[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Health See other Health Articles Title: From Dr Leonard Coldwell Newsletter Dr. Samuel Epstein has published detailed evidence implicating industrial carcinogens that permeate our environment — in our foods, our air, ourwater, our cosmetics and other consumer products. And he blames the National Cancer Institute(NCI) and the American Cancer Society (ACS) for ignoring these causes and instead spendingbillions on the elusive search for a magic bullet cure for cancer. Epstein maintains that with a comprehensive program of prevention, we can drive cancerrates back down to the relatively low rate of the 1950s. Why are cancer rates increasing? EPSTEIN: Let’s go over the reasons. Is it possible the reason is that people are living longer? No that isn’t the case. The figures that I have given you are based on what is called age standardized rates. We standardize them to take into account the fact that people are living someone longer now than they were thirty years ago. So the age factor is irrelevant. Is it smoking? Smoking is the single largest cause of cancer. But these increases are not smoking related. The increases are based on non-smoking cancers. Is it genetics? The answer is no. It takes tens of thousands of years for the genetics of human populations to change. So, what then is the reason for it? It is an expression of avoidable industrial causes of cancer, for which we have an overwhelming body of scientific documentation. And these avoidable industrial causes of cancer are many fold. They exist in the totality of our environment. From consumer products-the food of the nation is highly contaminated with a wide range of carcinogens, ranging from pesticides to hormones in meat, Cattle in feedlots are given potent 100 hormones prior to slaughter to increase their muscle mass. And therefore there are very high residues of carcinogenic estrogens in the meat. The you irradiate the meat, which creates a whole family of carcinogens. Cosmetics and toiletries are a witch’s brew of undisclosed carcinogenic ingredients and also precursors of carcinogens. Household products, particularly pesticides-household use of pesticides can increase the risk of childhood lymphomas by up to six or seven fold. There is no double that proximity of residents to petrochemical industries, municipal incinerators-are major risk factor. And the environment is becoming increasingly contaminated with multiple carcinogenic byproducts of industrial processes. Water is becoming increasingly contaminated with a variety of industrial carcinogens. And I would single out atrazine, a commonly used herbicide. Proximity to hazardous waste sites is a risk factor for several cancers. Occupation is responsible for up to about 20 percent of cancer mortality. There is a pretty wide range of carcinogenic pharmaceutical products currently on the market. These include lindane, which is used to get rid of head lice. you have Ritalin for attention deficit disorder. You have Evista by Eli Lilly to prevent bone lone in post-menopausal women. Eli Lilly’s own data recognize that it causes a high incidence of ovarian cancer in mice and rates. Back in 1998, I discussed this on CBS Sixty Minutes. Pre-menopausal mammography. The radiation dosage for pre-menopausal mammography is just a little bit short of the radiation does delivered to Japanese women outside of the epicenter where the atom bomb exploded outside of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which was estimated to be about ten rads. The dose of radiation over a ten year period to pre-menopausal mammography is about five to six rads. Women are constantly assured- that the radiation does is trivial and don’t need to worry about it-it’s just like a transatlantic air flight. But in fact, it is a very, very high dose. And in fact, the reliability of pre-menopausal mammography is low. The incidence of false positives-falsely diagnosed cancers-is extremely high. The incidence of missed cancers is extremely high. And in fact, breast self-examination is much safer, much more reliable. In this context, the industry, together with NCI and ACS, are pushing for digitized mammography, the cost of which would be extraordinary. Pediatric CAT scans-the use of CAT scans for children if they hit their head. Children are given CAT scans with very high doses of radiation generally about 14 to 15 times greater than is 101 needed for diagnostic purposes. And that is one of the reasons why childhood cancer rates are on the increase. Two other reasons why cancer rates are increasing-one is the rollover the mainstream media. The mainstream media is highly gullible. They are taken in by the massive public relations of the NCI and the ACS. The Arthur Andersen silence regarding Enron’s misconduct pales in comparison to NCI and ACS silence regarding reckless misconduct by petrochemical and the other industries. Arthur Andersen’s silence created financial meltdown. But the silence of the NCI and ACS has resulted in the current cancer epidemic. Chemotherapy Kills 27% of Sick Patients; Doctors Urged to Stop Killing People with Chemo A UK report is warning doctors about the consequences of using chemotherapy on sick cancer patients, citing new data that reveals chemotherapy kills 27% of those patients. I never thought I’d see the day that researchers from the world of conventional medicine actually admit the truth about chemotherapy: It’s a toxic, poisonous therapy better suited for barbaric torture than anything resembling the healing arts. The cancer industry is a grand fraud, and it kills millions of people with chemotherapy, radiation and surgical procedures that do nothing to address the root causes of cancer. But stupid oncologists just keep poisoning everybody they can, oblivious to the number of people they are killing with their dangerous drugs. Many of the victims are women, and they’re being maimed and killed in record numbers by a cancer industry that has killed far more people than it has helped. FromNews.bbc.co.: Doctors are being urged to re-think their approach to giving chemotherapy during care at the end of life. A review of 600 cancer patients who died within 30 days of treatment found that in more than a quarter of cases it actually hastened or caused death Chemotherapy Kills 27% of Sick Patients; Doctors Urged to Stop Killing People with Chemo Lemon(Citrus) is a miraculous product to kill cancer cells. It is 10,000 times stronger than chemotherapy. Why do we not know about that? Because there are laboratories interested in making a synthetic version that will bring them huge profits. You can now help a friend in need by letting him/her know that lemon juice is beneficial in preventing the disease. Its taste is pleasant and it does not produce the horrific effects of chemotherapy. How many people will die while this closely guarded secret is kept, so as not to jeopardize the beneficial multimillionaires large corporations? As you know, the lemon tree is known for its varieties of lemons and limes. You can eat the fruit in different ways: you can eat the pulp, juice press, prepare drinks, sorbets, pastries, etc… It is credited with many virtues, but the most interesting is the effect it produces on cysts and tumors. This plant is a proven remedy against cancers of all types. Some say it is very useful in all variants of cancer. It is considered also as an anti microbial spectrum against bacterial infections and fungi, effective against internal parasites and worms, it regulates blood pressure which is too high and an antidepressant, combats stress and nervous disorders. The source of this information is fascinating: it comes from one of the largest drug manufacturers in the world, says that after more than 20 laboratory tests since 1970, the extracts revealed that: It destroys the malignant cells in 12 cancers, including colon, breast, prostate, lung and pancreas … The compounds of this tree showed 10,000 times better than the product Adriamycin, a drug normally used chemotherapeutic in the world, slowing the growth of cancer cells. And what is even more astonishing: this type of therapy with lemon extract only destroys malignant cancer cells and it does not affect healthy cells. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
i've never heard this before.
Baking soda cancer treatment was elaborated upon on C2C Wed. night: Alternative Cancer Treatment First hour guest, Dr. Tullio Simoncini discussed his antifungal treatment for cancer using sodium bicarbonate (baking soda). He has concluded that cancer is a fungal infection, and that sodium bicarbonate can be a highly effective treatment when applied correctly to tumors. Sometimes this might involve surgery, where the bicarbonate solution is applied directly to the cancer growth such that it sterilizes its roots, he explained.
There are no replies to Comment # 4. End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||