See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: Violence more common among kids of combat veterans
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://news.yahoo.com/violence-more ... jg3OARwb3MDMgRzZWMDTWVkaWFTZWN
Published: Nov 1, 2011
Author: MIKE STOBBE - AP
Post Date: 2011-11-01 00:45:56 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 96
Comments: 4
ATLANTA (AP) — A new study suggests that when parents are deployed in the military, their children are more than twice as likely to carry a weapon, join a gang or be involved in fights. And that includes the daughters. "This study raises serious concerns about an under-recognized consequence of war," said Sarah Reed, who led the research of military families in Washington state. Last year, nearly 2 million U.S. children had at least one parent serving in the military. Deployment can hurt a family in a variety of ways. There's stress while that parent is overseas and in danger, as the remaining parent has to shoulder all responsibilities and family roles shift. There can also be challenges after deployed parents' return, especially if they were physically or psychologically damaged. The effect of military deployment on kids is an emerging field of research. The new study is considered the first of its kind to focus on those affected by deployments to Afghanistan and Iraq. It's unique in that it looked at a statewide swath of the population in comparing the behavior of kids in military families to children in non-military families. The study, to be presented Monday at a public health conference in Washington, D.C., was based on a 2008 questionnaire survey of about 10,000 students in the 8th, 10th and 12th grades in Washington. That state has the sixth largest active duty population in the country. About 550 of surveyed children said they had a parent deployed to a combat zone in the previous six years. The study tried to account for potential differences in educational background and other issues between military families and the general population that might skew the results. Even after taking steps to account for such differences, the researchers found that high school-age daughters of deployed parents were nearly three times more likely than civilian girls to be in a gang or get into a fight. They were more than twice as likely to carry a weapon to school. There were similar increases among boys of deployed families when compared to civilians. To be sure, such behavior in boys is more common — the rate of boys from deployed families involved in such violent behaviors was twice as high as for girls in deployed families. For example, 14 percent of girls from these military families said they had been in fights, compared to 28 percent of boys. Nevertheless, experts say the findings contradict the traditional view that girls under stress exhibit "internalizing" behaviors, like becoming depressed or thinking about suicide, while boys are the ones who "externalize" through violent behavior The new research may be something of a wake-up call for health professionals who deal with military families, one expert suggested. "Maybe if we make assumptions about children, we may overlook other ways they may be suffering," said Dr. Gregory Gorman, an assistant professor of pediatrics at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Md. Additional research is needed to confirm the findings, said Reed, who has since left the University of Washington and is now a social worker with the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston. For example, the survey found that 10 to 20 percent of the adolescents in deployed families said they were in gangs. That's surprisingly high — more like something seen in New York City in the 1950s. Perhaps a larger, more national study would produce a lower number. But it's not surprising that kids in deployed families would seek out other kids to help them deal with stress, said Gregory Leskin, a UCLA psychologist who is director of a military family program at the National Child Traumatic Stress Network. "Adolescents may be able to get lost in social networks," he said. ___ Poster Comment: Just a bit of blowback generated by a pro-Israel Congress which keeps funding wars against countries which want to help Palestinians get back lands taken by Israeli terrorists to form the illegal Israeli state. And all because a bunch of Shylocks helped pro-Israel Congress critters get elected with money, manpower and promotion by Jew-controlled media.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
(Edited)
Now is this because (1) the parent in the military is therefore more likely to be handling a weapon, talking about violent experiences, and the like or (2) the parent is more likely to be absent, away on duty, leaving the child inadequately supervised and bereft of a parent's attention??
These kids are just trying to be like their parents, violent good for nothing assholes.
God is always good!
I beat my kids regularly. to make sure they know it's wrong to hit each other. No. Really!?
When I was a kid in the 1960's, all the neighborhood dads were veterans and there was a high incidence of gun ownership in all households. The guns were accessible to children, nobody used gun safes back then. Shockingly, some of us kids even had our own guns!! All of us kids would get together and have dirt-clod wars and play Germans and Japs, we probably slayed 6 million in what could only be called a nightmarish repeat of the HolocaustTM of WWII. I never knew it was just institutional abuse on a neighborhood-wide scale.....
#2. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
(Edited)
#3. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
#4. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest