See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: DINOSAUR and HUMAN FOOTPRINTS TOGETHER
Source:
POKERFACE E MAIL
URL Source: http://184.154.224.5/~creatio1/inde ... tent&task=view&id=48&Itemid=24
Published: Oct 14, 2011
Author: Paul and Poker Face
Post Date: 2011-10-14 06:12:12 by HOUNDDAWG
Keywords: None
Views: 1272
Comments: 66
Introduction: In early July, 2000 Alvis Delk, assisted by James Bishop (both of Stephenville, Texas), was working in the Cretaceous limestone on the McFall property at the Paluxy River near Glen Rose, Texas and discovered a pristine human footprint intruded by a dinosaur footprint. This discovery was made in the vicinity of McFall I and II Sites where the Creation Evidence Museum team has excavated since the Spring of 1982. The eleven-inch human footprint matches seven other such footprints of the same dimensions in the “Sir George Series,” named in honor of His Excellency Governor General Ratu Sir George Cacobau of Fiji.[2] Scientific Verification of Footprint Authenticity: The fossil was transported to a professional laboratory where 800 X-rays were performed in a CT Scan procedure. Laboratory technicians verified compression and distribution features clearly seen in both prints, human and dinosaur. This removes any possibility that the prints were carved or altered. Importance of Discovery: Professor James Stewart Monroe, writing in Journal of Geological Education candidly asserted that “Human footprints in geologically ancient strata would indeed call into doubt many conventional geological concepts.”[3] Professor David H. Milne of The Evergreen State College, Olympia, Washington and Professor Steven D. Schafersman of the Department of Geology, Rice University, Houston, Texas made further admissions in writing that “Such an occurrence, if verified, would seriously disrupt conventional interpretations of biological and geological history and would support the doctrines of creationism and catastrophism.”[4] Professor Steven M. Stanley in The New Evolutionary Timetable opined that “any topsy-turvy sequence of fossils would force us to rethink our theory…As Darwin recognized, a single geographic inconsistency would have nearly the same power of destruction.”[5]
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 17.
#3. To: HOUNDDAWG (#0)
(Edited)
I just finished reading Origins, by Phillip Day. Among other things, the author uses math to prove that evolution is bunk. Paraphrasing his work, at a rate 1/10 of proven population expansion rate through written history, if humanity began 2 million years ago, the earth would now be populated by 18,932,139,737,991,000,000,000,000,000,000... people, give or take. Where are all these people, and where are all of the ancestral remains? Starting with two original ancestors, it would take 4,400 years to arrive at today's population, using historical population growth rates. Gotta love math. :)
Paraphrasing his work, at a rate 1/10 of proven population expansion rate through written history, if humanity began 2 million years ago, the earth would now be populated by 18,932,139,737,991,000,000,000,000,000,000... people, give or take. I wonder how deep human bodies would have to be stacked on the earth for there to be that number of people. I have a feeling the ones on the top wouldn't have any dirt in which to plant a blade of grass.
Dust to dust Pinguinite. : ) If man was cruising with the Dinos there wouldn't be a massive expansion in numbers of humans, but rather that number of humans would be reduced by dino dining. Only those humans smart enough to not become the dino snack of the day would increase in numbers......given the intelligence of the species today, millions of years later, I can't fathom that many being smart enough to avoid the fate of dino snack.
Okay, here are some rather disgusting statistics on that number, posted solely for amusement purposes. The average human body volume is about 2.7 cubic feet. This means there would be about 5.111677729×10^31 cubic feet of people on the earth. Dividing that by the number of cubic feet per cubic mile (147,197,952,000) comes to the nice manageable number of 3.472655468×10^20 cubic miles of people mass. Ignoring the earth completely, if we just compute the size of this mass of (former) humanity if it were rolled up into a ball, it would, by my calcs, have a diameter of about 8.6 million miles, which would rise about 20 times higher than the moon, and be about 20 times the diameter of Jupiter, and about 10 times the diameter of the sun. This means that the unfortunate souls at the center of this thing would instantly undergo nuclear fusion simply due to the same gravitational forces that stars do on a relatively routine basis, and would likely be enough people-mass to collapse into a black hole big enough to impact the movements of nearby stars. Now I understand Critter probably just rattled off an exaggerated number but please...!!! :^)
lol.......you and critter forgot to calculate entropy and time into the formula. : ) The mass of a dead body begins deteriorating the moment the life force exits and rapidly.
I hope you are as amused as I was while running these numbers! But Critter did say there would be that number living today. That's not the number of people that ever lived -- that's living today. I do understand that this is an argument against humanity walking the earth as long as alleged, but obviously there would be some limiting factors kicking in long before the above number was reached.
#18. To: Pinguinite, Critter, Original_Intent (#17)
Personally, I think humans have been around a LONG time but the herd has been culled whenever the ratio of idiots and assholes overwhelms the tiny fraction that maintain reason and sanity.......hence, we are due for another culling. We could never attain Critter's numbers of humans as this species isn't equipped spiritually to handle that capacity.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#6. To: Critter (#3)
#9. To: Pinguinite (#6)
I wonder how deep human bodies would have to be stacked on the earth for there to be that number of people.
#13. To: abraxas, Critter (#9)
(Edited)
if humanity began 2 million years ago, the earth would now be populated by 18,932,139,737,991,000,000,000,000,000,000... people, give or take.
#14. To: Pinguinite, Critter (#13)
(Edited)
if we just compute the size of this mass of (former) humanity if it were rolled up into a ball,
#17. To: abraxas (#14)
lol.
Replies to Comment # 17. I do understand that this is an argument against humanity walking the earth as long as alleged, but obviously there would be some limiting factors kicking in long before the above number was reached.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 17.