[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: On 9/11, the U.S. Military Was Preparing for a Simulated Nuclear War
Source: 911blogger.com
URL Source: http://911blogger.com/news/2011-11- ... reparing-simulated-nuclear-war
Published: Nov 19, 2011
Author: Shoestring
Post Date: 2011-11-23 11:32:58 by GreyLmist
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: 9-11, War Games
Views: 434
Comments: 24

While September 11, 2001 is well known as the day when the U.S. suffered its worst terrorist attack, what is little known is that it was also a day when large sections of the armed forces around the nation had been preparing to fight a simulated nuclear war, as part of major training exercises being conducted at the time. In their annual exercises "Vigilant Guardian" and "Global Guardian," the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and the United States Strategic Command (Stratcom) were scheduled to carry out what has been described as a "simulated air war," a "full-blown nuclear war" exercise, a "fictional nuclear war," and a "practice Armageddon."

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

This article is very long. Am archiving the link here for the evidence that Defcon 3 is oddly the highest level of alert and readiness that was implemented that day, rather than Defcon 1 for immenent attack(s)/attack(s) in-process. This is from a post by the article author in the comments section:

It is difficult to know the reasons for Rumsfeld's actions, such as why he ordered the military to Defcon 3. At present, we can only make educated guesses. This is one of many reasons why we urgently need a new and unrestrained investigation of 9/11, to find out the full truth of what went on and who was responsible for the attacks.

I think the fact that the evidence I've presented in this article isn't already common knowledge alone proves there has been a massive cover-up of the truth about what happened on September 11.

Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 9.

#3. To: GreyLmist (#0)

The Sept. 11th hijackers might have known in advance that the military was going to be preoccupied that day. I suspect that at least one or two of the hijacker pilots had some training on a serious jet, possibly a Saudi military or commercial jet, or at least getting a lot of advice from a veteran of military or commercial jets -- that's how they figured out about the transponders, the thrusters, and some other details that wouldn't be on those small planes they trained on in US-based flying schools.

Someone with military or airline connections, even foreign ones, might have been able to ferret out some advance warning of the Pentagon war games (such as "foreign defense systems should not be alarmed that on Sept 11th, US fighter planes will be all over the map"). It is even possible that some inkling of the military aircraft maneuvers would be communicated to commercial airlines, including foreign ones. If one of the hijackers had the right connection, even with a foreign (Arab) pilot, he might have been able to share that information with his accomplices.

Shoonra  posted on  2011-11-23   12:40:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Shoonra (#3)

The Sept. 11th hijackers might have known in advance that the military was going to be preoccupied that day.

I've thought the same thing. They had someone inside the defense establishment who knew some details of this military preparedness drill and tried to that to their advantage, hoping that the drill would cloud anything out of the ordinary with confusion.

Very cunning if they did have an insider.

TooConservative  posted on  2011-11-23   17:06:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: TooConservative (#8)

What's your opinion on why our nation's alert and readiness level wasn't elevated to Defcon 1?

GreyLmist  posted on  2011-11-23   17:28:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 9.

#11. To: GreyLmist (#9)

What's your opinion on why our nation's alert and readiness level wasn't elevated to Defcon 1?

I've no idea. The problem with stories like this is that they have a complicated timeline and we can have no confidence that we ever got the entire truth out of the 9/11 Commission.

TooConservative  posted on  2011-11-24 09:45:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 9.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]