates food packaging, has been somewhat "tight-lipped" about any upcoming changes to nutrition labels, though it's been working on improvements to the labels since 2005.

Sources: Globe and Mail, NY Times, WJLA

Comments; Kathryn The reason people eat bigger portions now, is most processed food is now heavily laced with added glutamate. Sometimes you will see it on the label as MSG, but most times they add it in other ways to have a "clean label." They know many people will avoid MSG, so they trick you into eating added glutamate anyway because it makes you eat more, so they sell more. Look up hidden sources of MSG to find out all the different names.

Studies show that increased MSG consumption increases BMI, amount eaten and speed of eating. I believe added glutamate is the main driver of the obesity epidemic.

I had to start cooking all things from scratch because my daughter was diagnosed with a long list of food allergies, and our health and the way we felt improved dramatically. We did not go on a spartan diet either. We had plenty of homemade treats, but I still lost weight just by going off the corporate chow. I noticed that my appetite was down dramatically once off of the corporate chow. It was suddenly easy for me to eat one or 2 cookies instead of 10 or 12.

If you do want to keep eating corporate chow, you should take B6 and Taurine supplements. Excess glutamate can kill cells, but B6 helps your body convert glutamate to other substances. Glutamate is used for signaling in many organs and the nervous system. Taurine works on the opposite receptors as glutamate, so can counteract much wrong signaling that is happening from eating high amounts of added glutamate. The high amounts of added glutamate in the food, can deplete your body of B6 & Taurine because it makes your body have to constantly fight being pushed one way, a way that can kill cells.

If you ever get cancer, definitely stop eating corporate chow. Most cancerous tumors have glutamate receptors, so eating a great deal of added glutamate can cause tumors to grow.

Your best off if you try to eat homemade foods more than store bought or restaurant foods. Even taking the B6 & Taurine won't necessarily make everything better. There's a lot of other non-foods in the food that may cause you health problems.

Based on my experience, if you try to go off of corporate chow for 1 month, you will not want back on it.

One extra thing you should watch out for is malted barley flour in the store bought flour. It also increases glutamate levels, but sounds so fine and natural. Look for flours without malted barley flour in them. They're out there. Just harder to find.

Rh100 The best guide for number of servings in a container is to divide the total calories by 280. That will give you the number of servings. Try it

Fletch In Soviet Russia, One serving is what we give you.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2011-08-08   0:03:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]