[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: War on terror or war on freedom?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/baldwin/110923
Published: Sep 23, 2011
Author: Chuck Baldwin
Post Date: 2011-09-26 17:14:01 by James Deffenbach
Keywords: None
Views: 123
Comments: 4

A recent major investigative report by the Los Angeles Times sheds light on what all this "war on terror" is actually costing — and actually accomplishing. According to the report, "A decade after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, federal and state governments are spending about $75 billion a year on domestic security, setting up sophisticated radio networks, upgrading emergency medical response equipment, installing surveillance cameras and bombproof walls, and outfitting airport screeners to detect an ever-evolving list of mobile explosives.

"But how effective has that 10-year spending spree been?

"'The number of people worldwide who are killed by Muslim-type terrorists, Al Qaeda wannabes, is maybe a few hundred outside of war zones. It's basically the same number of people who die drowning in the bathtub each year,' said John Mueller, an Ohio State University professor who has written extensively about the balance between threat and expenditures in fighting terrorism."

The LA Times report goes on to say, "Like the military-industrial complex that became a permanent and powerful part of the American landscape during the Cold War, the vast network of Homeland Security spyware, concrete barricades and high-tech identity screening is here to stay. The Department of Homeland Security, a collection of agencies ranging from border control to airport security sewn quickly together after Sept. 11, is the third-largest Cabinet department and — with almost no lawmaker willing to render the U.S. less prepared for a terrorist attack — one of those least to fall victim to budget cuts.

"The expensive and time-consuming screening now routine for passengers at airport boarding gates has detected plenty of knives, loaded guns and other contraband, but it has never identified a terrorist who was about to board a plane. Only 14 Americans have died in about three dozen instances of Islamic extremist terrorist plots targeted at the U.S. outside war zones since 2001 — most of them involving one or two home-grown plotters."

The report also notes, "Large sums of Homeland Security money, critics complain, have been propelled by pork barrel politics into the backyards of the congressionally connected."

See the LA Times report at:

http://tinyurl.com/3u3olzx

Add to the LA Times report a report by Madison Ruppert. In the report, Ruppert notes that it is clearly the Bill of Rights — especially the First Amendment's freedom of speech and the Second Amendment's right to keep and bear arms — that are suffering the most egregious attacks from the federal government's "war on terror."

Ruppert concludes his report saying, "In short, despite the fact that all the statistics and data in the world directly contradict the report's findings and the claims made by clearly biased 'experts' on the threat of terrorism, especially of the homegrown variety, the HSPI [Homeland Security Policy Institute] and other bodies continue to fearmonger and lie to the American people to keep us scared while they empty our pockets and continue their imperialistic adventures in the Middle East and now North Africa."

See Ruppert's column at:

http://blacklistednews.com/?news_id=15638&print=1

Back to the Times report, not only do we Americans have about an equal chance of dying at the hands of a terrorist as we do dying in our own bathtubs, we have a much greater risk of dying at the hands of prescription drugs — something lawfully encouraged and tightly controlled by the US government. According to a recent report, more people now die each year from prescription drugs than from automobile accidents. That's some 37,000 deaths via prescription drugs annually! (Come to think of it, how many people do you know who have died from marijuana?) And as hard as it will be for some people to accept, this number is gigantically greater than those who die from hard drugs such as heroin or crack cocaine. In fact, the prescription drug Vicodin, by itself, has killed more people than cocaine and heroin combined.

See the report on prescription drug deaths at:

http://tinyurl.com/6eh8bw3

So, what has this trillion-dollar "war on terror" accomplished? If it's not making us more secure, what is it doing? Well, for one thing, it has created a stupendous surveillance society. Virtually every piece of public communication is now captured and stored by the federal government. Surveillance cameras are now ubiquitous throughout the United States. We have a gargantuan federal police department (which is anathema to the US Constitution): the Department of Homeland Security. We have thousands of Orwellian laws, most of which were spawned by the Patriot Act. And more and more often, law enforcement agencies are demonizing US citizens for their religious and political beliefs and statements — even categorizing them as potential domestic terrorists based simply on those religious and political beliefs.

To refresh reader's minds regarding how Americans have been labeled, profiled, and denigrated as "terrorists" because of their religious or political beliefs, please peruse the material on this web page:

http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?page_id=52

Fortunately, it does appear that the combination of an emerging police state and a declining economy that has resulted from this "war on terror" is finally starting to catch the attention of the American people. According to a Brooking Institution report, "Six in ten Americans believe that that the United States weakened its economy by overspending in its responses to the 9/11 attacks. In particular, respondents felt this was especially true of the U.S. mission in Iraq. Two out of three Americans perceive that over the decade since 9/11, U.S. power and influence in the world has declined."

A Rasmussen report further revealed, "As with the recent turmoil in Egypt, most Americans (67%) say the United States should leave the situation in the Arab countries alone."

Beyond that, "A Zogby poll conducted in August 2007 found that 51% of Americans want Congress to probe Bush/Cheney regarding the 9/11 attacks, two-thirds (67%) of Americans say the 9/11 Commission should have investigated the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7."

See the http://BlacklistedNews.com report containing the above survey results and more at:

http://tinyurl.com/3v2n538

The LA Times is right to question what Americans are getting for their $75 billion a year contribution to the "war on terror." Some could even argue — with convincing data — that the "war on terror" is in reality a "war on freedom."

P.S. Understanding the financial difficulties that many people are having due to the current recession, and wanting to help people who desire to download my video and audio messages, we have reduced the price of both of these downloads. Video downloads are now only $10 (down from $15) and audio downloads are only $5 (down from $10). To download these messages, go to:

http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?cat=16

P.S.S. Our printer has just cleared his warehouse of all remaining FREEDOM DOCUMENTS. We now have 50 copies of THE FREEDOM DOCUMENTS available. And with our move to Montana, it is not certain that we will be able to provide FREEDOM DOCUMENTS this Christmas as usual. So, if readers want to obtain this fabulous collection of America's great historical documents in one volume, we have a total of only 50 copies that will be shipped while the supply lasts on a first-come, first-served basis. To order FREEDOM DOCUMENTS, go to:

http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?p=279

© Chuck Baldwin

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: James Deffenbach (#0)

Spot on! thanks.

Freedom documents ordered.

Break the Conventions - Keep the Commandments - G.K.Chesterson

Lod  posted on  2011-09-26   18:13:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Lod (#1)

You're welcome. Glad you enjoyed it.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.    Lord Acton

The human herd stampedes on the fields of facts and the valleys of truth to get to the desert of ignorance. Saman Mohammadi

The only difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits. Albert Einstein

"...if the military is going to defend our freedoms, then we need freedoms to defend. Our freedoms must be restored before the military can defend them..."  Lawrence M. Vance

Você me trata desse jeito só porque eu sou preto. Junior (my youngest son)

James Deffenbach  posted on  2011-09-26   18:24:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: James Deffenbach (#0)

A recent major investigative report by the Los Angeles Times sheds light on what all this "war on terror" is actually costing — and actually accomplishing. According to the report, "A decade after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, federal and state governments are spending about $75 billion a year on domestic security, setting up sophisticated radio networks, upgrading emergency medical response equipment, installing surveillance cameras and bombproof walls, and outfitting airport screeners to detect an ever-evolving list of mobile explosives.

"But how effective has that 10-year spending spree been?

Meanwhile, back in the war theatre, costs continue to rise.

The U.S. is deeply in debt, its economy is foundering and much of its infrastructure is crumbling. So why spend $10 billion a month on military operations in Afghanistan, plus $320 million in aid to the country?

That question becomes more compelling in light of analyses that indicate Afghanistan won't ever have the economic base to sustain the trained army and operational government the U.S. is trying to build. Afghanistan "can't possibly afford the military we're designing," Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley told the Statesman Journal Editorial Board last week.

Neither can the U.S. budget afford the ongoing war, which is one reason Merkley has become an outspoken critic of it. He has called for President Barack Obama to bring U.S. troops home next year, rather than withdrawing them over several years.

Last month Merkley made his second trip to Afghanistan, along with Pakistan. "We've been at it 10 years," he said of the war. "My conclusion is reinforced. There are inherent challenges to this mission. It is not going well, it is not likely to go well, and it is not proportional to our national interest in terms of the cost in lives, injuries and bank account."

August was the deadliest month for Americans; 66 U.S. service members were killed. At least 1,640 service members have died and 13,447 have been wounded since the U.S. and its allies invaded Afghanistan in late 2001. Those figures don't include the U.S. civilians, as well as foreign troops and Afghan civilians, who have been killed or injured.

The U.S. entered Afghanistan to wipe out the al-Qaida training camps and hunt down the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks. But then President George W. Bush went off track, pursuing Saddam Hussein and invading Iraq, allowing Afghanistan to become a side issue. The great irony is that strategy enabled the Taliban to regroup in Afghanistan while destabilizing Iraq so it became a haven for foreign terrorists.

Obama re-shifted the focus to Afghanistan, but the objectives remain murky. The military, including the Oregon National Guard, has made valiant efforts to establish civil institutions and train professional military and police forces. There are many success stories.

But the allies are fighting more than the insurgent Taliban; they're up against a culture of tribalism and corruption and a country steeped in discord and illiteracy.

"The corruption and the illiteracy and the resistance to institutions that are unfamiliar to this nation are all huge obstacles to the success of the mission that we've undertaken," Merkley said. "We would be far better off with an anti-terrorism mission — a counter-terrorism mission — than a nation-building mission."

The U.S. Wartime Contracting Commission reported last week that 10 percent to 20 percent of the money spent in Afghanistan had been wasted. Between $31 billion and $60 billion has disappeared in Iraq and Afghanistan due to corruption, overcharges, and inadequate planning and oversight of contractors.

Wasteful spending probably has occurred in every war, but that doesn't make it acceptable. Consider what the annual war budget could do if spent at home. If Oregon got a proportional share of that money, Merkley said, "You're talking about 50,000 jobs paying $20,000 — or subsidizing private business to create jobs, maybe it's 50,000 jobs paying $50,000."

The cost of the war isn't the only issue that should drive its future. But it's a relevant one.

It is vital to understand that there is no truth without discernment and no wisdom without the truth. What then is “faith” but an effort to confound truth and wisdom?

angK  posted on  2011-09-26   23:26:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: James Deffenbach (#0)

So, what has this trillion-dollar "war on terror" accomplished? If it's not making us more secure, what is it doing? Well, for one thing, it has created a stupendous surveillance society. Virtually every piece of public communication is now captured and stored by the federal government. Surveillance cameras are now ubiquitous throughout the United States. We have a gargantuan federal police department (which is anathema to the US Constitution): the Department of Homeland Security. We have thousands of Orwellian laws, most of which were spawned by the Patriot Act. And more and more often, law enforcement agencies are demonizing US citizens for their religious and political beliefs and statements — even categorizing them as potential domestic terrorists based simply on those religious and political beliefs.

The Patriot Act, a misnomer if there ever was one, was clearly set up to convince gullible people to give up their freedoms in return for security. To do otherwise would be "Unpatriotic." In fact, there was no need for either loss of freedom or security, but America was traumatized by 9/11.

The government doesn't want a free and armed population, asking questions about its unconstitutional wars or about 9/11. We all know that!

The government must be terrified of us to bring such tyranny upon our nation. It must be time for open defiance, ridicule, and impudence to get across to them that we have no respect for criminals that seek to rule us.

It is vital to understand that there is no truth without discernment and no wisdom without the truth. What then is “faith” but an effort to confound truth and wisdom?

angK  posted on  2011-09-26   23:47:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]