The bogus plot cooked up by the FBI and DEA to frame a used car dealer and claim he tried to set up an assassination plot at the behest of Irans Quds is coming apart at the seams.
Hillary Mann Leverett, a former official in the Bush administration, says the supposed plot makes no sense.
She should know something about the Iranians Mann Leverett was Director for Iran, Afghanistan and Persian Gulf Affairs at the National Security Council in the Bush administration, served as Middle East expert on the Secretary of States Policy Planning Staff, and Political Advisor for Middle East, Central Asian and African issues at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations.
Ms. Leverett has published extensively on Iran as well as on other Middle Eastern, Central and South Asian, and Russian issues. She has spoken about U.S.-Iranian relations at Harvard, MIT, the National Defense University, NYU, the Norwegian Institute for International Affairs, and major research centers in China, her bio states.
Despite her expertise, the CNN teleprompter reader on duty at the time of her interview lamely attempts to dispute the claim that the Iranians would never engage in such pointless stupidity.
Others are disputing this absurd terror plot as well.
Afshon Ostovar, a senior analyst at the Center for Naval Analyses, went on NPR and to say the alleged attack is drastically out of step with [Quds] modus operandi because carrying out an assassination in the United States is unprecedented. Working with a criminal drug cartel in Mexico is also unprecedented, Ostovar says. He is writing a book about Irans Revolutionary Guards.
Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton is consulting with allies in preparation for an attack on Iran or at minimum a round of debilitating sanctions, although it should now be obvious the globalists who run Obama prefer the former.
The Germans have expressed reservations about the plot as related by the Justice Department, according to Spiegel.
Some doubts have been expressed in Washington about the Tehran governments actual involvement, said Gernot Erler, a Social Democratic Party lawmaker in parliament who specializes in foreign affairs. Id suggest we take those seriously.
Erler said it was absolutely clear that a confrontation would enormously complicate the activities of the Middle East quartet seeking to broker a peace deal between the Israelis and the Palestinians.
In fact, this is exactly the point in addition to taking out Iran the same way Iraq was taken out and Syria will eventually be taken out despite its resistance.
The neocon faction of the globalists have made it perfectly clear the idea is to reduce Islamic nations to Stone Age rubble in preparation for IMF and bankster fire sales and looting practices that pass in some quarters as free trade.
Not all German politicians are as circumspect, however. Ruprecht Polenz, chairman of the German parliaments Foreign Affairs Committee and a member of Merkels Christian Democrats, said Iran has the burden of proof in the current showdown. We shouldnt act as if this assassination plot is just some sort of American fantasy, he told Spiegel.
Uusually, the accuser has the responsbility of providing the burden of proof, but all the normal rules of behavior changed following September 11, 2001.
This theory can be seen in practice here in the U.S. where people have been deceived to think a piece of paper with a picture of an old dead man on it is "money."
This instrument of war should have been Sun Tzu's highest priority weapon as it is in Amerika. There can be no question that Amerika has constructed the most powerful and excessive military force ever known to planet earth by getting the entire world to accept these pieces of paper.
Sometimes I really want to weep for the stupidity of mankind.
"the man who puts all the guns and all the decision-making power into the hands of the central government and then says, Limit yourself; it is he who is truly the impractical utopian." Murray Rothbard
It sounds like something the United States' "Intelligence" community would do, not Iran. If Iran really wanted to take out the Saudi Ambassador they would have succeeded without using Mexican drug cartels which are well known to be in bed with the CIA. "False flag" does come to mind, the United States government is constantly looking for an excuse to go to war and not call it a war. There should be a serious investigation into the CIA, but there is certainly no way that will ever happen. As long as the CIA exists there can be no peace in this world, and that is just what the Democratic and Republican parties want. With the notable exception of Ron Paul who is a Libertarian in the Republican party.