[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Half of the US secret service and every gov't three letter agency wants Trump dead. Tomorrow should be a good show

1963 Chrysler Turbine

3I/ATLAS is Beginning to Reveal What it Truly Is

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,


Health
See other Health Articles

Title: Fear and its Consequences: Why States Should Get Tough with Vaccinations
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.scientificamerican.com/a ... e.cfm?id=fear-and-consequences
Published: Sep 17, 2011
Author: Scientific American
Post Date: 2011-09-17 16:55:14 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 191
Comments: 15

This winter in the San Francisco Bay Area, many children will sit in classrooms and play on the jungle gyms at recess and then go home to attentive parents who work hard to give them every advantage in life. Parents in this part of the country are better educated and wealthier than the average American and can give their children more opportunity. But the Bay Area is also a hotbed of the growing movement to abstain from vaccinations for fear that the shots cause autism and other disorders. Although these parents may have the best of intentions—to protect their kids—they are dangerously misguided.

California is now in the middle of the worst outbreak of pertussis in half a century. This highly contagious disease—known as whooping cough for the distinctive sound its victims make when gasping for air after a fit of paroxysmal coughing—was a scourge of childhood until the advent of an effective vaccine against it in the 1940s, which drastically reduced incidence of the disease. The number of annual cases has been climbing in recent years. Last year, though, the rate of infection rose, once again, to epidemic proportions—7,297 known and suspected cases, a fourfold increase from 2009. Whether those refusing the vaccine have helped fuel the current pertussis epidemic is uncertain, but their decisions have created a public health tinderbox: in some Bay Area schools, 40 percent or more of the kids are not vaccinated, leaving them unprotected against pertussis and other preventable diseases, such as measles.

California is hardly the only state grappling with antivaccine sentiment. Significant numbers of parents across the country are declining standard immunizations for their children. The success of any given vaccine depends on so-called herd immunity, in which a high rate of immunization in a population helps to protect those individuals who are not immune. Herd immunity requires high immunization rates—around 95 percent for highly contagious infections like pertussis and measles. When immunization rates drop below the critical level, disease can strike not only unvaccinated individuals but also vaccinated ones, because all vaccines fail to confer immunity in a certain percentage of people. Parents who opt out are endangering not only their own kids but everybody else’s, too—including those who cannot be vaccinated because they are too young or immunocompromised, as well as youngsters who have received their shots.

Vaccine anxiety has been around for as long as there have been vaccines, but the fear of autism originated with a paper published in the Lancet journal in 1998. On the basis of a study of 12 children, author and British medical doctor Andrew Wakefield43; claimed to have found a link between the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and an autismlike disorder. Antivaccination groups and the media pounced on the news, and before long the alleged vaccine-autism connection became a Hollywood cause célèbre; former actress and Playboy model Jenny McCarthy43; claims that MMR caused her son’s autism.

In February 2010 the Lancet retracted Wakefield’s infamous paper. That leaves no scientific evidence to support the assertion that vaccines cause autism or other chronic diseases. Unfortunately, fear is far easier to ignite than to extinguish. Some parents caught in the crossfire between scientists and charlatans have decided, against all reason, that the vaccines are more dangerous than the diseases they protect against.

They are wrong. Vaccines may provoke a low fever and other unpleasant symptoms. Very rarely, side effects are serious, such as an allergic reaction. The risk of unprotected exposure to vaccine-preventable diseases is far higher: for example, more than 90 percent of unvaccinated people exposed to measles will become infected.

Each state has its own immunization requirements for schoolchildren. Yet in 48 states parents may exempt their kids on the basis of religious or philosophical beliefs (only Mississippi and West Virginia disallow exemptions). The right to decide what is best for oneself and one’s children ends where science has so clearly documented a threat to public welfare. It’s time for the other 48 states to eliminate these exemptions and adopt strict enforcement policies to ensure that kids get their jabs. In the interim, doctors need to be patient but firm with fearful parents, explain why vaccines are essential and help restore the public’s faith in science.34;


Poster Comment:

Sorry, Scientific American, I'm not buying it.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: christine (#0)

CBS news finds a researcher who agrees with you here -

www.cbsnews.com/8301-31727_162-20049118-10391695.html

StartPage returned over 1.039M results for 'vaccines autism'.

Break the Conventions - Keep the Commandments - G.K.Chesterson

Lod  posted on  2011-09-17   17:08:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: christine (#0) (Edited)

The success of any given vaccine depends on so-called herd immunity, in which a high rate of immunization in a population helps to protect those individuals who are not immune. Herd immunity requires high immunization rates—around 95 percent for highly contagious infections like pertussis and measles.

And Whooping Cough: Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 179, April 1999; 915-923. Temporal trends in the population structure of bordetella pertussis during 1949-1996 in a highly vaccinated population- "Despite the introduction of large-scale pertussis vaccination in 1953 and high vaccination coverage, pertussis is still an endemic disease in The Netherlands, with epidemic outbreaks occurring every 3-5 years." One factor that might contribute to this is the ability of pertussis strains to adapt to vaccine-induced immunity, causing new strains of pertussis to re-emerge in this well-vaccinated population.

Just recently, Dr. Kari Simonsen, a pediatrician at the University of Nebraska Medical Center, USA, said one in five children who are vaccinated for whooping cough will still get the disease. She said efficacy of the vaccine was 'comparatively low', but said 'It's the best vaccine we can build to date.' Despite admitting this, she still believes that parents should get the vaccine for their children.

At St. Robert Bellarmine School in west Omaha, 12 children had confirmed whooping cough, of those, most had been vaccinated.

The Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services reported Thursday that the state has had 117 confirmed cases this year, up from 70 all of last year and 99 in 2006. There were 312 cases in Nebraska in 2005.

In Douglas County, 48 cases have been reported this year. Last year, 21 cases were reported.

This is in a country that gives five doses of the vaccine in the first four years of life and then another dose at 11 years of age!

(Omaha World Herald, 'Vaccine Didn't Stop Whooping Cough', 31st October 2008).

Victor Plotkin - an epidemiologist from Lake County in the US has reported that there have been 82 cases of pertussis in the county so far this year.

'Plotkin said the county did see very high numbers of cases during a nationwide outbreak of pertussis in 2004 and 2005. In 2004, there were 152 cases of pertussis and 135 cases in 2005. However, before that, pertussis cases in the county had averaged about 8 to 10 a year for many years.

Plotkin said the 2004 and 2005 pertussis outbreak appears that it may have been attributed to waning immunity among older children and adults who had not received booster shots. He said the most recent outbreak is a bit more puzzling because many of the children who are becoming ill are younger children who were recently vaccinated.

"Unfortunately, during this outbreak, even people that have been recently vaccinated are becoming sick anyway," he said. "Their symptoms are milder, but they still can pass the bacteria along to others and make others sick."

(Whooping Cough Increases in Lake County - the Vernon Hills Review 20th November 2008).

So What Happens if People don’t Vaccinate? Are the unvaccinated really infectious?

According to Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 59, no. 2, February 1984, pp. 162-5): ‘Severity of whooping cough in England before and after the decline in pertussis immunisation’, "Since the decline of pertussis immunisation, hospital admission and death rates from whooping cough have fallen unexpectedly… The severity of attacks and the complication rates in children [who were] admitted to hospital were virtually unchanged. – i.e. hospital admissions and death rates reduced when people WEREN’T getting vaccinated, meaning that avoiding shots is actually good for your child’s health and may save his life, and in those cases which were admitted to hospital, there were no increased complications in the unvaccinated group. Basically, at best the shots don’t make a difference and at worse, they kill or disable. But there has never been one double-blind controlled study of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children. Why? The medical profession say it is unethical to withhold vaccination from children. Therefore they cannot gain an accurate indication of what health is because everyone is getting the shots and suffering colds, ear infections, eczema, asthma and there is nothing to compare it with. If they did do a study, they would undoubtedly find the unvaccinated are healthier and maybe that it why they refuse. Not one of my four daughters ever suffered from any of the common childhood ailments that so many of their friends did. Whilst all the babies in the nursery were catching colds every other week, my baby was happy and healthy. “She’s got an excellent immune system even though she’s never been vaccinated”, remarked the health visitor at her check.”No” I corrected, “She has an excellent immune system BECAUSE she’s never been vaccinated.”

link

So, the same reason the medical profession rendered many antibiotics ineffective is why the herd immunity theory is cracked. And if you want to hear them talk voodoo ask how it benefits us to receive a flu shot for the wrong strain of flu, and they tell us that "in general" any 'ol vaccine is better than nuthin, or better than natural immunity."

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2011-09-17   17:25:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: HOUNDDAWG, christine, 4 (#2)

You can't turn around here without seeing signs to get your flu shot here.

Mrs.L and I will be taking a pass once again.

Break the Conventions - Keep the Commandments - G.K.Chesterson

Lod  posted on  2011-09-17   17:42:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: HOUNDDAWG (#2)

interesting read. thanks. i passed your post onto my mom who is in a quandary over whether or not to get a flu shot this year. her experience has been that she hasn't gotten the flu the years that she received the shot and got sick the years she did not.

christine  posted on  2011-09-17   23:29:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: christine (#0)

Herd immunity requires high immunization rates—around 95 percent for highly contagious infections like pertussis and measles. When immunization rates drop below the critical level, disease can strike not only unvaccinated individuals but also vaccinated ones, because all vaccines fail to confer immunity in a certain percentage of people.

Yet we are never given solid information on how many people are not immune after vaccination.

It's part of the info they seem to deliberately withhold from us.

TooConservative  posted on  2011-09-18   5:44:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Lod (#3)

You can't turn around here without seeing signs to get your flu shot here.

Every doctor and pharmacy asks if I've had my flu shot yet as if it's mandatory or something. I just say yes rather than explain why I've never had one and never will.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2011-09-18   6:52:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: christine (#4) (Edited)

i passed your post onto my mom who is in a quandary over whether or not to get a flu shot this year. her experience has been that she hasn't gotten the flu the years that she received the shot and got sick the years she did not.

I know I've mentioned it before but please tell your dear mother that the winter of '70-'71 the flu shot killed more people than the flu and I nearly lost my mother.

It was the same excuse, that is, it was supposed to be "an attenuated strain" and "OOPS!" Needless to say no one went to jail, lost their job or was even demoted as a result.

And you may recall a few years ago the govt "accidentally" sent out a deadly strain of flu (not the Spanish Influenza of 1917, but the 1957 flu) in the test kits sent to labs in 18 countries that test to identify the various strains in their regions. Again, it was "oh darn" as if someone grabbed the wrong vial out of the fridge by mistake. Deadly strains are not kept in a fridge where anyone can access them, and the record keeping is supposed to eliminate the possibility of such blunders.

The fact is they had to culture the deadly strain in order to make enough to send out and you can bet it was not a mistake. And of course some "radical America hater lab tech" could then swipe the bug and use it to start a pandemic, and he will be untraceable because so many kits were sent out....

The govt will be pleased as punch if they kill a substantial number of seniors because of their political muscle. That's the one demographic that even Fearless George Bush didn't dare cross.

__________________________________

"It was not immediately clear why the 1957 pandemic strain, which killed 1 million to 4 million people, was included in the proficiency testing kits. Dr. Stohr described that decision as ''unwise'' and ''unfortunate.''

The 1957 strain has not been included in the flu vaccine since 1968, and anyone born after that date has no immunity to it.

Dr. Nancy Cox, chief of the influenza branch at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, said her agency was notified of the situation on Friday morning. She also said officials strongly doubted that someone deliberately planted the strain or that it was an act of bioterrorism.

''It wouldn't be a smart way to start a pandemic to send it to laboratories, because we have people well trained in biocontainment,'' Dr. Cox said.

_______________________________

Right, sure you do. And the tiny anthrax that is only produced at Ft Detrick didn't get out, either. And, if the flu wasn't deliberately planted then it was accidental. Let's ponder that in light of the "people well trained in biocontainment" assurance, shall we?

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2011-09-18   7:13:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: christine, HOUNDAWG, ALL (#0)

Sorry, Scientific American, I'm not buying it.

Fewer and fewer people ARE buying it, prompting this hit piece.

Any article or argument that begins with "States should" or States must" declares explicitly that what follows is a piece of lying polemic. Invoking the reified abstraction of the nanny-state OR the big-brother state is a mind- control trigger, a mind-trap plain and simple.

Deliberate assault on the immune system through vaccinations is the central campaign in the depopulation and social control strategy.

Vaccination is not immunization


Anger? as a first reaction to get your a$$ moving, once you see through the Media Matrix and set yourself free from your lifelong mind control collar. Sustainable? not enough to screen your intention to be free from the Talosians, who can’t read primitive emotions but know what you watch on cable/sat, read on the Internet and eat. Our ultimate weapon is laughter and amused detachment at the folly of the would-be emperors. Fear mongers HATE it when the FEAR card doesn’t work. The humiliation of being seen as merely a naked ape is THEIR big fear. Laugh the bastards off the stage! Tell your friends that we can build a real civilization from the ruins of the totalitarian game!

HighLairEon  posted on  2011-09-18   12:50:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: HOUNDDAWG (#8)

Sorry, Scientific American, I'm not buying it.

Fewer and fewer people ARE buying it, prompting this hit piece.

Any article or argument that begins with "States should" or States must" declares explicitly that what follows is a piece of lying polemic. Invoking the reified abstraction of the nanny-state OR the big-brother state is a mind- control trigger, a mind-trap plain and simple.

Deliberate assault on the immune system through vaccinations is the central campaign in the depopulation and social control strategy.

Vaccination is not immunization

(((PING)))) (misspelled your moniker)


Anger? as a first reaction to get your a$$ moving, once you see through the Media Matrix and set yourself free from your lifelong mind control collar. Sustainable? not enough to screen your intention to be free from the Talosians, who can’t read primitive emotions but know what you watch on cable/sat, read on the Internet and eat. Our ultimate weapon is laughter and amused detachment at the folly of the would-be emperors. Fear mongers HATE it when the FEAR card doesn’t work. The humiliation of being seen as merely a naked ape is THEIR big fear. Laugh the bastards off the stage! Tell your friends that we can build a real civilization from the ruins of the totalitarian game!

HighLairEon  posted on  2011-09-18   12:54:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: HighLairEon (#8) (Edited)

Fewer and fewer people ARE buying it, prompting this hit piece.

Any article or argument that begins with "States should" or States must" declares explicitly that what follows is a piece of lying polemic. Invoking the reified abstraction of the nanny-state OR the big-brother state is a mind- control trigger, a mind-trap plain and simple.

Deliberate assault on the immune system through vaccinations is the central campaign in the depopulation and social control strategy.

An insightful observation.

EDIT: And, thanks for the pingy.....

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2011-09-18   13:13:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: HighLairEon, hounddawg, christine (#9)

thanks for the posts. This vaccine propaganda piece reminded me of a glamorous magazine cover i saw yesterday at the store. Town & Country has a photo of a nice looking LAUREN BUSH with her husband & the title A New Dynasty, or some word to that effect.

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2011-09-18   13:15:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Artisan (#11)

Town & Country has a photo of a nice looking LAUREN BUSH with her husband & the title A New Dynasty, or some word to that effect.

She is a truly lovely creature with the features of an aristocrat.

As long as she doesn't turn out to be a red, give birth to a mud baby or sympathize with gays, welfare blacks or illegals she'll have a built in constituency who would vote for her when she reaches the age to serve in the senate (she'd old enough to be a representative) and then ultimately the White House.

If she can only cop Maggie Thatcher's business-friendly "kill a commie for your mommy" posture she'd have millions of sad case conservos fantasizing about her and writing long posts about how she's just what this country needs. She could be the "un-Sarah", assuming of course that Lauren actually has a brain.

It wouldn't even matter if folks have to ride mules to the polls because her uncle George set the stage for the destruction of our infrastructure. Just dangle a pretty, "registered Republican" face in front of the working poor lemmings who support their own corporate enslavement and they'll worship it.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2011-09-18   13:38:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: HOUNDDAWG (#12)

lol! I assumned she was 1 of the bush twins, no? Who's her daddy? The magazine cover stood out, was 1 out of hundreds that i noticed & looked at. Then it was a Bush. Theyre working this one,for sure. Prescott III the mexican is another to watch for 2016

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2011-09-18   13:50:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Artisan (#13)

lol! I assumned she was 1 of the bush twins, no? Who's her daddy? The magazine cover stood out, was 1 out of hundreds that i noticed & looked at. Then it was a Bush. Theyre working this one,for sure. Prescott III the mexican is another to watch for 2016

The twins are the daughters of Dubya and Laura. Lauren is the daughter of Neil and Sharon.

"On September 4, 2011 she married David Lauren, son of fashion designer Ralph Lauren, and became legally known as Lauren Bush-Lauren.[2]"

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2011-09-18   14:36:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: HighLairEon, christine, HOUNDAWG, ALL (#8)

Sorry, Scientific American, I'm not buying it.

Fewer and fewer people ARE buying it, prompting this hit piece.

Any article or argument that begins with "States should" or States must" declares explicitly that what follows is a piece of lying polemic. Invoking the reified abstraction of the nanny-state OR the big-brother state is a mind- control trigger, a mind-trap plain and simple.

Deliberate assault on the immune system through vaccinations is the central campaign in the depopulation and social control strategy.


Vaccination is not immunization

Succinct and to the point. Too many batches of "Vaccine" have come up positive with other "contaminants" such as "Aspartame".

Why would you put Aspartame in a vaccine?

There is no health reason for it to be there - it is a neurotoxin and when placed in a vaccine shot it is going directly into the blood system.

Gosh. You don't think it was intentional do you? /sarcasm

Remember The White Rose
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-09-18   14:52:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]