See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: DINOSAUR and HUMAN FOOTPRINTS TOGETHER
Source:
POKERFACE E MAIL
URL Source: http://184.154.224.5/~creatio1/inde ... tent&task=view&id=48&Itemid=24
Published: Oct 14, 2011
Author: Paul and Poker Face
Post Date: 2011-10-14 06:12:12 by HOUNDDAWG
Keywords: None
Views: 1173
Comments: 66
Introduction: In early July, 2000 Alvis Delk, assisted by James Bishop (both of Stephenville, Texas), was working in the Cretaceous limestone on the McFall property at the Paluxy River near Glen Rose, Texas and discovered a pristine human footprint intruded by a dinosaur footprint. This discovery was made in the vicinity of McFall I and II Sites where the Creation Evidence Museum team has excavated since the Spring of 1982. The eleven-inch human footprint matches seven other such footprints of the same dimensions in the “Sir George Series,” named in honor of His Excellency Governor General Ratu Sir George Cacobau of Fiji.[2] Scientific Verification of Footprint Authenticity: The fossil was transported to a professional laboratory where 800 X-rays were performed in a CT Scan procedure. Laboratory technicians verified compression and distribution features clearly seen in both prints, human and dinosaur. This removes any possibility that the prints were carved or altered. Importance of Discovery: Professor James Stewart Monroe, writing in Journal of Geological Education candidly asserted that “Human footprints in geologically ancient strata would indeed call into doubt many conventional geological concepts.”[3] Professor David H. Milne of The Evergreen State College, Olympia, Washington and Professor Steven D. Schafersman of the Department of Geology, Rice University, Houston, Texas made further admissions in writing that “Such an occurrence, if verified, would seriously disrupt conventional interpretations of biological and geological history and would support the doctrines of creationism and catastrophism.”[4] Professor Steven M. Stanley in The New Evolutionary Timetable opined that “any topsy-turvy sequence of fossils would force us to rethink our theory…As Darwin recognized, a single geographic inconsistency would have nearly the same power of destruction.”[5]
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: HOUNDDAWG (#0)
More crap about Paluxy River at this late date?? The Paluxy River has genuine dinosaur prints ... but during the Depression, to try to turn the River into a tourist attraction, a great many of the dinosaur prints were "embellished" - usually by staining the rock to highlight the prints, and sometimes by deliberately carving human-like footprints for size comparison (also, some of the dinosaur prints, being partial such as if the dinosaur had been running, looked a tad like human prints but without toes - and some people added the toes by carving or by staining). This stuff was publicized back in the 1980s, when the Creationists were making waves. No real human prints at Paluxy.
#2. To: Shoonra, HOUNDDAWG (#1)
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/03/050325100541.htm Soft tissue found in T. rex bone Interesting to find any soft tissue from 68+ million years ago. I wonder what the answer is?
by the power of numb-skull you are she ra!
The article claims the footprints could not have been carved. FWIW.
This stuff was publicized back in the 1980s, when the Creationists were making waves. No real human prints at Paluxy. Horse manure and other execretory references. The footprints have been excavated up under the overlying formation which had never been previously removed and the prints were found to continue under the overlying rock layers and well beyond those already exposed. No, the real problem with them is that the contradict the rantings of the Fundamentalist Darwinians. The evolutionary timelime as currently accepted in the Academic Lamestream is highly dependent upon a series of assumptions which are in turn used to support the dominant materialist dogma. If the foot prints of human and dinosaur coincident in the same strata were accepted then the Darwinist/Materialist Fairy Tale of the "Shit Happens" theory of creation is immediately thrown into the dustbin of history. Academics, frequently, are not scientists in the truest sense as they will discard, attack, and ignore evidence which runs contrary to their favorite "theories" whereas the Scientific Method, taken verbatim and as established since "The Enlightenment" dictates that a contrary datum MUST be accounted for by the theory or the theory discarded or reformulated to account for the contradictory datum or data. Just as in another sphere the recent observation of neutrinos apparently exceeding the speed of light throws decades of scientific theory into question. If the initial observation is confirmed then modern physics MUST be rewritten to accommodate the new data.
Could you source this confident assertion please? I'd like to compare the facts and then apply Occam's razor. After all, fraud cannot simply be alleged but must be proven. Otherwise, it would not be unreasonable to surmise that those making such allegations are more desperate to further an agenda, and agenda that you obviously want to embrace. If history has taught us anything it's that those who dismiss anti-establishment revelations such as this with waves of their sickly, vaccine tainted paws should be viewed with skepticism. Surgeons who refused to accept the fact that microscopic bacteria on their hands were infecting and killing their patients were as certain of their positions as you seem to be. And they were wrong. If you have proof it will stand on its own merits. But, factoids such as "The Smithsonian says it's a fake" no longer constitute the last word. Their motto seems to be, "The scientific method is not a suicide pact."
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Replies to Comment # 1.
#4. To: Shoonra (#1)
#5. To: Shoonra (#1)
by deliberately carving human-like footprints for size comparison
#8. To: Shoonra (#1)
More crap about Paluxy River at this late date?? The Paluxy River has genuine dinosaur prints ... but during the Depression, to try to turn the River into a tourist attraction, a great many of the dinosaur prints were "embellished" - usually by staining the rock to highlight the prints, and sometimes by deliberately carving human-like footprints for size comparison (also, some of the dinosaur prints, being partial such as if the dinosaur had been running, looked a tad like human prints but without toes - and some people added the toes by carving or by staining).
#10. To: Shoonra (#1)
No real human prints at Paluxy.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.