[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Arctic Sea Ice Soars to Highest Level for 21 Years

Tucker Carlson Reveals He Was Clawed By a Demon While Sleeping, Even Started to Bleed

Top Kamala Harris Surrogate Mark Cuban Faces Intense Backlash From #WomenForTrump

Kamala Harris Is Insane & Cannot Be Trusted

Israel-Hezbollah Ceasefire Possible Within 'Days': Lebanese PM

‘We were totally betrayed’ – 500 migrants for tiny German village of 600 will nearly double population

Hezbollah tactics, weapons stall Israeli advance

President Kennedy's Final Address to the United Nations General Assembly

RFK Jr. Explains Plan For Reforming The CIA

Harris Campaign Recruits Foreign Volunteers, Tells Noncitizens How To Skirt Donation Rules

Lame Yuck! With Nothing To Lose, Biden Goes On Baby-Mouthing Spree At White House Halloween Party

The Fastest Way To Reverse A Fatty Liver Naturally | Dr. William Li

CIA Advisor Warns: This is the beginning of the 2025 Civil War

When Evil Is Allowed In, Evil Stays

US layoffs rose 42% in three years, reaching 1.83M in September.

Iran Will Carry Out 'Definitive, Painful' Retaliatory Strike, Likely Before Election: CNN

How 2024 Election Will Lead To Second Civil War

Tulsi Gabbard Drops a Killer Trump Ad

Israel Genocide Tracker Account Sparks 'Panic' Among Israeli Soldiers

Battleground Voting Shift: Hispanic Voters Now Driven by Issues, Not Party Lines

North Carolina Appeals Court Rules to Allow Voters Who have Never Lived in the U.S. To Vote in State Elections

The 5 Tiers of Stolen Elections (Dems already did 1 & 2)

A Palestinian Family Goes to Pick Up Olives. It Ends in an Execution by Israeli Soldiers

Israel Suffers A Multimillion Dollar Economic SUCKER PUNCH!

The Babylon Bee Endorses Communist Harris

Nosy NY Times Journos Uncover Elon Musk's Secret Luxury Compound In Austin

A 20% surge in gov't spending inflates the national debt, inflation, and interest rates, now reaching 10% of GDP

MI EARLY VOTE SHOCKER! An Excess of 125,428 Votes Cast!

DMSO is the ivermectin for strokes and neurological damage

The Curious Case Of Ariane Tabatabai


Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: Rising atheism in America puts 'religious right on the defensive'
Source: The Guardian (UK)
URL Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/201 ... theism-america-religious-right
Published: Oct 4, 2011
Author: Paul Harris
Post Date: 2011-10-04 16:12:24 by Original_Intent
Keywords: atheism, Israelism, false, idols
Views: 299
Comments: 19

Rising atheism in America puts 'religious right on the defensive'

High profile of faith-based politicians such as Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry masks a steady growth in secularism

in New York

(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

Rising atheism in America puts 'religious right on the defensive'

Actually I think I would reword the headline as: Christian NeoCon pseudo-Christian Right puts atheism on the rise

Why?

Because the support of grotesque and inexcusable crimes against humanity are increasingly being rejected. To use a perversion of the Christian faith as justification for murder and pillage is a real turn off. That does not mean that there is no God nor that religion is without value, but that the perversion of religion is what many people perceive as the truth of religion.

As for the atheist kooks all they really want to do is exactly what they accuse others of i.e., to FORCE their beliefs upon others. Freedom OF Religion is not the same as Freedom FROM Religion. The former is tolerance of differing beliefs and the latter is the enshrinement of intolerance of differing beliefs.

Remember The White Rose
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-10-04   16:21:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Original_Intent (#1)

An atheist has simply never met or experienced God. They don't believe what they don't know. Can't really blame them.

Anyone who is turned off by religion because of what some do in the name of god has likely never experienced or met God either.

Simple stuff for anyone that has.


"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it.” ~ Patrick Henry

wudidiz  posted on  2011-10-04   16:58:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Original_Intent (#0)

"Faith is believing what you know ain't so,"

This is an incorrect definition of faith. Faith is believing in something without 100% proof of something.

It is not believing in something you know isn't so. That isn't faith, that is insane.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2011-10-04   17:18:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Original_Intent, you did it again (#1)

As for the atheist kooks all they really want to do is exactly what they accuse others of i.e., to FORCE their beliefs upon others.

Holy shit that was funny!

If it wasn't for forced converting (via torture, mass murder, etc.) those awful Pagans that were just minding their own business, christianity would have died in the cradle.

Now it is dying the death of a thousand cuts.

Too bad the christians are (probably) not going to get the exact same treatment that they meted out to others, and continue to inflict on others.

PSUSA2  posted on  2011-10-04   20:25:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: wudidiz (#2)

An atheist has simply never met or experienced God. They don't believe what they don't know.

Perhaps, and it is also not real to them that they are a spiritual entity and not a meat body. They have bought into the concept of materialism i.e., that matter is what matters and that all we are is animate sacks of water, chemicals, and meat. Interestingly, there is less proof for that hypothesis than for the existence of God and that man is more than meat. However, they (the atheists) are always amusing in that they are as convinced of the rightness of their position, based on their faith in materialism, as is a 3rd grade edumacated backwoods Parson. The Parson has the advantage though as he is at least sniffing in the direction of truth. You read my toasting of Alan Chapman (who has never posted here since) and can see the illogic and insubstantial nature of the atheistic arguments when they are rigorously explored.

Where P is the belief in God and Spirituality and ~P is the negation of that or the rejection in the belief in God and Spirituality you can dissect their position, slice and dice, using their own supposed weapon of "logic" against them. That is of course because their beliefs are faith in the belief in the nonexistence of God. And that is a position for which they can produce no evidence more substantial than: "Because!!!!!!"

Remember The White Rose
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-10-04   22:09:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: PSUSA2 (#4)

If it wasn't for forced converting (via torture, mass murder, etc.) those awful Pagans that were just minding their own business, christianity would have died in the cradle.

And your proof for that unsupported assertion is?

Remember The White Rose
"“Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings - that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide.” ~ Gautama Siddhartha — The Buddha

Original_Intent  posted on  2011-10-04   22:10:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Original_Intent (#0)

Rising atheism in America puts 'religious right on the defensive'

The only thing that will bring these heretics back to the fold is more stake burnings!

"You'll just sing about Jesus and drink wine all day. It's great to be an American" - Sail Away by Randy Newman

Flintlock  posted on  2011-10-04   23:39:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Original_Intent (#0)

Sometimes I really wonder how many so called "Atheists" are still God believers and even Christians that simply don't belong to some ORGANIZED church and obey the stupid unbiblical doctrine rules of such organizations and are called "Atheists" by ORGANIZED religion for that reason.

Photobucket The FARO RESERVE BANK!!! Photobucket

Coral Snake  posted on  2011-10-05   1:16:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Coral Snake (#8) (Edited)

Unfortunately there are a lot of athiest today among young people. The Jews have been more sucessful lately in turning people away from God by actually training to become Christian preachers and taking over churches with their lies. Jews are our number one enemy, and the sooner people realize that the better.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2011-10-05   2:07:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Original_Intent (#5)

Where P is the belief in God and Spirituality and ~P is the negation of that or the rejection in the belief in God and Spirituality you can dissect their position, slice and dice, using their own supposed weapon of "logic" against them. That is of course because their beliefs are faith in the belief in the nonexistence of God. And that is a position for which they can produce no evidence more substantial than: "Because!!!!!!"

"I haven't experienced it therefore it doesn't exist."


"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it.” ~ Patrick Henry

wudidiz  posted on  2011-10-05   5:21:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Original_Intent, again, you did it again (#1)

As for the atheist kooks all they really want to do is exactly what they accuse others of i.e., to FORCE their beliefs upon others. Freedom OF Religion is not the same as Freedom FROM Religion. The former is tolerance of differing beliefs and the latter is the enshrinement of intolerance of differing beliefs.

And your proof for that unsupported idiotic assertion is?

Freedom OF religion is the right to choose for yourself whether to have a religion or not, and to choose a path of ones choice. Christians do not like others to that freedom. Not having others validation of their beliefs scares them to death.

Freedom FROM religion is the right to be left alone by others trying to convert them, AND not to be forced to live by religious standards of other people. Christians do NOT like others to have that freedom. It is their mission in life to convert the world, by hook or by crook.

Then they wonder why they meet such resistance.

PSUSA2  posted on  2011-10-05   8:31:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Original_Intent (#0) (Edited)

This is so biblically prophetic [Micah 4:11, Psalm 2:1-3 etc.] and so indicative of the Illuminati/Jewish plot against America ["The Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations", and "THE DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA", both at www.apfn.org or apfn.net ], that it should make believers out of atheists, if they had any sense.

"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2011-10-05   13:04:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: PSUSA2 (#11)

Freedom FROM religion is the right to be left alone by others trying to convert them, AND not to be forced to live by religious standards of other people. Christians do NOT like others to have that freedom. It is their mission in life to convert the world, by hook or by crook.

i think you have it ass-backwards.

Feds' rhetoric imperils Christian values, beliefs

1/5/2011 4:15:00 AMBookmark and Share

christ cross banA California-based organization has released its annual list of anti-Christian acts in America for 2010 -- a list determined through an online poll.

The list [ http://defendchristians.org/comm...-christian-events-in-2010 ] included stories like the Department of Homeland Security's report on "Rightwing Extremism," which labeled conservative Christians as potential terrorists -- or when police officers were called to a middle school in Kentucky to stop eighth-graders from praying during lunch for a student whose mother was tragically killed.

The number-one anti-Christian event in 2010, according to the poll's final tally, was the continued push for passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) -- a bill that, if made law, would force ministries to hire individuals who oppose their beliefs or who live in open defiance of their values.

Gary CassDr. Gary Cass, president and CEO of http://DefendChristians.org, says while the actions on the list are not as egregious as incidents in other parts of world, Christians should be concerned when anti-Christian rhetoric comes from political leaders.

"Attacks are real; the discrimination is growing; the threats are not just rhetorical now -- some of them have even resulted in physical violence," Cass shares. "And probably the most ominous thing is that some of the threats are now coming to us directly from the government.".......

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Persecution/Default.aspx?id=1266282

see also "Now It Is Legal for the Government to Kill Christians" [two of them. one by Dr. Lorraine Day and one by Congressman William Dannemeyer] at takebackourrights.com [or .org?]

"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2011-10-05   13:25:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#13)

The number-one anti-Christian event in 2010, according to the poll's final tally, was the continued push for passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) -- a bill that, if made law, would force ministries to hire individuals who oppose their beliefs or who live in open defiance of their values.

www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-3017

This bill never became law. This bill was proposed in a previous session of Congress. Sessions of Congress last two years, and at the end of each session all proposed bills and resolutions that haven't passed are cleared from the books. Members often reintroduce bills that did not come up for debate under a new number in the next session.

Now let us say it had become law. What would the law say? Let's look it up.

LET US SEE IF YOUR SOURCE WAS TELLING THE TRUTH, SHALL WE??????

SEC. 6. EXEMPTION FOR RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS.

This Act shall not apply to a corporation, association, educational institution, or society that is exempt from the religious discrimination provisions of title VII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 pursuant to section 702(a) or 703(e)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 2000e-1(a); 2000e-2(e)(2)).

What have we here? Hmmm? Did they lie? FUCK YES THEY LIED. Imagine that, a christian lied. Unthinkable! Surely the webmaster will end up in hell for that. Unless he is already forgiven by jebus, that is. Then he can do as he damn well pleases.

Now do you want me to continue ripping apart your post? Really? It took me all of 2 minutes to come up with that.

next time, check your references. It can only help.

PSUSA2  posted on  2011-10-05   13:53:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: PSUSA2 (#14) (Edited)

SEC. 6. EXEMPTION FOR RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS.

This Act shall not apply to a corporation, association, educational institution, or society that is exempt from the religious discrimination provisions of title VII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 pursuant to section 702(a) or 703(e)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 2000e-1(a); 2000e-2(e)(2)).

good work...let's see the rest of it...there may be more in the fine print...if not...it conflicts with the Noahide Law signed into "law" by GBush the First....which boils down to: all Christians are "idolators" according to the Judeo-British CorpUSA, which is punishable by death by decapitation...no "rights"/no "exemptions" allowed to "idolators"

"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2011-10-05   14:30:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: All (#15) (Edited)

SEC. 6. EXEMPTION FOR RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS.....

there may be more in the fine print...if not...it conflicts with the Noahide Law

OR....maybe that's why it didn't pass in this Zionist-Occupied "government"

=======

edit.

to "All"

sorry, meant to address that to PSUSA

"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2011-10-05   14:35:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#15) (Edited)

I didn't see any fine print.

The only reason webmasters get away with this crap is because they know that if their readers cannot be bothered to read their own bibles, they will certainly not check out that webmasters allegations about what Bill X says. This is especially true if other websites pick up the story, which they always seem to do, without bothering to check it out first.

Alex Jones and others do the same thing.

And when it comes to the kikes vs christians, I'm safe. But that will not stop me from killing them if they try anything. I just disagree with christians. I fucking hate kikes.

PSUSA2  posted on  2011-10-05   14:50:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: PSUSA2 (#17)

I didn't see any fine print.

This Act shall not apply to [define] a corporation, association, educational institution, or society that is exempt from the religious discrimination provisions of title VII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 pursuant to section 702(a) or 703(e)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 2000e-1(a); 2000e-2(e)(2)). [text? revisions? court decisions? etc..... of such is "fine print" derived from]

"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2011-10-05   15:35:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#18) (Edited)

www.law.cornell.edu/uscod..._42_00002000---e001-.html

Act (42 U.S.C. 2000e-1(a)

§ 2000e–1. Exemption How Current is This? (a) Inapplicability of subchapter to certain aliens and employees of religious entities This subchapter shall not apply to an employer with respect to the employment of aliens outside any State, or to a religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society with respect to the employment of individuals of a particular religion to perform work connected with the carrying on by such corporation, association, educational institution, or society of its activities.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

2000e-2(e)(2))

www.law.cornell.edu/uscod..._42_00002000---e002-.html

(e) Businesses or enterprises with personnel qualified on basis of religion, sex, or national origin; educational institutions with personnel of particular religion Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, (1) it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to hire and employ employees, for an employment agency to classify, or refer for employment any individual, for a labor organization to classify its membership or to classify or refer for employment any individual, or for an employer, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining programs to admit or employ any individual in any such program, on the basis of his religion, sex, or national origin in those certain instances where religion, sex, or national origin is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise, and

(2) it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for a school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning to hire and employ employees of a particular religion if such school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning is, in whole or in substantial part, owned, supported, controlled, or managed by a particular religion or by a particular religious corporation, association, or society, or if the curriculum of such school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning is directed toward the propagation of a particular religion.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Civil Rights Acts of 1964 pursuant to section 702(a)

www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm

APPLICABILITY TO FOREIGN AND RELIGIOUS EMPLOYMENT

SEC. 2000e-1. [Section 702]

(a) Inapplicability of subchapter to certain aliens and employees of religious entities

This subchapter shall not apply to an employer with respect to the employment of aliens outside any State, or to a religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society with respect to the employment of individuals of a particular religion to perform work connected with the carrying on by such corporation, association, educational institution, or society of its activities.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Civil Rights Acts of 1964 703(e)(2)

www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm

(e) Businesses or enterprises with personnel qualified on basis of religion, sex, or national origin; educational institutions with personnel of particular religion

Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, (1) it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to hire and employ employees, for an employment agency to classify, or refer for employment any individual, for a labor organization to classify its membership or to classify or refer for employment any individual, or for an employer, labor organization, or joint labor­management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining programs to admit or employ any individual in any such program, on the basis of his religion, sex, or national origin in those certain instances where religion, sex, or national origin is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise, and

(2) it shall not be an unlawful employment practice for a school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning to hire and employ employees of a particular religion if such school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning is, in whole or in substantial part, owned, supported, controlled, or managed by a particular religion or by a particular religious corporation, association, or society, or if the curriculum of such school, college, university, or other educational institution or institution of learning is directed toward the propagation of a particular religion.

PSUSA2  posted on  2011-10-05   15:49:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]