[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 9/11 Building 7 - Martin Noakes (Video)
Source: You Tube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMq1PiUbf-M&feature=player_embedded
Published: Sep 2, 2011
Author: Martin Noakes
Post Date: 2011-09-02 01:26:42 by TwentyTwelve
Keywords: 9/11 Building 7, WTC
Views: 408
Comments: 10

9/11 Building 7 - Martin Noakes

An original music video that explores a few of the myriad of unanswered questions surrounding the events of 9/11. please rate & forward to your friends.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 9.

#2. To: All (#0)

www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/

How Stuff Works

WTC7 only needed 2 floors to have explosives, for them to collapse it in on its own footprint.

quote: science.howstuffworks.com/building-implosion1.htm

Generally speaking, blasters will explode the major support columns on the lower floors first and then a few upper stories. In a 20-story building, for example, the blasters might blow the columns on the first and second floor, as well as the 12th and 15th floors. In most cases, blowing the support structures on the lower floors is sufficient for collapsing the building, but loading columns on upper floors helps break the building material into smaller pieces as it falls. This makes for easier clean-up following the blast.

So for WTC7, it would be fairly easy to do this.

Also, in the link I provided, look at the image that shows where explosives are generally put to bring down a building. Maybe 9 different places, treating each building as a group of 9 different towers, would need explosives. Now, that seems extremely easy to get away with. Something the U.S. government is more than capable of planning and acting on.

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2011-09-02   1:50:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: TwentyTwelve (#2) (Edited)

looks more and more like the powers-that-be are lying not so much to cover up, but to alienate people who can think.

what they really need is an uprising that will justify military intervention in america --humanitarian invervention, of course -- but the main thing, the real thing, is stirring up the hotheads.

so the disbelief and discontent and disgust and resistance grows to the point that the government can justify locking up or shooting anyone that calls their bluff.

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-09-02   2:02:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: lead.and.lag (#5)

so the disbelief and discontent and disgust and resistance grows to the point that the government can justify locking up or shooting anyone that calls their bluff.

thanks to all their professional efforts since the events, 'calling their bluff' now equals showing the true sheep a potential terrorist they need to be wary of ... we may feel good about speaking truth, but we are alienating ourselves and being marked for collection later, and if you're in a small town, good luck finding a job once the locals know you're 'one of them nuts' ~

Amandil  posted on  2011-09-02   2:29:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Amandil (#7) (Edited)

we are alienating ourselves and being marked for collection later, and if you're in a small town, good luck finding a job

yup.

i've been fired from a job for pointing out the inconsistencies of the official story.

it's a measure of how low i'd already sunk that the job was a minimum wage job in las vegas as a security guard.

i was "guarding" a fancy apartment complex, and somehow i got into a conversation with this guy who was hanging off his balcony on the second floor... i asked him who benefited from 9/11, naming zionist oil men... the guy went ballistic.

i got to say that there's nothing much lower than a job as a security guard in vegas.

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-09-02   2:36:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: lead.and.lag (#8)

~ have reached the point at my current job where just plain shutting my mouth is the only choice left, besides unemployment ... in their defense I must fess to becoming a bit annoying and borderline sarcastic/insulting past few weeks ... in my defense, I was extremely patient for 5 years, they are reporters and some silly part of me thought they might be goaded into acting like it ...

~ lowest job I had was scrubbing toilets for minimum wages ... may be back into it soon, hedging my bets now and making friends with janitor that cleans our offices once per week ... used to be 3 days per week but our corporate bean counters decided that was too much, they have us re-using trash bags too ~

Amandil  posted on  2011-09-02   3:36:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 9.

#10. To: Amandil (#9)

i got nothing to say, except i'm sorry for all of us.

lead.and.lag  posted on  2011-09-02 03:43:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 9.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]