See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: DINOSAUR and HUMAN FOOTPRINTS TOGETHER
Source:
POKERFACE E MAIL
URL Source: http://184.154.224.5/~creatio1/inde ... tent&task=view&id=48&Itemid=24
Published: Oct 14, 2011
Author: Paul and Poker Face
Post Date: 2011-10-14 06:12:12 by HOUNDDAWG
Keywords: None
Views: 1236
Comments: 66
Introduction: In early July, 2000 Alvis Delk, assisted by James Bishop (both of Stephenville, Texas), was working in the Cretaceous limestone on the McFall property at the Paluxy River near Glen Rose, Texas and discovered a pristine human footprint intruded by a dinosaur footprint. This discovery was made in the vicinity of McFall I and II Sites where the Creation Evidence Museum team has excavated since the Spring of 1982. The eleven-inch human footprint matches seven other such footprints of the same dimensions in the “Sir George Series,” named in honor of His Excellency Governor General Ratu Sir George Cacobau of Fiji.[2] Scientific Verification of Footprint Authenticity: The fossil was transported to a professional laboratory where 800 X-rays were performed in a CT Scan procedure. Laboratory technicians verified compression and distribution features clearly seen in both prints, human and dinosaur. This removes any possibility that the prints were carved or altered. Importance of Discovery: Professor James Stewart Monroe, writing in Journal of Geological Education candidly asserted that “Human footprints in geologically ancient strata would indeed call into doubt many conventional geological concepts.”[3] Professor David H. Milne of The Evergreen State College, Olympia, Washington and Professor Steven D. Schafersman of the Department of Geology, Rice University, Houston, Texas made further admissions in writing that “Such an occurrence, if verified, would seriously disrupt conventional interpretations of biological and geological history and would support the doctrines of creationism and catastrophism.”[4] Professor Steven M. Stanley in The New Evolutionary Timetable opined that “any topsy-turvy sequence of fossils would force us to rethink our theory…As Darwin recognized, a single geographic inconsistency would have nearly the same power of destruction.”[5]
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
#3. To: HOUNDDAWG (#0)
(Edited)
I just finished reading Origins, by Phillip Day. Among other things, the author uses math to prove that evolution is bunk. Paraphrasing his work, at a rate 1/10 of proven population expansion rate through written history, if humanity began 2 million years ago, the earth would now be populated by 18,932,139,737,991,000,000,000,000,000,000... people, give or take. Where are all these people, and where are all of the ancestral remains? Starting with two original ancestors, it would take 4,400 years to arrive at today's population, using historical population growth rates. Gotta love math. :)
Paraphrasing his work, at a rate 1/10 of proven population expansion rate through written history, if humanity began 2 million years ago, the earth would now be populated by 18,932,139,737,991,000,000,000,000,000,000... people, give or take. I wonder how deep human bodies would have to be stacked on the earth for there to be that number of people. I have a feeling the ones on the top wouldn't have any dirt in which to plant a blade of grass.
Dust to dust Pinguinite. : ) If man was cruising with the Dinos there wouldn't be a massive expansion in numbers of humans, but rather that number of humans would be reduced by dino dining. Only those humans smart enough to not become the dino snack of the day would increase in numbers......given the intelligence of the species today, millions of years later, I can't fathom that many being smart enough to avoid the fate of dino snack.
Dust to dust Pinguinite. : ) If man was cruising with the Dinos there wouldn't be a massive expansion in numbers of humans, but rather that number of humans would be reduced by dino dining. Only those humans smart enough to not become the dino snack of the day would increase in numbers......given the intelligence of the species today, millions of years later, I can't fathom that many being smart enough to avoid the fate of dino snack. The other problem is that fossils of any kind are actually a rare occurrence. People make the mistake of assuming they are more common than they are because of the volume found, but they were all created under special conditions over millions to hundreds of millions of years. In that vast quantity of time the conditions have been replicated over and over, but there are still huge gaps in the fossil record. Even if we assume that anatomically modern man was coincident with the existence of dinosaurs most of the remains have long since been "recycled". Even structures constructed by prior civilizations have long since melded into the landscape except for those made of stone, and even some of them are very weathered. Steel, and I once had a poster who just refused to accept this, will, in geologic time, quickly corrode and disappear being no longer recognizable as anything other than a pile of dust. Without maintenance and repair a steel framed building would virtually disappear and melt into the landscape in a mere thousand years, and in the geologic record we are talking millions of years. So, the great wonder of human artifacts is that any at all have survived. There are no ancient wood or metal structures, other than the occasional anomaly, and only stone, and stone used in shapes, forms, and quantities some of which even now we cannot replicate.
There are no replies to Comment # 11. End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#6. To: Critter (#3)
#9. To: Pinguinite (#6)
I wonder how deep human bodies would have to be stacked on the earth for there to be that number of people.
#11. To: abraxas, Pinguinite (#9)
I wonder how deep human bodies would have to be stacked on the earth for there to be that number of people.
Replies to Comment # 11.