Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Insurance giant withdraws 9/11 lawsuit against Saudi Arabia
Source: Daily Mail (UK)
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 22, 2011
Author: Daily Mail Reporter
Post Date: 2011-09-22 03:29:19 by Original_Intent
Ping List: *US INDUSTRIAL WAR MACHINE*     Subscribe to *US INDUSTRIAL WAR MACHINE*
Keywords: 911, PsyOps, spin, bogus
Views: 132
Comments: 8

Insurance giant withdraws 9/11  lawsuit against Saudi Arabia

By Daily Mail Reporter

Last updated at 8:37 PM on 21st September 2011

DM.has('shareLink', 'sociallinks', { 'id': '2039879', 'eTitle': 'Insurance+giant+withdraws+9%2F11++lawsuit+against+Saudi+Arabia%0A', 'eUrl': 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymail.co.uk%2Fnews%2Farticle-2039879%2FLloyds-withdraws-Sauid-lawsuit-Insurance-giant-withdraws-action-claimed-country-funded-9-11.html', 'eShortUrl': 'http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FpDf67E', 'eDesc': 'An+insurance+firm+has+withdrawn+its+lawsuit+against+Saudi+Arabia%2C+which+had+claimed+the+country+funded+the+terrorists+responsible+for+the+9%2F11+attacks.' });

An insurance firm has withdrawn its lawsuit against Saudi Arabia, which had claimed the country funded the terrorists responsible for the 9/11 attacks.

A division of Lloyd's of London had filed documents in a U.S. court

on September 8 demanding the return of $215million compensation it paid victims. But the lawsuit has now been dropped.

Lawsuit: The headquarters of Lloyd's of London

Lawsuit: The headquarters of Lloyd's of London

Attorney Stephen Cozen of law firm Cozen O'Connor, which represents Lloyd's, told Insurance Journal that he cannot comment on why Lloyd’s decided to drop the case less than two weeks after filing the complaint. Mr Cozen told the journal: 'We were instructed to voluntarily dismiss without prejudice. That of course means that the suit is free to be refiled and certainly similar suits may be filed by others.'
 Lloyd's is voluntarily dismissing its lawsuit 'without prejudice,' meaning the motion seeks to close the case without precluding the possibility of renewal at a later date, the court clerk's office said. The lawsuit - filed in Johnston, Pennsylvania, where United Airlines flight 93 crashed on 9/11, named nine defendants, including a leading member of the oil-rich state's royal family. Saudi Arabia has always denied claims that Osama bin Laden's organisation received official financial and practical support from his homeland.

Disaster: Legal documents were filed in Johnston, near where the United 93 jet crashed after being hijacked by 9/11 terrorists

Disaster: Legal documents had been filed in Johnston, near where the United 93 jet crashed after being hijacked by 9/11 terrorists

And the 9/11 Commission's official report on the attacks, found that there was no evidence that the Saudi government or senior Saudi officials individually funded Al Qaeda.

POSTER COMMENT: It seems that the lawsuit came up just in time for the 911 tenth anniversary and went away as soon as it was no longer needed for Propaganda Effect. (2 images)

Subscribe to *US INDUSTRIAL WAR MACHINE*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

#1. To: Tatarewicz, Shoonra, All (#0)

Ping.

Remember The White Rose
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-09-22   3:30:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#2. To: Original_Intent (#0) (Edited)

Disaster: Legal documents had been filed in Johnston, near where
the United 93 jet crashed after being hijacked by 9/11 terrorists


Flight 93 crater supposedly made by a plane.
NOTE: Absence of plane.
Flight 93 crater supposedly made by a plane 757 boeing N591UA notice, no plane parts left debris ?

"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it.” ~ Patrick Henry

wudidiz  posted on  2011-09-22   5:15:20 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#3. To: Original_Intent (#1)

If the lawsuit was not a propaganda ploy and was followed through it would be next to impossible to avoid bringing in Israel's role in 9/11 so Organized Jewry may well have leaned on Lloyds.

Also, there's the possibility there were no Saudis on the planes at all. The planes may have been programmed irreversibly on auto pilot to home in on targets, the auto cut in taking effect sometime after take off. Would explain reports from some of the alleged hijackers that they were still alive.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2011-09-22   6:08:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#4. To: Tatarewicz, wudidiz (#3)

My best guess is that Flight 93 was the exception. The auto control system cut in and someone on board was savvy enough to find it and disconnect/disable it. Since a plane load of living passengers that could testify that there were no Arabs with "boxcutters", and a flight crew that would testify the plane was taken over, would have blown the entire cover story higher than WTC 7 they could not be allowed to live. So, the plane was shot down.

That there was a debris field spread over at least 8 miles, and there was some very heavy stuff out at the 8 mile mark that could not be accounted for by the plane into ground impact where everything else was pulverized, it supports the plane shot down theory. There are other data points as well so at this point some version or variation of what I mentioned above is, I believe, the case.

Remember The White Rose
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-09-22   13:31:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#5. To: Original_Intent (#4)

Anyone recall if at anytime there was pilot communication (after takeoff) between the "doomed" planes and ground? Might indicate a programmed disabling of radio as well.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2011-09-22   22:55:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#6. To: Original_Intent (#0)

Indicates some sort of out-of-court negotiation, presumably between the insurance company and the Saudis (if not the official Saudi govt, then the royal Saudis or some other really bigshot Saudis), possibly to avert further investigation and/or publicity about the lawsuit. This negotiation may have involved huge sums of money being paid, not necessarily to the insurance company but to the individuals who were running the lawsuit ... or maybe instead of money some sort of threats of personal violence.

Shoonra  posted on  2011-09-23   1:14:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#7. To: Shoonra (#6) (Edited)

Speculation. The data is that the suit was withdrawn without prejudice. While I am not above speculation or drawing inferences from circumstance I don't see anything in evidence to either prove or disprove your contention. While your suggestion is certainly possible, it is equally possible that there was a decision made not to go forward with a lawsuit for which the plaintiffs could provide no substantive support.

Remember The White Rose
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-09-23   2:48:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#8. To: Tatarewicz (#5)

Anyone recall if at anytime there was pilot communication (after takeoff) between the "doomed" planes and ground? Might indicate a programmed disabling of radio as well.

No data really. I do know that the flight controllers were put under a gag order and all of the tapes of conversations with the controllers were put under lock and key or in one case destroyed - which leads me to suspect that there is something there which could lay the lie to the official story. However, data insufficient to say exactly what.

Remember The White Rose
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-09-23   2:56:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest