[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain?

Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish'

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest

Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus

A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst.

Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan.

Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane

Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand?

LOOK AT MY ASS!

Elon Musk Responds As British Government "Summons" Him To 'Disinformation' Hearing

MSNBC Contributor Panics Over Trump Nominating Bondi For AG: Dangerous Because Shes Competent

House passes dangerous bill that targets nonprofits, pro-Palestine groups

Navy Will Sideline 17 Support Vessels to Ease Strain on Civilian Mariners

Israel carries out field executions, massacres in north Gaza

AOC votes to back Israel Lobby's bogus anti-Semitism definition

Biden to launch ICE mobile app, further disrupting Trump's mass deportation plan: Report

Panic at Mar-a-Lago: How the Fake Press Pool Fueled Global Fear Until X Set the Record Straight

Donald Trumps Nominee for the FCC Will Remove DEI as a Priority of the Agency

Stealing JFK's Body

Trump plans to revive Keystone XL pipeline to solidify U.S. energy independence

ASHEVILLE UPDATE: Bodies Being Stacked in Warehouses & Children Being Taken Away

American news is mostly written by Israeli lobbyists pushing Zionist agenda

Biden's Missile Crisis

British Operation Kiss kill Instantly Skripals Has Failed to Kill But Succeeded at Covering Up, Almost

NASA chooses SpaceX and Blue Origin to deliver rover, astronaut base to the moon

The Female Fantasy Exposed: Why Women Love Toxic Love Stories

United States will NOT comply with the ICC arrest warrant for Prime Minister Netanyahu:

Mississippi’s GDP Beats France: A Shocking Look at Economic Policy Failures (Per Capita)


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Why Do Republicans Hate Social Security?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.opednews.com/articles/Wh ... Bernie-Sanders-110922-509.html
Published: Sep 24, 2011
Author: http://www.opednews.com/articles/Why-Do-
Post Date: 2011-09-24 14:38:00 by tom007
Keywords: None
Views: 303
Comments: 35

Why Do Republicans Hate Social Security? Add this Page to Facebook!

Become a Fan Become a Fan (45 fans) -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com AdChoices

Republicans hate Social Security because it has been an extraordinary success and has done exactly what it was designed to do. It is the most successful government program in our nation's history and is enormously popular.

When Social Security was developed, 50 percent of seniors lived in poverty. Today, that number is 10 percent -- still too high, but a testament to the success of Social Security.

Republicans have spent years demonizing Social Security and spreading lies about its sustainability. They want to scare Americans and build support for making drastic cuts to the program or privatizing it entirely. Their long-term goal is to end Social Security as we know it, and convert it into a private account system which will enable Wall Street to make hundreds of billions in profits.

The truth is that today, according to the Social Security Administration, Social Security has a $2.7 trillion surplus and can pay out every benefit owed to every eligible American for the next 25 years.

Further, because it is funded by the payroll tax and not the U.S. Treasury, Social Security has not contributed one nickel to our deficit.

Now -- in a prolonged recession that has decimated the poor and middle class and pushed more Americans into poverty than at any point in modern history -- we need to strengthen Social Security. That's why I, along with nine co-sponsors, have introduced the "Keeping Our Social Security Promises Act." This legislation would lift the Social Security Payroll tax cap on all income over $250,000 a year, would require millionaires and billionaires to pay their fair share into the Social Security Trust Fund, and would extend the program for the next 75 years.

For 76 years, through good times and bad, Social Security has paid out every benefit owed to every eligible American. The most effective way to strengthen Social Security for the next 76 years is to scrap the payroll tax cap for those earning $250,000 a year or more.

Right now, someone who earns $106,800 pays the same amount of money into Social Security as billionaires like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. That is because today, all income above $106,800 is exempt from the Social Security tax. As a result, 94% of Americans pay Social Security tax on all of their income, but the wealthiest 6% do not.

That makes no sense.

The "Keeping Our Social Security Promises Act" will ensure the long-term solvency of Social Security without cutting benefits, raising the retirement age or raising taxes on the middle class.

Social Security is keeping tens of millions of seniors out of poverty today. I can think of no more important issue facing our country today than making sure that Social Security remains strong for generations to come.

Join me and Democracy for America in fighting to strengthen Social Security -- Sign on as a citizen co-sponsor of the Keeping Our Social Security Promises Act.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

#2. To: tom007 (#0)

Socialist drivel. FDR, Federal Deficit Russianvelt, was the idiot who foisted off this socialist crap. What would have been wrong with letting people keep what they earned and saving it or investing it themselves? But no, that wasn't good enough for socialists/communists like FDR, he wanted means of CONTROLLING the people. And the government spends the money people pay into that Ponzi scheme just like they do all other taxes and it all goes into the general fund. And the country is beyond broke and the unfunded liabilities of SS is one of the things that helped to break it.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2011-09-24   14:52:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: James Deffenbach (#2)

Socialist drivel. FDR, Federal Deficit Russianvelt, was the idiot who foisted off this socialist crap. What would have been wrong with letting people keep what they earned and saving it or investing it themselves? But no, that wasn't good enough for socialists/communists like FDR, he wanted means of CONTROLLING the people. And the government spends the money people pay into that Ponzi scheme just like they do all other taxes and it all goes into the general fund. And the country is beyond broke and the unfunded liabilities of SS is one of the things that helped to break it.

During the Great Depression the country was treated to the specter of old people digging from trash can to trash can trying to find enough to survive.

Based on more recent research the fairy tale of everybody surviving those hard times without casualties has been proven FALSE. The more recent research provides a basis for an estimate of about 7 MILLION people having starved to death during the Great Depression.

As originally conceived it was intended to be a survival stipend not a retirement account.

Had Congress not spent the money it would not be a problem as there would be more than enough available funds to pay the benefits.

I would agree that monies were grievously mishandled and had those monies been properly invested then there would be enough money to pay more than the pittance is paid now.

In concept I have no problem with it so long as it his handled in a manner consistent with the obligations of any other fiduciary.

Cutting it off now would be a great eugenics move though. Shucks those old poor folks don't need food. Let the bastards starve.

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-09-24   16:54:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 13.

#14. To: Original_Intent (#13)

Correct.

It was known back then as Old Age Assistance, not My Retirement Account.

Anyone counting on it these days best like Alpo.

Lod  posted on  2011-09-24 16:59:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Original_Intent (#13)

As originally conceived it was intended to be a survival stipend not a retirement account.

"As originally conceived" it was unconstitutional and it still is! Congress has no authority to steal from people under the guise of protecting them or saving money for them which they then piss away. I am not advocating that the people who are already on it should not get their benefits. What I do advocate is being honest with young people and telling them that a great crime had been perpetrated on the American people, one which they would go to jail for. And explain what a Ponzi scheme is and tell them that it was going to be abolished and to save for their own retirement or do their own investing and take their own chances. Their life and their money.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2011-09-24 19:57:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Original_Intent (#13)

The more recent research provides a basis for an estimate of about 7 MILLION people having starved to death during the Great Depression.

An uncomfortable fact that I believe is true. A Russian researcher, iirc, put the number at twelve million.

Whatever it is , it is a lot more than zero, which I think is what most Americans have been led to believe.

tom007  posted on  2011-09-25 08:42:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]